1. Advanced (2.88 stars, 237 notes)
2. Cool! (6.14 stars, 413 notes)
3. Easy (1.56 stars, 90 notes)
4. Hard (3.61 stars, 280 notes)
5. Light Insane (4.26 stars, 327 notes)
6. MrSergio's Insane (4.69 stars, 385 notes)
7. Normal (2.24 stars, 161 notes)
8. Voli's Extra (5.45 stars, 422 notes)

By nyu -

rip cool dad

NEW QUALITY DAD BACKGROUND!! REDOWNLOAD REQUIRED!!!!

Cerulean Veyron wrote:

TEMPORARY BG OKAY!!??!>!>!!>!!??!<!1

Anxient wrote:

make it permanent

Weriko wrote:

:P

Mod from queue :p

My dad diff

00:01:160 (1) - maybe make this an stacked stream? like this ? I know it's a really cool thing to start off like that. But actually, I prefer an easier way so a single note should suffice even without streams just for the drums on the song track. And a little consistency with the rest of the diffs, so yeah. I may keep this.

00:09:936 (6,7,8,9) - maybe align this with the slider? I already did after the time you're about to mod this xDDDDDDDDD

00:37:542 (3) - overlap It's 100% intentional. I also provided a blanket there if you hover a little bit on this part in order to show you it's on purpose.

00:37:542 (3) - Same as above 00:37:542 (3) - 00:37:542 (3) - 00:37:542 (3) - 00:52:862 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - 00:52:862 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - 00:52:862 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - 00:52:862 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - ............... and whatever.... every overlap you see (I DONT KNOW WHY PEOPLE CARE SO MUCH ABOUT OVERLAPS :C) same reason as above, 2017 is coming m8 MOAR OVERLAPPSSSS

01:08:181 (9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - you can make this stream more rounded Yeah, I can do that.

01:13:685 (14,15,16) - move this a bit to the left so the stream looks nicer Okay

01:20:308 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,1) - distance between slider and stream should be the same.... i think Okay

01:21:026 (12,13,14,15,16,17,18,1) - 01:21:026 (12,13,14,15,16,17,18,1) - spacing change feels weird... probly just me Oh it's just you :^)))

Hard

00:01:160 (1) - same as in My Dad diff ..... like a stacked stream Same thing too. And besides, it'll be TOO HARD ;n;

00:06:106 (6,1,2) - the change in the slider kinda breaks the flow... I was intending an overlap here ofc, it doesn't even flaw tbh. As how the cursor guidance should flow like some wave, it shouldn't look broken ;p

00:29:883 (3,4,5,6) - noooop..... monstrata blessed me these triangles, do not pester his wisdom.

00:39:457 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - im not sure if distance is the same between some sliders? OH MY VOLKS- gonna fix that soon loool

PLEASE HIGHER AR..... Isn't AR7 enough for Hard diffs? ;n;


and then again..... overlapssss

and well..... the map felt a bit weird.. its like the flow is weird.... not sure tho.. im not the best with that ;-;

normal

00:01:160 (1) - hehehjsjsjsjsjsj.... you know what... but maybe you can put a 1/4 slider??? What the... I've NEVER put a 1/4 repeatable slider on any normal diff unless it's low bpm. But this one, it's pretty much a 'no' because too... complex(?).

and well.... same problems as other diffs :c

SORRYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!

i think your map has some of the same issues as my maps ;-;.... weird flow and stuff..... so im sorry if this felt weird but i dont really know how to help more ;-;


and those overlaps.... i dont really care but you know.......



Good luck!!!

