forum

AKB48 - Songs Compilation

posted
Total Posts
64
show more
Arf
Hello, M4M as we agreed! Your map is very good I don't think I'll find much, but I will try my best! Sorry it take so long compare to your mod but had some internet problems \O/

Marathon
00:25:161 (3,4) - In the drum backbeat section of the song this type of stack is very nicely accentuated with the music but that BGM hasn't started yet so are you sure you want to use the stack here? Makes it a bit inconsistent imo when throughout this section you use 00:29:223 (4,5) - or 00:15:004 (2,3,4) - I know there's no vocals here but there weren't any in the first one either
00:49:223 (4,5) - Whenever this pattern has appeared in the song so far it has utilized sharp angles from the 4->5 but here it uses a more linear flow from the sliderend to 4 to 5 to the next slider which is spaced for the drum sound. It felt a little strange while playing because I was expecting a back and forth motion like 00:39:223 (4,5,1) - or 00:29:223 (4,5,1) - or even 00:51:723 (4,5,1) - :P
01:21:098 (2) - IMO after this part the song isn't as intense as before in the BGM so you could tone down the spacing here a bit to reflect that. Up to you
02:05:792 (1) - Maybe it's just me but I think this could look a bit better :D Maybe more like http://arf.s-ul.eu/NkuSnsap ?
02:06:592 (4,1) - Minor thing, but maybe make these sliders the same for slider pairing purposes? Can feel a little strange visually IMO
02:46:325 (4,5,6) - Hmm I'm not sure about this rhythm, it sounds like two 1/2 sounds instead of a triple to me
02:53:263 (2,3) - Hmm the stack felt a bit random to me, anything in particular you're emphasizing here or is it just for variation? Muscle memory from the rest of the song wasn't expecting a sudden stop in movement is all
02:59:263 (2) - Consider removing this? Mapping the lyrics right before an very instrumental heavy section felt a little strange and leaving that little vocal as a break sounds better to me than mapping it when "tamashii saa" isn't really mapped
03:50:637 (4,5) - I know it's consistent with the previous iteration, but here the vocal is slightly different and doesn't have as much happening on the second note aka "5". I think it could work as a slider especially with the held vocal being held sound.
03:52:713 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I don't mind linear jumps at all personally, but I feel there is some lost opportunity to emphasize the sound shift at 5, possibly by making the flow direction change at 5.
04:03:613 (6,1) - (Unsure) Consider Ctrl+G ing these rhythm wise for the vocal, I know you want drum beats on clickable things but it sounded a little odd to me. Well I know it's an inconsistency but consider it?
(minor) 04:14:859 (1) - Adjust the red point to the middle?
(minor) 04:17:627 (1) - I think this looks better if the last sliderpoint is moved to the right a bit
04:29:046 (5,6,7) - I think the sound best fitting a slider is from 04:29:392 - to 04:29:565 - in other words consider Ctrl+G ing 04:29:219 (6,7) - rhythm wise
04:35:620 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - It looks nice but comes a bit out of nowhere as there hasn't really been this level of 1/4 spam before. Consider nerfing the spacing a bit?
04:40:637 (5) - Are you sure you want the sound at 04:40:810 - to be a sliderend? It sounds strong sound to me and also you mapped the sounds right before it at 04:39:772 (1,2,3) - so highly recommend this to be clickable
04:43:924 (1) - Same here, recommend 1/2 slider and circle instead of single 1/1 slider
04:54:456 (6,7) - Why spacing decrease here when pitch of the BGM went up and there is finish hitsound D: I expected it to increase like the previous ones since the sound keeps going up in pitch
05:02:126 (2) - I don't recommend stacking this, it's a ripe moment for a miss/sliderbreak/early hit. Recommend more like 05:01:029 (5,6) -
05:08:924 (2,1) - Whoa such a huge jump like this after smaller 1/4 jump like 05:07:608 (1,1) - hmm I feel it may catch player off guard, especially in long map like this maybe surprises aren't the best idea. Up to you whether to decrease spacing or not though
05:51:026 (1,2,3,4) - Well if it looks like a square, maybe make it a perfect one? People notice these things in my experience :P
06:59:139 (6) - NC the SV change? It's very difficult to read otherwise IMO
07:11:139 (10) - No SV change here even though similar sound?
07:52:230 (7) - Delete this note for emphasize the hard drum sound?
08:01:605 (1) - Higher spacing when the noise is decreasing is a little weird IMO, perhaps lower the spacing from the previous note to 1
08:10:605 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - I love these copy/paste patterns for the similar verse, it's a cool structure idea!
08:25:042 (4,5,6) - Make perfect triangle
08:26:730 (4,5) - Spacing decrease from 08:25:042 (4,5,6) ? I think the higher tone of vocals is continued here so can be spaced a bit more
09:15:161 (1,2) - Recommend spacing it a little closer, I had some trouble reading it as a 1/4 jump after all the streams in the previous song, even with the ending of that song and the 1/4 kickslider triple jumps. 09:15:678 (3,4) - being a 1/2 jump is also a little difficult to read as it is spaced rather close to the slider, almost similar spacing like the 1/4 IMO, maybe space this note a bit more?
09:18:264 (2,3) - NC the SV changes maybe? In such a long map especially, unexpected SV changes are combo killer D: Same at 09:24:126 (3) - 09:29:299 (2,3) - 09:34:816 (2,3) - etc. Maybe this is your style and it looks more aesthetically better to you to not spam new combos, but for readability from player point of view, especially one whom is sightreading, I think it is very difficult to expect such SV changes D: See how you NC them at 11:22:562 (1,1,1,1,1) -
09:21:195 (3,4) - Yeah like I mentioned in the previous points, the spacing is just a biiit too small for comfort, perhaps you could space it slightly more so it can be more easily differentiated from 1/4 jumps like 09:20:678 (1,2,3,4) - ? Just my opinion, if you think the spacing is fine then up to you, but see how you make them at 09:26:713 (3,4) - I think this kind of spacing is better :D
09:40:333 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Hmm I have some issue with this jump pattern, my opinion I think the vocal is not really conducive to this kind of spacing at this point. To be honest 5,6,7 in this pattern is fine, but 1,2,3,4 better fits to the pattern you did at 09:48:609 (2,3) - or 09:51:368 (2,3) - for example. In my opinion that pattern fits much better than these jumps, and if you agree recommend changes to this one and 09:45:850 (2,3,4,5) - . I know it ruin some of your pattern aesthetic especially at the second one but it really stood out to me as slightly overdone and unneeded, in my opinion.
09:47:402 (4,5) - Hmm this verse with these lyrics repeats twice more but we do not see this 1/4 pattern again, why? Is the song more intense and more fitting to 1/2 jumps in your opinion? Legitimately asking, I was expecting some more 1/4 jump in playing this but it never come :D
(little nazi) 09:56:540 (1,2) - These are not symmetrical >.< It is annoying to make them equal on both sides but for polish purposes I recommend trying if you can :D
10:20:234 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Any reason spacing get larger in the stream, I don't hear intensity rising but maybe I miss something? Also I recommend simply make it a smooth curve instead of changing the flow at 6 onwards, the vocal change is not that large in my opinion
11:14:907 (3,1) - IMO for follow the drums some counter flow would be better here, make the 11:15:081 (1,2,3) - flow from right to left rather than up to down to contrast with the left to right flow of 11:14:559 (1,2,3) -
11:37:003 (1,2,3) - Same at this part, the flow from 11:35:437 (1,2,3) - into 11:35:959 (1,2,3) - feels very nice but I'm not sure about this second one
11:54:922 (7,1) - Is a little hard to read this 1/4 jump since 6 to 7 was closer and had some overlap, perhaps decrease the spacing a bit? The SV being faster at 1 makes this very easy to sliderbreak already, could make it a little less evil with spacing IMO :P
12:02:751 (1,2,3) - Consider making these a repeat slider? Then it adds a lot more emphasis to the next jumps and makes it a little easier to adjust to them IMO. I know the small spacing kind of does this already but from key tapping point of view it makes the jumps have that much more gameplay impact if you only need one key push to complete these notes compared the jumps afterwards which require rapid 1/2 presses. Same at places like 12:13:886 (1,2,3) - where there's jumps after that echo three beat pattern
12:21:715 (3,4) - IMO the sounds after this 3 to 4 jump are stronger than the sound here from 3 to 4 so it is a little strange for this to be the biggest jump of them all, just my thoughts
12:30:240 (2) - Ctrl+G? Makes it consistent with similar pattern at 12:24:151 (1,2) - and also IMO flows better from 1 to 2 and also 2 to 3
12:52:916 (3,4,5) - Just my personal feelings about this is that it is often difficult for player to adjust to new rhythm style after playing through a previous song which had very different rhythm. This is deceptively fast compared to the spacing and I think for the first instance of this rhythm in this new song it might be better to space them less/make it clearer that it is 1/4, like the triple patterns before it? 13 minutes into a map and missing on something like this is heart breaking to say the least (no I'm not salty >:c)
13:47:427 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - Brilliant again
15:32:411 (3,1) - EVIL! >:(

