I AM SO ANGRY I COULD JUST SCREAM
Don't start the unneeded comments either you provide something that helps or don't provide anything at all. Stating your opinions without any flaming is fine to some extent (expect when there is about 30 comments like that already no point then) but don't start the QAT flame storm-Trophy- wrote:
haters gonna hate
I'm graveyarding it for outside reasons, I had full intentions to get this going and rank it and have a blast with this map, but that's not allowedAldwych wrote:
if this gets unranked I'm graveyarding itNice mentality for people who doing effort to mod and map this. Really mature yep.
This wasn't an attempt to be that map. In the slightest. In fact, it was the complete opposite. It was an effort to try out different difficulty settings across the highest diffs in order to change up what's currently being mapped and seen for maps all around. If anything this map was more of a message that people should dare to be different and try out different styles/map difficulties in order to shake up the mapping community a bit and change the "regular" in order to go back to more creative mapping.Loctav wrote:
a staff member is supposed to be a representation of the game. This is not quality, and it is a shame to see such a thing attempt to make it to rank. It is basically a "fuck you to all the mappers out there who toil endlessly to have their (arguably better) maps ranked, we are staff members, we can do whatever we want!".
Additionally, QATs disqualify maps after discussion. This is not a question about a single staff. This also applies to any situation.LexiaLovesU wrote:
Don't start the unneeded comments either you provide something that helps or don't provide anything at all. Stating your opinions without any flaming is fine to some extent (expect when there is about 30 comments like that already no point then) but don't start the QAT flame storm-Trophy- wrote:
Dear Loctav, please stop unranking/unqualifying maps just because you don't like them.
Thank you.
Well if you want my vision of mapping :Maeglwn wrote:
for no floodingI'm graveyarding it for outside reasons, I had full intentions to get this going and rank it and have a blast with this map, but that's not allowed
It's really disappointing that I was able to rank 3 other songs just like this one without any issue, but now this one suddenly sparks an issue.
I'm extremely saddened, honestly.
Actually, let me change that wording for a bit. It's upsetting that because I had so many difficulties from different people on this map, that this map happened to be seen and apparently is so much worse than every other map I've created, to the point where frank and disdainful remarks had to be put into play because of it. It's honestly embarrassing.
I can't believe that, in quote, this is what is actually believed, if anything.This wasn't an attempt to be that map. In the slightest. In fact, it was the complete opposite. It was an effort to try out different difficulty settings across the highest diffs in order to change up what's currently being mapped and seen for maps all around. If anything this map was more of a message that people should dare to be different and try out different styles/map difficulties in order to shake up the mapping community a bit and change the "regular" in order to go back to more creative mapping.Loctav wrote:
a staff member is supposed to be a representation of the game. This is not quality, and it is a shame to see such a thing attempt to make it to rank. It is basically a "fuck you to all the mappers out there who toil endlessly to have their (arguably better) maps ranked, we are staff members, we can do whatever we want!".
However, this was apparently seen as a ploy to just use staff powers to get maps ranked faster than other maps that deserve it.
I apologize to anybody who felt that way; it was absolutely not that. It's a shame to see that our mapping in this regard is suddenly diminished and looked down upon because of the "staff member" regard.
Like fine, you can say my diffs have all of the quality issues in the world and that's fine, but there's literally no reason that everybody else on the set should have to suffer as well.
I'm graveyarding this for various reasons, but one of them being that I don't really like how this was treated as a map. As much as many different people enjoyed the map and I recieved MANY different highlights/pms in and out of the game regarding congratulations and how much they liked the map, apparently the "haters" to put it frankly got the best of it.
I'll still be mapping, but I guess this is the end of my soundcloud mapping for good.
Have a good one to anybody reading this.
its not that the problem but there some 2007/2008 maps with cs5/ar7 that are funnier and more playable Than ur diff ( u can fc it but u will not enjoyed doing that )Blue Dragon wrote:
Remove my difficulty since people apparently suck too much to play AR7.
Good job for ruining a great map and still ranking *CENSORED MAP*
Oh, by the way: "this difficulty is quite bad"
Yeah, thank you for considering the effort I put on it and making as fun as possible with AR7. Because of some whiny players who can't stand anything non-AR9 is why mapping nowadays sucks so much.
After all, encouraging different settings to map, such as small CS or AR seems to be "trolling" nowadays, and ranking maps who are barely playable and focus on "art" should be 100% fine.
Congratulations for this community proving itself worse everyday.
Who are you to say that? You can't even play my diff, it's way out of your skill level to say that.OSUjanaiKATSURAda wrote:
its not that the problem but there some 2007/2008 maps with cs5/ar7 that are funnier and more playable Than ur diff ( u can fc it but u will not enjoyed doing that )Blue Dragon wrote:
Remove my difficulty since people apparently suck too much to play AR7.
Good job for ruining a great map and still ranking *CENSORED MAP*
Oh, by the way: "this difficulty is quite bad"
Yeah, thank you for considering the effort I put on it and making as fun as possible with AR7. Because of some whiny players who can't stand anything non-AR9 is why mapping nowadays sucks so much.
After all, encouraging different settings to map, such as small CS or AR seems to be "trolling" nowadays, and ranking maps who are barely playable and focus on "art" should be 100% fine.
Congratulations for this community proving itself worse everyday.
Maybe JUST MAYBE theres a reason these kind of difficulties are in higher ar? What youre basically saying is that "Im allowed to have a little bit of fun with approach rate" ..Blue Dragon wrote:
Remove my difficulty since people apparently suck too much to play AR7.
Good job for ruining a great map and still ranking *CENSORED MAP*
Oh, by the way: "this difficulty is quite bad, it has to be remapped"
Yeah, thank you for considering the effort I put on it and making as fun as possible with AR7. Because of some whiny players who can't stand anything non-AR9 is why mapping nowadays sucks so much.
After all, encouraging different settings to map, such as small CS or AR seems to be "trolling" nowadays, and ranking maps who are barely playable and focus on "art" should be 100% fine.
Congratulations for this community proving itself worse everyday.
what is so bad about encouraging people to learn how to read lower ARs? my godSotajumala wrote:
Maybe JUST MAYBE theres a reason these kind of difficulties are in higher ar? What youre basically saying is that "Im allowed to have a little bit of fun with approach rate" ..Blue Dragon wrote:
Remove my difficulty since people apparently suck too much to play AR7.
Good job for ruining a great map and still ranking *CENSORED MAP*
Oh, by the way: "this difficulty is quite bad, it has to be remapped"
Yeah, thank you for considering the effort I put on it and making as fun as possible with AR7. Because of some whiny players who can't stand anything non-AR9 is why mapping nowadays sucks so much.
After all, encouraging different settings to map, such as small CS or AR seems to be "trolling" nowadays, and ranking maps who are barely playable and focus on "art" should be 100% fine.
Congratulations for this community proving itself worse everyday.
Maybe so but if thats the case i dont see any reason why said diff should get ranked.
ikr, perhaps i'm still living in 2012 or earlierMaeglwn wrote:
Congratulations, you represent a very small vocal minorityFateburn wrote:
Why do people only focus on that AR7 thing? No one focus on those jumps? Do you really think everyone loves those giant jumps?
Well, everyone but not me.
PPPPPPPPPFTTTTTTTTTTTTT HHAHAHHAHAHAHA HE SAID GAY! GAY GUYS GAY!!!1!1! lmfaoAxarious wrote:
General
- gay