[Niamh]
Good luck with that then~
- 00:14:345 (4,5,6,7,1) - Would be nice if you can give a rotated flow on this like 00:05:617 (2,3,4,1) - 00:22:708 (2,3,4,5,1) .
- 01:17:617 (4,5,6) - 02:44:890 (4,5,6) - Not necessarily needs to be a triangle imo cuz these are unlike 01:16:526 (1,2,3) - 01:26:345 (4,5,6) - etc where those triangles reflected the main instrument.
- 01:25:072 (8) - Not really a fan of the placement here, it forced a linear(well not completely but almost) flow on 01:24:890 (7,8,1) . Also the way you spaced things there should be more consistent with 02:52:345 (8) .
- 01:41:254 (3,4) - Was expecting a more consistent(smaller) spacing on this according to your spacing concept in this section, like what you did with 01:32:526 (3,4) .
- 02:15:435 (1,2,3) - Doesn't look really appealing(at least to me) because you used different shapes on 02:15:799 (2,3) which kinda kills the symmetry/equality or whatever you're trying to do here compared to the others. Same applies to 03:42:708 (1,2,3) - 05:09:981 (1,2,3) .
- 04:01:254 (3,4) - 04:02:345 (1,2,3) - Use the same rhythm on these places? The way main instrument played is kinda similar on these places imo
- 04:14:708 (4,5,6) - Better use same/consistent spacing on these circles, kinda hard to read these circles as the same beat spacing considering how you spaced 04:13:254 (1,2,3) which is the same sound.
- 04:16:163 (3,4) - Was expecting a bigger spacing compared to how you spaced 04:07:435 (2,3) - 04:11:799 (2,3) - 04:20:526 (3,4) which are pretty much similar.
- 04:30:435 - 04:39:163 - Map both of these or not at all for consistency?
Good luck with that then~