sorry I was too aggressive ;w;
Toehoe wrote:
General
- You make a lot pattern changes when mapping the same sounds, I think it upsets the flow of the song if i map same things here and there it wouldn't be that fun
- I'm being very pedantic sometimes but it's needed for consistency, sorry if it seems harsh
Mountain of Faith
- 00:50:585 - You map to the kicks but miss a beat intentionally
- 00:52:143 (4,5,6,7,8) - Don't agree with mapping the triples to the guzheng suddenly i like it and it is kinda buildup for next section
- 01:09:871 (1,2) - Sliders here seem like a poor choice since it ends on a significant beat i map piano here and see no trouble if it ends on a strong beat
- 01:16:104 (1,2) - Same here
- 01:17:663 (1,2,3) - Change it to what you did before here 01:11:429 (1,2,3) lol no listen carefully to piano. it ends on first and continuous on second case you mention
- 01:48:344 - You mapped to triple kicks before but not here again i do piano here
- 01:48:734 - Here too, then make so the slider is last beat
- 01:46:104 - Missed beat, or if you map to kicks instead change so matches 01:47:468 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) (missed triples) just because there is a sound that does not mean that that sound has to be mapped. i like how it is now
- 01:52:922 (3,4,5) - Not a triple here, or do same as above nah this section plays and looks and represents music fine for me
- 01:48:832 (1,2) - Make a kickslider instead then another repeat slider like 01:49:319 (3) so it matches 01:49:611 (4) mm no
- 01:52:338 - Again
- 02:13:377 (3) - Make so the kicks are mapped like at 02:07:143 (3,4,5) i did same thing through that kind of sections 04:11:819 (3,4,5) - 05:07:728 (2,3,4) - and think it matches song if i skip that beats on where you mentioned
- 03:14:546 (1,2) - Ends on significant beat again, if you made changes at 01:09:871 (1,2) just copy paste here
- 03:22:337 (1,2,3) - But keep this how it is, seems fitting
- 03:50:781 - Missed beat again since you map to guzheng
- 03:57:013 - Here too
- 03:59:741 (1) - Kickslider instead (see before)
- 04:00:033 (2) - Then make this like 04:00:228 (3)
- 04:38:507 (8) - I think this note should be deleted for the effect you go for next no i want to keep this
- 04:40:650 (1,2,3,4,5) - I feel that these should be spaced more to highlight pitch changes and not just solid beats maybe, but i think its fine how it is, i like it
- 04:41:430 (1,2,3,4,5) - Here too, like you did here 04:43:377 (2,3,4,5,6) but not that spaced
- 04:59:742 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - I think this should be remapped, you ignore the symbols and just mix it in with the rest of the notes and it doesn't seem like a logical flow i think i hit sounded it well and it plays naturally
Strategas wrote:
when it came to 1/4 sliders having weird flow was mostly fine, but when it comes to 1/2 and above stuff like 02:56:039 (2,3,4) - doesn't really play well so would be good to change the flow so that transition into and out of slider would be better. 02:56:234 (4) - ctrl j and bringing it back up would be enough, but you might want to adjust 02:56:624 (5) - afterwards to look a bit better
03:52:143 (2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - could rearange object placement here a bit so it wouldn't looks so messy by avoiding unncessary overlaps
04:25:065 (3,4,1,2) - I guess something similar as the first point but this is even harder cuz you have linear movement until a harsh flow break at 04:25:552 (2) -
04:39:091 (2,1) - this empty space is kinda awkward, you can avoid it by placing sliders on 04:38:507 (8) - 04:41:819 (5) - and 04:39:091 (2) - it would still follow the piano and passively follow the drums
04:57:598 (2,1) - can avoid irregular rhythm by making 04:57:598 (2) - a slider that ends on 04:57:793 - to be more intuitive to play
04:58:962 (7,1) - can avoid this 3/2 again for same reason if you start the slider at 04:58:962 (7) - and add a reverse
05:12:890 (7) - 05:14:448 (7) - overmapping both notes like this doesn't work that well imo, it doesn't look that well either, could just stack 05:12:793 (6,1) - or smth else if you wish
05:48:442 (4,1) - well I get that you want emphasis but this seems too harsh, it's almost a guaranteed 100 from the slider there
not really sure what the quality issues were before but I'm assuming it had something to do with object placement/aesthetics cuz there's a lot of messy stuff, but the map seems to execute another idea which makes up for it and I like it, feel free to call me back