hello ~ from my mod queue
[General]
offset+4 on all redlines
01:37:259 - this piano timing somehow feels wrong bpm?? especially in elvcho's since its the only diff that mapped this part , might need to revise the timing here
Yuki Takao , タカオユキ to tags (singer name)
[Professional collab with Box]
01:07:259 (6) - divide them into 2 slider like you did at 02:14:841 (6,7) -
02:22:753 (3) - end this at white previous white tick? because of vocal
03:20:775 (1) - i think delete and ad a 1/2 slider at 03:21:104 -
03:30:005 (1) - delete this and nc 03:30:335 (2) -
[Kibb collab with leru]
01:46:324 (4) - maybe delete this? fits with the vocal
01:51:599 (5,1) - i think it should be like this ?
02:16:489 (3) - maybe straight movement? since the previous slider is rigid ,it fits the flow
03:18:632 (2,3) -
fits better i think!
03:47:643 (2,3) - wonder why u stacked these but not 03:52:918 (3,4) - ?
[Insane]
00:21:682 (6) - maybe delete?
00:32:973 (2,3) - since this stack is 1/2 , better make 00:34:622 (4,1) - as overlap , or add the 1/2
00:41:545 (1,2) - distance too low..
00:51:105 (2,4) - not perfect stack
00:54:731 (1,2) - this overlap , make them consistent ds please , with 00:56:050 (1,2) - and 01:00:006 (1,2) - and so on~ also check on your other kiais as well
01:15:501 (2) - start on previous red tick
01:55:390 (5,1) - avoid minor overlap?
02:39:896 (3) - nc this for consistency
02:56:050 (3) - move it to x372|y100
03:44:181 (2) - same as mentioned earlier
[Elvcho]
00:04:622 (3) - maybe delete this object since you were mapping piano out of this part would make it more consistent
00:34:704 (6) - cant hear this sound ..
00:37:341 (6) - same ^
00:39:567 (1) - end this on previous white tick is better imo.. since the vocal stops there , didnt get the intention of extending this slider
00:53:001 (4,1) - hmm this stack could be confusing
01:30:171 - add a circle here? since you follow vocal starting this part
01:51:105 (1) - try this http://puu.sh/s3HGy.jpg
02:26:819 (4) - slider should end at white tick
02:29:456 (4) - same
02:32:094 (4) - ^
02:59:017 (1,2,1,2,1) - 1/3
03:28:687 (1) - why stack this..
[toybot]
00:00:666 (3) - nc this for instrument consistency??
00:14:841 (5) - i feel this should be further away from 4 and closer to 1 because the vocal here is kinda strong , would help to emphasis it better imo
00:19:786 (4,5) - maybe do overlaps here? to be consistent with 00:17:314 (4,5) - or either way is fine too~
00:21:765 (5) - better make this a 1/2 slider i think .. the gap with the next slider spacing could be misleading somehow , recommended a low sv slider would make it nice
00:25:226 (5) - ctrl g? it has the same vibe as 00:24:072 (6) - imo
00:27:534 (4) - move this up a little so it has the same spacing as 00:28:028 (6,1) -
00:32:644 (2,3) - somehow this kind of antijump feels better with overlaps but that is subjective i guess.
00:36:600 (3) - o? is this a mistake or intentional.. since you were constantly do 1/1 beats on this section and suddenly feel out of pace
00:50:281 (4,5) - imo this should be equal strength with 00:48:468 (2,3) - so maybe increase some spacing??
01:22:094 (1) - i think this nc is unnecessary ?
01:28:687 (3) - this is fine but i think circle is better? looks more consistent too!
02:09:896 (6,1) - distance out a little to avoid minor overlap
02:15:006 (4) - hmm feels better with a littler larger jumps i think.. since the vocal strengh is the same..
02:22:423 (1,2) - make the same distance as the next one?? could be confusing imo since its 1/3
02:45:171 (4,5) - stack? or the otherwise on 2 and 3
02:59:456 (3,4,1) - why dont you make overlaps like 02:58:852 (2,3,1) - ? isnt it the same?
coool
sorry for lots of question =O,im a curious mapper and i wanted to understand your map so please reply me with detail (if possible) so i can improve my understanding)towards your future maps/gd!