I liked your map a lot! Normally I am not the biggest fan of Japanese young girl singing but the voices were not loli and the songs were quite catchy, especially "Ponytail to Shushu" :D Sorry I could not find many important things to point out but hope it was a helpful mod, thank you for modding my map and wish you good luck!
Topic Starter
P A N

gracefu wrote:

o/ hello there

m4m for https://osu.ppy.sh/s/581515

random people who read this please mod my map too cause you're pretty <3

[Ponytail no Shushu]

lol this song is funny

love your repeating 08:10:605 (1,2) - pattern! visuals/structure are really good on this one except for some weird spacing here and there.
  1. 07:52:417 (8,1) - Could stack these two on top of each other, since you seem to be emphasising the guitar here I didn't stack because there is vocal on 1 XD
  2. 08:00:105 (1,2) - You could have this pattern be similar to 07:58:605 (1,2) - this pattern by having the (1) be a curved slider too I don't want to use only curve there and straight slider flows pretty fine too.
  3. 08:01:605 (1) - Since this sound is relatively weak you could put it on the left instead so the flow remains smooth (e.g. 48,112) that flows well and interesting but mine is also flow well :( but since i prefer zig-zag so yea.. will see if someone suggest this more.
  4. 08:22:605 (1) - The spacing here could be larger as this note is stronger than usual (and it has the cymbal too) okay
  5. 08:25:605 (1) - No hitsound on this? If really no hitsound I suggest removing hitsound from 08:13:605 (1) - or 08:37:605 (1) - too since its the same note in the phrase it's a mistake ofc XD
  6. 08:37:605 (1) - The spacing here could be larger, since it seems to be much less emphasised compared to 08:36:105 (1) - from the same phrase, or compared to 08:25:605 (1) - from the same note in a different phrase yup fixed.
  7. 08:55:042 (4,1,2,3) - The flow changes direction twice in a row quickly here for no reason, maybe ctrl-g 08:55:792 (2,3) - to fix? I think it's fine.

[Oogoe Diamond]

hitsounds are really quiet from 09:36:195 - onwards fixed
  1. 09:24:816 (1) - I think its better to use extended slider + circle here, since you do it for basically everything else there is clap o.o
  2. 09:30:333 (1) - Same for this same
  3. 09:44:126 (1,3) - Maybe swapping this will be better for flow and gives the vocals on 234 a bit more emphasis it's pretty the same imo.
  4. 09:45:850 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - This pattern can be improved imo, it doesn't really give emphasis to the vocals on 09:46:023 (3) - and 09:46:885 (1) -, and also doesn't give emphasis to the instruments on 09:46:195 (4) - and 09:46:885 (1) -, so it feels neither here nor there interesting suggestion but I bored of zigzag pattern so i use this.
thanks a lot for a mod :D
Underdogs
aitakatta
00:05:786 (1,2,3,4,5) - http://puu.sh/uAiv7/dd85fe60de.jpg
00:23:286 (1) - make it same as 00:23:598 (2) - so it looks flow-ish

last song
15:31:473 (2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - looks confusing since you put it the same spacing but 15:32:411 (3,1,3,1) - has 1/2 beat.
Topic Starter
P A N

Arf wrote:

Hello, M4M as we agreed! Your map is very good I don't think I'll find much, but I will try my best! Sorry it take so long compare to your mod but had some internet problems \O/ alllllllright very long, how should I respond to this XD

Marathon
00:25:161 (3,4) - In the drum backbeat section of the song this type of stack is very nicely accentuated with the music but that BGM hasn't started yet so are you sure you want to use the stack here? Makes it a bit inconsistent imo when throughout this section you use 00:29:223 (4,5) - or 00:15:004 (2,3,4) - I know there's no vocals here but there weren't any in the first one either i got your point but my point of view, those three part are different. 00:15:004 (2,3) - kick is on red -- red while 00:25:161 (3,4) - kick is on white - red so I fixed the first one to fit with the kick better.
00:49:223 (4,5) - Whenever this pattern has appeared in the song so far it has utilized sharp angles from the 4->5 but here it uses a more linear flow from the sliderend to 4 to 5 to the next slider which is spaced for the drum sound. It felt a little strange while playing because I was expecting a back and forth motion like 00:39:223 (4,5,1) - or 00:29:223 (4,5,1) - or even 00:51:723 (4,5,1) - :P I think i fix it correctly.
01:21:098 (2) - IMO after this part the song isn't as intense as before in the BGM so you could tone down the spacing here a bit to reflect that. Up to you in my point of view, this level of spacing is still decent.
02:05:792 (1) - Maybe it's just me but I think this could look a bit better :D Maybe more like http://arf.s-ul.eu/NkuSnsap ? oooo... k tried to fix.
02:06:592 (4,1) - Minor thing, but maybe make these sliders the same for slider pairing purposes? Can feel a little strange visually IMO it's not next to each other so I think it's fine and it doesn't cause visual that bad.
02:46:325 (4,5,6) - Hmm I'm not sure about this rhythm, it sounds like two 1/2 sounds instead of a triple to me I also think it's two 1/2 idk why I did that.
02:53:263 (2,3) - Hmm the stack felt a bit random to me, anything in particular you're emphasizing here or is it just for variation? Muscle memory from the rest of the song wasn't expecting a sudden stop in movement is all it doesn't affect the play that much XD but anyway I tried unstack and it plays more flow.
02:59:263 (2) - Consider removing this? Mapping the lyrics right before an very instrumental heavy section felt a little strange and leaving that little vocal as a break sounds better to me than mapping it when "tamashii saa" isn't really mapped great suggestion
03:50:637 (4,5) - I know it's consistent with the previous iteration, but here the vocal is slightly different and doesn't have as much happening on the second note aka "5". I think it could work as a slider especially with the held vocal being held sound. I think different here, I stack because I want player to do a movement on vocal while I still want to make kick clickable too so I prefer stack.
03:52:713 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I don't mind linear jumps at all personally, but I feel there is some lost opportunity to emphasize the sound shift at 5, possibly by making the flow direction change at 5. another great suggestion.
04:03:613 (6,1) - (Unsure) Consider Ctrl+G ing these rhythm wise for the vocal, I know you want drum beats on clickable things but it sounded a little odd to me. Well I know it's an inconsistency but consider it? aaaa I prefer mine this time.
(minor) 04:14:859 (1) - Adjust the red point to the middle? nope, I like it that way.
(minor) 04:17:627 (1) - I think this looks better if the last sliderpoint is moved to the right a bit tried my best to make it better.
04:29:046 (5,6,7) - I think the sound best fitting a slider is from 04:29:392 - to 04:29:565 - in other words consider Ctrl+G ing 04:29:219 (6,7) - rhythm wise you are right.
04:35:620 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - It looks nice but comes a bit out of nowhere as there hasn't really been this level of 1/4 spam before. Consider nerfing the spacing a bit? yup also thinking about this, nerf.
04:40:637 (5) - Are you sure you want the sound at 04:40:810 - to be a sliderend? It sounds strong sound to me and also you mapped the sounds right before it at 04:39:772 (1,2,3) - so highly recommend this to be clickable it's a mistake XD fixed.
04:43:924 (1) - Same here, recommend 1/2 slider and circle instead of single 1/1 slider fixed.
04:54:456 (6,7) - Why spacing decrease here when pitch of the BGM went up and there is finish hitsound D: I expected it to increase like the previous ones since the sound keeps going up in pitch mistake again, fixed.
05:02:126 (2) - I don't recommend stacking this, it's a ripe moment for a miss/sliderbreak/early hit. Recommend more like 05:01:029 (5,6) - fixed.
05:08:924 (2,1) - Whoa such a huge jump like this after smaller 1/4 jump like 05:07:608 (1,1) - hmm I feel it may catch player off guard, especially in long map like this maybe surprises aren't the best idea. Up to you whether to decrease spacing or not though it's not that huge imo and this pattern is fit with the song.
05:51:026 (1,2,3,4) - Well if it looks like a square, maybe make it a perfect one? People notice these things in my experience :P
06:59:139 (6) - NC the SV change? It's very difficult to read otherwise IMO
07:11:139 (10) - No SV change here even though similar sound?
07:52:230 (7) - Delete this note for emphasize the hard drum sound?
08:01:605 (1) - Higher spacing when the noise is decreasing is a little weird IMO, perhaps lower the spacing from the previous note to 1
08:10:605 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - I love these copy/paste patterns for the similar verse, it's a cool structure idea!
08:25:042 (4,5,6) - Make perfect triangle aaa didn't intend to
08:26:730 (4,5) - Spacing decrease from 08:25:042 (4,5,6) ? I think the higher tone of vocals is continued here so can be spaced a bit more umm I think it's already decent, vocal a bit down.
09:15:161 (1,2) - Recommend spacing it a little closer, I had some trouble reading it as a 1/4 jump after all the streams in the previous song, even with the ending of that song and the 1/4 kickslider triple jumps. 09:15:678 (3,4) - being a 1/2 jump is also a little difficult to read as it is spaced rather close to the slider, almost similar spacing like the 1/4 IMO, maybe space this note a bit more?
09:18:264 (2,3) - NC the SV changes maybe? In such a long map especially, unexpected SV changes are combo killer D: Same at 09:24:126 (3) - 09:29:299 (2,3) - 09:34:816 (2,3) - etc. Maybe this is your style and it looks more aesthetically better to you to not spam new combos, but for readability from player point of view, especially one whom is sightreading, I think it is very difficult to expect such SV changes D: See how you NC them at 11:22:562 (1,1,1,1,1) -
09:21:195 (3,4) - Yeah like I mentioned in the previous points, the spacing is just a biiit too small for comfort, perhaps you could space it slightly more so it can be more easily differentiated from 1/4 jumps like 09:20:678 (1,2,3,4) - ? Just my opinion, if you think the spacing is fine then up to you, but see how you make them at 09:26:713 (3,4) - I think this kind of spacing is better :D
09:40:333 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Hmm I have some issue with this jump pattern, my opinion I think the vocal is not really conducive to this kind of spacing at this point. To be honest 5,6,7 in this pattern is fine, but 1,2,3,4 better fits to the pattern you did at 09:48:609 (2,3) - or 09:51:368 (2,3) - for example. In my opinion that pattern fits much better than these jumps, and if you agree recommend changes to this one and 09:45:850 (2,3,4,5) - . I know it ruin some of your pattern aesthetic especially at the second one but it really stood out to me as slightly overdone and unneeded, in my opinion. there has vocal pronounce "at" actually so I use circle there.
09:47:402 (4,5) - Hmm this verse with these lyrics repeats twice more but we do not see this 1/4 pattern again, why? Is the song more intense and more fitting to 1/2 jumps in your opinion? Legitimately asking, I was expecting some more 1/4 jump in playing this but it never come :D
(little nazi) 09:56:540 (1,2) - These are not symmetrical >.< It is annoying to make them equal on both sides but for polish purposes I recommend trying if you can :D
10:20:234 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Any reason spacing get larger in the stream, I don't hear intensity rising but maybe I miss something? Also I recommend simply make it a smooth curve instead of changing the flow at 6 onwards, the vocal change is not that large in my opinion i kinda want to divide the vocal and pure drum part.
11:14:907 (3,1) - IMO for follow the drums some counter flow would be better here, make the 11:15:081 (1,2,3) - flow from right to left rather than up to down to contrast with the left to right flow of 11:14:559 (1,2,3) -
11:37:003 (1,2,3) - Same at this part, the flow from 11:35:437 (1,2,3) - into 11:35:959 (1,2,3) - feels very nice but I'm not sure about this second one
11:54:922 (7,1) - Is a little hard to read this 1/4 jump since 6 to 7 was closer and had some overlap, perhaps decrease the spacing a bit? The SV being faster at 1 makes this very easy to sliderbreak already, could make it a little less evil with spacing IMO :P
12:02:751 (1,2,3) - Consider making these a repeat slider? Then it adds a lot more emphasis to the next jumps and makes it a little easier to adjust to them IMO. I know the small spacing kind of does this already but from key tapping point of view it makes the jumps have that much more gameplay impact if you only need one key push to complete these notes compared the jumps afterwards which require rapid 1/2 presses. Same at places like 12:13:886 (1,2,3) - where there's jumps after that echo three beat pattern I like 3 circles more :( idk one hit per one word sounds good for me. echo 3 words one hit is kinda meh, will looking for more opinion.
12:21:715 (3,4) - IMO the sounds after this 3 to 4 jump are stronger than the sound here from 3 to 4 so it is a little strange for this to be the biggest jump of them all, just my thoughts
12:30:240 (2) - Ctrl+G? Makes it consistent with similar pattern at 12:24:151 (1,2) - and also IMO flows better from 1 to 2 and also 2 to 3
12:52:916 (3,4,5) - Just my personal feelings about this is that it is often difficult for player to adjust to new rhythm style after playing through a previous song which had very different rhythm. This is deceptively fast compared to the spacing and I think for the first instance of this rhythm in this new song it might be better to space them less/make it clearer that it is 1/4, like the triple patterns before it? 13 minutes into a map and missing on something like this is heart breaking to say the least (no I'm not salty >:c) will looking for more opinion about this, player had experience at 10:10:375 - before i think.
13:47:427 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - Brilliant again
15:32:411 (3,1) - EVIL! >:( not :(