Cerulean Veyron wrote:

Weriko wrote:

01:21:026 (12,13,14,15,16,17,18,1) - 01:21:026 (12,13,14,15,16,17,18,1) - spacing change feels weird... probly just me Oh it's just you :^)))

Yahuri wrote:

from #memehelp
ur dad is cool
i dont know him but hes cool
the COOLEST dad ever ヽ( ｡ ヮﾟ)ノ

General
-can you get a louder finish hitsound? its softer than the soft-hitclaps (its not very audible in the early parts of the song, the kiai is better tho) Okay, increased volume a bit
-soft-hitclaps are pretty overpowering in the kiai, make hitsound volume a bit softer Same here, pretty sure it'll be fine now.

Hard
-low AR -> harder to read cuz too many objects on screen, try AR 8 instead (take into account that this has a fairly high bpm as well) Doing this just for the sake of readability. Redid.
-personally i would make NC every measure instead of every 2 measures (stay away from dat 10 combo 00:58:287 (10)) An NC in two tracks doesn't seen very bad tbh, as long as the combo isn't like... REAAALLLLY long for the low HP rate ;p
00:15:840 (7,8,1) - dont like the spacing here since the (tail of 8 is closer to the tail of 7) than the (head of 8 is to slider 1) so try something more like this? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5929974 I kept the spacing for emphasizing the music, but I fixed the blanket on slider (1) at least xdd
00:18:713 (9,1) - blanket not look good cuz the tail of 1 gets pretty close to the body of 9, also overlap 00:17:436 (4,1) I don't see this as a blanket bad at all. At least the tail isn't overlapping slider (9)'s slider body borders and making it look awkward... Was trying to make a small jump here fyi
00:24:777 (4,5) - flow looks kinda weird imo Dx how about this? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5929990 ngl It'd still look the same as the current one. But in case for polishing aesthetics, maybe yes I may do that lol
00:26:691 (1) - this section would work better if you just use 1/2 sliders until 00:28:606 (put circle) so that you can click on the important lyrics I did that while I was mapping this in the first place, it made the diff's SR go up because of density. So I wouldn't want it to affect the difficulty spread. I decided to redo some 1/1 sliders here instead.
00:33:074 (5,6,7) - same thing about spacing like here 00:15:840 (7,8,1) I made no mistake on indicating the music by note density and spacing being merely multiplied by 0.5x. I wouldn't reduce it just for slider tails anyway D:
00:35:628 (7,8) - flow not perfect, move 8 to around x:190, y:141 Also moved to y:135 for the perfect spacing~
00:39:777 (2,3,4) - spacing, i think its ok if you want to change DS a little bit I don't think there's a problem with the spacing here either xdd just a nazi 0.01x which doesn't affect much lmao
00:41:851 (9,1) - blanket D: I don't intend to make more blankets on this one for the sake of flow. It does improve aesthetics, but I matter structure more on this part here.
00:45:202 (4,5,6) - spacing Same here tbh
00:50:787 - could put circle here and here 00:50:947 then move the spinner back a bit (how it is now is still fine tho) I'd just like to give a few bit of space for players to prepare for spinning, even if it's a hard diff I'd still give it out. So I don't think adding a circle here is necessary just for filling out the rhythm.

Normal
00:05:468 - map this, its way stronger than 00:05:628 ;-; I'm blaming you if this one would be too hard.
00:04:989 - this rhythm might work better? (circle 5 is optional) https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5930102 NO WAY, for an Intro it is too early to represent more overdone 1/2s, so I've only started doing it on 00:21:585 - . This shouldn't be implemented imho
00:09:298 - you missed a beat here Nearly the same reason as above, I know it sounds pretty intense. but ^
00:09:138 - add clap? A drum-clap wouldn't fit here as I tried when I was hitsounding. I didn't even add one on other diffs tho.
00:09:457 - ^ Well, this one should be alright~
00:09:777 (4) - remove clap nuuuu hitsound consistency ;m;
00:10:096 - add clap Okay
00:31:798 (1,2) - i think it would be better if 1 flowed into 2 At least the current one didn't hurt the flow pretty much not a bit. Even If I moved the slider's tail towards the circle in order to do what you suggest. I may keep this ofc.
00:56:691 (2,3) - blanket? D: Same reason from the previous diff for blanketing ;p

good luck~

havkz wrote:

Cool song! see what i did there

• 
  
  [MrSergio's Insane]

1. 00:09:138 (2,3) - I'd personally unstack these to emphasize the strong crash sound on 00:09:298 (3) - with a jump, just as you did here: 00:09:936 (1) - , why would they be different?
   
