Hi! M4M from my queue o/
I'm a bit later than I said I would be, sorry about that ;;.
Mod in return however much you think is fair since my set is signifcantly longer in drain time owo;
[General]
Name every diff Easy! Normal! Advanced! Hard! to match with the title name and the final diff plz thx
(the above is half a joke but I think it'd be neat)
[Normal]
I think the intro could benefit from having the rhythms of 00:00:255 (1,2,3) - and 00:01:922 (1,2) - switched.
This is primarily because I feel like 00:01:505 - is a weaker note than 00:03:172 - is, especially when former is compared to the piano note 00:01:713 - right after it being a bit stronger, so it feels awkward to click at 00:01:505 but not 00:01:713 - .
The same goes for: 00:13:592 (1,2,3,1,2) - , 00:28:598 (1,2,3,1,2) - , 00:35:267 (1,2,3,1,2) -
Give that a try and see what you think
But since that's just an idea I'll mod the rest of the diff under the assumption you don't make that change (woo)
[Advanced]
Generally, I found this difficulty's rhythms to be far more fitting to the song itself than the ones in Normal, despite not being too-much-more intense. Is very nice >:3
This diff has quite a lot of style! I like it a lot!
[Polka's Another]
Hi Polka~
Dang this is a lot harder than SR would make you think.. wowza.
Overall a super cool mapset!!! Best of luck with this good luck and have a nice day !
I'm a bit later than I said I would be, sorry about that ;;.
Mod in return however much you think is fair since my set is signifcantly longer in drain time owo;
[General]
(the above is half a joke but I think it'd be neat)
- 00:25:263 - Random hitsounding idea: Adding a normal whistle to this bar, because there's an actual whistle in the song here (albeit fairly quiet)
- 00:08:591 (3) - Possibly move this to the left a bit, (x:412) so that it is more vertically symmetrical with the end of 00:06:923 (1) - ?
- 00:11:925 (3) - I think it could be better for this slider to have only one red anchor instead of 2, since the rhythm it's following isn't much different from 00:12:759 (4) - .
- 00:13:592 (1) - Consider adding a finish here, as the guitar strum is just as forceful as it was at 00:06:923 -
- 00:21:929 (1) - Maybe move up a bit so that 00:21:929 (1,2,3) - can be a single wave fwoosh instead of the currently slightly not.
- 00:30:265 (3) - Perhaps adjust this slider a bit to head straight into 00:31:515 (4) - aye
[Normal]
I think the intro could benefit from having the rhythms of 00:00:255 (1,2,3) - and 00:01:922 (1,2) - switched.
This is primarily because I feel like 00:01:505 - is a weaker note than 00:03:172 - is, especially when former is compared to the piano note 00:01:713 - right after it being a bit stronger, so it feels awkward to click at 00:01:505 but not 00:01:713 - .
The same goes for: 00:13:592 (1,2,3,1,2) - , 00:28:598 (1,2,3,1,2) - , 00:35:267 (1,2,3,1,2) -
Give that a try and see what you think
But since that's just an idea I'll mod the rest of the diff under the assumption you don't make that change (woo)
- 00:01:922 (1) - Possibly curve this more to match better with the angle for 00:00:255 (1) - .
- 00:06:923 (1,2,3) - This angle feels rather small compared to the majority of patterns in this difficulty. Maybe move 00:06:090 (2,3) - to the right some and arrange like so to open it up a bit more.
- 00:09:424 (2) - Maybe rotate this like -14 degrees so that 00:08:591 (1,2) - can be symmetrical around this line (science)
- 00:17:552 (2) - Maybe reconsider the rhythm in this area, this is really weird to click to when there isn't really a sound here but at the blue tick afterwords ;; ( 00:17:656 ) and it's also different from how most of the similar patterns were mapped, making it additionally harder to follow.
- 00:26:097 (3) - Is that middle anchor supposed to be curving this slider?? cause it appears to be straight.. ?
- 00:41:936 (1,2,3) - Why isn't the rhythm here like, say, 00:06:923 (1,2,3) - ? They have the same high pitched bopping going on. The rhythm you have here is ignoring the sound at 00:42:769 - which you had mapped in the previous similar parts of the song.
[Advanced]
Generally, I found this difficulty's rhythms to be far more fitting to the song itself than the ones in Normal, despite not being too-much-more intense. Is very nice >:3
- 00:15:260 (1) - Move the tail end to the left a bit, since currently 00:15:885 (2,3) - make a straighter line then 00:15:260 (1,2) - does.
- 00:16:093 (3) - For even straighter lines maybe move the end of 3 down here too. yay
- 00:10:258 (1,2,3,4) - I think a rhythm like you did here: 00:06:923 (1,2,3,4) - with the 1/1 slider right at the start could be potentially more fitting.
- 00:11:925 (1) - The flow right here was pretty weird to p- no, wait, forget that, this goes offscreen in 4:3! potential non-offscreen positioning idea
- 00:18:594 (1) - Maybe remove the first white anchor point so that the start can be straight like it was for 00:11:925 (1,3) - these two.
- 00:41:936 (1) - Consider moving this to the right some so that it makes a nice smiley face with 00:41:727 (5,2) - . (but also so that it looks more even and flows into 2 better)
This diff has quite a lot of style! I like it a lot!
- 00:02:964 (5) - I'd consider spacing this one as well, since it starts the same group of three piano notes that 00:03:172 (6,7) - are a part of. The same goes for when this pattern repeats.
- 00:18:594 (1) - This reverse slider is fairly misleading to read, as it repeats twice instead of once without an obvious differnece in the music like how there were heavier drums at 00:05:673 (4) - or the weirder piano that was at 00:21:929 (1) - to account for the difference. Maybe have this repeat just once instead.
- 00:23:596 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - For this bar, consider a rhythm like this instead so that you'd be clicking on the high piano notes instead of ending sliders on them: Either that or make it similar to how you did 00:26:930 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - .
[Polka's Another]
Hi Polka~
- 00:22:658 (7) - In my opinion, this note isn't as strong as 00:22:033 (2) - and I think removing it could help emphasize the difference between 00:21:929 (1,2,3,4,5) - and 00:22:554 (6,7,8,9,10) - .
- 00:26:514 (6) - 00:26:722 (7) - consider applying ctrl+g to each of these invidually, I think it'd make for some quite nice flow. whee (in the image it looks a little chaotic but I hope it gets my point across that this would potentially be really nice) the way it currently is, for comparison. No loopity-loops here ;.;
Dang this is a lot harder than SR would make you think.. wowza.
- 00:28:598 (1,2) - not stacked perfectly vrrr
- 00:30:265 (1,2) - vrr
- 00:36:934 (1,2) - vrr
Overall a super cool mapset!!! Best of luck with this good luck and have a nice day !