I liked your map a lot! Normally I am not the biggest fan of Japanese young girl singing but the voices were not loli and the songs were quite catchy, especially "Ponytail to Shushu" :D Sorry I could not find many important things to point out but hope it was a helpful mod, thank you for modding my map and wish you good luck!
this is really a helpful mod, thanks :D but next time please at least list them because wall is hard to read and recognize the line :(
no reply = fixed, I'm lazy to reply what I fix after 2 hours since I start to check your mod :)
Topic Starter
P A N

Underdogs wrote:

aitakatta
00:05:786 (1,2,3,4,5) - http://puu.sh/uAiv7/dd85fe60de.jpg no :(
00:23:286 (1) - make it same as 00:23:598 (2) - so it looks flow-ish yup

last song
15:31:473 (2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - looks confusing since you put it the same spacing but 15:32:411 (3,1,3,1) - has 1/2 beat. no :(
Reazen
M4M :3
Mod
  1. 00:22:504 (2,3,4) - maybe make distance even? eg. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7528068 visually looks better
  2. 04:39:599 (6,1,2,3,4) - this note 04:39:599 (6) - looks like part of pattern similar to this 04:38:734 (2,3,4,5) - but i don't think there is a sound to emphasize 04:39:599 (6) - like this 04:38:734 (2) - i think more intuitive is something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7528357
  3. 06:19:094 - this jumpy section is somehow flat, maybe for each whistle/finish hs note you increase a distance a little?
  4. 07:19:764 (7,8) - i think flow here is a little weird, maybe 07:19:953 (8) - ctrl G and rotate ? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7528475 very similar flow you made here 07:21:827 (5,1,2) -
  5. 10:51:783 (3,4) - maybe better blanket?
  6. 11:20:301 - i think this should be clickable since 11:19:953 (4) - this sound is clickable
  7. 12:07:275 (3,1) - i think this should look like 12:01:708 (4,1) - oh and later 12:12:842 (3,1) - hmm.. anyway just make it more consistent since it's the same sounds yet different patterns
  8. 12:35:111 (2) - maybe change to slider for better ephasize?
Pachiru
Here is my M4M as promised, it will not be very long, since the map is already very nice!

[General]
  1. Why not putting some Kiai parts? That would be better, even if they are small, that could give some good effects to the song o:
[Aitakatta]
  1. 00:15:317 (3) - Why not moving this not a bit more on the end of this slider: 00:14:536 (1) - so it would do a better effect with this slider? Or ou could even do symetrycal patterns with this slider too 00:15:473 (4) - !
  2. 00:25:786 (1) - I think I would mark a bit more this slider with spacing, due to the strong sound on the starting slider. Why not stacking it on this double note here: 00:25:161 (3,4) -
  3. 00:37:661 (5,6) - With the sound you're mapping, it feels weird to have two sliders that have different shapes, why not giving them same shapes on both of them? o:
[Bingo!]
  1. 01:32:992 (3) - I think that this beat should be marked differently as those two notes: 01:32:192 (1,2) - why not moving this circle: 01:32:992 (3) - on this one: 01:33:192 (4) - with using a NC on this note: 01:33:192 (4) - so it will be read easier for the player. That's just a personal taste!
  2. 01:53:792 (3,4,5,6) - Compared to the difficulty of some patterns in the song (not the map), I think it would be better to increase difficulty of this pattern, by increasing distance between them :)
  3. 02:08:992 (1) - I think that the angle between this pattern here can be changed: 02:09:592 (2,3,4) - because it's quite strange to have two patterns that go in different way. In other words, I think you should change the curve of this pattern here: 02:09:592 (2,3,4) - and moreover, there is not real reason to make a brutal angle here, because there is no beat that allow that o:
  4. 02:23:292 (1) - It's maybe just me, but it feels very strange when the spinner start on a song, and end on an other song... You should probably shorten this spinner so it will fit better! o:
[Akb Sanjou!]
  1. 02:41:544 (3,4,5) - A ryhthm like this https://puu.sh/uD4OI/160afa8f5f.png would fit better I guess, because I feel like the strong beat here, should be clickable: 02:42:013 -
  2. 02:45:200 (8,9,1) - I would place those part a bit down on the grid, so it will flow better with the previous moves on the jumps, like this: https://puu.sh/uD5KL/a9480ba945.png
[10nen Zakura]
  1. 03:27:627 (1) - That would be better if this slider would be at the center of this one: 03:28:146 (3) - (actually it's not really)
  2. 03:49:772 (1,2) - Why the distance between those two, and those two: 03:48:734 (2,3) - are different? They are the same sound, so why giving them such a strong difference between them? o:
  3. 03:54:617 (5) - Add a NC here, no, that would make it more easier to read, and that mark a new kind of beat here o:
Good luck for rank P A N, feel free to contact me if you need mods on other maps <3
Topic Starter
P A N

Reazen wrote:

M4M :3
Mod
  1. 00:22:504 (2,3,4) - maybe make distance even? eg. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7528068 visually looks better
  2. 04:39:599 (6,1,2,3,4) - this note 04:39:599 (6) - looks like part of pattern similar to this 04:38:734 (2,3,4,5) - but i don't think there is a sound to emphasize 04:39:599 (6) - like this 04:38:734 (2) - i think more intuitive is something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7528357 I tried that but mine is kinda more flow somehow.
  3. 06:19:094 - this jumpy section is somehow flat, maybe for each whistle/finish hs note you increase a distance a little?
  4. 07:19:764 (7,8) - i think flow here is a little weird, maybe 07:19:953 (8) - ctrl G and rotate ? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7528475 very similar flow you made here 07:21:827 (5,1,2) -
  5. 10:51:783 (3,4) - maybe better blanket? heh, I think it is.
  6. 11:20:301 - i think this should be clickable since 11:19:953 (4) - this sound is clickable ah that one is just for connect the rhythm, or it will be a 1/1 break.
  7. 12:07:275 (3,1) - i think this should look like 12:01:708 (4,1) - oh and later 12:12:842 (3,1) - hmm.. anyway just make it more consistent since it's the same sounds yet different patterns it's fine actually XD
  8. 12:35:111 (2) - maybe change to slider for better ephasize?
no reply = fixed, thanks!
Topic Starter
P A N

Pachiru wrote:

Here is my M4M as promised, it will not be very long, since the map is already very nice!

