d
04:06:228 (4) - sounds like it should be on the 1/8th 04:06:286 -
04:52:728 (1,4) - overlap doesnt look nice here
04:58:843 (4) - i'd prefer something like this 00:30:920 (2,3) - this would be more comfortable to play as well as the other one similar to this ^
01:59:536 (2,3) - same 02:54:574 (1) - i think these look better if the head and tail didnt touch :d
03:25:728 - why skip this? i thought you like to focus on instrumentals
03:33:112 - ^
03:45:343 (2,3) - why not just extend these by 1 repeat
04:04:728 (1,2,3,4) - although vague, i think this part should be snapped something like this 01:12:112 (1) - 02:31:497 (1) - 04:27:805 (1) - what are these NC for?..
04:06:228 (4) - sounds like it should be on the 1/8th 04:06:286 -
04:52:728 (1,4) - overlap doesnt look nice here
04:58:843 (4) - i'd prefer something like this 00:30:920 (2,3) - this would be more comfortable to play as well as the other one similar to this ^
01:59:536 (2,3) - same 02:54:574 (1) - i think these look better if the head and tail didnt touch :d
03:25:728 - why skip this? i thought you like to focus on instrumentals
03:33:112 - ^
03:45:343 (2,3) - why not just extend these by 1 repeat
04:04:728 (1,2,3,4) - although vague, i think this part should be snapped something like this 01:12:112 (1) - 02:31:497 (1) - 04:27:805 (1) - what are these NC for?..