HighTec wrote:

not sure whether i can bring something in really

but lets see

period blood

00:06:043 (1) - why dont u make this a returning slider as well, should be able to put more emphasis on the piano that this is probs mapped to The rhythm of the piano was hard enough to snap to at all. It's probably still inaccurate, but this is the most playable
00:15:181 (2,3,4) - idk if possible but maybe you can make these look a bit like this so it'll look just that little bit nicer I evened the spacing between the circles, but I like the outward curve, so that stays.
00:28:284 (2,3) - why isn't this stacked normally now seems weird to me Rounding errors, lol don't blame me for that. Blame peppy.
00:32:939 (1,2) - imo these shouldnt be stacked as the rest of the section hasnt got anything stacked either That has nothing to do with the rest of the section
00:43:112 (1) - maybe remove NC, it seems not needed at all, not sure about 00:43:284 (1) - either no, it's totally needed xd
00:56:560 (2) - o god whistle on slider body isnt there anything else you can do ;w; (counts for others as well) Leab my default normal-hitwhistle alone, you fiend! ;-;
01:02:077 (2,3) - why not stack em! Stacking these makes for extremely hard reads. I'd rather not have the player be caught by surprise in an easy section
01:04:836 (2,3) - uh this blanket is a bit off I really just did that for an indention for a circle, and something to follow the next slider... while I see what you mean, idk how I would fix this and have the slider bodies follow each other @-@
01:15:871 (1,1,1) - NCs may be removed here, no SV change or other sound to indicate it too, it's mapped to the exact same sound yaknow nu, ncs are the best in special moments
01:17:595 (1,1,1) - same for these
01:20:698 (6) - idk feels better when u use ctrl+g imo I like the current ver.
01:54:319 (1,2) - with these sounds I'd expect more of a SV increase instead of decrease, think about it Maybe in a different song, one where the surface tones are darker and more haunting. It makes less sense in this context.
02:00:181 (1) - remove NC no new sound! nuuuu ;-;
02:01:215 (1,2,3,4) - wouldnt make this increase this much tbh, i get the emphasis but it doesnt need to be harder than blue zenith + hr I've never even seen that map, and this isn't even that hard.
02:03:974 (2) - ctrl+g to lead it better to 02:04:146 (3) - idk, I like this flow
02:17:422 (1) - tihs slider breaks the circular flow you had first ;w; maybe change shape or at least ctrl+g it no, this is ok
02:25:008 (1,2,3) - we need different spacing between (1,2) because these different rythms will make it very hard to read otherwise Trust me, it's alright @-@
02:46:388 (1,2) - you can make this a little like this so the note isn't completely hidden ;w; It's just a stack @-@
02:58:629 (4) - nah double negative flow is a no go so ctrl+g wtf is negative flow? There's almost infinite types of flow that can be plastered on a 2D plane.
03:17:595 (1) - s a m e ass before
03:49:836 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - why is the spacing of the stream lower while the sound only gets stronger??? Pitch. And the song's volume stays the same.
04:00:353 (1) - you got it I'm confused lol
04:18:457 (1,2,3,4) - i dont believe this has to be this hard of a spacing, scaling it down 0,9x would be nice .9x is less than initial... If change at all, I'll probably rework this into something special, without the questionability
05:18:112 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - every slider has another SV right? you can NC all of these Since when should SV changes always prompt NCs? It's in duples so that it shows the full array of colors once for the end.

for the rest just repetitive errors u can fix urself tbh

map is anyhow fun to play! it looks nice too

gl with this map!