MrDorian wrote:

Hello!
I noticed your map in someone's modding queue and because I like this song really much, I decided to mod it for you! Nice!

Hard

00:00:345 (345|3,345|0) - There is no sound, what can "give" another note, so delete one of them I've gotten good feedback for the playability on this and I like how the second notes here kinda go with the whistle hitsound instead. I see what you mean though but I think I'll wait for more suggestions before changing this cuz I really like how this segment plays as a hole.
00:01:043 (1043|0,1043|3) - ^^^
00:04:182 (4182|2,4182|3,4531|0,4531|1) - and 00:06:973 (6973|1,6973|0,7322|1,7322|3) - why haven't you added notes like in 00:08:368 (8368|3,8368|1,8455|2,8543|1,8630|2,8717|3,8717|0) - or 00:05:578 (5578|3,5578|1,5665|2,5752|1,5839|0,5926|1,5926|2) - It was more about a change in rhythm. Wanted the stream/stair thing to happen on the 2nd and 4th sounds only for a bit of variety while keeping consistency.
00:30:519 (30519|1) - move to 00:30:345 (30345|1) - ?? You equalized that sound before and before, soo maybe Remapped section to better emphasize what the instruments do
00:31:566 (31566|0,31740|0,32264|0,32438|0,32700|0) - for me it's a bit too dense moving 00:32:264 - to 3
00:29:647 (29647|3,29822|3,29996|3,30345|3,30519|3) - ^^^ this one not really its kinda like a shield I think :v
00:56:159 (56159|0,56333|2) - move one column right to equalize pitch moved 00:56:333 - to 2 and 00:56:508 - to 3
01:08:717 (68717|2,68717|0) - delete one note, same situation like at beggining I'll apply the change along with the beginning one if I get more suggestions
01:09:415 (69415|3,69415|0) - ^^^
01:22:932 (82932|2,82932|0) - my personal suggestion: maybe move it to red line under, it can work better nah don't really like that :v
01:36:362 (96362|2) - delete ok. changed some things after for better readability
01:57:903 (117903|3) - move to 1, uncomfortable it would still be unconfortable because of the trill tbh and I think there's not so many maps with these patterns so it's good practice

Really good mapset, good luck! Thanks!

Wonki wrote:

NM request
0 1 2 3

Normal

00:26:857 (26857|1,26857|0) - move 0 1 okay
01:12:205 - ~01:12:903 - i think this part need long note yes! fixed thanks!

Protastic101 wrote:

Thank you, I work hard to keep my mustache as mustachy as possible XD

Column 1|2|3|4

Short mod since your map's pretty good already

Nevermind, Hard turned out being longer than I expected cause I was nitpicking I think.
[General]- Did you take the BG from Nivrad's ranked set? If so, credit him in the map description or mention it. I'll make sure to do that
- Uncheck widescreen support in all difficulties except for normal since you don't have an SB yes
- OD for Easy is too low for the note:LN ratio. Increase it to ~7. HP seems a little too forgiving for a fairly dense easy, so increase to ~6.8 to 7?
- Increase OD of Normal to ~7. Well I had it at 6 and most ranked easy diffs seem to be betwen 5-6.5 or so. Uhh....I guess I'll change easy to 6.5 and normal to 7 for now and get more feedback on this cuz idk xd

[Normal]00:11:159 (11159|0,11159|3) - For a normal difficulty, I highly suggest against using a double to start off a roll since they can be difficult for players at this level to predict and read. So remove 00:11:159 (11159|3) ? Sure. I did it cos I do a 1 4 pattern for the doubles and wanted consistency but if its too hard I can remove 4.
00:13:165 (13165|1) - Also, this is my nitpickiness (or general dislike of this pattern) kicking in, so move this to 4 since the last single note was in 2? I don't know why, I just don't like 2 single notes tucked into the in between column of a {13} or {24} pattern. I like this pattern especially for some reason how it feels with the 3/4 rhythm idk how to explain it sorry :/
00:28:775 (28775|3,28775|2) - This is pretty quiet, so reduce this to a single note? Remapped this section
00:30:519 (30519|0,30519|2) - ^^
00:31:217 (31217|3,31217|1) - ^^
00:31:566 (31566|3,31566|1) - ^^
00:34:357 - Add a note here for the piano? Sure. Also deleted the double right after.
00:37:322 (37322|3,37322|2) - I also probably would advise against using a double to end a burst in a normal difficulty; especially one that isn't a simple roll. I felt this one was pretty easy and natural since the right hand wasnt so active by the end of it but I suppose if its too hard I can remove 4
01:00:345 - For this swing section, I'd recommend removing the doubles so that it's easier for novice players to read 1/3 and get the hang of compound timing. Sure. I'll keep 01:00:345 - tho cuz it emphasizes the change in the music section.
01:44:298 (104298|2,104298|0) - Same stuff I've been saying about doubles + 1/4 = I don't really recommend it since it might be hard to read and hit. Sure. Removed most doubles in this section and made the rhythm a bit clearer to play.
01:50:578 - Make a double to accent the burp kind of sound? Well not cuz of the burp but I did mess up a pattern I did so I switched around the doubles to where the whistles are instead of the claps

