1. Collab Insane (4.4 stars, 659 notes)
2. Delis' Hard (3.32 stars, 537 notes)
3. Shad0w1and's Insane (4.27 stars, 547 notes)
4. Shurelia's Normal (2.13 stars, 445 notes)
5. Countless (4.85 stars, 717 notes)
6. Easy (1.47 stars, 265 notes)

Collab Insane brought to you by:
Trust | Giralda | apaffy | captin1

jonathanlfj wrote:

有别人帮我做第二个insane了你要是能做个hard最好了

1. 01:28:479 (1) - 我觉得这个条没必要有棱有角，类似前一部分的弧形怎样
2. 03:07:990 (1,1,1) - 感觉好像有点乱，试试del nc, 03:08:722 (2) - add nc

1. 00:24:821 (2) - how about use 1/2 to following the voice, like what you did before. 00:13:114 (2,3,4) -
2. 03:10:185 (2) - nc please

1. 00:09:455 (1) - please move to 264,157 to improve the stack
2. 01:48:235 (2) - maybe move to 35,282 for equal distance

1. 02:08:723 (3,5) - 5叠到3上怎样

1. 03:40:187 (1,2,3,4) - perhaps rearrangement for better flow, like this https://puu.sh/A8GKE/e4b0b6a169.jpg

1. 00:43:479 (4) - 加nc吧，像前面一样
2. 02:02:504 (2) - 试试ctrl+g，感觉这部分常用逆时针flow

ArThasCD wrote:

Hello jonathanlfj


[General]

file size 31.7 MB lol



[shadow]

01:55:187 (2,3,4,5,6) - The shape could be improved as a better look pattern
03:09:453 (1) - the sound here is similar to 03:07:990 (1) - so you could make similar type of slider to it but not just a curved ones
03:13:843 (1) - the jump is too large. Although it matched the heavy sound well, it didn't match this difficulty. Maybe simply move it a bit closer would be fine its fine cause the NC



美麗

jimmy55555 wrote:

[Shadow]
01:06:894 (5,6,7,8,1,2,3,1,2,3) - I think this part is confusing since the gaps are not the same. Could overlap like 01:09:089 (3,1) - when 1/2 gap comes. it wont confused players at this speed
01:24:821 (1) - ctrl + G? confusing with 01:24:272 (3,4) - ^
01:51:345 (3,1) - could rotate this (-50 degree) to fit with 01:50:796 (2) - -----it seems not to fit with 01:53:723 (2,3) - . Just some suggestions.
02:09:272 (5) - I think placing more right is better(form a line with 02:08:723 (3) - ). its stacked on slider tail
02:27:198 (5) - overlap ?
03:00:307 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - I suggest not stack here and 03:01:770 (1,2) - stack. For 03:00:307 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - maybe can have some triangle circular jump like what is done with this 03:22:258 (3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - . Because I think in this way, it is more fun and more clear to read.
03:15:856 (3) - should check this out. it has different distance with these 03:14:941 (5,1) - its fine
03:47:319 (1) -Could place 03:47:319 (1) more lower right that can form two straight line with 03:46:039 (1,4,5,7) - and could use moon slider like collab and countess diff. pref current

01:10:918 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2) - really like this



NICE SONG

leo16834 wrote:

Hi~

• Shad0w1and's Insane
  
  00:04:699 (2,1) - 好像没有叠好?
  00:39:089 (2,3) - 我不确定现在是不是可以接受点叠在折返点上 因为我之前被纠正这种摆法 或许可以在多问点意见 其他有相似的摆法就同这里 大於500ms ok
  01:07:260 (7,8) - 这里有点近 会不会有误判的可能呢? 不會，故意的
  02:18:601 (2) - NC ?

好圖

ArThasCD wrote:

[Collab Insane]
01:57:748 (1) - should add finish to it as well okay

jimmy55555 wrote:

