Asahina Momoko wrote:

yehaj lamo yehaj

Easy

1. 00:58:173 (3,4) - idk stack in this diff is rankable but put 00:58:173 (3) - at 456/352 and apart them are newbie friendly xd ok, changed it.
2. 01:47:409 (1) - remove reverse and put 1/2 slider at 01:48:467 - to emphasize finale? I think 3/2 beat spacing there will be a bit hard to follow because there is no sound in between to help the player stay on beat.

Normal

1. 00:38:585 (5,6) - this rhythm is also good to play Changed it.
   
   SPOILER

   

Hard

1. you mainly follow vocal but 00:47:585 - is ignored and it'd be better to do something i think, how about these? I prefer my rhythm to give stronger emphasis to drum there... I think it's more important.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

Insane

1. 00:32:232 (4) - 01:03:467 (4) - 01:31:526 (3) - are those overlaps really needed? o.o They're not needed, but I don't think it's a problem. Changed the third one to stack.
2. 01:30:467 (1) - to make arrow more visible move a bit like this? Ok.
   
   SPOILER

   

good luck on this and your desire!!
-.-

pkhg wrote:

[Easy]

• 
  
  dont hitsound to drums if you arent following them. right now is kinda a clap here and there which sounds bad. goes for normal too I think it's ok to keep hitsound where the match the music.

1. 00:25:879 - add a circle or make (1) a 1/1 slider No, I'm strictly following drum here.
2. 00:27:114 (3,4) - that gap feels weird you can do something more vocal oriented instead of skipping everything to hit that snare. you arent following the drums in the next sections
3. 00:31:526 - circle maybe Makes awkward rhythm to play imo.
4. 00:33:820 (1,2) - this doesnt play good imo. maybe http://puu.sh/pixyx/7d3fb948e8.jpg
5. 01:07:879 (1) - the middle tick is covered by the tail Adjusted the shape.

[Hard]

1. 00:26:762 (1,2,3) - idk exactly what are you following like you follow vocals for most of the map and suddenly this I want to follow the rhythm that is more interesting, so in this case, I follow drums.
2. 00:47:232 (2,3,4) - this plays weird imo I think it's ok. I want to emphasize drum here.
3. 01:17:056 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - idk if its safe to have two almost consecutive triplets idk

[Insane]

1. 00:14:056 - the 1/8 starts from here. the rest is 1/2 http://puu.sh/piyM4/3f9139c47b.jpg ok, fixed it.
2. 00:47:232 (2,3,4) - same as hard

i suck gl

HabiHolic wrote:

Hi. from my queue

[Easy]

00:27:644 - 00:31:526 - Note? cuz vocal emphasis. Keep the first one, change second one.
01:12:114 - 01:12:820 - sound is big. i think change better for clap. Changed.

[Normal]

00:50:585 (6) - add repeat? Added.
01:48:644 - finish? I don't think it's needed.

[Hard]

00:56:938 (2,3) - Ctrl+G is better flow rhythm imo. Changed rhythm.
01:48:644 (2) - sugguest. I prefer stack here.

SPOILER

[Insane]

Notting,

Good Luck!

Electoz wrote:

Hi

[Easy]

1. 00:27:467 - Map sth here to follow vocal? You already have a 3/2 spacing on 00:30:291 (4,5) so I think it wouldn't hurt to have another one here. I think it's fine. I like this rhythm better, as it brings out the drum more.
2. 00:31:526 (5,1) - Swap NC? Fixed.
3. 00:41:056 - 01:40:350 - 01:43:173 - Add whistle? Added.

[Normal]

1. 00:42:114 (6,1) - 1.2 DS here but idk if it's intentional so I'm mentioning this just in case. It's the same distance. Lower SV makes the distance spacing number higher.
2. 00:53:762 - Add a circle here? To me this beat here is just the same as 00:50:938 . I want to push more emphasis on the syncopated vocal here.
3. 01:12:114 (1) - Any reason for putting NC here? Since you put one on every 2 downbeats. Readability, and also because this part feels like a separate idea from the previous four beats.
4. 01:17:938 (5) - Add whistle? Added.

[Hard]

1. 00:17:232 - Add a circle here for consistency with 00:17:938 (4) ? No.

Yeah sry for a short mod but hope this helps anyways~

Aihuro wrote:

Hey Little! NM from my queue.

