1. Advanced (2.83 stars, 198 notes)
2. Easy (1.8 stars, 103 notes)
3. Extreme (6.23 stars, 512 notes)
4. Hard (3.35 stars, 284 notes)
5. Normal (2.48 stars, 151 notes)
6. P o M u T a's Extra (5.63 stars, 473 notes)
7. toybot's Insane (4.42 stars, 458 notes)
8. Ultra (6.81 stars, 508 notes)

Mazziv wrote:

can i g d? xd

Priti wrote:

Mazziv wrote:

can i g d? xd

i guess...

Lina Sintyadewi wrote:

Can I Make For Mania Diff Priti?

Rapthorn wrote:

Um can we get od 9.7 or smth on highest diff to avoid notelocking? 9.7 would get rid of all notelocking on jumps as long as you hit a 300.

idk

Rixia Mao wrote:

the new kiai part LOOLLL

Priti wrote:

Rixia Mao wrote:

the new kiai part LOOLLL

ayy

Lama Poluna wrote:

RETURN OLD KIAI

pls............

why

P o M u T a wrote:

Lama Poluna wrote:

RETURN OLD KIAI

pls............

why

But you don't play osu! Lmao

Bubblun wrote:

From #modreqs

Extra
00:37:765 (1,2,1,2) - Why the sharp turn for such a tight pattern? Could you ctrl+g the second pair so it plays better? I want keep flow this.
01:17:696 (6,1) - The only time you give the player a sharp movement. This part doesn't seem any different from the rest of the Kiai, so I suggest changing this part a bit. What you could do is make 01:17:489 (5,6) - horizontal sliders, and then ctrl+g the second one and move it so it shares similar distance, but plays better into the upcoming stream. I'll be honest, I tried finding options myself, but I couldn't think of anything better because of how compact in the corner this pattern was. So this could just be me. You decide. no problem part i believe.
01:22:869 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Considering the distance, these look a lot like the 1/8 streams. Could these streams have more spacing? this part 4stream continue.. small spacing is playable and fit. i think people not confuse.

1. 00:59:696 (1) - This slider feels a bit out of place. To represent this sound you've used sliders with lots of red anchor points and sharp shapes, but then there is this basic loop slider. I'd change it to something a bit more fitting.
2. 01:09:214 (5) - You should map to this 1/8 to better represent the music. One way you could do this without inflating the difficulty is by using by using a 1/8 repeat slider. Same suggestion goes for 01:38:179 (5) - .
3. 01:17:489 (5) - Add a clap at the head of this slider to keep your hitsounds consistent.

1. 00:08:800 (4,5,6,7) - This set of 1/4 doesn't feel that structured to me. Maybe you could move (6) to somewhere like x:368 y:360. This way we have the pattern of a double note increasing in spacing and rotating slightly.
2. 00:22:455 (6,7) - I would make this into a partial stack. As it is right now, it can be slightly hard to read due to being completely hidden, as well as feeling out of place with the general aesthetic of the map.
3. 00:58:869 (1,2,3,4,5) - I'd curve this stream as well because in this part of the map; it is the only stream that's not curved, which is inconsistent.

1. 00:32:179 (4,1,2,3,4,5) - I feel like a sharper angle would make this stream entry feel smoother, so you should make the start of the stream stacked under 00:31:869 (2) - instead. The sharper angle and increased spacing will also help emphasise the strong sound here.
2. 00:42:111 (4,5,1) - To add more emphasis to the last two sounds here, you should get rid of (5) and have the slider start where that previously was, like this. I feel that this is better because it's more important to emphasise the strong sounds in the music. In your case, having a simple triplet over it doesn't do much for emphasis
3. 01:03:007 (1,2,3) - I feel like you should change the shape of these sliders to be more consistent with the overall aesthetic of your map, as I think you can make them a bit more "chaotic". Here are some example designs that I think would fit well: 1, 2, 3
4. 01:17:489 (4) - Add a clap at the head of this slider to keep your hitsounds consistent.
5. 01:29:076 (7,8) - You should change this rhythm to be consistent with the rhythm at 01:22:455 (7) - . Doing this will help emphasise the sound more and make it distinct from all the other 1/4 slider pairs.
6. 01:34:455 (1) - Perhaps it would flow better if you moved this note to say, x:160 y:16. That way it would comply with the motion from the sliders before it (01:33:214 (1,2,1,2) - ) and be smoother to play.