[General]
  1. Why not putting some Kiai parts? That would be better, even if they are small, that could give some good effects to the song o: I might do :)
[Aitakatta]
  1. 00:15:317 (3) - Why not moving this not a bit more on the end of this slider: 00:14:536 (1) - so it would do a better effect with this slider? Or ou could even do symetrycal patterns with this slider too 00:15:473 (4) - ! ummm I want to make spacing of 2,3,4 consistent.
  2. 00:25:786 (1) - I think I would mark a bit more this slider with spacing, due to the strong sound on the starting slider. Why not stacking it on this double note here: 00:25:161 (3,4) - I tried your idea but mine is more flow imo and both choice are not that different >_>
  3. 00:37:661 (5,6) - With the sound you're mapping, it feels weird to have two sliders that have different shapes, why not giving them same shapes on both of them? o: I didn't intend to make them the same XD I only do at 00:40:786 (1,2,3,4)
[Bingo!]
  1. 01:32:992 (3) - I think that this beat should be marked differently as those two notes: 01:32:192 (1,2) - why not moving this circle: 01:32:992 (3) - on this one: 01:33:192 (4) - with using a NC on this note: 01:33:192 (4) - so it will be read easier for the player. That's just a personal taste! I try unstack 3 and add NC on it
  2. 01:53:792 (3,4,5,6) - Compared to the difficulty of some patterns in the song (not the map), I think it would be better to increase difficulty of this pattern, by increasing distance between them :) I think the current spacing is pretty decent with the song, not over jump according... to my mouse movement.
  3. 02:08:992 (1) - I think that the angle between this pattern here can be changed: 02:09:592 (2,3,4) - because it's quite strange to have two patterns that go in different way. In other words, I think you should change the curve of this pattern here: 02:09:592 (2,3,4) - and moreover, there is not real reason to make a brutal angle here, because there is no beat that allow that o: agreed about this.
  4. 02:23:292 (1) - It's maybe just me, but it feels very strange when the spinner start on a song, and end on an other song... You should probably shorten this spinner so it will fit better! o: good point but I want to look for more opinion about this because the current one is kinda fit with the cymbal in bgm too.
[Akb Sanjou!]
  1. 02:41:544 (3,4,5) - A ryhthm like this https://puu.sh/uD4OI/160afa8f5f.png would fit better I guess, because I feel like the strong beat here, should be clickable: 02:42:013 - I want to make vocal clickable there.
  2. 02:45:200 (8,9,1) - I would place those part a bit down on the grid, so it will flow better with the previous moves on the jumps, like this: https://puu.sh/uD5KL/a9480ba945.png I also tried this but I feel mine is more flow :( that will be more flow in other case.
[10nen Zakura]
  1. 03:27:627 (1) - That would be better if this slider would be at the center of this one: 03:28:146 (3) - (actually it's not really) no need XDD
  2. 03:49:772 (1,2) - Why the distance between those two, and those two: 03:48:734 (2,3) - are different? They are the same sound, so why giving them such a strong difference between them? o: ah don't mind that, just variation and I make them consistent with 03:45:966 (2,3)
  3. 03:54:617 (5) - Add a NC here, no, that would make it more easier to read, and that mark a new kind of beat here o: I don't think there need any? XD
Good luck for rank P A N, feel free to contact me if you need mods on other maps <3
thanks about the mod! it makes me change many notes :o I also fix some note that next to the note I rejected to fix XD
Lanturn
osu! needs more poniteirus~ (Should be preview point tbh)
Topic Starter
P A N

Lanturn wrote:

osu! needs more poniteirus~ (Should be preview point tbh)
I love all of them, I cant decide O_O
Pachiru
Go for rank :)
Topic Starter
P A N

Pachiru wrote:

Go for rank :)
on the way XD
Gokateigo
ayy
mod
  1. 04:53:360 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Do something similar of this 04:51:606 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) -
  2. 04:54:890 (1,2) - This has the same spacing than the previous jumps but it's a weak sound, you should lower it
  3. 05:10:020 (1) - Curve here (like the previous sliders)
  4. 05:46:859 (7,8,9) - Make this wide angle easier to aim
  5. 05:53:876 (7,8,9) - ^
  6. Overlap this 08:13:417 (6) - and this 08:13:980 (2) -
  7. 08:15:855 (4) - NC
  8. 08:20:542 (4,5,6) - Sharp angle please
  9. 08:56:355 (4) - NC
  10. 13:56:865 (4) - NC
  11. 13:58:718 (6) - Move this a little bit to the right
  12. 14:35:376 (1,2,3,4,5) - NC ?
  13. 15:06:536 (4) - NC
  14. 15:09:911 (4) - NC + Make a triangle wit hthe following slider
  15. 15:10:286 (1) - Remove NC here if you did that
Topic Starter
P A N

Gokateigo wrote:

ayy
mod
  1. 04:53:360 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Do something similar of this 04:51:606 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - eh no, various.
  2. 04:54:890 (1,2) - This has the same spacing than the previous jumps but it's a weak sound, you should lower it i tried lower it and it plays weird. consistent spacing is btter.
  3. 05:10:020 (1) - Curve here (like the previous sliders) nice one.
  4. 05:46:859 (7,8,9) - Make this wide angle easier to aim I prefer this way.
  5. 05:53:876 (7,8,9) - ^ ^
  6. Overlap this 08:13:417 (6) - and this 08:13:980 (2) - intentional.
  7. 08:15:855 (4) - NC no need.
  8. 08:20:542 (4,5,6) - Sharp angle please hmm already plays good and I love current square.
  9. 08:56:355 (4) - NC I add NC on every big white tick.
  10. 13:56:865 (4) - NC why? :o
  11. 13:58:718 (6) - Move this a little bit to the right eee why? the current one already plays good.
  12. 14:35:376 (1,2,3,4,5) - NC ? yup
  13. 15:06:536 (4) - NC nope
  14. 15:09:911 (4) - NC + Make a triangle wit hthe following slider nope, slider is cymbal.
  15. 15:10:286 (1) - Remove NC here if you did that
thanks for the mod :D
Deppyforce
good morning
nice karaoke

00:24:868 (2,3,4) - try circle + 1/2 reverse maybe fit better tbh
01:25:806 (1) - stack under 01:25:024 (3) - tail instead? looks cleaner and works a bit better with how u use stacks before on 01:24:087 (4) -
01:45:919 - theres sound here which is equally strong with previous triple so it feels a bit weird to just ignore this, maybe change the previous triple to a 1/4 reverse would blend in better
02:43:238 (6) - try move to x197 y152 having this curved a bit will differ it from 02:43:707 (9,10,1) - which is a bit stronger so that thing got emphasized a bit more (also this would flow a bit nicer
03:14:457 - also i think making some kind of sliderart to map guitar would fit in nicely
03:58:250 (1) - nc here is kinda useless lol
04:28:354 (2,7) - blanket
04:35:620 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - can u mute the slider ends cuz there are no solid sound on those ticks to support and guitar doesnt exactly end on those
04:55:328 (3,4) - 04:56:205 (6,1) - the 1/4s have different sounds but you mapped them same so can u mute the slider end on 2nd one here too
05:44:893 (5) - lol this spacing its even higher than 05:47:306 (9,1) - but these are stronger and more noticeable :thonkang:
06:51:452 (3) - there no real reason why this should be a 1/2 sliders while u could split to 2 circles to map both strong sound on head and tail anyways
06:55:952 - isnt there supposed to be 'aa' here in storyboard
07:35:139 (4,5) - ctrl+g rhythm here so both instruments on red and white become clickable
07:48:077 (1) - snapped to wrong tick
08:28:605 - now the lalala in storyboard is english but at 00:51:196 - its japanese :thonkang:
08:45:105 (1,5) - blanket
08:48:292 - lol hitsound is way too loud imo
09:58:092 (2,3) - this linear thing flows a bit bad tbh xd i would change 09:58:954 (4) - to 3 instead and move 4 somewhere else
10:25:304 - considering how weak this thing is it'll probably be better if u change 5 to 1/2 slider
11:37:872 (3) - try move to stack under 11:37:177 (2) - instead? idk it feels like 1/2stack would ruin the movement u had going on in the previous patterns especially on a part with rhythm like this
12:22:759 - i think lyrics here is every,every,everyday pls fix sb
12:28:326 - ok now this is obviously wrong
13:20:013 (1,2) - stack nazi
14:07:820 - this is missing (yes there is sound here in the song, pls map this thing even tho its weak cuz u did smh similar at 13:38:158 (2) -
14:34:617 (1) - lol the vocal actually starts at 14:34:786 here
14:35:713 (1) - same /it s on 1/2
15:17:786 - idk but i think circle spam here contradicts with how u map vocals before and kinda ruined it idk but try changing 15:17:786 (1,2,3) - to 1/2 reverse slider is a valid solution imo
15:33:911 (2,1) - http://puu.sh/uKa9d/14a5883402.jpg

gl
why did u update when im modding this god dam
Topic Starter
P A N
well who would knows you are modding XD
will reply on tomorrow, have an exam.

