No answer = FixedSonnyc wrote:
General.
00:02:074 ~ 00:15:869 - I'm pretty sure you've forgot to add claps in this section. If it was intended, I recommend you adding since the music has got upbeat drums while none are hitsounded at all. ReHitsounded the whole thing, i think, it needs another one check now
Easy.
00:06:453 (2,3,4) - (3,4) is a blanket, but (2,3)'s placement is a bit questionable. If (3,4) was a blanket afterall, why not making (2,3) a blanket too? The current placement feels a bit less organized.
00:33:606 (4) - The combo felt a bit getting long. Consider adding a new combo here.
00:43:679 (5) - The finish felt way too spammed, and being spammed kinda lose its emphasis effect. This feels less intensed compared to other spots, and I recommend you to remove finish here.
00:49:373 - Remove finish.
00:51:125 (1,2) - Take a look at the slider bodies. You'll feel the bodies are a bit closer than the spacing of (1)'s tail and (2)'s head. Having equally spaced will make things visually stable. As something you've done at 00:54:628 (1,2,3).
01:03:825 (4) - Why is this having a linear slider, while most sliders in the kiai section were a curve? I don't think this fit the structure of your kiai.
01:17:183 - There is a notable vocal here. I think you could've expressed this with a 1/2 slider as you've done at 01:21:782 (4).
Normal.
00:05:577 (6,1) - According to the stanza, starting the new combo from (6) feels more natural along the music.
00:06:672 (4,5) - The slider ends overlapping each other didn't felt nice in visual.
00:07:110 (5) - Since this is using a distinct pattern from the previous one, and since the combo has got a little long, consider adding nc here. Overall, the combo feels a long in this difficulty. Dividing every new stanza would work better imo.
00:43:679 (6) - Add clap, and remove finish.
00:49:373 - Remove finish.
00:57:694 (4,1) - Due to the ar being 5, I'm not sure about having such placement. So before clicking (4), the following (1) is already visible and since its path is heading (4), (1) and (4) feels pretty much close in visual. Replaced 4 on the end of 2, but not sure if this plays better than previous variant
00:58:132 - Where's the finish?
01:09:519 (2) - The curve part could be more balanced. Commonly, placing the second control point centered from the first and the thrid one will make things better.
The noble Theif.
00:02:730 (2,3,4,5) - The spacing can be more consistent. They look less stable in visuals atm.
00:17:840 (6,7) - Are you sure about this jump? It feels a little large even more than 00:15:650 (8,1) and it doesn't feels like a structured setting. Yes, I'm sure about this since Sieg wrote that I can increase spacing on some points:00:19:154 (8) - Check your spacing. Being unbalanced wasn't nice in visual.Sieg wrote:
00:01:217 (3,1) - https://puu.sh/rVaHb/80699a5700.png
00:03:606 (4,5) - https://puu.sh/rVaNB/24c82b8307.png
00:15:650 (8,1) // 00:18:278 (7,8,1) // 00:21:782 (7,8,1)
00:21:125 (6,7,8) - o well. Seems at least you've used the jump consistently. The thing here is, that the spacing of 1/2 and 1/1 was nearly the same so it wasn't forming a visually meaningful difference to indicate the rhythm properly through pattern design.
00:34:920 (4,5) - Any reason for this small jump? It feels inconsistent with 00:31:855 (5).
00:40:176 (3) - Unlike 00:38:424 (3), this being placed near (1) felt less completed in pattern. Just placing where (3) was would work better along the slider of 00:38:862 (1,2) imo. Unless, those placement just lost their meaning.
00:40:614 (1,2) - The flow kinda feels visually broken. Mind placing somewhere around (360,80)?
00:49:373 - Remove finish.
00:51:782 - Here contains both a vocal and a strong instrument. Leaving it a blank didn't made much sense.
00:55:942 (4,1) - (1) is a different stanza, and could have some different feeling in the pattern. Leaving it stacked below (4) felt too weak in expressing it. Nobody else complains about it, so, i think, i can leave it
00:57:693 (5) - Even it is 30%, the volume was a little hard to hear. Mind adding a whistle at least?
00:59:446 (5,2) - 01:00:322 (2,4) - The pattern was nicely organized, but these being a little close each was a little annoying.
01:10:395 (3,1) - Imo grouping these as one combo would work better in terms of patterning, but fine if you wanted to emphasize the finish sound. But (1) has different SV from (3), if there was one combo, this would be unrankable, as far as I know...
01:20:906 (1,2,3,4) - The vocals are a little different from 1/2 here. Just expressing it as a 1/2 note didn't felt like reflecting the song nicely.
01:25:285 (3,4,5) - Imo this placement of (4,5) could be more polished. They aren't really kinda forming a pattern atm, and leaving that way made (5) way too detached.
Thanks 3rd time for the HUUGE mod!