[Hard]00:18:397 (18397|1,21188|1) - I'd remove these notes if you're not going to add them at places like 00:17:002 or 00:19:793 since they're the same sounds, and therefore mapping to some of those sounds but not all might be pretty confusing to a player. Not really it's pretty consistent in regards to rhythm since I do it every other time. I thought about adding the other two bursts but that felt like too much to me and kinda ruined the rhythm to me idk
00:22:671 - Add a note here for the kick like at 00:17:089 (17089|0,17089|3) Actually, I'm wondering as to why you map the kicks on the first downbeat of each measure using a double, but you use a single note for the kicks on the upbeat of beat 4, so like these notes for example 00:18:485 (18485|2,18485|3,19357|1) Shouldn't you use one note at the beginning of each measure to represent the kick to be consistent with how you map certain sounds? That'd basically mean removing a note from 00:17:089 (17089|0,17089|3,18485|2,18485|3,19880|0,19880|3) and etc. Well in regards to the first point I left that blank because I wanted to emphasize that sharp sort of "plucked" chord since it sounds like it stops so abruptly. I'm sure there's a musical term for it I forgot what its called tbh it's been a while since I had to use them lol. As for the doubles in the kick sounds I could remove them and it would probably still play well but idk it feels kinda empty that way imo
00:25:810 (25810|1,25810|0) - Move one of these to 4 since it's the same pitch as 00:25:636 (25636|3) I reworked this pattern from previous mods so it should make more sense now :v
00:25:985 (25985|2) - ^^
00:26:333 (26333|0) - Move to 2 for same reason as above. So basically, since the piano plays the same note 4x, then another note 2x, and another 2x, I'm basically suggesting you jack the notes I mentioned above with the previous notes or whatever. Doing this would cause a 1/4 jack with some of the other notes though, so this is the pattern I'm suggesting Pattern was reworked not to that example but to something else :v
00:27:205 (27205|1,27205|3,27729|2,27729|0) - Reduce these to single notes since they're far quieter than the previous piano chord. It's more about feel in playability it's quieter in the music but the jack sound is still there so I want the doubles to kinda make it feel like it's a chord jack (which it is in the music)
00:27:380 (27380|0) - Remove this note? I underestand it's for the hihat(?), but I think it serves to accent the piano if you leave this empty. If you do want to keep it, then maybe add a note in 00:27:467 at 2 to complete the 1/4 hihat roll? Well it's for the hihat but more importantly it's so 00:27:903 - would make sense too since the clap here cannot be ignored and I'd have to delete it for consistency's sake
00:29:822 (29822|1,29996|0,29996|1) - Control J since the upbeat is accented and the downbeat is quieter. Actually, just make the single note double for the piano? Nevermind, I didn't realize you were accenting the snare XD lol nice. I did rework this pattern though :v
00:57:205 (57205|1) - Move to 00:57:227 for the piano's arpeggio? It's on a 1/16 snap, so it's basically the same as hitting the note simultaneously. Ignore if you're just following the snare here. Sounds a bit complicated and I'd rather not get into snap debates as I try to push this forward :/
01:00:345 - I cry whenever a song switches from straight notes to swing >.< >.<
01:03:601 (63601|1) - Maybe move this to 4 since playing a {2}{13}{2} pattern may be a little uncomfortable, at least for me. I forget if I changed this cuz it doesnt look the same to me but I think I changed this already xd
01:09:415 (69415|3,69415|0) - I don't really understand the purpose of this double. Is it too accent the piano? I feel like it might be too hard for this difficulty, as a lot of hard difficulties are just single note stream oriented. Kinda to accent the 1/1 rhythm similar to the intro. The whistle also kinda helps with that I feel.
01:12:838 - Where's your preview point snapped? T.T :o did not notice that LOL fixed on all diffs
01:18:397 (78397|2) - Remove, I think this is a ghost note? that 1/4 sound is there from the 5 note burst sound the piano makes. Kinda hard to hear cuz its on the lower pitch notes
01:22:845 - Add a note for the kick or whatever this sound is *gives up on drum terminology* nuuuu my 3/4 piano rhythms ;(
01:22:671 (82671|1) - Also, there's no crash here, so remove the finish hitsound from it or something. It's more for flavor actually. There's a lot of finishes that aren't necessarily in the music but would be suitable there. This to me is one of them :v
01:24:415 (84415|2,84589|2) - These are the same pitch as 01:24:066 (84066|3,84240|3) so move them to 4? I see what you mean I did this 2 note separation on purpose so like 01:24:066 (84066|3,84240|3) - 01:24:415 (84415|2,84589|2) - 01:24:764 (84764|1,84938|1) - 01:25:112 (85112|0,85287|0) - are in groups of 2 descending from 4 3 2 1 mostly for playability but also because it makes a bit more sense than the 4 note jack to play
01:24:764 (84764|1,84851|2,84938|1,85025|2) - Since the trill after this one is on the left hand, make this a right handed trill for symmetry? Also, people would be training those trilling fingers XD I kinda did it this way because of the pattern I explained above. Also this is a bit of a harder trill mixup to play cus 2323 into 1212 isnt very common xd
01:29:822 (89822|0) - This is sustained for an entire beat, unlike 01:28:601 (88601|1,88775|2,89124|1,89473|2) so end this LN at 01:30:171 I don't really hear it. I'd rather keep it the same lengh as the others though to avoid confusion anyway.
01:36:362 (96362|2) - Remove this note since it's a ghost note. There's a 1/2 beat pause between the snare roll and tom roll. Fixed with a previous mod :v
01:38:543 (98543|3,98543|0) - Reduce this to a single note since the piano is much quieter than the next note.
01:41:333 (101333|0) - Move this up to 01:41:421 since the kick is much louder and accented than the hihat at 01:41:333 This would be pretty unintuitive playwise. There is a sound on this red tick and there is also a sound on 01:41:421 - so a good option would be to add a triple so I'll do that instead
01:42:380 - Add note here since it's the same sound as 01:43:078 (103078|0) Somewhat reworked this section from a previous mod
01:43:078 (103078|0) - Alternatively to the above, you could move this up to 01:43:165 to get a 1/4 hooked note kind of feel.
01:43:601 (103601|3,103775|3) - Make these doubles since they're the clap sound like at 01:43:252 (103252|2,103252|3) where you used a double to represent it.
01:45:868 (105868|2,106217|2) - Move down to 01:45:781 since that's where the accent is.
01:46:217 and 01:46:304 - Add notes for the rim hit and hihat.
01:49:705 (109705|0,109880|2) - Combine these LNs into one since the sound is 1/1 long and not 1/2. Sure. Did the same for the second one
02:24:764 - Add a note here since this silence breaks the flow a little bit. Also, you mapped this same sound at 02:26:159 (146159|3) so consistency Actually the silence is consistent since the matching sound to this is 02:30:171 (150171|1) - so it's like the other example where its consistent with every other beat for adding (or in this case removing) rhythms lol
02:01:828 (121828|1) - Remove this note since it's a ghost note. The piano doesn't start until 02:01:915 I can hear the note it's very quiet though. Anyway not mapping it would be a lot less intuitive especially considering that this is a stream that happens throughout the song
02:07:409 (127409|2) - ^^ I'd also like to warn you that, while I love one handed trills, you should keep them from being too long and using them too often since at this level, a lot of people can only handle a measure long trill at a medium BPM before needing a lot of rest for their fingers. so, for this trill and the next, I'd suggest making it something like {4}{2}{4}{2} and then switching to a {1}{3}{1}{3} noted lol
02:07:496 (127496|3,127583|2,127671|3) - I'd probably make this a {1}{2}{3} roll since it's actually 1/8. Isn't live piano amazing? :^)
02:38:601 and 02:38:659 - Add a two handed trill so {2}{3}{2} on a 1/6 snap for the piano? Not sure if these are the wrong timestapms but they seem way off xd

