ctb mod xdd
[Clam]
00:10:168 (3,4,5,6,1) - wouldn't it be cooler if it had some consistency? like you see in the play the notes are not so consistent to theirself imo. You could move (5) to 192;192 and 00:12:168 (1) - to 176;192, looks better to me.
[Relxaing]
00:10:168 (3,4,5,6,1) - dunno if you want a spacing increase at each beat but uh, I don't see the reason why 00:10:668 (4,5) - is by far wider distanced than 00:11:168 (5,6) - are. It looks random imo.
00:16:168 (3,4) - Move (3) to 56;192 and (4) at 200;192, fits better to the music having a consistent spacing at similar sound/beat.
[Chalenging]
00:10:668 (4,5,6) - Same case like Relaxing.
00:17:168 (5) - Why not moving on the same spot like 00:16:168 (3) - ? looks cleaner imo
[Let it go]
00:12:168 (1) - Move it on the same spot like 00:11:168 (5) - is.
.
[Clam]
00:10:168 (3,4,5,6,1) - wouldn't it be cooler if it had some consistency? like you see in the play the notes are not so consistent to theirself imo. You could move (5) to 192;192 and 00:12:168 (1) - to 176;192, looks better to me.
[Relxaing]
00:10:168 (3,4,5,6,1) - dunno if you want a spacing increase at each beat but uh, I don't see the reason why 00:10:668 (4,5) - is by far wider distanced than 00:11:168 (5,6) - are. It looks random imo.
00:16:168 (3,4) - Move (3) to 56;192 and (4) at 200;192, fits better to the music having a consistent spacing at similar sound/beat.
[Chalenging]
00:10:668 (4,5,6) - Same case like Relaxing.
00:17:168 (5) - Why not moving on the same spot like 00:16:168 (3) - ? looks cleaner imo
[Let it go]
00:12:168 (1) - Move it on the same spot like 00:11:168 (5) - is.
.