[Collab]
01:57:016 (1,2,3) - I think this is a problem. Could use 2 reverse sliders and the second one start at 01:57:382 - to match the rhythm here. If no change with the 2 reverse sliders here,could use 120 degree here (90 90 180 now). But that change would actually represent the rhythm worse. The real issue here is that I mis-hitsounded the tick on 01:57:382 - the pattern itself is snare, snare, snare, snare, kick, kick. I've adjusted the hitsounding to reflect that, but two reverse sliders would be a worse change by incorrectly grouping the notes. I don't see a need to change the positioning of the sliders either; it plays fine and looks fine.
02:08:906 - I somehow think no stream here is weird. Why am I the only one who gets told to make a stream there? In any case, it would mess up the patterning I'm doing there and I frankly don't see why it's necessary.
02:20:796 (1) - I just think this sound is not strong enough to break the flow here. Just some light suggestion. I don't really agree, especially given the drum pattern there. Sorry.
02:28:845 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - could use stream and kick slider to fit with the HS here. stream match with the strong one and kick slider with the light one. I don't see what a stream would do what my pattern hasn't. I mapped it like that because I wanted to group those sounds like that. A stream, particularly if I kinked it at the parts where I changed the combo could represent it equally well, but I don't see why I need to change it for the sake of changing it when my part already represents it fine.
02:52:626 (1) - I think the SV here should not be that slow since the logic is the highest one 02:51:528 (1) - with smaller SV. I think just SV with 1.2 is OK. Honestly, I did the low SV just to fit the slider in there. I can see how that's potentially weird to players. Increased SV to 1.0x.
02:56:284 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - this is a problem. This rhythm is not a combo with 3 beats its just normal 4 beats. Just like this part of Shadow1and's insane. The grouping is based on the guitar. Perhaps my ears are fooling me, but given the pitch change between 02:56:467 - 02:56:650 - 02:56:833 - those ticks in each repetition there, I did not want to group them the way you are suggesting. I think you could make the case that my comboing could be different there, but I feel the way I represented the pattern in the music is valid.

leo16834 wrote:

• Collab Insane
  02:10:187 (3,5) - seems not stack perfect? fixed

ArThasCD wrote:

[shurelia]

00:12:382 (1) - The spacing will confuse people because the spacing here shows 1/2 beat but it is actually 1/1. should move it further to avoid the confusion I'm gonna stack it instead since it'll cost a lots of space if i want to move it further to avoid confusion
02:25:552 (1,2) - I think they are too close so they look not good. Maybe make like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10780464 yes
03:04:880 - the drum is strong so it probably need a circle to follow it let's give it a try
03:38:722 (3) - move it to (397,123) if you wanna make a pretty blanket with 03:37:990 (2) - sure

AIR wrote:

[Shurelia's Normal]

1. 00:24:821 (2) - how about use 1/2 to following the voice, like what you did before. 00:13:114 (2,3,4) - sure
2. 03:10:185 (2) - nc please NC

SyraxAxoJaxco wrote:

Okay, here's my M4M part~

[notice][b]Shurelia's Normal
00:53:357 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I guess these CCs are unintentionally switched? ^ ^' (Don't forget to switch 00:59:211 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - too then if you apply this)
02:25:552 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Orange? But this part's supposed to be pink, right?
03:43:112 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Why don't these notes' CCs get customized as well? I hope it's just a coincidence. :3 idk if you are already noticed but, the thing about this map's CC or not. but basically the CC plays for this map are actually video based . That aside i do agree with the third point so i did something to it

00:09:455 (1) - Well, it's a nice slider if you can execute it more precisely. Suggestion: First white tick x314|y131, red tick x316|y88, second white tick x337|127, tail x381|y137. There, not the most perfect thing in the world but eh, I tried. XD oooh, sure thanks
00:10:918 (3) - Same as ArThasCD's mod. But since I know what you're trying to achieve, maybe just move 00:10:918 (3) - to x512|y168 to minimize the damage. ^ ^' same reply then
00:23:723 (4,1) - Blanket issue. But hm, tricky tricky. I suggest you to move 00:22:626 (3) - tail to x96|y162, 00:23:723 (4) - to x29|y213, 00:24:089 (1) - head to x46|y298, first white tick to x83|y279, tail to x109|y246. yes
00:44:211 (8,1) - I get what you mean here. But, that tight space between 00:44:577 (1,2) - tho (o.o'). Move 00:44:211 (8) - to x247|y217 and 00:44:577 (1) - to x332|y220 to make them look better. there
00:49:699 (5,6,1) - Blanket issue again. Suggestion: 00:49:699 (5,6,1) - head x325|y29, first white tick x346|y43, tail x361|y60, 00:50:065 (6) - x379|y106.
Dunno, I feel like 00:55:553 (6) - blanket is still kinda off. Maybe try to move 00:55:553 (6) - first white tick to x260|y184 and tail to x230|y148?
00:59:760 (2) - Minor thing, but x44|y323 please. XD
01:02:138 (1) - The same kinda-off feeling strikes again. Maybe try 01:02:138 (1) - head to x422|y148 and first white tick to x387|y125?
01:10:918 - Imo, you can't leave this beat unmapped. Try either putting another note on it or making 01:10:553 (6) - a 1/2 slider instead. naaah, i don't want to forcing myself to slider-art spamming on this section.
01:23:357 (3) - Blanket issue again. But eh, let's move 01:22:626 (1) - to x308|y200 and 01:22:992 (2) - to x227|y230 to make things go easier. XD
01:24:821 (6,1) - A g a i n. But, hm, let's just move 01:24:821 (6) - to x92|y246 so we can hinder from all the detail stuffs. ^ ^'
01:26:284 (3,4) - Almost, but not there yet. Move 01:26:284 (3) - tail to x244|y173.
01:27:382 (5,6) - Almost as well. But let's move 01:27:748 (6) - head to x462|y201, first white tick to x459|243, and tail to x438|y240.
01:30:675 (5,1) - Aiyeeehhhh. Let's just move the whole 01:31:406 (1) - to x202|y47 to save time.
01:34:333 (1) - Hmmm, my anal side told me to polish this. I'm sorry. XDD Suggestion: First white tick x318|y324, first red tick x292|y303, second red tick x256|y326, second white tick x226|y314, tail x194|y322[ yes/notice]regarding blanket stuffs, i do check it and also applies your suggestions too , Thank you