If you need any clarification, just say so; I know I'm kind of vague sometimes. Pretty clear overall. Thanks!

KcHecKa wrote:

ehh i like the 1/6 part.. lol

One Miss wrote:

hi o/ doing mod for the rest of the mapset from modding que lel
|1|2|3|4|

Easy

1. 00:21:798 (21798|2) - consider making this a hold until 00:22:322 Sure. Idk if it would be too hard but if it is I can change it back anyway
2. 00:48:136 (48136|2,48310|1) - ctr+g 00:48:659 (48659|1,48833|2) - ctr+g i say this because the sound goes snare and then kick, but the kick has lower pitch so it could be a bit more pitch relevant based off of that up to you. I think I'll keep it this way for now
3. 01:43:252 (103252|2) - move to 3 Sure
4. 01:44:647 (104647|0) - same sound as 01:44:211 (104211|0) - move to 1 I'll keep it at 3 since I applied the previous suggestion. Also don't wanna have them on the same lane tbh
5. 01:59:647 (119647|1,119822|2) - move both left one column for hand switch on snare sure. also made a change on this pattern for consistency.
6. 02:01:392 (121392|2) - move to 3 for hand switch.
7. 02:05:403 (125403|2) - move to 3 for hand switch on snare
8. 02:17:961 (137961|0) - move to 1 and move 02:18:136 (138136|3) - to 4 to make the hand switch on the snare Didn't do these changes exactly but I did something similar for hand switches on snares as suggested from the first mod.
9. this problem repeats multiple times in the diff just keep an eye out for it ^^ This really only concerns me on this diff tbh but I'll consider it for some sections on the other diffs.
10. 02:35:926 (155926|3,156101|2,156275|1,156450|3,156624|2) - make the same pattern as
11. 02:33:136 (153136|1,153310|0,153485|2,153659|1,153833|0) - Sure something similar.