Deppyforce wrote:

good morning
nice karaoke

00:24:868 (2,3,4) - try circle + 1/2 reverse maybe fit better tbh I emphasize that clap with using 1/2 slider because there is no kick on red tick.
01:25:806 (1) - stack under 01:25:024 (3) - tail instead? looks cleaner and works a bit better with how u use stacks before on 01:24:087 (4) - recently, I don't want to perfect stack on tail. I pay attention on how player notice the note more.
01:45:919 - theres sound here which is equally strong with previous triple so it feels a bit weird to just ignore this, maybe change the previous triple to a 1/4 reverse would blend in better aight added
02:43:238 (6) - try move to x197 y152 having this curved a bit will differ it from 02:43:707 (9,10,1) - which is a bit stronger so that thing got emphasized a bit more (also this would flow a bit nicer the point you gave is very very far away.
03:14:457 - also i think making some kind of sliderart to map guitar would fit in nicely hmm next song already popup
03:58:250 (1) - nc here is kinda useless lol comeon, it's for the recognizing about 1/1 change to 1/2
04:28:354 (2,7) - blanket eh didn't intent to.
04:35:620 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - can u mute the slider ends cuz there are no solid sound on those ticks to support and guitar doesnt exactly end on those aight, tried 5% on tail.
04:55:328 (3,4) - 04:56:205 (6,1) - the 1/4s have different sounds but you mapped them same so can u mute the slider end on 2nd one here too the tail is already pretty soft and next note has a strong hitsound so I think these is no need to mute the tail, will look for more opinion.
05:44:893 (5) - lol this spacing its even higher than 05:47:306 (9,1) - but these are stronger and more noticeable :thonkang:yup fixed.
06:51:452 (3) - there no real reason why this should be a 1/2 sliders while u could split to 2 circles to map both strong sound on head and tail anyways ok/
06:55:952 - isnt there supposed to be 'aa' here in storyboard ikr, I also doubt about that but lyrics in the all the websites give me only that. looks like i might add it myself.
07:35:139 (4,5) - ctrl+g rhythm here so both instruments on red and white become clickable ah ok
07:48:077 (1) - snapped to wrong tick fixed?
08:28:605 - now the lalala in storyboard is english but at 00:51:196 - its japanese :thonkang: yup lyrics on website did it to me again.
08:45:105 (1,5) - blanket aaa oook
08:48:292 - lol hitsound is way too loud imo hmm i don't think so.
09:58:092 (2,3) - this linear thing flows a bit bad tbh xd i would change 09:58:954 (4) - to 3 instead and move 4 somewhere else hm this pattern really flow for me tbh, I don't find any problem with it.
10:25:304 - considering how weak this thing is it'll probably be better if u change 5 to 1/2 slider will see, it still considered as a vocal for me so better make it clickable.
11:37:872 (3) - try move to stack under 11:37:177 (2) - instead? idk it feels like 1/2stack would ruin the movement u had going on in the previous patterns especially on a part with rhythm like this yea fixed
12:22:759 - i think lyrics here is every,every,everyday pls fix sb
12:28:326 - ok now this is obviously wrong ok nicr catch.
13:20:013 (1,2) - stack nazi it's auto unstack but oh well, stack it again.
14:07:820 - this is missing (yes there is sound here in the song, pls map this thing even tho its weak cuz u did smh similar at 13:38:158 (2) - how strong of them is different imo, and double sounds better for me.
14:34:617 (1) - lol the vocal actually starts at 14:34:786 here fix other too.
14:35:713 (1) - same /it s on 1/2
15:17:786 - idk but i think circle spam here contradicts with how u map vocals before and kinda ruined it idk but try changing 15:17:786 (1,2,3) - to 1/2 reverse slider is a valid solution imo fix in other way.
15:33:911 (2,1) - http://puu.sh/uKa9d/14a5883402.jpg nah ok

gl
why did u update when im modding this god dam
ok thanks for the mod :D
Luna-
AKB48 <3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3

good luck!
Topic Starter
P A N

Luna- wrote:

AKB48 <3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3

good luck!
AKB48 HOLY YES

Nostalgic
o/

m4m
  1. lower stack leninecy?
  2. add all the song names and albums and Akihabara into tags
  3. 00:49:399 (5) - place it somewhere like 103, 220 for better flow?
  4. 01:14:556 (1) - 01:19:556 (1) - the 'yes' sound can be made into 1/2 fast slider, at least it should be distinguishable from the drum sounds later on
  5. 01:45:819 (6,2) - fix stacking
  6. 05:08:926 (2) - nc
  7. 06:27:550 (1) - asymmetrical
  8. 09:24:126 (1) - whistle the whole slider like what u did here 09:23:437 (1)
  9. 09:29:299 (1) - this sv change seems unnecessary to me. Or you may change 09:29:988 (2) to a faster sv for consistency
  10. 09:38:264 (5) - I will always associate this slider shape with fast sv so idk...
  11. 11:14:559 (1,1) - remove nc?
  12. 11:33:001 (2,4) - nc
  13. 11:55:618 (2) - ^
  14. 12:26:586 (4) - stack on top of 12:26:760 (1) - ?
  15. 12:32:154 (4) - ^
  16. 12:33:894 (5,6,7,1,2,3) - stack triples here feel weird. Would feel better if there's constant movement instead of stationary
  17. 13:47:427 OMG HEAVY ROTATION

GL :)
Topic Starter
P A N

Nostalgic wrote:

o/

m4m
  1. lower stack leninecy? why? nope
  2. add all the song names and albums and Akihabara into tags nice, added
  3. 00:49:399 (5) - place it somewhere like 103, 220 for better flow? nooo it will be close to next note.
  4. 01:14:556 (1) - 01:19:556 (1) - the 'yes' sound can be made into 1/2 fast slider, at least it should be distinguishable from the drum sounds later on I prefer to use just circle because sounds more fit to me and 1/2 slider then 3 circles is weird somehow.
  5. 01:45:819 (6,2) - fix stacking okay o.o
  6. 05:08:926 (2) - nc I think so
  7. 06:27:550 (1) - asymmetrical fuck that
  8. 09:24:126 (1) - whistle the whole slider like what u did here 09:23:437 (1) remove that one.
  9. 09:29:299 (1) - this sv change seems unnecessary to me. Or you may change 09:29:988 (2) to a faster sv for consistency this is way weaker compared to that.
  10. 09:38:264 (5) - I will always associate this slider shape with fast sv so idk... it's cute.
  11. 11:14:559 (1,1) - remove nc? hmm why? no
  12. 11:33:001 (2,4) - nc remove on 2.
  13. 11:55:618 (2) - ^ player able to recognize the SV there.
  14. 12:26:586 (4) - stack on top of 12:26:760 (1) - ? why? nope
  15. 12:32:154 (4) - ^ ^
  16. 12:33:894 (5,6,7,1,2,3) - stack triples here feel weird. Would feel better if there's constant movement instead of stationary will see there have is any problem :)
  17. 13:47:427 OMG HEAVY ROTATION YUP

GL :)
thanks for your mod :D
Monstrata
Marathon

00:56:431 (3,4,5,1) - Didn't relaly like the flow here. I think you should continue with the counterclockwise movement here.
01:14:087 (4,5,1) - I wish there was a bigger jump onto 1. it feels like the same spacing as 3>4>5
01:19:087 (4,5,1) - ^etc...
01:56:019 (9,1) - Is it possible to get more emphasis onto 1?
02:21:019 (4) - You should do NC spam here, and on 02:22:619 (4) - . It's especially good on 02:22:619 (4) - imo so you can give players a better visual clue that the stream coming up is 1/2 rather than 3/4 beat away. I know you already have spacing, but this is nice too~
02:30:419 (1) - Snap to red line.
02:44:082 (2,3,4,5) - Ctrl+G flows better imo. Just keep the whole pattern counterclockwise since you set up a pretty nice flow with 02:42:582 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) -
03:23:302 (6,1) - xd blanket
03:28:146 (3) - imo, Ctrl+G flows better. I think the flowbreak is not really necessary here, and causes players to have to move in an awkward angle for a note that i don't think is especially emphasized.
05:07:171 (1,1) - Looks quite off. I think you wanted the slider-end to stack with the slider's bend or something?
05:11:009 (4) - I think this should be snapped to red tick on the sliderend? something is off.
05:19:453 - 05:26:471 - I would have liked to see some doublet rhythm here instead. The rhythm is quite different from many of the other songs in the marathon, it would be nice to map these unique rhythms since they don't happen often, rather than just using a generic stream.
05:33:489 - Would apply hre too~
05:45:990 (3) - NC here? Since its the beginning of another pattern with increasing ds
06:47:514 (1,2) - missed blanket opportunity here i think,
07:19:014 (4) - NC? Downbeat.
07:38:139 (6,7,8) - You could try using two kicksliders here instead. 07:38:139 - is a pretty strong beat too, but usually with triplets, the emphasis ends up being only on the last note 07:38:327 (8) - . kicksliders let you emphasize both red and white tick. But here its up to you~ just an idea xD.
08:01:605 (1) - Stacking with 08:00:480 (2) - 's head gives a better angle imo.
08:44:167 (3) - Ctrl+G gives a cleaner angle imo. Also doesn't feel as flow-breaky transitioning from 1>2>3
08:48:105 (1,2) - I get your idea, but I think you should space these out at least a bit more, otherwise I think people will get the spacing too confused and either play the stream too fast or too slow cuz they don't see that the first note on the stream and assume 08:48:480 (3) - is the first note.
09:17:919 (1,1) - Imo, the first slider should be slower, and the second faster, cuz of the snare. If you agree, then i guess this applies to 09:29:299 (1) - too.
10:38:262 (3,4,5) - There are a lot of 1/4's here, particularly when the slider is playing. You could probably add more circles here.
10:43:896 (7,8,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This is nice :D
11:18:039 (3) - 11:20:823 (3) - Extended 3/4 sliders like these seemed kinda unnecessary imo. There's not really anything special in the vocals imo that makes me think they need to be held. If you have a reason for using these though please let me know.
12:22:759 (1,2,3,4) - These, especially 3>4 are reeeeaally big tbh.. I would tone down the jumps a bit.
12:29:022 (3,4) - ^
12:37:025 - Extend the pause until here? before break? Where you ahve is kinda weird imo.
13:21:465 (3,4,5) - You could probably do some symmetrical structure here if you want. They're in the right positions anyways xD.
15:09:536 (3,4,5) - Use a stack pattern instead? This arrangement seems a bit confusing imo due to the spacing.

