00:26:529 (60,61,62) - I dont really like how 00:26:695 (62) is a kat. I think this note is better off as a don. The notes that land on 1/2s up until that point is d-d-k-d-k-d-k-d but after that, it continues off the being kdk, hence changing the notes that land on 1/2s to k-k instead of the usual k-d. The parts after that triplet will not need changes since the pitch went down.
kdd does not match the fx at all00:46:862 (226) should be a kat because of the up-beat in the background. If you decide to change this, it may be better to tweak its surrounding notes so that you don't end up having 3 kats in a row. Also, if you decide to change, 00:47:195 (228) should still be a don because of the downbeat. Here's how I would do it
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5578956 or maybe also make 227 a kat. I understand if you choose not to though, as the up-beat consists of both a kick and a snare and a don can still be mapped to the kick.
Yea, it might fits the song but I would not change it because of my mapping style. Keeping this part simple would be better for me01:07:612 (390) - imo, this could be a don but the way it is is also fine
No change, would easily choke players01:14:362 (454,455) - you sure you don't want to make this a triplet?
Yes, no triplet here, I found out that 01:14:362 (451,452) - should not be connected because there is a change of the pitch.01:28:362 (566,567,568) - you've been using DONs all the way up until here. You might want to keep the motif going and make all finishers in this section DONs or the way it is is also fine.
Changed 566 only ,
567 and 568 does not fit a D because 567 has higher pitch than 566 and have same pitch as 56802:17:695 (247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258) - all of these start with kats and some also ends with kats. Imo, it makes the hitsounding lack the bass sound in general although the music hasn't change the slightest bit. You might want to add in some more dons.
Changed, not sure if u accept this pattern or not,02:22:529 (1) - Don't get me wrong, I did read the disclaimer about 1/6s but I think putting it in at the start of each measure (every 4 beats) really interrupts the flow of the music. Notice that I'm only saying the music because the map still flow just fine. I think you should at least let the music flow through for a little bit before choking. I think every 2 measures would be a good frequency which means that I think 02:23:862 (18,19,20,21) and 02:29:195 (86,87,88,89) should be made into 1/4. 02:26:529 (52,53,54,55) can stay as it can be used to emphasize the change of chords.
Nope, the pitch goes up every 1st half measure and goes down every another half measure, this made the period 1 measure, therefore I used 1/6 4plets every single measure02:37:195 (158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184) - I know that you have 1/4s but you should probably throw in some finishers. It sounds a little bit awkward.
Uh, reused D for every single measure for better emphasis
03:50:529 (142) - you sure you want to start kiai here?
Yes, this is a really clear sign that the song goes from soft to hard partHP 5 is fine but I would prefer HP 4 or 4.5 given the already pretty high OD and the length of the song
Fixed in the prev. modThe map in general is of pretty good quality,there weren't anything that sounded awfully off either. I loved the last kiai so much lol, it looked hard but it's actually not that hard and it fits the song pretty well too. How the 1/6s are put into this map is also better than most I've seen posted in my queue (those who try to overmap 1/6s when they can't even make normal maps right, pisses me off to the point I sometimes reject their requests). In fact, it's one of the best ones I've seen. Hope to see this ranked