Hello, passing by seeing that you want more mods over a bubble.
Easy looks nice.
[Normal]
00:26:631 (4,1,2,1,2) - The transition around here doesn't feel quite smooth. The tail of 4 catches the drumsound that you decide to skip on 00:27:902 - only to return to a full commitment to drums with the following combo.
That way the sound on 00:26:631 - feels relatively underrepresented considering that pitch and volume that it is the most emphasized of the bleep-sounds in this phrase.
I would suggest to use a rhythm like this:
This is easier to play while still being very different from the Easy, it puts the attention on the most emphasized sound and there is no confusion about whether the drums should be used for orientation or not as it entirely avoids them until the song transitions to them.
As you can see I also put a NC there as I personally think that the phrase from 00:26:631 - to 00:28:665 - is an exact mimic of 00:24:852 (1,2,3) - with the only difference that the last note is echoed. Putting a NC is natural when seeing it that way imo.
00:30:953 (1) - This feels a bit underwhelming as the final of the build-up...When you're already there I would either have the slider have small back and forths aligning with the music like this
or if you don't like that it would be still very easy to blanket the slider with the following spinner as you're already using a curved one.
01:22:817 (3) - 01:30:953 (3) - 01:35:021 (2) - What the hell. These notes are clearly left out by most of the instruments in order to give the sounds from the previous red tick time to ring. This red tick is very emphasized but it is in no way properly represented in this difficulty. What were you thinking? I see that you replied to a previous modder that the diff "is normal, should be fine" for 01:35:021 (2) - and I want to tell you that this is a bullshit reply. Missing important sounds and getting none in return is okay because it is a Normal? I think not. You have all tools at your disposal to represent this spot a lot better with a map, for example using a 3/2 slider on the red tick.
This will sound harsh but you should ask yourself if you actually intend to rank this map when you give that kind of mod replies that are simply one thing: lazy. You could dig further in the pursuit of making your mapset the best possible instead. And give the modder a useful feedback as in "I disagree because...<insert arguments here>"
(01:26:885 (2) - is similar but "not as grave" as it misses one of the sounds but you would probably want to change it for consistency as well in case you decide to change it).
Putting the mod on-hold here because I'm a bit enraged and also not too eager to invest time into an elaborate mod at the risk of getting declined without reasons. Please don't give kd if you don't consider this post any good.
maybe add finish to all of them