2. 00:11:053 (1) - a reverse isn't very fitting here since you're skipping over the main beat 00:11:372 - on this tick without making it clickable, i mean CMON LEMME CLICK DAT DOWNBEAT PLZ
   
3. 00:13:606 (1,2) - increase SV a bit for vocal intensity?
   
4. 00:17:117 (4,5) - this plays meh, the momentum stops for no reason, I'd just make it a slider instead of two stacked notes. That way you can still get those two drum beats while still maintaining momentum + slider glides well with the vocal here
   
5. 00:17:596 (1,2) - minor point, but overlapping the slider in the middle looks neater like so: https://voli.s-ul.eu/CEBdio7e
   
6. 00:20:149 (4) - I recommend you ctrl+g it, as of now its unintuitive to play as you'd expect the slider to start from the other side after the jump from 00:19:989 (3,4) -
   
7. 00:21:106 (1,2,3) - I'd rather expect a larger jump than the previous pattern here seeing the intensity of the drums
   
8. 00:26:691 (2,4) - These parts could be more interesting if you increased the SV of these sliders by around 1,20 or 1,30
   
9. 00:27:968 (2,4) - ^ and same goes for similar instances like this 00:56:372 (2,4) - (srsly those kicks get a lot more going for them when theyre slightly emphasized by SV)
   
10. 00:50:947 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - spacing felt rather underwhelming to me D:
    
11. 00:53:500 (1) - increase SV to around 1,20 for more SPICE k
    
12. 01:16:957 (2) - you kinda missed the strongest vocal sound by making it a reverse, why not remove the reverse and add a note 01:17:277 - here?
    
    Cool map! Could use a bit more flavor here and there imo (you only used a single SV throughout the entire map when the song calls for a lot of emphasized parts), but generally like how you did it.

Voli wrote:

Greetings Mr. Car and MrSergio, I've been asked to mod this.

• 
  
  [MrSergio's Insane]

1. 00:09:138 (2,3) - I'd personally unstack these to emphasize the strong crash sound on 00:09:298 (3) - with a jump, just as you did here: 00:09:936 (1) - , why would they be different? let's say I had in mind a certain pattern for the first part and then changed my mind midway LOL
   
2. 00:11:053 (1) - a reverse isn't very fitting here since you're skipping over the main beat 00:11:372 - on this tick without making it clickable, i mean CMON LEMME CLICK DAT DOWNBEAT PLZ heh, I wanted to follow vocals in most parts of the song since they are "cool" :^). Jokes aside, if someone else points this out I'll probably change it, but it seems consistent with the rest of the map to me
   
3. 00:13:606 (1,2) - increase SV a bit for vocal intensity? trust me, at first that was exactly my intention, but then I realized I couldn't make good patterns when I arrived 00:26:372 - at this part, so I threw away all the SV changes I formerly used for 00:13:606 - and 00:15:840 -
   
4. 00:17:117 (4,5) - this plays meh, the momentum stops for no reason, I'd just make it a slider instead of two stacked notes. That way you can still get those two drum beats while still maintaining momentum + slider glides well with the vocal here actually, I didn't use a slider since I had poor imagination how to make one fit well there, but instead I placed one more jump. Using the same concept I fixed also 00:18:394 (4,5) -
   
5. 00:17:596 (1,2) - minor point, but overlapping the slider in the middle looks neater like so: https://voli.s-ul.eu/CEBdio7e well, I was aiming to constant spacing between 00:18:074 (2,3,4) - so moving 2 more to the left would move that whole pattern to the left, creating an ugly overlap between 00:17:596 (1,3) -
   
