don't find reason to make a map that you hate going to disqualify
Enon wrote:
don't find reason to make a map that you hate going to disqualify
Blue Dragon wrote:
just a quick reminder that tags can be changed without a DQ so finding wrong things there will not take the map down
why do you exclude the high bpm part from your ifmarshallracer wrote:
I listed my reasons why I am so salty about itMazzerin wrote:
why are you so salty Bakari once suggested and 'allowed' me to use it, ever since then I've been using it on any of my high bpm maps with lots of 1/2 and 1/4 in a row successfully
Even if Bakari "allowed" you to use it and you've used it several times already, it's still an incorrect usage of a tag
If "lots of 1/2 and 1/4" are the only requirement for a map to have rsi as a tag, then maybe I'd suggest to everyone who makes a map with streams, no matter the BPM or speed of those as long as they are 1/2 or 1/4, to put rsi in their tags
I'll have to admit I overread that and I'm sorry about itMazzerin wrote:
why do you exclude the high bpm part from your if
well people in the song select can search up "rsi" to find songs that might give them rsi, signifying the intense mapping. so, yoou could easily define this map as an rsi map, giving it purpose in the tags :^)AncuL wrote:
marshallracer wrote:
I see no connection between rsi and artist, song, album and/or mapper.
Do you mean by issues that you just personally cant read that part? Its not an issue If its just something you personally have trouble with. Have you thought of the chance of it not being meant to be easy to read?blahpy wrote:
readability issues
No, I mean that it's objectively hard to read. In the same way that, say, an old skystar map is hard to read. Being able to read it because you've watched that specific pattern in the editor 50 times on 25% doesn't count.Reddit wrote:
Do you mean by issues that you just personally cant read that part? Its not an issue If its just something you personally have trouble with. Have you thought of the chance of it not being meant to be easy to read?blahpy wrote:
readability issues
On my sightread play, I read that properly and had no issues with it?blahpy wrote:
No, I mean that it's objectively hard to read. In the same way that, say, an old skystar map is hard to read. Being able to read it because you've watched that specific pattern in the editor 50 times on 25% doesn't count.
1. Probably hitsound changes to emphasize different instruments.[ Eon Fox ] wrote:
I realize these won't be changed, but I still found them odd enough to address:
1. Why use six different SV values?
2. 04:00:137 (1) - How come you didn't put a spinner here instead. Musically, it actually makes more sense.
[ Eon Fox ] wrote:
I realize these won't be changed, but I still found them odd enough to address:
1. Why use six different SV values?
2. 04:00:137 (1) - How come you didn't put a spinner here instead. Musically, it actually makes more sense.
3. Isn't the HP a little too high? I mean, no one appears to have passed nomod, and at the very least, that should be able to be done.
someone gotta map 300bpm jumps and streamsMapper wrote:
Next Mission: 10 stars
im hoping "The Deceit/Violation" goes ranked 1stMapper wrote:
Next Mission: 10 stars