Normal

1. 00:27:205 (27205|2) - move to 2 maby, idk it doesnt look like good finger balance here. Jack follows the similar sound in the music.
2. 00:37:671 (37671|3) - add note on 3 I would but don't want a double after 00:36:973 (36973|2,37060|1,37147|0,37235|1,37322|2) - which I would need for cosistency.
3. 01:03:601 add note I'd rather avoid doubles in this 1/3 section. Only double is at the very start and end of this section.
4. 02:08:019 (128019|1,128717|2,129415|3) - confused on what these are following in the song not much else to say here good diff. The piano in general has very long sounds. It follows the stronger more emphasized notes in the piano as well similar to how I have the doubles in the hards.

Hard

1. 01:52:060 (112060|2,112147|3,112235|2,112322|3,112409|2,112496|3,112583|2,112671|1,112758|0,112845|1,112932|0,113019|1,113107|0,113194|1,113281|0) - i feel like this should be consistant with 01:57:642 (117642|2,117729|1,117816|2,117903|1,117990|2,118078|1,118165|2,118252|3,118252|1,118339|0,118426|3,118514|0,118601|3,118688|0,118775|3) - Technically it is. What I could have done is have the trills on the left hand then switch to the right hand but instead I did them on the middle columns and then switch to the edge columns. I can change this I don't mind but I think I'll wait for a bit more feedback beforehand.
2. 02:32:612 (152612|1) - no existing background sound that i can hear and i think the pause better builds up emphasis anyways overall good diff as well, I kind of agree the sound is almost inadible. I really don't like the idea of having this empty especially during the kiai. The 1/2 keeps the momentum going very well and is almost an expected note especially after the jumptrills/mini burst thing into a pause it just feels so bad. I would hate to have to remove this but I might have to. I'll double check this with someone first before doing this though.
3. i couldnt find much sorry.

gl on rank! Thanks for the mod!

Julie wrote:

Add pump it up / piu in tags~
So the PIU player will find this map !! Thanks Sure added to tags.

TvSize225 wrote:

NM from my Modding queue
Nomenclature [0|1|2|3]
Vospi - Reverence
Hydria's Insane ok finally time to take a look at this as a distraction from other work