1. 00:42:110 (4,5,1) - Like in extreme, maybe you could emphasise the last two sounds better by placing a 1/8 slider at (4), and having (1) start 1/4 of a beat earlier, like this.
2. 01:17:489 (1) - Add a clap on this circle to keep your hitsounds consistent.
3. 01:25:559 (1,2,1,2) - I would space these out so that they're not overlapping the stream at 01:25:973 (1,2,3) - , I feel that it'll look nicer that way. At the moment it feels a bit cramped. Same suggestion goes for 01:38:800 (1,2,1,2) -
4. 01:33:214 (1) - Moving this down a bit (somewhere like x:288 y:340. Adjust the rest of the stream so it looks nice again) would flow better since the player can keep their fluid motion following the stream.
5. 01:35:903 (5,1) - Likewise, I feel that it'll also flow better if the note after (5) started at somewhere like x:392 y:280. This would allow the player to keep their circular flow, and slider leniency would prevent them from missing the tail of (5).

-Faded- wrote:

Hey, m4m as requested

[P o M u T a's Extra]

1. 00:08:800 (4,5,6,7) - This set of 1/4 doesn't feel that structured to me. Maybe you could move (6) to somewhere like x:368 y:360. This way we have the pattern of a double note increasing in spacing and rotating slightly. I tried testplay, i want to keep because playable and step method this part.
2. 00:22:455 (6,7) - I would make this into a partial stack. As it is right now, it can be slightly hard to read due to being completely hidden, as well as feeling out of place with the general aesthetic of the map. this map slow SV, not hard to read this pattern imo. but, Let's see how it goes.
3. 00:58:869 (1,2,3,4,5) - I'd curve this stream as well because in this part of the map; it is the only stream that's not curved, which is inconsistent. Don't I think it a bad thing becasue many pattern born fun.

This is a very nice map, just as I would expect from you guys. It goes with the music well and I like the concept behind the Ultra difficulty (spaced streams!). There are just a few problems with flow, rhythm and aesthetics that I've highlighted in my mod. Good luck!

-Faded- wrote:

Hey, m4m as requested

[Extreme]

1. 01:29:076 (7,8) - You should change this rhythm to be consistent with the rhythm at 01:22:455 (7) - . Doing this will help emphasise the sound more and make it distinct from all the other 1/4 slider pairs. There is a crash on the second one, which is why it's different, Keeping this as it is.

[Ultra]

1. 00:42:110 (4,5,1) - Like in extreme, maybe you could emphasise the last two sounds better by placing a 1/8 slider at (4), and having (1) start 1/4 of a beat earlier, like this. I can't understand the reasoning behind this suggestion, it seems completely overmapped and unneeded to me.
2. 01:25:559 (1,2,1,2) - I would space these out so that they're not overlapping the stream at 01:25:973 (1,2,3) - , I feel that it'll look nicer that way. At the moment it feels a bit cramped. Same suggestion goes for 01:38:800 (1,2,1,2) - Originally they didn't overlap, but then I saw that 95% of playtests didn't manage to hit that because of the spacing, lowering the spacing made it much more playable and in my opinion cooler.
3. 01:35:903 (5,1) - Likewise, I feel that it'll also flow better if the note after (5) started at somewhere like x:392 y:280. This would allow the player to keep their circular flow, and slider leniency would prevent them from missing the tail of (5). Due to the nature of slider leniency, This doesn't prove as an issue at all

This is a very nice map, just as I would expect from you guys. It goes with the music well and I like the concept behind the Ultra difficulty (spaced streams!). There are just a few problems with flow, rhythm and aesthetics that I've highlighted in my mod. Good luck!