[Goodbye]
00:00:666 (3) - nc for instrument consistency
00:14:347 - maybe add a circle here?? since the gap kills a little vibe around this part since you didnt skip beat at 00:16:984 (2) -
00:32:314 (1) - ok here to 00:38:907 (1) - im kinda confuse your way of using nc its either vocal or instrument(??)
its better to follow up either vocal or instrument instead of new measure nc to fit the section more ( example should be nc for instrument 00:33:138 (4) - ,00:35:775 (5) - ) for vocals 00:33:468 (6) - 00:36:105 (7) -
00:46:655 (6,1,2) - hmm suggestion to fit the instrument while doing the vocal https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6470096
if you dont understand feel free to pm me in game i can explain further~ because im bad at explaining in post mod..
00:54:237 (5,6,7) - strongly recommend you follow vocal here instead would be more consistent , this play fine but the transition feels a little off i think.
00:57:204 (8,1) - change position , 00:57:204 (8) - here fits a slider more because of vocal , 00:57:534 - and here starts a 1/2 vocal which circle fits too!
01:04:457 (3,4) - same as mention above
01:05:281 (1,1) - o even with the nc the spacing feel a bit low here , if you want to make it very low make them overlap i guess??
01:13:852 (2,3) - ahh this feel kinda random since you didnt do any of these around this part.. unlike in toybot's diff he uses this regularly , a simple suggestion is to switch this to 1 reverse slider or just triple~
01:25:061 - why dont you map this beat out??
01:25:308 (2) - not sure if it just me , but i didnt hear any 1/4 sound here ;;
02:00:830 (5) - nc
02:01:819 (6) - i think this should be at 02:01:654 - and the 1/4 starts at 02:01:819 -
02:20:940 (1) - remove nc??
02:40:720 (2,3,4) - this feel too drag.. since its so large than the rest .. imo 02:41:214 (5,6,7) - this should be larger since the jump sound is dramatically increase intensity
02:46:819 (4,1) - this flow is kinda awkward i think..maybe try http://puu.sh/s3GJj.jpg
02:59:264 (2,2) - 1/3
03:34:621 (1) - not necessary to nc
03:35:940 (1) - same as above
03:37:258 (1) - ^
03:38:577 (1) - ^
and ncs around these part..
03:44:016 - 1/4 should start here~
03:44:841 (2) - distance this out away from (3) so it has same distance with 03:46:159 (2,3) -
03:51:434 (2,3) - refer 03:50:115 (2,3) - spacing
03:58:687 (4) - the violin sound doesnt fit with stack imo.. make a little movement here instead??
the way it play is very nice but some minor inconsistency here and there which i think could be polish more
nice song and map
good luck!!
[General]
offset+4 on all redlines
01:37:259 - this piano timing somehow feels wrong bpm?? especially in elvcho's since its the only diff that mapped this part , might need to revise the timing here
Yuki Takao , タカオユキ to tags (singer name)
[Professional collab with Box]
01:07:259 (6) - divide them into 2 slider like you did at 02:14:841 (6,7) -
02:22:753 (3) - end this at white previous white tick? because of vocal
03:20:775 (1) - i think delete and ad a 1/2 slider at 03:21:104 -
03:30:005 (1) - delete this and nc 03:30:335 (2) -
[Kibb collab with leru]
01:46:324 (4) - maybe delete this? fits with the vocal
01:51:599 (5,1) - i think it should be like this ?
02:16:489 (3) - maybe straight movement? since the previous slider is rigid ,it fits the flow
03:18:632 (2,3) -
fits better i think!
03:47:643 (2,3) - wonder why u stacked these but not 03:52:918 (3,4) - ?
[Insane]
00:21:682 (6) - maybe delete?
00:32:973 (2,3) - since this stack is 1/2 , better make 00:34:622 (4,1) - as overlap , or add the 1/2
00:41:545 (1,2) - distance too low..
00:51:105 (2,4) - not perfect stack
00:54:731 (1,2) - this overlap , make them consistent ds please , with 00:56:050 (1,2) - and 01:00:006 (1,2) - and so on~ also check on your other kiais as well
01:15:501 (2) - start on previous red tick
01:55:390 (5,1) - avoid minor overlap?
02:39:896 (3) - nc this for consistency
02:56:050 (3) - move it to x372|y100
03:44:181 (2) - same as mentioned earlier
[Elvcho]
00:04:622 (3) - maybe delete this object since you were mapping piano out of this part would make it more consistent
00:34:704 (6) - cant hear this sound ..
00:37:341 (6) - same ^
00:39:567 (1) - end this on previous white tick is better imo.. since the vocal stops there , didnt get the intention of extending this slider
00:53:001 (4,1) - hmm this stack could be confusing
01:30:171 - add a circle here? since you follow vocal starting this part
01:51:105 (1) - try this http://puu.sh/s3HGy.jpg
02:26:819 (4) - slider should end at white tick
02:29:456 (4) - same
02:32:094 (4) - ^
02:59:017 (1,2,1,2,1) - 1/3
03:28:687 (1) - why stack this..