[]

Aside from that, you have a loooot of unused files in your storyboard. Please recheck what you actually need and what is not being used etc...
Topic Starter
P A N

Monstrata wrote:

Marathon

00:56:431 (3,4,5,1) - Didn't relaly like the flow here. I think you should continue with the counterclockwise movement here. I want to keep the back-forth pattern to emphasize that err soft sound but also fix the flow like your suggestion.
01:14:087 (4,5,1) - I wish there was a bigger jump onto 1. it feels like the same spacing as 3>4>5 fixed
01:19:087 (4,5,1) - ^etc... fixed
01:56:019 (9,1) - Is it possible to get more emphasis onto 1? yup, I ctrl+g 8,9 too.
02:21:019 (4) - You should do NC spam here, and on 02:22:619 (4) - . It's especially good on 02:22:619 (4) - imo so you can give players a better visual clue that the stream coming up is 1/2 rather than 3/4 beat away. I know you already have spacing, but this is nice too~ oh yea agreed.
02:30:419 (1) - Snap to red line. woops
02:44:082 (2,3,4,5) - Ctrl+G flows better imo. Just keep the whole pattern counterclockwise since you set up a pretty nice flow with 02:42:582 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - wow never thought of this.
03:23:302 (6,1) - xd blanket I think it already is DX http://puu.sh/uR3VX/73b73ae8c9.jpg (i move tail a bit tho in this pic)
03:28:146 (3) - imo, Ctrl+G flows better. I think the flowbreak is not really necessary here, and causes players to have to move in an awkward angle for a note that i don't think is especially emphasized. hmm I want to keep this because it's kinda awkward angle but it makes a great flow on 03:28:665 (4,5)
05:07:171 (1,1) - Looks quite off. I think you wanted the slider-end to stack with the slider's bend or something? alright fixed.
05:11:009 (4) - I think this should be snapped to red tick on the sliderend? something is off. fixed.
05:19:453 - 05:26:471 - I would have liked to see some doublet rhythm here instead. The rhythm is quite different from many of the other songs in the marathon, it would be nice to map these unique rhythms since they don't happen often, rather than just using a generic stream. I agreed that some might be unique but I also want to emphasize vocal or kick on red tick :( and I think the repeat flow on some song already make the map various pattern.
05:33:489 - Would apply hre too~ same here~
05:45:990 (3) - NC here? Since its the beginning of another pattern with increasing ds ok looks good.
06:47:514 (1,2) - missed blanket opportunity here i think, do you mean improve blanket? @_@ adjust a bit
07:19:014 (4) - NC? Downbeat. yup added, big white tick too.
07:38:139 (6,7,8) - You could try using two kicksliders here instead. 07:38:139 - is a pretty strong beat too, but usually with triplets, the emphasis ends up being only on the last note 07:38:327 (8) - . kicksliders let you emphasize both red and white tick. But here its up to you~ just an idea xD. I feel like hit 3 times of circle is stronger here o.o
08:01:605 (1) - Stacking with 08:00:480 (2) - 's head gives a better angle imo. umm yea but I want to use zig-zag pattern to the end and I think last note is weaker than other three.
08:44:167 (3) - Ctrl+G gives a cleaner angle imo. Also doesn't feel as flow-breaky transitioning from 1>2>3 agreed, also move 2 3 along to be closer with 1
08:48:105 (1,2) - I get your idea, but I think you should space these out at least a bit more, otherwise I think people will get the spacing too confused and either play the stream too fast or too slow cuz they don't see that the first note on the stream and assume 08:48:480 (3) - is the first note. ok increase the spacing.
09:17:919 (1,1) - Imo, the first slider should be slower, and the second faster, cuz of the snare. If you agree, then i guess this applies to 09:29:299 (1) - too. I follow vocal here ><
10:38:262 (3,4,5) - There are a lot of 1/4's here, particularly when the slider is playing. You could probably add more circles here. since this is a slow song so I really want to strongly emphasize the vocal, so if there has a extend vocal, I will use the long slider to emphasize. meanwhile, no vocal, I use many circles.
10:43:896 (7,8,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This is nice :D thank you so much :D
11:18:039 (3) - 11:20:823 (3) - Extended 3/4 sliders like these seemed kinda unnecessary imo. There's not really anything special in the vocals imo that makes me think they need to be held. If you have a reason for using these though please let me know. I want to make them different with 1/2 vocal. I mean, 11:17:691 (2) , 11:20:475 (2) vocal is end on red tick (might be a bit off) while (3,3) is extented till white tick.
12:22:759 (1,2,3,4) - These, especially 3>4 are reeeeaally big tbh.. I would tone down the jumps a bit. okay
12:29:022 (3,4) - ^ ^
12:37:025 - Extend the pause until here? before break? Where you ahve is kinda weird imo.
13:21:465 (3,4,5) - You could probably do some symmetrical structure here if you want. They're in the right positions anyways xD. oh well, didn't notice that XD
15:09:536 (3,4,5) - Use a stack pattern instead? This arrangement seems a bit confusing imo due to the spacing. umm I NC instead.

[]

Aside from that, you have a loooot of unused files in your storyboard. Please recheck what you actually need and what is not being used etc... I guess you mean the glow folder with contain about 384 files, delete that folder XD
some SB lyric is still wrong but my code file is in my dorm which I will go tomorrow (im home) thank you very much monstrata! XD
Raging Bull
Can't be AKB without Koisuru
Topic Starter
P A N

Raging Bull wrote:

Can't be AKB without Koisuru
afraid it will be too long :(
Monstrata
Saw your message in the morning, but you were already offline rip.

Anyways, yea I guess it was the glow folder.

sb\f\0026.png
sb\f\0033.png
sb\f\0036.png
sb\f\0037.png
sb\f\0039.png
sb\f\0046.png
sb\f\005c.png
sb\f\007b.png
sb\f\007d.png

These files still appear unused. I ctrl+f'ed them on your .osu notepad just in case, since Modding Assistant only checks for unused files on .osb.

Please confirm if these files are supposed to be used (maybe you are missing code or something?) if not please remove them. Anyways, call me when you're ready I guess :D
Topic Starter
P A N
thanks monstrata again, I will add more song and readjust the song order first.
sdafsf
2nd last song
15:54:473 - this beat seems too strong to be a sliderend. make it clickable
15:55:618 (1) - missing hitsound? not sure it feels too weak anyways
15:55:618 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - this is too much nc imo. id nc 15:55:618 (1) - and 15:56:075 (1) - since these are the points where the 1/2s are different sounds. also the patterning is wrong. since the first 1/2 sound repeats 3 times and the second one 4 times the square pattern should be before the triangle. id also use higher spacing on the first 3 beats than on the last 4 since the sounds are definetly stronger
16:02:946 (3,4,5,6) - make the heads from 3 to 4 parallel to the heads from 5 to 6. would look cleaner
16:07:755 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - circle shape doesnt fit well imo. S shape would fit better
16:32:259 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - id rather not spam nc here. seems overdone
16:54:702 (2) - nc
16:55:389 (4) - ^

kinda undermapped in the beginning and the hitsounds on the repeats are weird. overall really good tho

last song
17:01:193 (2,4,5,6,7,8) - not the nicest overlap
17:02:915 (1,4,5,6,7,8) - ^ you could stack the last note of the stream with 1
17:15:948 (8) - id nc because of the new sound. same with the claps following
17:42:259 (1,3) - prettty bad overlap. basically in this whole jump pattern. if you overlap try to at least have them like 2/1 away from each other
17:50:620 (1,2) - i get why they are close to each other but either make them overlap nicely or not at all
18:02:669 (5,6) - weird spacing. 1/1 stack would fit very well here with a nc on 6

this one was really clean up until the jumps which were kinda crowded and overlapped for my taste.
still well mapped

good luck!
Topic Starter
P A N

sdafsf wrote:

