hey
[General]
don't need these green lines
00:02:057 (1) - personally i'd start the volume real low (10%) so it doesn't overpower the music since hitsounds should complement the music
00:18:595 (3) - you could probably touch up on this slider, the circle it creates is a little wonky at the start and the slider head touches the slider border which you can avoid. you can make really nice circles by following the shape of a 3 point circle slider http://puu.sh/rkK2t/015dbfa803.jpg
00:36:478 (1,2,3,1) - this is pretty misleading because the rhythm between 00:36:478 (1,2,3) - is the same while 00:36:765 (3,1) - has a longer rhythmic gap yet 00:36:717 (2,3,1) - is mapped to look like a triplet. perhaps you could move 00:36:717 (2,3) - closer to 00:36:478 (1) - to help players identify the rhythm. http://puu.sh/rkLVH/3beb0a8213.jpg as an example
00:48:596 (3) - whistle to be consistent with 00:47:057 (3)
01:38:595 (1,1) - would probably play better to have this as one combo and having the nc on 01:39:364 (2) - instead. if you look back to beforehand, you mapped the same sounds with one combo 01:01:672 (1,2)
01:53:210 (4) - hm shouldn't this be a pink combo because its the same as 01:47:249 (2)
02:05:903 (1) - you could add another reverse to this because the sound ends on 02:06:143
02:12:057 (1) - ^
02:18:210 (1) - ^ ends on 02:18:499
02:21:095 (3,1) - swap ncs here? the sv change is on 02:21:095 (3)
02:20:807 (2,1) - also try make these two not overlap
02:58:210 (1) - why not end this at the blue tick?
03:11:287 (2) - whistle? 03:05:133 (2) - 03:08:210 (2) - had them
03:16:287 (3) - and maybe whistle here too for consistency
03:26:143 - quite strange to end the break this early. drag it back to how it originally would end
04:28:595 (1) - remove whistle? other sliders like this didn't have them
05:01:672 (1,2) - probably space this out more so it doesn't stand out since they're quite close
05:23:018 (1) - remove nc since you didn't have one on 05:26:095 (7)
05:36:672 (1,2) - these two aren't quite stacked
05:37:249 (2,1) - ^
05:55:133 (1,2) - ^
u might want to check the rest of these stacks if it matters to you :p
poke me when you've replied
[General]
don't need these green lines
- 00:36:478
- 00:36:840
- 00:33:594
- 00:33:978
- 00:35:517
- 00:35:902
00:02:057 (1) - personally i'd start the volume real low (10%) so it doesn't overpower the music since hitsounds should complement the music
00:18:595 (3) - you could probably touch up on this slider, the circle it creates is a little wonky at the start and the slider head touches the slider border which you can avoid. you can make really nice circles by following the shape of a 3 point circle slider http://puu.sh/rkK2t/015dbfa803.jpg
00:36:478 (1,2,3,1) - this is pretty misleading because the rhythm between 00:36:478 (1,2,3) - is the same while 00:36:765 (3,1) - has a longer rhythmic gap yet 00:36:717 (2,3,1) - is mapped to look like a triplet. perhaps you could move 00:36:717 (2,3) - closer to 00:36:478 (1) - to help players identify the rhythm. http://puu.sh/rkLVH/3beb0a8213.jpg as an example
00:48:596 (3) - whistle to be consistent with 00:47:057 (3)
01:38:595 (1,1) - would probably play better to have this as one combo and having the nc on 01:39:364 (2) - instead. if you look back to beforehand, you mapped the same sounds with one combo 01:01:672 (1,2)
01:53:210 (4) - hm shouldn't this be a pink combo because its the same as 01:47:249 (2)
02:05:903 (1) - you could add another reverse to this because the sound ends on 02:06:143
02:12:057 (1) - ^
02:18:210 (1) - ^ ends on 02:18:499
02:21:095 (3,1) - swap ncs here? the sv change is on 02:21:095 (3)
02:20:807 (2,1) - also try make these two not overlap
02:58:210 (1) - why not end this at the blue tick?
03:11:287 (2) - whistle? 03:05:133 (2) - 03:08:210 (2) - had them
03:16:287 (3) - and maybe whistle here too for consistency
03:26:143 - quite strange to end the break this early. drag it back to how it originally would end
04:28:595 (1) - remove whistle? other sliders like this didn't have them
05:01:672 (1,2) - probably space this out more so it doesn't stand out since they're quite close
05:23:018 (1) - remove nc since you didn't have one on 05:26:095 (7)
05:36:672 (1,2) - these two aren't quite stacked
05:37:249 (2,1) - ^
05:55:133 (1,2) - ^
u might want to check the rest of these stacks if it matters to you :p
poke me when you've replied