SPOILER

00:09:851 (9851|1,9938|0,10112|1,10287|0) to 00:09:851 (9851|0,9938|1,10112|0,10287|1) - follow pitch relevance and is more fluid to play in term of finger balance. Accepted.
00:03:659 (3659|1) and 00:06:450 (6450|2) - I assume those LN follow the piano but either the rest of the piano isn't map in those part or it's mapped in the drum punches. which makes it a bit inconsistent considering the punches of the drums are most of the time carefully patterned in a same way and this part would be inconsistent if it's the case. considering all the other piano noises would just be 1/4 LNs it's easier to just place single notes as to not oversaturate the map
00:16:043 (16043|3,16043|2) and 00:18:833 (18833|1,18833|0) and 00:20:229 (20229|3,20229|2) - 2 notes used for this sound
while all the others use three notes, see :
00:16:740 (16740|2,16740|1,16740|3) - 00:17:438 (17438|1,17438|3,17438|0) - 00:18:136 (18136|1,18136|0,18136|3) - 00:19:531 (19531|1,19531|0,19531|2) - 00:20:926 (20926|3,20926|0,20926|2) and so on. Accepted
Same here : 00:38:368 (38368|2,38368|0) - 00:40:461 (40461|2,40461|3) - 00:41:159 (41159|0,41159|1) - 00:43:950 (43950|3,43950|0) - 00:46:740 (46740|0,46740|1) - 00:47:438 (47438|2,47438|0) - 00:48:833 (48833|0,48833|3) - again two notes on a pattern that you usually use three notes, there's probably more example of this across the map so maybe just taking a special attention to this to follow sound consistency. I checked through this and there still might be some consistancy errors but I've fixed up what I can for now
01:00:345 - 01:08:717 Really well mapped and fun but maybe take in consideration mapping over the doubles the chords inverted sound in the background. would add a neat counter rhythmical point, but that is just personal opinion though. I don't hear what you're talking about in here
01:17:612 (77612|1,77612|2) - just adding those small long notes as opposed to the beginning gives a better feel of the piano, that way maybe just adding triples when there's a piano chords+kick+hithat cymbal hits. for instance here: 01:17:089 (77089|2,77089|3) - adding a 0 to this chord, just validating all around those small piano and drum part to replace those if you want, it would add a nice twist and still manageable with a good finger balance to play and it would be fun. messed around a bit with this idea and settled with something I'm happy with
01:50:578 - 01:53:368 - why stop mapping the the reversed sound chords in that part? It just gets overlayered then
01:56:159 - same here. It just gets overlayered then
01:58:950 - I would stop them here instead of 01:56:159 since you clearly switch to give priority to the drum here. It just gets overlayered then
01:56:159 - same as earlier, this whole part has sound inconsistency(3 notes pattern that you use two notes instead)
02:13:950 (133950|1) - here especially, you use 1 notes instead of the regular three. Sometimes consistency has to be sacrificed for playability but I made minor changes.
02:18:310 (138310|1,138310|2,138485|2) - Here there should be a note between the chords and the note to follow the drum. maybe 02:18:397 (138397|0) - to follow finger balance. Accepted.
02:19:357 (139357|0) - move this to 3 to follow pitch relevance and you still keep a good finger balance from the 0 you added right before. fixed PR here
02:23:019 (143019|2,143019|3) - a triple here would be more appropriate for drum emphasis plus piano chord, adding a 1 would be nice.
02:28:601 (148601|0,148601|1) - same add a 2 here I avoided these as it creates an awkward 1/3 jack through the JS whilst playing, see previous "sacrificing consistency for playability" comment
02:29:211 (149211|3) - That note doesn't exist in the song. Accepted.
02:29:298 (149298|2,149298|0) - again, use triple for emphasis, add a 3 Accepted.
02:38:019 - 02:40:810 here I would probably put LN for the chords in the background. to put emphasis on the piano line. I got complained at for mapping the 1/6th sounds at 02:39:415 - and those are louder than the chords in the background so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Overall: I really love the map and the song, feels smooth to play and it's well mapped. The main issue is the sound consistency where you put different amount of notes for the same sound each time it comeback, I think rewatching your map paying a careful attention to that could improve it a lot. Your drum mapping is nuts aside from the previous point and you also don't seem to be having any issue with pitch relevance. So if you would mostly apply the sound consistency to each diff, I think it would be a great improvement. If you have any question, don't be afraid to ask ! "Inconsistency" is my middle name.

Good job on the map and good luck on rank. Thanks~

Side wrote:

Jaja es que estoy en móvil y no me di cuenta que ya moddeaste antes xd

Al rato checo el mod y arreglo lo del kds :p

Etsu wrote:

Hola!

Un pequeño modding para easy xD

No kudos.

Columns: 0|1|2|3

Easy

1. 00:11:508 (11508|0) - este LN deberia terminar en 00:11:857 - por las notas que estan en 00:12:380 (12380|1,12554|3) - ya que seria un poco dificil en esta diff por ese LN... si es por el efecto LN termina en 00:12:903 - hasta ahi desaparece el efecto. Pero tendria que borrar esa notas imo xd creo que si seria muy dificil si extendiera la LN por 00:13:165 (13165|0) - . Ademas el LN sigue ese sonido de guitarra o quien sabe que instrumento sea ese y ahi termina.
2. 00:14:996 (14996|0,15345|0) - y si la mueves en la columna 2? comienza los tambores altos imo buena idea
3. 00:24:240 (24240|2) - eliminar? no se porque pusiste esa nota :s sigue el piano. Es un poco quieto pero ahi esta :v
4. 00:58:950 - y si le agregas LN por ese efecto del fondo? pense hacer so pero tampoco quiero tener tantas LNs en esta dificultad.
5. 01:08:019 (68019|2,68368|1) - control + g? ok
6. 01:08:717 (68717|3,68717|0) - porque doble? creo que deberias eliminar una nota xd Lo tenia porque antes tenia un doble en 00:00:345 - pero ya no xd
7. 01:24:764 (84764|0,85112|0) - lo mismo que se dijo anteriormente hecho
8. 01:50:054 (110054|2,110229|3) - y si lo mueves a la izquierda? senti raro por las notas anteriores 01:49:531 (109531|3,109705|2) - para mejor estructura imo Okay. Movi 01:49:705 (109705|2,110054|2) - a 0
9. 02:22:147 (142147|2) - move a la column 0? me gusta un poco mas sobre 2 :v

Critical_Star wrote:

