I'd like to see voting rounds with some sort of theme, e.g. rabbit jumps, 3/3 time, high bpm, low AR, etc.
Can't wait to see how else maps get loved too.
Can't wait to see how else maps get loved too.
[Toy] wrote:
It's probably one of the greatest additions to this game ever. The only thing it's lacking is just more maps. Like the community voting is cool, and it makes loved maps special and high quality, but it just feels too slow and there's very little choice for the community really. Like there's a very feigned sense of community interaction considering staff still chooses what we vote on. It's a fake choice.
I love just having more and more maps being accessible and with leaderboards so I personally would love a more streamlined process of getting maps consistently into the category, but also keeping the level of quality and discretion with what actually gets through.
Also I personally just don't enjoy flooding the category with nearly unplayable 9*+ shit even if those maps are extremely popular. Some are good but preferably I think it's best to stay away from them simply because a lot of them are simply not mapped well but yet the majority of people will vote for it because they wanna see it with a leaderboard. Variety is key, and I think there's been a good job of that, I'm just greedy and want more of everything
Holy, that´s a great idea...Xyrus wrote:
I'd like to see voting rounds with some sort of theme, e.g. rabbit jumps, 3/3 time, high bpm, low AR, etc.
Can't wait to see how else maps get loved too.
You seriously did that.Saturnalize wrote:
Love
What happened to every week lol x_xblahpy wrote:
I think it's a really good thing but I feel like the votes aren't often enough at the moment? The last one was a month from the previous one...
+1 it takes too long timeFireMelter wrote:
Still waiting for Vote nr.4 ... thats the only thing you need to change :/
FireMelter wrote:
Still waiting for Vote nr.4 ... thats the only thing you need to change :/
plus, i disagree with the fact hard maps in the loved state is a bad thing, there's already tons of easy maps ranked and a lot of experimental/gimmick/hard maps which cannot reach the ranked status, so it makes me pretty sad when stuff with the qualifications of a ranked map go to a loved state instead...blahpy wrote:
I think it's a really good thing but I feel like the votes aren't often enough at the moment? The last one was a month from the previous one...
I agree with willia, there should be more conditions to have the map into loved sections, because some maps are in Loved and they are not really good. But that's just my opinion.willia02 wrote:
I think loved maps need more filter, so the map who loved can be fun to play. (Quality over quantity)
Is not a big deal. AFAIK to apply for loved maps need a certain amount of favourites and stars, so favourite the map to support itSayoriKirigaya wrote:
It was cool until the changed the loved system by removing the community voting. (RIP fun maps)
Yes, I agree with S v p e r. Loved maps with favourite system are most likely to have a good quality and almost everyone like to play it. For example, if a player who like playing a map frequently, he/she will add it to his/her favourite list. Thus, loved maps aren't based on one time vote but on continuous vote.S v p e r wrote:
Is not a big deal. AFAIK to apply for loved maps need a certain amount of favourites and stars, so favourite the map to support itSayoriKirigaya wrote:
It was cool until the changed the loved system by removing the community voting. (RIP fun maps)