I should be more clear on some points so I have more thoughts, it would be nice to discuss things since this is what modding should be like.
sorry I was not clear. I meant 04:42:068 - until 04:54:091 - seems to have high SV all together because of less vocal holds in this section.09kami wrote:
borborygmos wrote:
Unrankable: normal-hitnormal has ~10ms of delay I'm not sure because I changed the place before. I need to see the next BN
Lingren Insane
04:42:068 - I don't see why such a high sv, though i understand the kiai toggle. There are much less vocal holds here so I would think lower SV than normal kiai times.
Why do you think 0.75 of SV is high? Here's a good incremental SV 0.75 1.0 1.25. And the pace is very tight... Why do I have to slow down. You know it's kiai times .I don't think it should be lowered
Crystal wrote:
thanks for modding! really appreciated this careful check but it's a matter of mapping style that is chosen for this map that leads to something you thought as "inconsistent" or "missing beats". this is not a song filled up with drum beats however. the thing for me is, i can see you focus more on the vocal emphasis, but when you are doing that you also map some drum beats to fill in the rhythm gap between the vocals like the beat here 01:32:693 (2,3) - , which can cause this confusion.borborygmos wrote:
Qingyi Insane
- there are a lot of times when you have rhythm on drum sounds, but you ignore the 3/4 rhythm a lot, which is kind of off, especially since you map drums to fill in the space made from the long vocal holds. The first one that bothered me was 01:30:349 - , though you do this for the whole song. mapping that 3/4 beat does not fit the overall style of this map. skipping all of them anyway shows consistentency I think this idea you expressed here could use more discussion. So I will use an example: Let's say there are drum sounds every white tick during a song, but for kiai's they are on the red tick also. For the kiai's you chose not to map the times the sound is on the red tick (for some reason I'm not sure of yet). Its consistent that you skip those red tick sounds, though its inconsistent choice to me because you skip the sound sometimes like this. This comparison is about the 3/4 rhythm you do, maybe you can elaborate what you mean it doesn't fit the style more.
- 00:39:449 - why skip this sound when you map it before. where do i map this sound before? to be critical there is no same "tick" sound before since this is the beginning of vocal parts so it's different and worth a pause here I though my idea was clear here, so I will link every time the tick sound occurs since you said you don't hear it. 00:28:574 - 00:28:949 - 00:29:324 - 00:29:699 - 00:30:074 - 00:30:355 - 00:30:636 - 00:30:824 - 00:31:199 - 00:31:574 - 00:31:949 - 00:32:324 - 00:32:699 - 00:33:074 - 00:33:355 - 00:33:636 - 00:33:824 - 00:33:074 (1) - 00:34:574 - 00:34:949 - 00:35:324 - 00:35:699 - 00:36:074 - 00:36:355 - 00:36:636 - 00:36:824 - 00:37:199 - 00:37:949 - 00:38:699 -
- 00:55:949 - 02:54:443 - how come you skip this vocal when each one before has a slider head/end to it. i like it having diverse rhythm expressions so i guess its ok I think you can still be diverse, but putting sounds on the end of sliders and the beginning of them are different, so in this case it would make sense to pick either one of these so you can be consistent and have the diversity you want.
- 01:24:824 (1,2,3,4) - these should probably have growing spacing similar to 01:05:324 (1,2,3,4) - and 01:24:824 (1,2,3,4) - for aesthetics? enlarging the size of this square looks kinda awkward doesn't it? well your aesthetics are random here too, because you have a sqaure here, you force the inconsistent spacing, though you don't have polygon shapes like this before.
- 04:22:568 (3) - it would make more sense if this were extended to 04:22:849 - because of the sound there. that 3/4 sound is somehow too weak imo. i'd rather like a 3/4 reverse here instead of extending it if this is strong enough. as i said above, putting too many 3/4s ruins the overall style of it this could make sense, but there is no sound on 04:22:755 - , and there is a sound that you didn't map which i pointed out.
- 04:25:849 - there is a small sound here you can map not mapping 3/4 beat here as i said above maybe you can consider the sound 04:25:755 - and do a triple?
- 04:41:505 - again you keep leaving out the first of a series of notes like this . not strong enough to put a circle here, a sliderend is anyway a bit reasonable but this will weaken the emphasis of 04:41:130 (5) - imo a slider end would be cool, like you said it could change the emphasis, so you would have to be careful with how much you make the slider move so it just turns into more of a hold slider. something to think of.