i cant testplay this because rip streaming so im just basically going off of what feels right
metal00:45:228 (3,4) - itd be kind of cool if you spaced it out like you did with the previous circle-circle-slider sections before this, something like
this but i have no idea how 2 map so
it fits the song with the no leniency overlap, i like it a lot like this00:46:548 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30) - holy shit can u like split this up so its not 30 notes??
noi legit cant look at the first kiai without my eyes dying
good02:39:463 (1,1) - idk if its just me but this feels better if its spaced out a bit more\
if you remove ncs it's perfect in DS03:03:223 (1,1) - basically same thing here
^also cant look at the third kiai for the same reason dude nice
05:05:443 (1) - this spinner could probably end a bit earlier just to show the transition into the next song because 05:17:863 (1) - idk if people will expect a slider like this after a long as hell spinner lol
wait what no they should be expecting more 250 streams, of course they'll be ready for a stupid slider06:22:984 (5) - nc this to showcase jump?
feels like 06:22:984 (5,6,7) - are of the same grouping like the sound on 06:22:762 (1) - , except that the first and second sounds have a drum roll conjointing the sounds06:58:094 (1,1) - wouldnt people get caught off guard by the first slider because of the repeat sliders before it?? why not just make it consistent
already done with this07:29:983 (2) - why isn't this nc'd like the other notes-after-sliders like 07:33:205 (1) - wh
it's nc'd by measure there cause there's only drums going and really long extended orchestral/guitar sounds, which is why i nc 07:32:315 (1,1) - these 2 times in one measure, cause the guitar does 2 2/1s there07:38:983 (2) - ^
^08:49:650 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - what i dont even know what this is
at least put a nc on 08:50:094 (7) - this because the entire section up to this point is nc spammy
there's no obvious grouping there like in groups of 2 or 3 (1/3s) before this, so it's all in one combo08:52:761 (6) - if you did the above suggestion you'd have to put one here 2
no it's all good, drums seem to be in one group here09:26:982 (1,1) - same as 06:58:094 (1,1)
explained09:31:427 (2) - nc this cuz the note-after-slider thin g again
explained09:40:316 (2) - ^
explained09:42:982 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - ok why the hell does 09:43:204 (1,2,3,4) - go upwards instead of downwards that's just confusing af
that was fixed a while ago now, it was a mistakealso is the mp3 supposed to cut off the finish is that like part of the song
sadly yes