Hi Side
mod as requested
col 1 2 3 4

Easy
00:09:938 - how about add a note for piano here, i see u try to catch only kick and snare here but i think u probarly shoudn't miss this piano sound here
00:26:682 - u can add a note here too, it feels better to continue the 1/2 stream here.
00:28:775 (28775|2) - looks too soft to notice this piano sound, i would suggest to add a note at 00:29:124 - which the sound are much more noticeable here
00:31:566 (31566|1) - doesn't seems worth to add a note for snare here where u didn't follow snare sound from the beginning, i guess is better to map a note at 00:31:915 - which it have the sync sound
00:33:659 (33659|0,34182|3) - CTRL+H for pitch relevancy?
00:37:322 (37322|3) - u can move it to col 2 where this sound are different from 00:36:973 (36973|3,37671|3) -
00:38:019 - till 00:58:950 - seems like u missed a lot of kick sound here, example u can refer to your normal diff for this part, i think is fine to have more note for kick here and it doesn't really feel hard for easy diff
01:12:205 (72205|2) - change into LN end 01:12:903 - will fit better to the sound

maybe i would mod other diff when i have some free time >w>

i testplayed your hard diff and it actually play nicely, good job~

good luck~

Evening wrote:

Easy

00:22:496 (22496|3) - Think it'd be more fitting if you did a {34} here instead of a {4} only considering the strong piano

00:33:659 (33659|3) - Same here

00:35:229 (35229|3,35578|2,35752|1,35926|0) - Think you can go for the piano here by mapping in the 1/2 in between this pattern just to make it slightly more interesting

01:10:112 (70112|0) - TO 01:12:903 (72903|1) - Suggesting to make this section softer in hitsounds

01:14:822 (74822|2) - Suggesting to make this note go with the strong piano sound by making it a 2 note chord, same goes to 01:17:612 (77612|3) -

01:19:705 - Not too sure about omitting a prominent sound here, you might want to add this in

01:46:740 - and 01:46:915 - Think you can add on 4 here. I felt that the pattern currently doesn't really "complete" the hi-hat rhythm here, so adding on 4 there would be my suggestion

Normal


00:22:671 - Think it'd be better if this timestamp here wasn't left empty, I felt that the 1/2 "swing" rhythm here isn't that necessary and it kinda adds a weird rhythm during play I see what you mean but that's kind of the effect I was going for since I wanted to emphasize the pause in the piano starting with 00:21:537 (21537|1,21798|0,21798|2) - so I also did want a pause here 00:22:671 - for that reason

00:20:926 (20926|3,20926|1) - Not too sure why this is a 2 note chord considering you only add 2 note chords every 4/1 at this section

00:29:298 (29298|3) - Might want to make this a 2 note chord for the snare

00:32:961 (32961|0,32961|2,33659|0,33659|2) - I felt that you should have lesser notes for the first chord here compared to the 2nd considering the piano intensity (suggesting to make the first chord a 1 note only)

01:03:485 (63485|3) - Seems like you're missing a 1/3 here

01:04:182 (64182|2) - and here too, I think it's fine if you have 4 1/3s in a row considering you do that in around 1 second after this part anyways

01:10:112 (70112|0) - TO 01:12:903 (72903|3) - Similarly, make this softer in hitsound

01:46:740 - Same suggestion as the one in Easy

01:49:182 (109182|2,109182|0,110578|3,110578|1) - Think it'd be more fitting if these chords (and all similar chords in this section) were on the snares and claps, I don't hear anything too prominent at the spots where you currently put these 2 note chords

02:19:008 (139008|0) - Think this should be on column 2 for the pitch

02:25:985 (145985|2) - Suggesting to make this a 2 note chord for the piano chord

02:37:322 (157322|0) - Suggesting to modify this pattern such that this note starts on column 4 for the pitch relevancy

02:39:415 (159415|0,159415|1,159764|2,159764|3) - I don't think you need to have these as 2 note chords, drop it down to 1 note each, felt that this ending was a bit too "emphasized" because of that

Hard

00:08:717 (8717|0,8717|3,9066|0,9066|3) - Suggesting to make these 2 chords different considering they are mapped to different pitches

00:21:798 (21798|3,21798|0,21798|1) - Suggesting to make this a 2 note chord so as to make it less "impactful" as 00:22:496 (22496|0,22496|3,22496|1) -

00:28:950 (28950|1) - Kinda suggesting to try to not have 1/2 hammers at all for the percussion since you didn't do that for the previous percussion section @ 00:15:694 (15694|2) - . Patterns like 00:33:485 (33485|1,33485|0,33659|3,33659|0,33659|2) - cannot avoid hammers so that's fine but I'm just suggesting for a more consistent layering Not sure I understand this one since you highlighted [2] for that section but the hammer is 00:28:775 (28775|2,28950|2) - from what I understand a hammer is playing a note in the same line consecutively but I actually did that here to follow the pitch cuz the piano plays that chord twice in 1/2. I tried to be reasonable with them but I might have missed a few that don't follow pitch so I'll look for those but I didn't see an issue with this one in particular.

