Easy00:24:711 (1) - 00:30:197 (1,2) - 00:35:683 (1,2) - 00:41:168 (1) - I mean, having consistent rhythm on all of these patterns would improve the general following of the song as they all are mapped on nearly identical beat patterns and vocals
00:51:283 (3,1,2) - This could be aesthetically improved if the circularity of these two would be connected or broken completely instead of both going on a tiny bit with each other. Mostly just personal preference and there shouldn't really be any problems with it begin what it is now
01:45:626 (2,3) - This is slightly inconsistent with the other section since the movement kinda cuts and goes backwards instead of flowing ( 01:34:654 (2,3) - ) or having other kind of patterning where the movement is still continuous ( 01:40:140 (2,3) - ). I'd not really say it's bad for it directly but it's something that is really different when compared to the usual patterning. I would suggest to move the 3 down a bit, roughly bit under the vertical level of the tailpoint of the 2 which would keep the pattern style but it would make the movement bit more continuous
https://puu.sh/vIlk2/70e5597ebe.png01:55:911 (2,3) - Nazi, the blanketing between the reversepoint of 3 and body of 2 is not perfect
NormalYou have simplified stuff quite a lot in the beginning which kinda makes hard to figure out what exactly you are following, which is one way to map normals. Though this 00:08:768 (2,3) - pattern is kinda different from everything as it is quite intense. So to simplify stuff you could extend the 2 by 1/2 beat and palce a hitcircle here 00:09:626 - which would be consistent with the way you have usually patterned the objects ( see 00:13:740 (1,2,3) - ) or alternatively make all of them more intense. Considering the intensity of the beginning overall, i'd suggest to make that one pattern bit less intense
00:42:197 (3,4) - Sort of similar thingy as above. As the intensity for the similar beat patterns is 00:30:197 (1,2,3) - (or atleast what you have presented it as) it's not really justified to increase the intensity in this kind of a situation where the beat doesn't really increase either
01:16:826 (1,2) - This is inconsistent for some reason with the following three patterns
01:25:054 (1) - Nazi, the curve formed by the two last followpoints and the red anchor is little bit tighter than the curve below it. Adjusting the middle point by moving it bit to the right should solve the issue
02:30:883 (1) - If you want to follow the vocals imo this
https://puu.sh/vIte2/68ae1a292f.png kind of a rhythm would fit it better
Hard00:09:626 (1,2,3) - This pattern doesn't really follow the way that you have mapped otherwise on the sections as the spacing between 1 and 2 is extremely high even when considering the slider leniency and the fact that the 2 is mapped on a really light piano beat which emphasizes it even though it's totally unnecessary
00:20:597 (1) - You usually haven't NCd these beats so i don't really see a reason to do it here either
00:25:397 - You have represented these white ticks with a clap on every other occasion with the exception of 00:43:226 - (which imo should have a clap) so could there be a way to represent it here 00:25:397 - aswell?
01:08:083 (3) - 01:10:826 (3) - 01:13:397 (3) - 01:16:140 (4) - All of these bring unnecessary emphasis to something that is next to non-existent. The part would feel much more natural if more of the sounds were mapped that are like the ones after the long sliders or the objects after the longer sliders were removed
01:20:940 (1,2,3) - You could make these like you the patterns prior to this one as the the part it's mapped on is fairly similar to them. If not you should atleast move the 3 away from the body of 1 as they don't have to be that close
01:58:140 (2,3) - You could try to follow the vocals more accurately to solve Karen's issue like this
https://puu.sh/vIAI7/cf52b0f770.png for example. Though i don't think it can be compared to 02:08:940 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - as the other one misses out the synthesizer
02:10:140 (6,1) - 02:16:997 (4,1) - (ect.) This kind of spacing may be mistakenly read as 1/1 spacing as you don't really use spacing to emphasis anything too much on the difficulty with hitcircle->other object patterning like this (only slider->other object 01:44:254 (1,2) - like here). Also it doesn't really help you that you use nearly identical spacing for 1/1 gaps in the same section, 02:25:054 (4,1) - to name one. Yes there is a small difference but it's kinda hard to read no matter what and when you have mapped one thing one way in one place, it shouldn't magically change since you are theoretically mapping the same thing
Insane00:14:940 (5,6) - 00:20:426 (5,6) - Could use some consistency?
00:26:597 (3,4) - 00:29:168 (2,3) - You could try to keep an eye out for emphasis stuff generally. As i said in the suggestions/notes for hard "when you have mapped one thing one way in one place, it shouldn't magically change since you are theoretically mapping the same thing"
00:38:940 (2,3) - Imo CTRL Ging the rhythm here would follow the melody little bit better
01:34:654 (1,2,3,4) - I personally disliked how this part felt when playing ;/
01:41:168 (5) - Imo the tailpoint could be mapped as a hitcircle since the beat it's mapped on is audible and it sounds very similar to 01:42:711 - for example
01:50:083 - Why this cymbal doesn't have any emphasis but for some reason 01:50:254 (2) - gets all the spacing emphasis even though the beat it's mapped on is not even important by any means