6. 00:20:149 (4) - I recommend you ctrl+g it, as of now its unintuitive to play as you'd expect the slider to start from the other side after the jump from 00:19:989 (3,4) - I actually thought about that, but there is a general better feeling if you organize your patterns around "centre point of the pattern". Let me explain: 00:19:670 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - take this whole part and you'll notice how I keep going over the "centre of the pattern" many times. This creates an invisible and giant circular flow and that's the reason I used 00:20:149 (4) - in that verse.
   
7. 00:21:106 (1,2,3) - I'd rather expect a larger jump than the previous pattern here seeing the intensity of the drums depending on the situation and the previous patterns, anti-jumps may give a stronger feeling. In this case I created a lot of movement with the previous 2-3 patterns so once the player arrives to this one he has to focus all that movement in a single point. This creates a virtual stronger emphasis imo which fits that part better than jumps. Consider also that due to previous spacings, I'd need a larger spacing on these beats since they are far stronger.
   
8. 00:26:691 (2,4) - These parts could be more interesting if you increased the SV of these sliders by around 1,20 or 1,30 I ended up explaining above. It's indeed an option and I already considered it, but I didn't come up with anything good. If you have any visual suggestion let me know because I'm drained xD
   
9. 00:27:968 (2,4) - ^ and same goes for similar instances like this 00:56:372 (2,4) - (srsly those kicks get a lot more going for them when theyre slightly emphasized by SV) same for first point ^ and I swear I'll try something out but I make no promises
   
10. 00:50:947 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - spacing felt rather underwhelming to me D: it's in order to create contrast with the kiai and also because I'm not considering vocals there anymore, only drum. If you have better options let me know, because it looks fine for me as it is
    
11. 00:53:500 (1) - increase SV to around 1,20 for more SPICE k it's already at x1.20 o.O
    
12. 01:16:957 (2) - you kinda missed the strongest vocal sound by making it a reverse, why not remove the reverse and add a note 01:17:277 - here? the pattern is mainly focused on vocals as I mentioned somewhere above tho and it feels nice to me D:
    
    Cool map! Could use a bit more flavor here and there imo (you only used a single SV throughout the entire map when the song calls for a lot of emphasized parts), but generally like how you did it. I intentionally avoided them as I said, because I couldn't come up with any cool patterns. I instead used different rhythm approaches, by considering the patterns around those specific parts to make the stand out more. I dunno if I achieved my goal

GL!

21:12 Cerulean Veyron: mo dm yc ool dadmap free 2k ds
21:12 *Cerulean Veyron hides in closet
21:12 Anxient: lets see the map first
21:12 *Cerulean Veyron is away: Playing Overwatch, do not disturb.
21:12 *Anxient drags CV out of closet
21:12 Cerulean Veyron: oh dang vw

1. 01:12:011 (2,3) - a little bit icky on flow, should prevent such a fallback
2. 01:15:840 (4,2) - that stack ewwwww

1. 00:05:787 (4) - i was surprised because from your nc usage there should be a nc for this straight pattern
2. 00:11:053 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1) - the beats are fine, but your cursor has to move only up and down all the way through this part. doesn't feel good tbh. can try something like this one if you're willing to make some changes here.
   
   example

   
3. 00:17:596 (1,2,3,4,5) - a weird pattern as well. from the pattern it seems like (5) is the one which really got emphasized, but there's nothing important in that place. should better reconsider the execution.
4. 00:19:989 (3,4) - 00:22:542 (5,1,2) - aren't those jumps too huge? They seem like don't fit their strengths.
5. 00:31:798 (1,2,3) - it's quite obvious that this straight pattern is intentionally placed, but I guess starting them on 00:31:479 - is a better idea. inside of this pattern, (2) is a useless note which doesn't contribute much to this. since you're mainly mapping to the vocal, it will be better to leave this spot.
6. 01:23:340 (4,5,1,1) - it's kinda icky to have so much things crowded together, especially there are several kinds of changes (extended slider, sv change, etc.) I would suggest you to expand them so they won't make unnecessary confusions.