00:50:403 (50403|0,50578|0) - Yea don't think a hammer is needed, move the first note to 4

01:10:112 (70112|0) - Same suggestion as Easy

01:20:229 (80229|2,80403|3,80403|1) - Since you chose to emphasize the piano here instead of the percussion on the 1/1 with a 2 note chord, suggesting to make 01:21:624 (81624|0,81624|3,81798|2) - the second chord of this a 2 note chord and make the first chord a 1 note chord

01:26:508 (86508|3,86682|3,87903|1,88078|1) - I don't get the hammer usage here as it's not consistent for the next section, think you should just avoid these hammers Can't really avoid this one 01:26:682 (86682|3) - I think

01:41:682 (101682|0) - Think you can just move this to 2 to make it more comfy as also to match columns with the previous kick 01:41:421 (101421|1) - Moved 01:41:857 (101857|0) - to 2 instead since it also makes sense

01:42:380 - Think it'd be more fitting if there was a note here too since this instrument is of the same volume as 01:42:467 (102467|0) -


will check insane some time later, kinda tired now lol

Side wrote:

Evening wrote:

Normal

00:22:671 - Think it'd be better if this timestamp here wasn't left empty, I felt that the 1/2 "swing" rhythm here isn't that necessary and it kinda adds a weird rhythm during play I see what you mean but that's kind of the effect I was going for since I wanted to emphasize the pause in the piano starting with 00:21:537 (21537|1,21798|0,21798|2) - so I also did want a pause here 00:22:671 - for that reason

Very interesting choice, that's good then

Hard

00:28:950 (28950|1) - Kinda suggesting to try to not have 1/2 hammers at all for the percussion since you didn't do that for the previous percussion section @ 00:15:694 (15694|2) - . Patterns like 00:33:485 (33485|1,33485|0,33659|3,33659|0,33659|2) - cannot avoid hammers so that's fine but I'm just suggesting for a more consistent layering Not sure I understand this one since you highlighted [2] for that section but the hammer is 00:28:775 (28775|2,28950|2) - from what I understand a hammer is playing a note in the same line consecutively but I actually did that here to follow the pitch cuz the piano plays that chord twice in 1/2. I tried to be reasonable with them but I might have missed a few that don't follow pitch so I'll look for those but I didn't see an issue with this one in particular.

Might be a bit too vague since I tend to signal a certain section by just highlighting 1 note (I can't copy the timestamp correctly for some reason :d)

I understand the piano 1/2 jacking part so that is fine

So for that section there, from 00:28:950 -

00:29:124 (29124|0,29298|0,29822|1,29996|1,30694|1,30868|1,31740|2,31915|2) - So talking about these jacks, I felt that you can make these more consistent so

for example like these "Kick + Snare" combos here, they can be 1/2 hammers:
00:29:124 (29124|0,29298|0,30519|3,30694|2) -

and for hammers like these:
00:29:822 (29822|1,29996|1,30694|1,30868|1) - I'm not too sure why these are hammers, so just have a consistent system for these hammers is what i'm talking about

01:26:508 (86508|3,86682|3,87903|1,88078|1) - I don't get the hammer usage here as it's not consistent for the next section, think you should just avoid these hammers Can't really avoid this one 01:26:682 (86682|3) - I think

01:26:682 (86682|3) - Think you can move this to 1 or 3 and shifted 01:26:857 (86857|0,86857|2) - around

Same goes to 01:27:903 (87903|1,88078|1,88252|0,88252|3) -

01:41:682 (101682|0) - Think you can just move this to 2 to make it more comfy as also to match columns with the previous kick 01:41:421 (101421|1) - Moved 01:41:857 (101857|0) - to 2 instead since it also makes sense

aight that looks ok

will check insane some time later, kinda tired now lol

Applied all others (green I did something else)
Also applied the hitsound suggestion to hydria's diff. Thanks!

Evening wrote:

Hard

00:28:950 (28950|1) - Kinda suggesting to try to not have 1/2 hammers at all for the percussion since you didn't do that for the previous percussion section @ 00:15:694 (15694|2) - . Patterns like 00:33:485 (33485|1,33485|0,33659|3,33659|0,33659|2) - cannot avoid hammers so that's fine but I'm just suggesting for a more consistent layering Not sure I understand this one since you highlighted [2] for that section but the hammer is 00:28:775 (28775|2,28950|2) - from what I understand a hammer is playing a note in the same line consecutively but I actually did that here to follow the pitch cuz the piano plays that chord twice in 1/2. I tried to be reasonable with them but I might have missed a few that don't follow pitch so I'll look for those but I didn't see an issue with this one in particular.