Easy:

1. 00:18:467 (3,2) - Mm. . looks kinda messy with this overlap here and I know it's hard to avoid it. Maybe try something like this instead: The overlap is not visible during gameplay.http://puu.sh/pydk2/b8f92073cc.jpg You don't have to change much if you do this if you are lazy like me .
2. 00:21:291 (2,2) - Maybe stack them? No.
3. 00:25:526 - I don't really get why you leave open spaces like this one and then over here: 00:28:350 - you don't. (Also, only my imo so it doesn't really matter of course) but I think a nice 1/1 slider would fit perfect. This is just how the song feels to me.
4. 00:39:644 (1) - I'm trying to figure out something that would fit better, I'm not sure if you would like this but what is he harsh to try. Just do something like this instead:http://puu.sh/pydDX/0aa999ff17.jpg I prefer the current rhythm to emphasize vocals.
5. 01:47:409 (1) - This is kinda of a tricky one, eh. I tried my best so that you can end a note on that last beat. So maybe you can try something like this instead: http://puu.sh/pydWs/17e847ac9c.jpg I like my rhythm better.
6. Other than that, very decent diff! I really love your mapping style.

Normal:

1. 00:32:938 (5) - I strongly suggest still my own opinion to add a note here. At the moment it sounds empty. I'm staying on the offbeat vocals here, and don't want too much rhythmic density since this part is relatively calm.
2. 00:40:173 (2) - Maybe end this slider here instead: 00:39:291 (7) - . Since you kinda missed an important beat there with that 1/1 slider. It's just much more fun to play if you don't miss the beats. That beat is weak, and not important.
3. 00:41:585 (5) - Okay, see here, there is no important beat, so this time it's okay to use a 1/1. I'm not saying it's wrong what you did, I personally just don't like when you don't map a beat.
4. 00:44:938 - Etto. . it's not an easy. . so I don't understand that gaping there. I suggest you add a note there, since you did with all the others. Gap there gives better emphasis to the start of the next phrase, and helps with the half-time feel.
5. 00:54:997 (3,4) - Would be nice if you can make them look similar. It's fine.
6. 00:58:350 - This really doesn't matter if you change it or not, but I think I hear a noise there. . maybe you can add a note there. Really, I can also just be stupid, lol. Gap to emphasize syncopation.
7. 01:28:879 (3) - Why not try something like this instead: http://puu.sh/pyeHT/ceb4579603.jpg My reason is that you missed an important beat again. So I tried finding a better pattern. Prefer to just emphasize vocal here.
8. Also a very good diff! Gj.

Hard:

1. Very nice diff!

Really nice mapset, wish I could mod Insanes
Good Luck!

Sonnyc wrote:

~General~

1. Consider using some slidertick hitsounds. Several hitsounds in the low diff remains empty since the selected rhythms doesn't contain a drum, which felt less interesting. I think this is fine without slidertick hitsounds. Many of the notes in Easy do have hitsounds on them, and I think that it's enough that it doesn't feel empty. I also don't want too many extra sounds where there are no circles or sliderhead/end.

~Easy~

1. 00:57:291 (2,4) - I won't recommend using such edgy overlaps for the easiest difficulty. More than half of the slider path of (4) is covered by (2). This isn't beginner-friendly. Changed this part to avoid the overlap.
2. 01:48:644 - This is the only difficulty that isn't ending at here, and I think it is pretty awkward to end this diff at 01:48:467 while there is an additional sound following. Instead of using a reverse slider at the end, consider using a long slider that ends here. Personally, I don't think it's weird to end there, but changed to long slider.

~Hard~

1. 01:00:644 (1,2) - It feels awkward to have a close spacing in this clap sound for the sake of blanket. It feels quite natural to me.

~Insane~

1. 00:43:879 (1,2,3) - According to the distance snapping, these seem to have a similar spacing, but in terms of visuals, it is quite unbalanced. I think you can make an adjustment here yourself. Fixed.
2. 00:49:350 (1,2) - Personally the scale of this jump felt a liiitle exaggerated. Feels ok to me. Slider end gives enough room to move there comfortably.
3. 01:14:232 (3,4,5,6,1) - Since there was little flow change here, the spacing really feels unbalanced. You can compare with 01:25:526 (3,4,5,6,1). Oh, and it seems the rhythm somehow is inconsistent. According to the music, the triple fits better at 01:14:320 instead 01:14:497. Changed it.

Fine map.