car
[general]
nice bg
should have some changes on timing - it's not exactly 188, should be around 187.99
it becomes faster by time and it's not an offset issue, so it must be fixed on bpm to correct the milisecond difference
also offset -2 if you applied the change
[ez]
00:10:096 (5) - would like to ask you for changing the beats here. according to your placements before this slider (00:08:819 (1,2,3) - ), it's quite hard to ignore such guitars like 00:10:255 - and 00:10:415 - . should be good if one or both of them are represented.
[hd]
00:28:447 - If I were you i would leave this place empty. you did drop 00:27:170 - for vocal, so in terms of consistency that's a good place to leave it blank.
actually nothing, just make sure people can read 00:29:564 (2,5) - easily and i have nothing to say about the rest
[sergio]
though this looks well-managed, it still shows your overdependence on back'n'forth jumps. i believe you can understand that.
i really cant say much here cuz i feel dizzy now
if you need anything more just call me
[]
I might have some more concerns about sergio's but lul
overall this is a cool diff
who knows
[general]
nice bg
should have some changes on timing - it's not exactly 188, should be around 187.99
it becomes faster by time and it's not an offset issue, so it must be fixed on bpm to correct the milisecond difference
also offset -2 if you applied the change
[ez]
- 01:12:011 (2,3) - a little bit icky on flow, should prevent such a fallback
- 01:15:840 (4,2) - that stack ewwwww
00:10:096 (5) - would like to ask you for changing the beats here. according to your placements before this slider (00:08:819 (1,2,3) - ), it's quite hard to ignore such guitars like 00:10:255 - and 00:10:415 - . should be good if one or both of them are represented.
[hd]
00:28:447 - If I were you i would leave this place empty. you did drop 00:27:170 - for vocal, so in terms of consistency that's a good place to leave it blank.
actually nothing, just make sure people can read 00:29:564 (2,5) - easily and i have nothing to say about the rest
[sergio]
though this looks well-managed, it still shows your overdependence on back'n'forth jumps. i believe you can understand that.
- 00:05:787 (4) - i was surprised because from your nc usage there should be a nc for this straight pattern
- 00:11:053 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1) - the beats are fine, but your cursor has to move only up and down all the way through this part. doesn't feel good tbh. can try something like this one if you're willing to make some changes here.
- 00:17:596 (1,2,3,4,5) - a weird pattern as well. from the pattern it seems like (5) is the one which really got emphasized, but there's nothing important in that place. should better reconsider the execution.
- 00:19:989 (3,4) - 00:22:542 (5,1,2) - aren't those jumps too huge? They seem like don't fit their strengths.
- 00:31:798 (1,2,3) - it's quite obvious that this straight pattern is intentionally placed, but I guess starting them on 00:31:479 - is a better idea. inside of this pattern, (2) is a useless note which doesn't contribute much to this. since you're mainly mapping to the vocal, it will be better to leave this spot.
- 01:23:340 (4,5,1,1) - it's kinda icky to have so much things crowded together, especially there are several kinds of changes (extended slider, sv change, etc.) I would suggest you to expand them so they won't make unnecessary confusions.
i really cant say much here cuz i feel dizzy now
if you need anything more just call me
- 00:03:633 - reduce volume plz
- 00:06:266 (1,2) - I would like to separate them cuz sticking them together might let people think the stream starts on a blue tick
- 00:31:080 - there should be something for the drum, not 00:31:239 -
- 01:26:612 (15) - kinda unnecessary here tbh, and it blocks so the spaced triple after is a little bit hard to read
[]
I might have some more concerns about sergio's but lul
overall this is a cool diff
who knows