1. Easy (1.54 stars, 101 notes)
2. Expert (4.79 stars, 546 notes)
3. Hard (3.07 stars, 245 notes)
4. Insane (3.97 stars, 377 notes)
5. Normal (2 stars, 162 notes)

Kisses wrote:

Easy

1. Slidertickrate of 2 seems unnecessary it is necessary for the slider bounces
2. 00:09:826 (3) - Because this is the lowest diff reducing the object density could never hurt in places where appropiate. For example deleting this circle would lower the density and still follow the melody well what is problem with density, for spread this is least dense difficulty.
3. 00:12:735 (3) - ^
4. 00:40:735 (3,4,5,6) - There are sounds on every beat but this just doesn't follow the song well imo, I also feel this is inappropiate for an easy diff. Try this http://puu.sh/vqMpc/1df745b87b.jpg its intense like the isolated strong beats its supposed to mimic. I don't see how its innapropriate for easy diff since I got testplay from 2 players, 1 500k rank and 1 1mil rank and they played these just fine.
5. 00:51:280 (1) - I feel like you should mix this measure with 00:52:371 in the same spinner since they are very, very different. If you still want to keep the spinner what do you think of this position? http://puu.sh/vqMyD/5186def930.jpg they are the buildup to the drop off I don't see issue.
6. 01:33:098 (2,3,4,5) - same as 00:40:735 (3,4,5,6)

[]Only have time to mod 1 diff. Spread between normal and hard seem fine overall tho hard can get really complicated in some places. GL!

kookoo11 wrote:

from my nm q

EXPERT
00:15:280 (2) - pull this closer to 00:14:917 (1) - 's end why, its DS'd to 1.00
00:30:917 (1,2,3,4) - inconsistent distance .02 is not inconsistent.
00:32:008 (1,2,3,4) - looks more pleasing if it were mapped like 00:33:098 (1,2,3,4) - disagreed
00:40:735 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - make this passage softer sounding than the kiai, so like 50 or 60% its' basically the kiai, I only turned it off because of the focus on instruments and kiai restart
00:41:826 (9,1) - looks bad ;/ disagreed
00:48:008 (1) - pull this a littttle away from the 4 no, its DS'd
01:22:189 (7) - make this slider look fancier ;o, it also overlaps 01:22:917 (1) - weirdly i don't care.
01:24:371 (1,2,3,4) - same thing same thing as what???
01:31:098 (2) - overlap this better overlap is fine to me
01:33:098 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - softer its' basically the kiai, I only turned it off because of the focus on instruments and kiai restart
01:40:371 (1) - move this away a little like 01:38:008 (2,1) - no

"sliders don't give pp ;(" ~rank 100k

Yahuri wrote:

m4m

General
-preview point is unsnapped not unrankable
00:07:297 - the feedback here is insufficient, try raising the volume gradually. also, suggestion: gradual increase of SV here (for any diff except Easy/Normal) applied volume not sv

Normal
01:02:570 (1) - suggestion: make this slider more "weird" to match up with 01:00:388 (3) and 01:04:025 (3) since they have the same instrument for the melody the fit since they both curvy
01:04:025 (3) - red anchor doesnt line up with the beat exactly fixed
01:31:661 - if im not mistaken, this should have the soft addition, not normal you are mistaken, i spam normal whistle
01:40:388 (1) - ^ ^
01:42:570 (5,1) - this kind of looks like a really bad blanket rip, you can move the wave slider down not sure why you would think that LOL

Hard
01:04:025 (1) - i liked the slider shape change you did in Normal, it would be nice if you did it here too, the rapid pitch changes are pretty audible ???? no ? its different how sliders work in normal(and below) between hard(and above)
01:29:843 (4,1) - move so that the head and tail of 1 are equidistant from 4, looks cleaner imo this is overlapped, its clean enough how it is.

01:34:570 (1) - 01:35:297 (3) - would look better if these were the same shape imo fixed

Insane
00:08:388 - this doesn't sound like 1/4. it's 1/6 applied 1/6 to appropriate diffs
00:16:934 (4,5) - increase DS for cymbal crash? it has enough emphasis.
01:46:025 (8,1) - there's a jump here. but in the Expert diff 01:46:025 (2,3) there isn't a jump, make it consistent pls because expert diff has much more of a controlled basis, and for this spacing is relative since i stacked prior notes

Expert
00:49:752 (3,1,2,3,4,1) - dont like the shape of this stream, there's nothing that sounds too special except at 00:50:206 (1) yet theres a really sharp turn at 00:50:025 (3) shape is arbitrary because of 1/4 slider jumps working for emphasis.
01:22:206 (7) - red anchor doesn't line up exactly with the tick fix
00:11:115 (8) - ^ f ix
01:46:252 (1) - fix spinner length, extend to 01:49:115 fix

good luck~

Gabe wrote:

hi, this is a check from Not Ephemeral's Super Featured Artist Modding/Feedback Queue

general

1. clean!
2. you should consider adding some tags. for an example, since the song is from a featured artist, I'm always suggesting to add 'featured artist' in the tags.
   also, you might wanna add 'electronic video game videogame' aswell.