2nd last song
15:54:473 - this beat seems too strong to be a sliderend. make it clickable I made it clickable at first but I'm afraid people can't adapt to this song bpm but let's make it again because I also love this way more.
15:55:618 (1) - missing hitsound? not sure it feels too weak anyways yup, forgot.
15:55:618 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - this is too much nc imo. id nc 15:55:618 (1) - and 15:56:075 (1) - since these are the points where the 1/2s are different sounds. also the patterning is wrong. since the first 1/2 sound repeats 3 times and the second one 4 times the square pattern should be before the triangle. id also use higher spacing on the first 3 beats than on the last 4 since the sounds are definetly stronger I nc'd like that because I want player to notice that the upcoming rhythm is weird which not 1/2 for sure but now I make them triangle so player will recognize that it's 1/3 so I think NC on 1,4,7 note is fine now.
16:02:946 (3,4,5,6) - make the heads from 3 to 4 parallel to the heads from 5 to 6. would look cleaner oooookay
16:07:755 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - circle shape doesnt fit well imo. S shape would fit better I prefer circle here
16:32:259 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - id rather not spam nc here. seems overdone yup fixed because I fixed the previous one too.
16:54:702 (2) - nc k added
16:55:389 (4) - ^

kinda undermapped in the beginning and the hitsounds on the repeats are weird. overall really good tho

last song
17:01:193 (2,4,5,6,7,8) - not the nicest overlap not necessary imo.
17:02:915 (1,4,5,6,7,8) - ^ you could stack the last note of the stream with 1 ^
17:15:948 (8) - id nc because of the new sound. same with the claps following I disagree about this, I think just NC to emphasize double clap doesn't worth messing up with NC and drain, will look for more opinion tho.
17:42:259 (1,3) - prettty bad overlap. basically in this whole jump pattern. if you overlap try to at least have them like 2/1 away from each other
17:50:620 (1,2) - i get why they are close to each other but either make them overlap nicely or not at all but the pattern that increase spacing bit by bit will surely overlap :( but I don't think there's a problem
18:02:669 (5,6) - weird spacing. 1/1 stack would fit very well here with a nc on 6 agreed with this.

this one was really clean up until the jumps which were kinda crowded and overlapped for my taste.
still well mapped

good luck!
thanks for the mod !
Natsu
pan con queso :)
Anxient
00:14 P A N: yo
00:14 P A N: do you accept m4m 2 mins drain
00:15 Anxient: looking for a map that is worthy of 2 min drain
00:15 Anxient: which song btw
00:15 *P A N is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1212686 AKB48 - Songs Compilation [Nostalgia48]]
00:16 P A N: I want mod on last two songs
00:16 P A N: so I can hunt bubble
00:16 Anxient: im a im@s doe :^)
00:17 P A N: wew.
00:17 P A N: but akb is 3d overcuteness doe
00:17 P A N: http://24.media.tumblr.com/d404e123e0e1 ... o1_400.gif
00:17 Anxient: did you map all of this
00:18 P A N: yup
00:18 P A N: and SB too
00:18 Anxient: ok
00:18 Anxient: ooo
00:18 Anxient: cool
00:18 Anxient: lets IRC
00:18 Anxient: quicker
00:18 P A N: WA
00:18 Anxient: wa?
00:19 P A N: means surprise
00:19 P A N: and ok
00:19 P A N: let's do it
00:19 Anxient: turning off SB
00:19 Anxient: coz i dont need dis lag w
00:19 Anxient: 15:53:795 - this song:
00:19 Anxient: 15:54:244 (2,3) - better if you use 1/4 imo
00:19 Anxient: 15:54:244 (2,3,4) - coz off these 3 notes, 2 and 3 are noticeaby softer
00:19 P A N: slider?
00:20 Anxient: so why not use this opportunity to make 4 a big emphasis?
00:20 Anxient: ..
00:20 Anxient: shit
00:20 Anxient: this song is actually good
00:20 P A N: oh shit
00:20 P A N: yea I have thought about that too
00:20 P A N: i mean slider 1/4 thing
00:21 P A N: because it will let player to adapt the bpm too i guess
00:21 Anxient: 15:54:931 (1,2,3,1) - itll also make this less of a shock
00:22 P A N: yep
00:22 P A N: shock
00:22 Anxient: applied?
00:22 P A N: yup
00:22 Anxient: DOUBLE SHOCK!
00:23 P A N: wew
00:23 Anxient: 16:07:755 - maybe for this part, http://puu.sh/uX2bn/434dca557f.jpg do something like this?
00:23 Anxient: 16:08:098 (2) - coz for some reason the impact starts here
00:24 Anxient: 16:09:358 - missing object
00:24 P A N: doesn't that harder to play
00:24 Anxient: 16:09:129 (3,4) - also, make these two quieter
00:24 Anxient: i dont think it makes it harder
00:24 P A N: yea
00:24 Anxient: but my fix is more reflective on the song itself so
00:25 Anxient: ./shrug
00:26 Anxient: 16:16:686 (7) - forgot to NC
00:26 P A N: nice
00:28 Anxient: 16:18:518 (7) - remove clap
00:29 Anxient: 16:18:747 (1,1) - ctrl g these two. for better flow
00:29 Anxient: plays more smoothly imo
00:29 Anxient: http://puu.sh/uX2tP/a6473f400b.jpg
00:30 Anxient: 16:09:358 - btw did you forget an object?
00:31 P A N: more like intentional
00:31 Anxient: ok
00:31 P A N: so it's double 2 reverses
00:31 Anxient: 16:27:908 (1,2) - 10/10 overlap tbh
00:31 Anxient: http://puu.sh/uX2zI/1eb9cb63f7.jpg 100/100
00:31 Anxient: 16:31:343 (4) - NC maybe?
00:31 P A N: wew
00:31 P A N: yup
00:32 Anxient: 16:32:259 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - wew airman
00:33 Anxient: 16:44:854 (2) - better if you dont overlap this with anything
00:33 P A N: nah
00:33 P A N: WHY
00:33 Anxient: UGLY FAM
00:34 Anxient: try x210 y76
00:34 P A N: btw I somehow wanna follow whistle here 16:07:755 -
00:35 P A N: what about [http://puu.sh/uX2K8/4ff7889e3f.jpg this] perfect rhythm
00:35 Anxient: 16:51:037 (2) - id pick a slower SV
00:35 Anxient: anxient approves.
00:35 Anxient: actually
00:35 Anxient: wait
00:35 Anxient: 16:08:098 (4,5,6,1) - but this is of equal importance..
00:35 Anxient: 16:08:098 - uhhh just NC this
00:36 Anxient: 17:09:554 (2) - NC
00:37 P A N: but wut about 16:08:442 -
00:37 Anxient: 17:10:538 (1,2,3) - 1/1s are reserved for this
00:37 Anxient: wot
00:37 P A N: wot
00:37 Anxient: uh nvm
00:38 Anxient: 17:27:259 (6) - NC?
00:38 P A N: nvm
00:38 Anxient: coz new pattern
00:38 P A N: hmmmm
00:38 Anxient: 17:31:685 (8) - NC, coz combo exceeds 10 (and hard trigger wwww)
00:38 P A N: uhhhh
00:38 P A N: uuu
00:39 Anxient: 17:35:620 (9) - NC coz clapping!!
00:39 P A N: is that necessary :(
00:39 Anxient: well my NCs are bs so if you feel like you dont need them
00:39 Anxient: dont do anything
00:39 P A N: damn I will reallyNC this clap
00:39 Anxient: 17:37:587 (2) - but what you NEED to do
00:39 Anxient: is ctrl g this
00:39 Anxient: dis spacing
00:39 Anxient: dis emphasis
00:39 P A N: but that's too ez man
00:40 Anxient: 17:37:587 (2) - ww pp map
00:40 Anxient: 17:42:259 -
00:40 Anxient: then try moving to x401 y154
00:40 Anxient: http://puu.sh/uX32L/0c63737fc3.jpg
00:40 P A N: oh well i will cltr+g that
00:41 Anxient: 18:04:882 (2) - just normal slider pls :C
00:41 P A N: but
00:41 P A N: it's CREATIVE
00:41 Anxient: its ugly
00:41 P A N: oh pls
00:41 Anxient: :C
00:42 P A N: that hurts me
00:42 Anxient: ok at least
00:42 Anxient: dont use the jagged slider
00:42 Anxient: idek why its there
00:42 Anxient: http://puu.sh/uX38p/fca48dea9b.jpg go full smooth fam
00:42 Anxient: btw
00:43 Anxient: sbtw
00:43 Anxient: wheres the bg from
00:43 P A N: http://puu.sh/uX3bY/b8e7d274f8.png
00:43 Anxient: o
00:44 Anxient: um
00:44 Anxient: brb
00:44 P A N: WUT
00:44 P A N: and why u ask this
00:44 Anxient: shh
00:44 P A N: oi
00:45 P A N: what are you doing
00:45 P A N: to my
00:45 P A N: ak
00:45 P A N: b
00:45 P A N: 48
00:45 Anxient: photoshopping the site link
00:45 Anxient: that shit is ugly
00:45 Anxient: http://puu.sh/uX3g7/88ab5be446.jpg
00:45 Anxient: nani kore
00:45 Anxient: hidoi desuyo
00:45 P A N: hodoi ne
00:45 P A N: but I
00:45 P A N: fuck photoshop
00:46 P A N: btw I censored the legs
00:46 P A N: so player can concentrate while playing
00:46 P A N: is that a good idea
00:47 Anxient: is it on SB?
00:48 P A N: yea
00:48 Anxient: but i tshould be fine tbh
00:48 Anxient: osu players are only into 2d
00:48 P A N: wew
00:48 P A N: that's sad
00:48 Anxient: unless your name is namirin
00:48 Anxient: www
00:49 P A N: who is namirin la
00:51 Anxient: HIME
00:51 P A N: ah
00:51 P A N: flat breast
00:51 P A N: song
00:51 Anxient: mmhm
00:51 Anxient: a song of justice
00:51 P A N: oi btw
00:52 P A N: what do you think if I make 16:26:076 (1,2) - same like 16:18:747 (1,1) -
00:52 P A N: other part too
00:52 Anxient: no
00:52 P A N: oh no?
00:52 Anxient: different sounds
00:52 Anxient: similar gimmick
00:52 P A N: I see
00:52 Anxient: but altogether different soudns
00:52 P A N: yea
00:53 P A N: that pattern just makes me wet
00:53 P A N: so Im kinda exciited to use it more
00:53 P A N: please poST THIS CAHT SO I CAN GIVE YOU KDS
00:54 Anxient: OK
00:54 Anxient: SEC
00:56 Anxient: fam
00:56 Anxient: is your bg
00:56 Anxient: hardcoded into your SB or something
00:57 Anxient: oops nvm
00:57 P A N: not
00:57 Anxient: 20% opacity on edited layer
00:57 Anxient: LOL
00:57 Anxient: im dumb.
00:57 P A N: XDD
00:57 P A N: but my bubble which come on from bottom
00:57 P A N: is lacking on the left screen
00:57 P A N: idk why
00:58 P A N: i mean left side of screen
00:58 Anxient: im not SB dude
00:58 P A N: oh ok
00:59 P A N: do you know who photoshop bg god
00:59 P A N: ringa something
00:59 Anxient: oook i give up
00:59 Anxient: uhh
00:59 P A N: give up what
00:59 Anxient: http://puu.sh/uX3Yj/5f176dd387.jpg
00:59 Anxient: here
01:00 P A N: oh
01:00 P A N: oh wow
01:01 Anxient: oh
01:01 Anxient: what the fuck
01:01 P A N: wow dude
01:01 Anxient: gimme a sec
01:01 Anxient: im resizing it
01:01 Anxient: http://puu.sh/uX44m/17a8da4f95.jpg
01:01 Anxient: i went to design school for this
01:01 Anxient: #worth
01:02 P A N: LMAO
01:02 P A N: nice
01:03 P A N: do you want me to credit u
01:03 Anxient: mm
01:03 Anxient: up2u tbh
Gaia
wew
15:12 P A N: dude
15:12 P A N: I need help :(
15:13 Gaia: dude
15:13 Gaia: whatssup
15:14 P A N: ummmm
15:14 P A N: eeeee
15:14 P A N: aaaaaaaaa
15:14 P A N: uhhhhh
15:14 P A N: mod my last two songs please
15:15 Gaia: last 2
15:15 Gaia: akb?
15:15 P A N: yea
15:15 P A N: of my perfect compilation
15:15 Gaia: shana compi is ur perfect compilation
15:15 Gaia: link me pls
15:15 P A N: wewww
15:15 *P A N is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1212686 AKB48 - Songs Compilation [Nostalgia48]]
15:15 P A N: yea
15:16 P A N: many favorites
15:16 P A N: im also surprise
15:16 Gaia: wew
15:16 P A N: I mean shana :(
15:16 Gaia: YEA
15:16 Gaia: serment soon(tm
15:16 Gaia: anyways ok
15:16 Gaia: irc ok?
15:17 P A N: umm
15:17 P A N: oo
15:17 Gaia: oo?
15:17 P A N: ook
15:18 Gaia: 15:56:534 (1,1,1) - this polarity sux but idk how to fix it so :p
15:19 P A N: >:(
15:19 P A N: me either
15:19 Gaia: 16:32:259 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - these 1/3 kinda sudden to me
15:19 Gaia: since middle of 1/4 patterns
15:20 Gaia: 16:48:404 (8) - triple after?
15:20 P A N: hmm but
15:20 P A N: I love that
15:21 P A N: and I add NC on every 3 notes
15:21 Gaia: 15:56:839 (1,1) - 16:53:556 (1) - shud be consistent i think
15:21 P A N: hm
15:21 P A N: good point
15:22 Gaia: 17:21:357 - tripleeeee
15:22 Gaia: 17:23:325 - ^
15:22 Gaia: 17:42:751 (3) - put this lower so no overlap?
15:23 Gaia: 17:43:120 - map this too maybe
15:23 Gaia: 17:45:948 (1,2,3) - stack all or manual stack all
15:23 Gaia: 17:46:685 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 17:48:161 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - difference is too big imo
15:24 Gaia: 17:56:152 - circle here too
15:24 Gaia: ok end
15:24 P A N: D:
15:24 Gaia: D:
15:29 Gaia: btw transparent legs http://puu.sh/uXjxH/be60ae0814.jpg
15:29 Gaia: wew
15:30 P A N: well it's orginial bg
15:30 P A N: XD
15:30 P A N: I even censored legs so player can concentrate on playing
15:30 P A N: am I kind
15:30 Gaia: censor leg wot
15:33 P A N: do you open sb
15:33 Gaia: yea
15:33 P A N: yea
15:33 P A N: black bar
15:33 P A N: censoring
15:33 Gaia: oh lol
15:34 P A N: so player can't look at legs while while playing
15:37 P A N: post
15:37 P A N: i give kds
15:37 Gaia: wew
15:37 Gaia: make me bn thx
Topic Starter
P A N
thanks Anxient and Gaia for the mod <3 fixed on Gaia mod about consistency, stack, add note and change pattern.


