m4m
[General]
AR 9 and OD 8 seem a bit high for 4* of 120 bpm. Maybe drop to AR 8,5 and OD 7 and have Bonsai's diff adjusted to AR 7 and OD for spread?
[Normal]
00:12:514 (1,1,2,3,4,1) - This part is 1.4x DS while rest is 1.2?
00:13:514 (1) - Quite unnecessary NC here, MaybeNC every 2 downbeats instead of every downbeat as now the combos are really short?
00:24:514 (1) - Vocals start on slider end, maybe want to change it in a way it's clickable
00:26:514 (1,2,3,4) - 00:22:514 (1,2,3) - Aren't these the same part? Maybe use same rhythm as well.
00:31:264 - Skipped a strong vocal here although yo have mapped red tick vocals earlier (00:22:264 (4,3) - ) And otherwise used red ticks a lot
00:32:514 (1,2) - Same as 00:28:514 (1,2,3) - try to keep consistent rhythm
00:36:264 (3) - No strong sound here so you could skip it for a normal
00:41:264 - And could map this instead
00:45:514 (3) - I'd really suggest 1/1 slider and a circle instead, here 00:53:514 (3) - works fine tho as it's single held vocal unlike 00:45:514 (3) -where the vocal changes on the white tick
01:32:514 (1) - I get you're trying to follow the vocals with this but there's a really strong sound on the white tick and it would work also for the vocals so might want to reconsider this slider
01:34:014 (1) - Not really fan of ending sliders on downbeat like this. maybe 1/2 + circle would be better
01:40:514 (1,2,3,4) - 01:42:514 (1,2,3) - 01:44:514 (1,2,3) - Again inconsistent rhythm for the exact same thing
02:01:514 (2) - 02:03:514 (2) - Here again you should try to work this so the vocals are clickable as you've followed vocals most of the time
etc
Your rhythm choices are kinda weird sometimes as you ignore some strong sounds but then sometimes map some very unimportant sounds on red ticks... They're pretty inconsistent too you should probably be focusing on that. Aesthetics look fine to me tho.
[Bonsai's Hard]
01:40:514 (1,2) - Just a random idea but you could nc both of these for the "one one" vocals heh
I get your idea on NCs but sometimes it results in really long combos like this 02:36:264 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17) - so might want to split some of them up. Overall a good diff imo, pretty different from my style so not much I could point out.
[Insane]
00:22:264 (6,1) - Feels like really big spacing compared to the rest, maybe a make it a bit smaller
00:23:014 (3,4) - Maybe some pattern like here 00:23:514 (1,2,3,4) - would work better as now your pattern has emphasis on 4 which is weaker than 3 imo
00:26:014 (5,6) - Here again spacing. 6 has a strong vocal on it so doesn't make sense imo to have so low spacing especially when you've used spacing like this earlier00:22:264 (6,1) -
00:30:014 (5,6) - Same here
00:56:514 (1,1,1,1) - NC spam?
01:12:514 (1,2,3) - Not sure about this, it playes rather weirdly imo
01:17:014 (3,4) - 01:18:014 (6,7) - inconsistent spacing again, had big spacing on all vocals earlier, now 6 with only drum has large spacing into a vocal with really low spacing
01:44:264 (5) - 01:45:264 (4) - You've had all sevens as stacks before so might want to change here too
02:00:514 (1,2,3) - Nice triangle meme
02:10:014 (6,7) - I'd say either stack there or increase spacing pretty much the same as 02:09:514 (4,5) - but I feel 7 has even stronger vocals than 5 so yeah.
03:04:514 (1,1,1,1) - Kinda unnecessary NCing again imo
Rhythmwise a lot better than your normal, might want to reconsider some spacing tho
[General]
AR 9 and OD 8 seem a bit high for 4* of 120 bpm. Maybe drop to AR 8,5 and OD 7 and have Bonsai's diff adjusted to AR 7 and OD for spread?
[Normal]
00:12:514 (1,1,2,3,4,1) - This part is 1.4x DS while rest is 1.2?
00:13:514 (1) - Quite unnecessary NC here, MaybeNC every 2 downbeats instead of every downbeat as now the combos are really short?
00:24:514 (1) - Vocals start on slider end, maybe want to change it in a way it's clickable
00:26:514 (1,2,3,4) - 00:22:514 (1,2,3) - Aren't these the same part? Maybe use same rhythm as well.
00:31:264 - Skipped a strong vocal here although yo have mapped red tick vocals earlier (00:22:264 (4,3) - ) And otherwise used red ticks a lot
00:32:514 (1,2) - Same as 00:28:514 (1,2,3) - try to keep consistent rhythm
00:36:264 (3) - No strong sound here so you could skip it for a normal
00:41:264 - And could map this instead
00:45:514 (3) - I'd really suggest 1/1 slider and a circle instead, here 00:53:514 (3) - works fine tho as it's single held vocal unlike 00:45:514 (3) -where the vocal changes on the white tick
01:32:514 (1) - I get you're trying to follow the vocals with this but there's a really strong sound on the white tick and it would work also for the vocals so might want to reconsider this slider
01:34:014 (1) - Not really fan of ending sliders on downbeat like this. maybe 1/2 + circle would be better
01:40:514 (1,2,3,4) - 01:42:514 (1,2,3) - 01:44:514 (1,2,3) - Again inconsistent rhythm for the exact same thing
02:01:514 (2) - 02:03:514 (2) - Here again you should try to work this so the vocals are clickable as you've followed vocals most of the time
etc
Your rhythm choices are kinda weird sometimes as you ignore some strong sounds but then sometimes map some very unimportant sounds on red ticks... They're pretty inconsistent too you should probably be focusing on that. Aesthetics look fine to me tho.
[Bonsai's Hard]
01:40:514 (1,2) - Just a random idea but you could nc both of these for the "one one" vocals heh
I get your idea on NCs but sometimes it results in really long combos like this 02:36:264 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17) - so might want to split some of them up. Overall a good diff imo, pretty different from my style so not much I could point out.
[Insane]
00:22:264 (6,1) - Feels like really big spacing compared to the rest, maybe a make it a bit smaller
00:23:014 (3,4) - Maybe some pattern like here 00:23:514 (1,2,3,4) - would work better as now your pattern has emphasis on 4 which is weaker than 3 imo
00:26:014 (5,6) - Here again spacing. 6 has a strong vocal on it so doesn't make sense imo to have so low spacing especially when you've used spacing like this earlier00:22:264 (6,1) -
00:30:014 (5,6) - Same here
00:56:514 (1,1,1,1) - NC spam?
01:12:514 (1,2,3) - Not sure about this, it playes rather weirdly imo
01:17:014 (3,4) - 01:18:014 (6,7) - inconsistent spacing again, had big spacing on all vocals earlier, now 6 with only drum has large spacing into a vocal with really low spacing
01:44:264 (5) - 01:45:264 (4) - You've had all sevens as stacks before so might want to change here too
02:00:514 (1,2,3) - Nice triangle meme
02:10:014 (6,7) - I'd say either stack there or increase spacing pretty much the same as 02:09:514 (4,5) - but I feel 7 has even stronger vocals than 5 so yeah.
03:04:514 (1,1,1,1) - Kinda unnecessary NCing again imo
Rhythmwise a lot better than your normal, might want to reconsider some spacing tho