1. 00:03:633 - reduce volume plz
2. 00:06:266 (1,2) - I would like to separate them cuz sticking them together might let people think the stream starts on a blue tick
3. 00:31:080 - there should be something for the drum, not 00:31:239 -
4. 01:26:612 (15) - kinda unnecessary here tbh, and it blocks so the spaced triple after is a little bit hard to read

Nerova Riuz GX wrote:

car

[general]
nice bg cool dad
should have some changes on timing - it's not exactly 188, should be around 187.99
it becomes faster by time and it's not an offset issue, so it must be fixed on bpm to correct the milisecond difference

also offset -2 if you applied the change
srsly NRG, I don't like ripping off a millisecond of a BPM, it's hardly noticeable for players even though they occur 100s but that's MOSTLY their playstyle and accuracy. Please, I'm not used to it ;AAA;

[ez]

1. 01:12:011 (2,3) - a little bit icky on flow, should prevent such a fallback Okay, redone slider (3) into regular one.
2. 01:15:840 (4,2) - that stack ewwwww tf r u talking about ._. This is the best stack I've did pls

[nm]
00:10:096 (5) - would like to ask you for changing the beats here. according to your placements before this slider (00:08:819 (1,2,3) - ), it's quite hard to ignore such guitars like 00:10:255 - and 00:10:415 - . should be good if one or both of them are represented. Alright

[hd]
00:28:447 - If I were you i would leave this place empty. you did drop 00:27:170 - for vocal, so in terms of consistency that's a good place to leave it blank. True, but it might sound smh tedious, even when only a circle on the white tick is there. Until that sudden 1/2 vocals, it'd sound pretty awkward though. So just filling up the rhythm actually worked much better for following up the next tracks.

actually nothing, just make sure people can read 00:29:564 (2,5) - easily and i have nothing to say about the rest Okay, it's readable.

[cool car]
i really cant say much here cuz i feel dizzy now Take a little break lmao
if you need anything more just call me

1. 00:03:633 - reduce volume plz There are some volumes on the other diffs the same as this, so reducing here might occur a problem. or it might be you reducing the music volume ;pppp
2. 00:06:266 (1,2) - I would like to separate them cuz sticking them together might let people think the stream starts on a blue tick It does starts on blue tick obviously because of the drums on track. I mean, it's really audible tbh.
3. 00:31:080 - there should be something for the drum, not 00:31:239 - Oh, yeah. I do hear it. More like a five-notes streaming drums. But imo, density looks pretty op so I wanted to try making a jump filling for that emphasis. I might be sure it's acceptable.
4. 01:26:612 (15) - kinda unnecessary here tbh, and it blocks so the spaced triple after is a little bit hard to read Ahh okay.... Anxient, you're dead soon

I feel the HP in all of those diffs are a little bit too high (except in sergio's diff because it has higher NC density)
[]

I might have some more concerns about sergio's but lul
overall this is a cool diff
who knows

Nerova Riuz GX wrote:

nice bg

Lapis Aoki wrote:

Nerova Riuz GX wrote:

nice bg

Inb4 disqualified

[-obee58-] wrote:

yea yeh smth ohey boiz
voli diff only bc voli asked

blanket mod:
00:56:691 (1) - blanket 2px off
01:11:691 (1) - upright? slightly off?
00:03:713 (2) - down 1px?
00:10:415 (1) - slightly off, but maybe because stack
00:11:691 (2) - right 1 Ok dad fixed all of them

and now for ACTUAL still garbage A E S T H E T I C mod:

01:01:160 (1) - can't this be slightly closer? idk upright yes sure
01:06:266 (1,1) - and these can be farther apart na it ruins the pattern
01:06:904 (1) - weird slider thx
01:08:819 (1) - weird slider thx
01:15:202 (1,2,3,4) - spacing?? its fitting tho!
#01:12:649 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1) - nerf stream so i can ezpp pls /s Ok nerfed by 1px

nothing else rly i dont think im lazy
kds plz

Cerulean Veyron wrote:

Modders: Weriko, Yahuri, Voli, Anxient, Plaudible, Nerova Riuz GX, [-obee58-],

[-obee58-] wrote:

yay im famous

CookieKivi wrote:

kakkoii. ~

Sieg wrote:

cool

Nerova Riuz GX wrote:

[sergio]
though this looks well-managed, it still shows your overdependence on back'n'forth jumps. i believe you can understand that.

1. 00:05:787 (4) - i was surprised because from your nc usage there should be a nc for this straight pattern why not
2. 00:11:053 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1) - the beats are fine, but your cursor has to move only up and down all the way through this part. doesn't feel good tbh. can try something like this one if you're willing to make some changes here. nice suggestion, but does it change that much a non-existent problem? I could even use your pattern which is just a rotation of mine, but why?
3. 00:17:596 (1,2,3,4,5) - a weird pattern as well. from the pattern it seems like (5) is the one which really got emphasized, but there's nothing important in that place. should better reconsider the execution. stacked 5 under 4 for the time being
4. 00:19:989 (3,4) - 00:22:542 (5,1,2) - aren't those jumps too huge? They seem like don't fit their strengths. reduced second one
5. 00:31:798 (1,2,3) - it's quite obvious that this straight pattern is intentionally placed, but I guess starting them on 00:31:479 - is a better idea. inside of this pattern, (2) is a useless note which doesn't contribute much to this. since you're mainly mapping to the vocal, it will be better to leave this spot. I find it fine as it is, since the build up was mainly made to emphasize 00:32:436 (5) - at the end of the combo
6. 01:23:340 (4,5,1,1) - it's kinda icky to have so much things crowded together, especially there are several kinds of changes (extended slider, sv change, etc.) I would suggest you to expand them so they won't make unnecessary confusions. I used previously similar spacings and the SV starts only from 01:24:138 (1) - and it actually flows naturally if you play it

FailureAtOsu wrote:

hllo
i wont be modding ur dad or voli's sexxtra because im lazy (it's a nm i have an excuse >:C) lmao it's okay xddd at least you modded the easier ones llo

The General's Insurance Company

spread between Normal > Hard is literal trash, i'd make an advanced Oh ffs, time to speedmap another diff for spreads uuuuggghh eight diffs spread on TV size incoming!!

Easy

OD1?!?!? do we live in different universes? i'd use 2 at the absolute least for this SR Well, it'd look pretty harsh for like, super-beginner players. And since it's the easiest diff around, OD1 looks pretty necessary imo.
00:03:713 (1) - make this a 1/1 slider that starts at the white tick before it because it feels empty ;( I probably like to keep it ez pz, more easier than 1/1 slider. So a simple click on the strongest beat in this part is also okay tho~
00:15:202 (2,1) - is this supposed to be a blanket? if so please improov Okay

Normal

00:39:457 (1,2,3) - move 3 up so that 1,2 and 2,3 kinda look more similar-ish Well actually in here, I rotate them around 15 or sth xddd and just moved them for the 1x spacing. Yours is good too, however I kinda don't like objects or slider tails that's NEARLY getting out of the screen. So yeah... like that
Why is Kyubey there

Hard

00:50:628 (6,1) - whats with the 1/1 gap, there's a noise on the red tick inbetween? or at least push back the spinner and extend it Hmm nvm I'm gonna fill the rhythm by replacing the circle into a slider anyway. I hope it's not gonna be that hard ;/