easy
for the first breaktime, you don't need to make it end that far, there's pretty nothing you can 'emphasize' or anything. as for the second breaktime, you can maybe do like normal and make it end at 01:15:661 - ? *or simply don't touch at the breaktime at all and leave it the way the game made it at first*

1. 00:13:115 (4,5) - over here, you can improve the rhythm a bit, by making something like this as the predominant sounds are on the red ticks in this case I did something in between what I have and what you suggested, which was making them both 3/2 sliders because I really like the second 3/2 slider where it ends, and you made a good case for having the other slider be 3/2
2. 00:45:115 (1,2,3)- (That's just my opinion, I'm not really asking you to change anything) That's pretty cool the way these are placed, however, I believe there could be an issue with the overlap of (2) over the slider (3). In this case, maybe the path might be leading to confusion, for beginner players. This is a good point, though I've gotten a couple of testplays from newer players to whom the audience of this would be. the overlapping isn't significant enough to confuse players, just the end of the first slider is partially overlapping with the body of the latter one. There is a decent balance here.
   

I am not really a big fan of the slider shapes you used for this Easy difficulty, however, it is always interesting to see. The rhythm is great also, so why not.

normal

1. 00:41:661 - A circle would be nice in this place, mainly because the previous object lands on a red tick and it will have a nice measure transition with the next object. (01:34:025 (4) - Just like you've done here? lol) I see why you would suggest this, though for me, I hear a distinct difference between 00:41:843 (5) - and 01:34:025 (4,5) - , this difference being, in the first link, the slider is supported by a sound that is not a continuation of the previous objects, so I highlighted that with a gap in rhythm, the second example is a continuation so it has the circle like you have pointed out.

hard

1. 00:06:752 (2) - I'm thinking that maybe, you can unstack this circle with the previous slider? if you decide to do this, it'll be more consistent with these objects 00:07:297 (3,4,5) -

insane

1. 01:26:206 (3) - I'm pretty sure the head of this slider should have a normal sampleset instead of a drum. reference: 00:33:843 (3) -
2. 01:39:479 (1) - there shouldn't be a new combo here. just look at this object for a reference: 01:27:843 (4) -
3. 01:42:206 (3) - this circle should have a normal sampleset as well, to keep the consistency within your previous object.
4. 01:42:388 (1) - there shouldn't be a new combo here, same reason as mentioned earlier.

expert

1. 00:14:843 (12) - to make sure the flow is great enough with the previous and the next objects, maybe you can move it to x:12 y:192?
2. 01:42:206 (1) - normal sampleset instead of drum?

woo

Pentori wrote:

wow!
[General]
countdown seems a bit pointless, theres nothing really that leads into the song I like it because there isn't something before the song and it kind of fits the genre/theme

[Expert]
00:09:661 (8,9) - 00:12:570 (8,9) - etc. i'd aim to put more spacing on these, the gaps feel a lot more like 3/4 gaps rather than 1/2 because of what actually gets clicked and this kinda disrupts the flow from the rhythms beforehand 00:08:752 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) . also this seperates it from similar visual patterns u used later on 00:23:661 (4,5) . http://puu.sh/w7b8x/4906dc476f.jpg could work The reason these are so linear and evenly spaced is to match previous doubles, its supposed to have a somewhat jarring space in between them similar to the doubles, which the rhythm gap with spacing emphasizes.
01:03:661 (1) - would look a lot nicer if u angled this down or something subjective (I like it how it is )

[Insane]
00:09:661 (6,7) - same thing about these patterns as mentioned in expert. i guess ctrl g'ing 00:09:934 (7) - would work in these cases same comment as expert.
00:21:115 (4) - 00:26:934 (4) - perhaps use a 1/4 reverses here for the blue tick good idea.

definitely wouldve been nice to see more rhythm variation in the kiais that further sets it apart from sections like 00:18:934 . as of now the rhythms feel very repetitive to me they seem fairly different from that section due to the 1/2 rhythm used to follow the melody, if you have some better suggestions for how to change it I'm open to ideas.

[Hard]
00:29:843 (5) - this ignores too many sounds imo and i dont think it needs to considering you have similar patterns mapped later on 00:40:752 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) . http://puu.sh/w7cRH/6c9134a9fb.jpg would workthere is a different of sounds, the melody stops at the link you provided and there is some weird other sound, my differentiation is supposed to highlight this.
00:33:479 (1,2) - seems kinda undermapped considering the music is doing more than normal here. http://puu.sh/w7cyE/ad93da51c9.jpg couple of things, I wanted to make sure this was noticably different than the parts before it, also because a hard player follows the slider all the way through and the angle these sliders at are just off linear I think it has a nice effect and the movement follows the rhythm appropriately.

00:52:388 (1,2) - should avoid the consecutive 1/2s, replacing these with a slider would work better to balance this out and have all the emphasis on 00:53:115 (4,5,6,7,1) I made some 1/2 sliders in places that follow the melody better.

[Normal]
01:34:025 (4) - 01:45:661 (5) - dont think u need the circles. consistency with 00:41:661 I made a similar comment prior: I think 00:41:843 (5) - is different because there is a lack of melody line here so I tried to highlight this with such inconsistency pointed out.