[toybot]
00:00:666 (3) - nc this for instrument consistency??
00:14:841 (5) - i feel this should be further away from 4 and closer to 1 because the vocal here is kinda strong , would help to emphasis it better imo
00:19:786 (4,5) - maybe do overlaps here? to be consistent with 00:17:314 (4,5) - or either way is fine too~
00:21:765 (5) - better make this a 1/2 slider i think .. the gap with the next slider spacing could be misleading somehow , recommended a low sv slider would make it nice
00:25:226 (5) - ctrl g? it has the same vibe as 00:24:072 (6) - imo
00:27:534 (4) - move this up a little so it has the same spacing as 00:28:028 (6,1) -
00:32:644 (2,3) - somehow this kind of antijump feels better with overlaps but that is subjective i guess.
00:36:600 (3) - o? is this a mistake or intentional.. since you were constantly do 1/1 beats on this section and suddenly feel out of pace
00:50:281 (4,5) - imo this should be equal strength with 00:48:468 (2,3) - so maybe increase some spacing??
01:22:094 (1) - i think this nc is unnecessary ?
01:28:687 (3) - this is fine but i think circle is better? looks more consistent too!
02:09:896 (6,1) - distance out a little to avoid minor overlap
02:15:006 (4) - hmm feels better with a littler larger jumps i think.. since the vocal strengh is the same..
02:22:423 (1,2) - make the same distance as the next one?? could be confusing imo since its 1/3
02:45:171 (4,5) - stack? or the otherwise on 2 and 3
02:59:456 (3,4,1) - why dont you make overlaps like 02:58:852 (2,3,1) - ? isnt it the same?
coool
sorry for lots of question =O,im a curious mapper and i wanted to understand your map so please reply me with detail (if possible) so i can improve my understanding)towards your future maps/gd!
[Goodbye]
00:00:666 (3) - nc for instrument consistency
00:14:347 - maybe add a circle here?? since the gap kills a little vibe around this part since you didnt skip beat at 00:16:984 (2) -
00:32:314 (1) - ok here to 00:38:907 (1) - im kinda confuse your way of using nc its either vocal or instrument(??)
its better to follow up either vocal or instrument instead of new measure nc to fit the section more ( example should be nc for instrument 00:33:138 (4) - ,00:35:775 (5) - ) for vocals 00:33:468 (6) - 00:36:105 (7) -
00:46:655 (6,1,2) - hmm suggestion to fit the instrument while doing the vocal https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6470096
if you dont understand feel free to pm me in game i can explain further~ because im bad at explaining in post mod..
00:54:237 (5,6,7) - strongly recommend you follow vocal here instead would be more consistent , this play fine but the transition feels a little off i think.
00:57:204 (8,1) - change position , 00:57:204 (8) - here fits a slider more because of vocal , 00:57:534 - and here starts a 1/2 vocal which circle fits too!
01:04:457 (3,4) - same as mention above
01:05:281 (1,1) - o even with the nc the spacing feel a bit low here , if you want to make it very low make them overlap i guess??
01:13:852 (2,3) - ahh this feel kinda random since you didnt do any of these around this part.. unlike in toybot's diff he uses this regularly , a simple suggestion is to switch this to 1 reverse slider or just triple~
01:25:061 - why dont you map this beat out??
01:25:308 (2) - not sure if it just me , but i didnt hear any 1/4 sound here ;;
02:00:830 (5) - nc
02:01:819 (6) - i think this should be at 02:01:654 - and the 1/4 starts at 02:01:819 -
02:20:940 (1) - remove nc??
02:40:720 (2,3,4) - this feel too drag.. since its so large than the rest .. imo 02:41:214 (5,6,7) - this should be larger since the jump sound is dramatically increase intensity
02:46:819 (4,1) - this flow is kinda awkward i think..maybe try http://puu.sh/s3GJj.jpg
02:59:264 (2,2) - 1/3
03:34:621 (1) - not necessary to nc
03:35:940 (1) - same as above
03:37:258 (1) - ^
03:38:577 (1) - ^
and ncs around these part..
03:44:016 - 1/4 should start here~
03:44:841 (2) - distance this out away from (3) so it has same distance with 03:46:159 (2,3) -
03:51:434 (2,3) - refer 03:50:115 (2,3) - spacing
03:58:687 (4) - the violin sound doesnt fit with stack imo.. make a little movement here instead??
the way it play is very nice but some minor inconsistency here and there which i think could be polish more
nice song and map
good luck!!