Light Insane

00:22:702 (4,5,6) - the spacing inbetween 4,5 and 5,6 are nearly the same but one is 1/2 and one is 1/1.. kinda hard for new-ish-bies to read :C Okay, reduced the spacing on slider (5) a little bit, hopefully might work better ;p
00:57:968 (9,10,11,12) - can you not do a slider end stream pls TBH It'd look a bit easier to notice the stream parts when it comes up to slider ends. It wouldn't affect playability even if I changed this into circles-only stream.

short mod because this is actually a decent set (my excuse for everything)

microism wrote:

[ Easy]

1. 00:13:925 (1) - Make this the same as 00:15:202 (2) flipped horizontally? Well, not sure it's still okay to make a change on this because of the blanket on 00:15:202 (2,1) - would be a bit too linear with using a lot of those sharp sliders. So yeah, I might keep it just not to make things a little boring.
2. 00:18:394 (3) - Try making this the same as 00:17:755 (2). It has better flow and is more aesthetically pleasant in my opinion. Aaaaand this one, Sure.
3. 00:21:585 (1) - Maybe make this a vertical straight slider? there is enough space and ^ same reason. I probably made a little anchoring on the slider tick to notice the 1/4 rhythm difference here, well maybe barely but it's still noticeable tbh.

[ Normal]

1. 00:08:819 (1,2,3) - I don't think this fits the rhythm at all, try changing it to something better that fits with the music. Was thinking about it, yeah. So probably the new one would at least suffice the complex tracking on this part.
2. 00:19:032 (1,2,3,4) - Here's a suggestion for the rhythm: Right here, there's a rhythm consistency falls over this part. With the previous ones already been passed until here. And I haven't changed any of them tho, so this would literally break it for sure. Thanks for the efforts btw!
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:23:819 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Here's a suggestion: Whoa, that rhythm you suggested is NEARLY the same as the Hard diff. For the sake of note density, I don't think this should be implemented. Well, as long as the current suffices the emphasis on track. There's no problem with this imo. Thanks again~
   
   SPOILER

   

[ Hard]

1. 00:08:819 (1,2) - I think the slider should go first instead of the circle, if you don't want to change that that's fine. I actually prefer circles hitting up the downbeat more than a slider because yeah, intensive cymbal. But somewhat I'm doing that less often unless so. Probably the same like 00:24:138 (1) -
2. 00:11:372 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The rhythm is not consistent with 00:16:479 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) Oh, good catch.
3. 00:53:500 (1,2,3,4,5) - Here's a suggestion:
   
   SPOILER

   
   If you do change it, then change the other ones that are like this.
   It sounds really good and okay with the vocals, but the sounds and instruments are probably been skipped over that slider (2), especially the white tick for the percussion. I probably think I should keep the current one for sure. Thanks for the efforts~

[ Cool!]

1. 00:36:585 (11) - Try making this a 1/2 slider? I wanted to indicate a manual stacking here. Replacing this to slider might make the note density takes over the track's. So maybe not.
2. 01:06:904 (4,8) - Overlap Hardly noticeable, but every overlap I did is intentional ;3
3. 01:15:202 (1,2,3,4) - Same reason in Voli's diff, "Maybe use 1/2 sliders instead of 3/4 sliders unless you can think of a better option, because the sudden extended (3/4) sliders seem out of place." Four measures of the rhythm composition and consistency is totally enough during the kiai. So I've started mainstreaming the vocals a bit more depth in order to fill up the rhythm. If I really do that, you'd just usually hear more boring 1/2 spaced sliders and these old-fashioned stuffs. I wanted to try different things much more suitable than that.
4. 01:26:372 (14,15,1,2,3) - Here's a suggestion:
   SPOILER

   
   Ehh, there's an audible drumming on the track on 01:26:771 (2) - , which sounds very very clear tbh. And for 01:26:372 (14) -, following the ride sound ofc.

A very decent map!
Good luck!

before edit

WOW DUDENICE