Might be a bit too vague since I tend to signal a certain section by just highlighting 1 note (I can't copy the timestamp correctly for some reason :d)

I understand the piano 1/2 jacking part so that is fine

So for that section there, from 00:28:950 -

00:29:124 (29124|0,29298|0,29822|1,29996|1,30694|1,30868|1,31740|2,31915|2) - So talking about these jacks, I felt that you can make these more consistent so

for example like these "Kick + Snare" combos here, they can be 1/2 hammers:
00:29:124 (29124|0,29298|0,30519|3,30694|2) -

and for hammers like these:
00:29:822 (29822|1,29996|1,30694|1,30868|1) - I'm not too sure why these are hammers, so just have a consistent system for these hammers is what i'm talking about Sure. I removed those jacks and only kept 00:29:124 (29124|0,29298|0) - and 00:31:740 (31740|2,31915|2) - cuz they're on the same parts in the music and go with the drums like you said

01:26:508 (86508|3,86682|3,87903|1,88078|1) - I don't get the hammer usage here as it's not consistent for the next section, think you should just avoid these hammers Can't really avoid this one 01:26:682 (86682|3) - I think

01:26:682 (86682|3) - Think you can move this to 1 or 3 and shifted 01:26:857 (86857|0,86857|2) - around

Same goes to 01:27:903 (87903|1,88078|1,88252|0,88252|3) - Sure fixed both. Shifted the LN on the second one to 3 so that it makes sense (it was also an inconsistency)

Evening wrote:

Insane I haven't looked at this map myself in like 4 weeks I probably hate it (going through testing I can't play for shit rn so let's see how this goes)

the diff looks ok after a look-through, just a few suggestions I guess that's a few, wouldn't like to see a mod with a lot though.

--

00:25:461 - I'm suggesting another patterning for this to include the piano in the background here, notice the highlighted notes: I like this idea

SPOILER

--

00:27:031 (27031|1,27031|0,27118|2,27205|1,27205|3,27205|0) - you might want to repattern this if you did that as it's a repeat of the previous pattern which might not be intended done

00:28:019 (28019|3,28078|2) - I feel like if you did 34 instead of 43 with this it'd fit the music more as it's pitch relevant and the jack there kinda matches the piano swing yeah this jack seems fine

00:48:485 (48485|2,48572|0,48659|3,48659|1) - Suggesting to do a 14 23 14 pattern here as to go with the *suddenly louder piano* sound yeah I can go with this

--

01:26:508 - Similar suggestion here I feel like having the jack on column 3 here might work out better since then the note is actually ascending onto another note, even if it does leave a slightly rough pattern in it's path (basically taking your 112 pattern and switching hands)

SPOILER

I kinda did 221 since i felt that it's more fitting (subjective), but feel free to just flip the jack+grace pattern to 112

--

01:32:089 (92089|1,92089|2,92089|0,92205|1,92264|3,92264|2,92351|1,92438|3,92438|2) - Felt that this wasn't "graceful" in terms of patterning:
1) didn't really like how that pattern plays like a jumptrill at the end
2) felt that it could be better if you would to do a minijack and grace all on 1 hand and put the 1/4 right after the grace on the other hand so as to give the hand that played the grace a bit of break so as to "emphasize" that grace patterning

So my suggestion would be I can see you have a stair inbetween the notes there after the jack and yeah it does just seem to be better than it's original pattern, changed

SPOILER

--

01:35:752 (95752|0,95752|1,95839|2,95926|0,95926|1,96014|3,96014|2,96101|1,96101|0,96188|2,96188|3,96275|0,96275|1) - Similar to before, try to include the piano in the music in here too by anchoring some stuff more or less same anchors as before, changed the JT pattern up slightly though

01:37:671 (97671|2,97787|3,97845|2) - same suggestion as before same response as before

01:42:147 (102147|3) - wait what's this for It's 1/6 instead of 1/12 snap so I can't even argue that it's a grace note, deleted

01:42:903 (102903|3) - not too sure about including this in as the instrument is either very soft or just not there at all, think the sudden lack of a 1/1 here emulates quite well what the composer is trying to do here actually that is better without it, nice

01:46:915 (106915|3) - miniLN here would be cool but that's like cosmetics better not for consistency and shit

--

02:22:845 (142845|2,142845|3,142903|1) - Not a fan of fast streams (with a jack at the back) that start of by pressing 32 or 23, it's more comfy if you did it on 12 or 34, anyways, suggesting a pattern here that kind of emphasizes the piano at the end of this stream by jacking on 1/3: I'm going to take this suggestion but delete the first note in the 3rd column because the later 1/6 stream patterns don't have that extra beginning note

SPOILER

--

02:28:426 (148426|1,148426|0,148485|2,148543|3,148601|0,148601|1) - Suggesting the exact same pattern as before actually yeah same response

02:34:008 (154008|2,154066|1,154124|3) - uhhhhh suggesting to not start with 23 or 32 on a fast stream rearranged this slightly

02:41:159 (161159|3,161333|2,161508|1,161682|0,161857|2,162031|1,162205|0) - I think it'd be more pitch relevant if you did 3421432, the last note in particular is 2 because i wanted the very last note to be to the left of that particular note ok yeah that's understandable