Mako Sakata wrote:

I thoought it was Krimek's lol, here have a star Beom

Spork Lover wrote:

rank plz beom <3 <3 <3

1. Image dimensions
2. Unused hitsounds
3. Unused files
4. Epilepsy warning

Spork Lover wrote:

rank plz beom <3 <3 <3

Lama Poluna wrote:

Spork Lover wrote:

rank plz beom <3 <3 <3

Chaoslitz wrote:

M4M with Len (He said he will use his ticket in this map.)

[Basic]

1. 01:04:188 (2) - I think it is better to follow 01:00:074 (2) as the music is repeating, players may not notice the 1/1 reverse slider is actually following another channel - yes

[Medium]

1. 01:02:131 (3,4,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - Can you simply this combo a bit? It is too long and there is no 1/1 interval for players to rest - tried my best

[Hard]

1. 00:01:102 (1,1) - I know it is minor but yea the blanket lol, too noticeable - agree

[Special]

1. 00:38:131 (4,1) - 00:47:388 (4,1) - 00:51:502 (4,1) - 00:54:588 (3,1) - Oh no please this should be stacked like what you have done in every 1/3 patterns in this section, they are way too different but expressing the same thing - I do not want to stack everything. so I created one logic. 00:38:245 (1) - This is very strange when stacked and I have no idea srsly. so I just reduced the distance(decrease). I think it's fine because it's obviously different with other notes. (cuz 00:38:045 (3) - ) and 00:43:388 (1) - reduced(increase) it too. Now The first part uses the stack for the most part, and the second part uses the increase distance. I think it should be okay. (hopefully D;)

call be back once you fixed the modddd

Chaoslitz wrote:

recheck

[Basic]

1. 01:04:188 (1) - Del NC sorry lol

[Special]

1. yea I know it is different in two parts, but can you at least decrease ds for a bit for those patterns, their difference is now too big, - I reduced the distance(00:47:502 (1) - 00:51:617 (1) - ). You can think of this as a very small change. But This is the greatest agreement point I can think of right now tbh. I hope you agree with this. However, if you have any other thoughts or solutions, please let me know. some of them even misleading like 00:38:045 (3,4,1), normally you stacked 1/6 patterns but you stacked 1/4 here - actually this was quite difficult point to understand. I changed 1/6 rhythms to manual stack. I'm not good at speaking English, so please see for yourself. 00:35:045 (1,2) - 00:30:931 (1,2) - 00:35:045 (1,2) - I thought you pointed this out.

sahuang wrote:

Gratz

Enon wrote:

no no no

Spork Lover wrote:

OMG I DIDN'T EVEN SEE THAT YOU RANKED IT AAA GRATZ