leo16834 wrote:

[notice]

• Normal
  
  00:43:479 (6,7) - maybe put this one on straight yes
  01:10:918 - well~ I think need to add a circle on here yes
  02:00:309 (6,1) - blanket? blanket
  02:53:600 (1,4) - try to avoid overlap on here it's a fine and readable overlap , so should be fine
  03:24:087 (1,1) - Spinner recovery time should be at least 2 beats...? changed the spinner into a slider

ArThasCD wrote:

Hello jonathanlfj


[General]

file size 31.7 MB lol video quality xD


[top diff]

00:02:504 (5) - I think the spacing is somewhat too large as a quite soft part. Also the similar part like 00:05:065 (4,5) - and 00:07:992 (3,4,5) - spacing there are comfortable. I think 00:02:504 (5) - should be decreased though
02:02:870 (3) - How about moving it to (112,56) to make 02:02:504 (2,3) - look nicer imo that kills the stacking here, im ok with the asymmetrical look tbh
02:05:796 (3) - I think you could make it like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10779942 would be better look
02:38:722 (1) - I think you could make a special slider shape here to emphasize the different sound here. Also it would be good to spotlight the low speed slider as a caution imo
03:25:185 (5) - How about NC here to highlight the different stream so it would distinct with 03:24:819 (1,2,3,4) -


[Easy]

00:04:699 (2) - I think the shape looks not good >< something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/10780524 looks better imo



美麗

AIR wrote:

hi~

[Easy]

1. 01:28:479 (1) - 我觉得这个条没必要有棱有角，类似前一部分的弧形怎样
2. 03:07:990 (1,1,1) - 感觉好像有点乱，试试del nc, 03:08:722 (2) - add nc 这里跟video

[Countless]

1. 00:43:479 (4) - 加nc吧，像前面一样
2. 02:02:504 (2) - 试试ctrl+g，感觉这部分常用逆时针flow 我觉得现在这样更好玩一些

也美丽

jimmy55555 wrote:

[Countless]

00:34:333 (1,2,3,1,2) - the instrument sounds get smaller here but the DS gets larger. the drums kick in so DS is increased

01:32:321 (6) - I somehow will miss this note. It seems like this has different flow from the previous one. this is because its stacked under the slider; its a gimmic i took from another map

02:16:955 (4) - stacked

02:38:722 - It's just my opinion. I don't like the HS here. It is noisy to me. Just simple sliderslide is OK to me. i love the whistle here ><

03:04:331 (1,2,3) - problem Use the same as 03:02:136 (1,2) - . i don't see a problem here, the drums are clearly different to the other ones earlier because this is during the chorus

02:58:843 (2,3,1) - I can't pass here... Just let you know.i tested this many times (with mouse only too), its tricky if you alternate but if you single tap its actually really easy

03:24:636 (4) - break the flow here but no strong sound here. I think the solution here is to move 03:24:270 (2) - to the place of 03:23:722 (1) - , but it seems not fit well with 03:23:904 (2,1) - . Just some suggestion. i think i know what you mean, i moved 03:24:270 (2) to 03:23:722 (1) to create a sharper angle to compensate

NICE SONG

leo16834 wrote:

Hi~

• Gereral
  
  Combo7 and Combo8 colors seems too similar ...?

• Easy
  
  00:11:650 - How about use volume 5% on here?
  01:57:016 (1,2) - Swap NC?

• Countless
  
  00:29:943 (1,2) - flow seems a little uncomfortable i think this is pretty standard flow?
  00:43:479 (4) - NC on here?
  02:20:614 (2,3) - a little far on here? i think this is fine, not the biggest jump in the map either

wow~ good map <3


好圖