Ну зови ты их уже опять и иди ранкай блять D:
Thanks for mod, lov u :3Sonnyc wrote:
Hi. I'm terribly sorry for the long delay. Hey, thanks. No wories xd
Several rhythm selections seem to be based on arbitrary feeling instead of the actual song. For example, there is an actual beat at 00:28:895 while the selected rhythm was at 00:29:195 (4). Another example would be at 01:56:120 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8), where 01:56:495 - 01:57:095 - got an actual beat in the music while 01:56:195 - 01:56:795 being selected instead. There are much more cases like these, and the rhythm needs improvement accordingly in a way to follow the music better. I am pretty sure it`s ok there.
01:27:320 (1,2,3) - 02:46:520 (1,2,3) - This kind of spacing usage isn't good in reading the rhythms properly. Giving more difference between 1/2 and 1/3 rhythm will be better. I changed it a bit.
02:09:320 (4) - NC will be better to distinct pattern. Yes, thanks
02:32:120 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - Nice approach. TY! :3
01:34:520 (5) - 02:53:720 (1) - Inconsistent combo. Fixed.
04:33:170 (6) - While (1,2,3,4,5) follows both the drums and the melody in the music, (6) has got no drum while containing only the melody. However your pattern selection represented no difference regarding that aspect, and it didn't seemed to fit the music nicely. Fixed.
04:51:320 (1,2) - If you are following the melody line, the snap should be 1/3. This rhythm is pretty wierd here, but 1/4 fits more here, i guess.
05:00:770 (7,8,1) - Imo keeping the distance would look better, but this is fine too. Yes, i wanna keep it like this.
05:05:720 (1,2,3,4,1) - 05:10:520 (1,2,3) - etc - These spacing usage for extended sliders felt too much.. The song wasn't that abnormal to demand such irregular patterns imo. I changed the whole section here.
05:15:020 - Consider using 1/3 to fit the instrument? Oh my, nice catch!
06:46:153 (3,4) - 06:59:820 (3,4) - I don't see much a reason behind this random jump. Alright, fixed :p
Patterns itself worked quite fine, considering a work from a new mapper. It definitely lacked professionality, but that's understandable. Just the rhythm selections had problems for me to push this mapset further.
Whirl wrote:
hello Hey Hey
I decided to do a small mod on this alright
feel free to deny everything as this is going to be quite a horrible mod, but you know whatever
ok so some triples can be improved, and I think you should use triples more artistaicaly as they are all through your map, if that made sence
for example
01:15:320 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - don't stack these, but instead did what you did 01:20:720 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - here, because making two triples right after eachother is a little bit hard to read AND also flows weirdly, I also think it would look nicer and move along with your pattern I have changed that one.
another thing about this is that some streams seeem a little overspaced, as in what i mean by that as there are lots of spaced streams that are hard to even fc for a 6*, I will be going over spots where you can lower ds a little bit
02:23:120 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - here also seems a bit too intense, the music doesn't get MUCH louder 02:22:520 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - from here, yet the ds change is dramatic, again lower the ds of the stream It`s pretty okay, i think.
01:41:720 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - here although it's the same beat as your other stream ds is lower than usual, I would raise ds so it matches with your other streams for consistency reasons Done!
ok now for some issues I found
01:29:120 (2) - ctrl g this and fix the spacing a bit, IMO it looks and feels better That`s fine, i`ll keep it.
01:46:520 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - this doesn't look natural, I would suggest making this a hexagon shape or something else because right now it just looks a little messy for an extra Why? It looks so nice to me -.-
01:51:320 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - distance can be slightly lowered, right now it's quite hard to hit and it's not even the most epic part of the song Chorus supposed to be intense, i`ll keep it ;p
01:56:120 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - now your getting a little too triple heavy, remove some triples and replace with some reverse 1/4 sliders ohas r something like that because I think it's a bit too much Triples are nice, you understand nothing, Whirl Snow!
01:58:520 (1,2,3) - if your going to keep your tiples, stack this, because as it is right now it's a little to repetitive and also hard to read for a 6* I don`t like stacking these.
02:02:120 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - if these triangles are going to ontinously get bigger (which they should) make then continously get bigger! Right now 02:02:720 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - these two are the same size even though the music is slightly louder on the second one, I also suggest lowering the ds because it's still kind of difficult to hit But.. They are already.
02:15:020 (4,5,6) - again overuse of this triple pattern, stack Nope, no stacks xd
02:33:920 (1,2,3,4) - although this square is supposed to stack over the other set of notes, it still looks a little inconsistant, I think this could be a perfect square, don't you think? Alrighty, i`ll change that one.
02:48:320 (2) - ctrl + g for a better flow and consistant Not really. I`ll keep it.
ok so I just modded first 3 minutes Thanks
the main problem with this diff is the unnecesarry SHAPES of triples, I would consider checking your WHOLE map and finding this mihaps that could be fixed, also nice map, I like the artistic streams and such xD
if you wan't me to mod the rest shoot me a pm Nah, it`s fine thanks
Monstrata wrote:
06:47:978 (1) - I think this should end 1/8 earlier, on 06:48:312 - . I can actually hear a note on 06:48:312 - , but not the 1/8 after.
Fixed :3
Double-checked other snappings, just this one stood out.
HYPESide wrote:
Bubble #3! .................................................................................................................................................................
I guess, you got the really old version, because i fixed it a while agoWishkey wrote:
oh nice man you revived this
might wanna check if the normal-slidertick.wav 8ms delay is okay to rank, would suck if it'd get dq'd by that
glgl!
Ah yeah might be those things don't autoupdateCircleChu wrote:
I guess, you got the really old version, because i fixed it a while ago
Thank you! :3Monstrata wrote:
#2
Warning to 3rd nominator: You have to wait 24 hours before qualifying due to the new changes to BN Rules. (Maybe it doesn't apply to QAT's though).
It does apply, I guess. Thanks for reminding, actually XDMonstrata wrote:
#2
Warning to 3rd nominator: You have to wait 24 hours before qualifying due to the new changes to BN Rules. (Maybe it doesn't apply to QAT's though).