edit: remove unused SB file monstrata mentioned.
Monstrata
Last two diffs:

15:56:534 (1) - How about positioning this in the center of the triangle? Would look more geometric i think lol. Emphasize with anti jump instead. But just an idea~
16:09:129 (3,4,5) - Really not sure what this rhythm is following. 16:09:358 - the white tick being empty feels really odd, and the next repeat beginning on a blue tick also sounds really odd.
16:10:961 (6,7) - Imo, better to stack here, and move to spaced 1/4 doublets and stuff in the next section since your rhythm becomes a lot denser. It makes better sense to introduce the spaced doublet gameplay element there.

16:24:244 (1,2,3) - These really sound like theyre 1/3... but they're also a bit hard to hear... double check the snapping here or maybe get another opinion if you think theyre 1/4?
17:54:554 (5) - NC'ing here for sliders looks nice. breaks the circle pattern + slider pattern into their own combos which makes sense imo since i don't think the sliders connect with the circles visually.
17:59:964 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This is a pretty mean pattern to put at the end of the map imo xD. I would have just stacked all the doubles, and used the bigger spacing as emphasis. Increasing spacing from the doublet feels kinda evil haha, but I guess its up to you.

just modding the two diffs that were added~,

Rechecking other diffs:

sb\f\77ac.png
sb\f\9593.png
These files seem to be unused still.

05:24:344 (1) - Should be snapped to the red tick.
08:39:178 (1) - This should be snapped to the new red tick.
10:55:734 (1) - Snap to red line.

[]

Okay that's all. Call me back when you're ready!
Topic Starter
P A N

Monstrata wrote:

Last two diffs:

15:56:534 (1) - How about positioning this in the center of the triangle? Would look more geometric i think lol. Emphasize with anti jump instead. But just an idea~ agreed with this idea, last one is kinda weak than other tooooooo..?
16:09:129 (3,4,5) - Really not sure what this rhythm is following. 16:09:358 - the white tick being empty feels really odd, and the next repeat beginning on a blue tick also sounds really odd. add one more reverse per each, I think it sounds fine now o.o
16:10:961 (6,7) - Imo, better to stack here, and move to spaced 1/4 doublets and stuff in the next section since your rhythm becomes a lot denser. It makes better sense to introduce the spaced doublet gameplay element there. agreed, plays better for me too.

16:24:244 (1,2,3) - These really sound like theyre 1/3... but they're also a bit hard to hear... double check the snapping here or maybe get another opinion if you think theyre 1/4? i listen to it again and I think it's 1/6
17:54:554 (5) - NC'ing here for sliders looks nice. breaks the circle pattern + slider pattern into their own combos which makes sense imo since i don't think the sliders connect with the circles visually. agreed
17:59:964 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This is a pretty mean pattern to put at the end of the map imo xD. I would have just stacked all the doubles, and used the bigger spacing as emphasis. Increasing spacing from the doublet feels kinda evil haha, but I guess its up to you. agreed ahaha thanks to take me back from dark side.

just modding the two diffs that were added~,

Rechecking other diffs:

sb\f\77ac.png
sb\f\9593.png
These files seem to be unused still. delete both

05:24:344 (1) - Should be snapped to the red tick.
08:39:178 (1) - This should be snapped to the new red tick.
10:55:734 (1) - Snap to red line. woops, my bad xd

[]

Okay that's all. Call me back when you're ready!
THANK YOU MONSTRATA
-Sh1n1-
16:51:037 (2) - shouldn't this finish at 16:53:327 - ? I also think that it could be cut in 3 or 2 parts, cause caught fruits will stack up on the plate in ctb and can potentially obstruct the player's view, sometimes it causes lag too, just keep in mind and maybe you can reconsider >.< anyways good map as always, Good Luck :)

Topic Starter
P A N

-Sh1n1- wrote:

16:51:037 (2) - shouldn't this finish at 16:53:327 - ? I also think that it could be cut in 3 or 2 parts, cause caught fruits will stack up on the plate in ctb and can potentially obstruct the player's view, sometimes it causes lag too, just keep in mind and maybe you can reconsider >.< anyways good map as always, Good Luck :)

I fixed the first one, but the second one is ummm it's really fit with only one slider imo x_x, thanks for mod :D
Monstrata
We worked out some issues with storyboard load. Should be fine now! Bubbled~
Topic Starter
P A N

Monstrata wrote:

We worked out some issues with storyboard load. Should be fine now! Bubbled~
thanks a lot monstrata!
Pachiru
Congratulations PAN :3
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply