[Standard]
01:33:417 (1,2) - Unlike other patterns in this diff, this seemed to be one of the weakest pattern with a lacking correlationshilp between two sliders. Mind a rework?
[Advanced]
01:04:528 (1,2,1,2) - The curve rate gets lower as time passes. Is it intended? Personally using all same curve rates will look more consistent.
01:20:083 (1) - Remove NC and add at 01:21:195. That way will make the setting and the pattern consistent with 01:23:417 (4,1).
[Hyper]
00:07:306 (3,4) - Personally a blanket seems to be better in reading than an overlap, but it's up to you.
00:14:806 (4) - This long note in this section feels really not matching the atmosphere. Placing where 00:13:972 (2) is seems to be just enough. This much spacing was too much imo.
00:34:528 (1,2,1) - The patterning here along this combo setting feels confusing in reading. Removing the jump in 00:35:083 (2,1) is strongly recommended.
00:46:056 (2,3,4,1,2,1) - The large spacing selection made the reading of 00:47:306 (1,2,1) little fishy. Consider using this kind of pattern with an advanced ds knowledge. ctrl+G of 00:47:306 (1) might discern the spacing better. http://puu.sh/pArGN/82c1bcc43a.jpg
01:18:417 (3) - This should be 1.20x sv multiplier.
01:46:195 (4,1) - Even it's a slider jump, this seems a bit too much on this level at this part of the song.
[Another]
00:52:861 (3) - Consider NC to discern 1234.
01:45:361 (4) - Consider NC for a better pattern reading.
[Expert]
01:08:313 (4) - Bubble pop.
[Gameover]
00:44:945 (5) - I'd like you to add NC here for a better readability.
00:52:861 (5) - Consider NC to discern 1234. Same for Extreme.
01:35:917 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - The stream shape doesn't seem to be cool enough, especially the sharp flow of 01:35:986 (3). Consider reworking this stream, using convert slider to stream?
01:33:417 (1,2) - Unlike other patterns in this diff, this seemed to be one of the weakest pattern with a lacking correlationshilp between two sliders. Mind a rework?
[Advanced]
01:04:528 (1,2,1,2) - The curve rate gets lower as time passes. Is it intended? Personally using all same curve rates will look more consistent.
01:20:083 (1) - Remove NC and add at 01:21:195. That way will make the setting and the pattern consistent with 01:23:417 (4,1).
[Hyper]
00:07:306 (3,4) - Personally a blanket seems to be better in reading than an overlap, but it's up to you.
00:14:806 (4) - This long note in this section feels really not matching the atmosphere. Placing where 00:13:972 (2) is seems to be just enough. This much spacing was too much imo.
00:34:528 (1,2,1) - The patterning here along this combo setting feels confusing in reading. Removing the jump in 00:35:083 (2,1) is strongly recommended.
00:46:056 (2,3,4,1,2,1) - The large spacing selection made the reading of 00:47:306 (1,2,1) little fishy. Consider using this kind of pattern with an advanced ds knowledge. ctrl+G of 00:47:306 (1) might discern the spacing better. http://puu.sh/pArGN/82c1bcc43a.jpg
01:18:417 (3) - This should be 1.20x sv multiplier.
01:46:195 (4,1) - Even it's a slider jump, this seems a bit too much on this level at this part of the song.
[Another]
00:52:861 (3) - Consider NC to discern 1234.
01:45:361 (4) - Consider NC for a better pattern reading.
[Expert]
01:08:313 (4) - Bubble pop.
[Gameover]
00:44:945 (5) - I'd like you to add NC here for a better readability.
00:52:861 (5) - Consider NC to discern 1234. Same for Extreme.
01:35:917 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - The stream shape doesn't seem to be cool enough, especially the sharp flow of 01:35:986 (3). Consider reworking this stream, using convert slider to stream?