1. 6th's Hyper (4,28 stars, 441 notes)
2. Another (4,95 stars, 635 notes)
3. Collab Hard (3,6 stars, 406 notes)
4. galv's Insane (4,76 stars, 602 notes)
5. Normal (2,25 stars, 280 notes)
6. Ren's Easy (1,48 stars, 132 notes)

N0thingSpecial wrote:

learn to SB son your's shit

FINISHED

yf_bmp wrote:

the storyboard is a little simple.
no probloems unless you make more effects.
good luck

1. 00:32:022 (5) - might wanna have a nc on this to highlight that storyboard effect, if u agree to this then nc this one 00:31:348 (5) - as well to look more balanced
2. 00:39:438 (2,3) - imo two 1/4 sliders here don't really fit since u mostly place such patterns where the vocal is like 00:34:719 (7,8) -
3. 00:48:202 (5) - i would prefer u stick to that vocal all the way, this pattern may work http://puu.sh/ps8MH/1037bb9fcf.jpg, not quite sure whether this breaks ur style tho
4. 02:20:224 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - all other places where u use 3 notes per nc are of same pattern (e.g. triangles: 02:22:921 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - obtuse angle flow: 02:25:617 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - straight: 00:43:146 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - ) so imo the pattern here doesn't agree with ur overall design, can reaarrange a bit

1. 00:13:483 (1,2,3) - can make them full blanketed with each other
2. 00:17:865 (2,4) - a bit weird overlap, can place 4 elsewhere to keep clean
3. 00:21:657 (1,1) - 01:47:949 (1,1) - 1/4 gap after a spinner is questionable afaik, i think u should consult some ppl about this
4. 00:43:652 (2,4) - u wanna have this blanketed i believe
5. 00:45:000 (3,4,1) - not a nice triangle, can adjust 1 a bit
6. 01:05:225 (2,4) - 01:15:168 (3,1) - not a clean overlap imo
7. 01:19:213 (1,2,3,4,5) - too crowded around this section, this is kiai part and there's full reason to space them out more
8. 02:09:438 (1,1) - if u decided not to follow drum but the special sound here, i believe 02:10:449 (2) - should be a slider and should disable nc on 02:09:943 (1) -, just like u do the rest part. And btw ur spacing here is kinda too small for the 1/1 gap, should fix that as well, reading traps like 02:08:595 (3,4,5,6) - is tolerable but imo ppl won't feel comfortable playing sth like 02:10:955 (3,4) - while u apply similar spacing to the 1/2 gap 02:11:460 (4,5) -

Garden wrote:

[Another]

1. 00:32:022 (5) - might wanna have a nc on this to highlight that storyboard effect, if u agree to this then nc this one 00:31:348 (5) - as well to look more balanced Hmm not sure about this since it would mess up a bit how the first triangle looks and since it's not on a big white tick modders will complain so idk I'll see
2. 00:39:438 (2,3) - imo two 1/4 sliders here don't really fit since u mostly place such patterns where the vocal is like 00:34:719 (7,8) - Fixed
3. 00:48:202 (5) - i would prefer u stick to that vocal all the way, this pattern may work http://puu.sh/ps8MH/1037bb9fcf.jpg, not quite sure whether this breaks ur style tho Fixed
4. 02:20:224 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - all other places where u use 3 notes per nc are of same pattern (e.g. triangles: 02:22:921 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - obtuse angle flow: 02:25:617 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - straight: 00:43:146 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - ) so imo the pattern here doesn't agree with ur overall design, can reaarrange a bit Fixed

best of luck!

00:13:483 (1,2,3) - can make them full blanketed with each other Spacing is more important imoimo[/b]
00:17:865 (2,4) - a bit weird overlap, can place 4 elsewhere to keep clean Looks readable
00:21:657 (1,1) - 01:47:949 (1,1) - 1/4 gap after a spinner is questionable afaik, i think u should consult some ppl about this Okay
00:43:652 (2,4) - u wanna have this blanketed i believe Yeah
00:45:000 (3,4,1) - not a nice triangle, can adjust 1 a bit I didn't want (1) to fit with previous pattern to "emphasize" it
01:05:225 (2,4) - 01:15:168 (3,1) - not a clean overlap imo agree
01:19:213 (1,2,3,4,5) - too crowded around this section, this is kiai part and there's full reason to space them out more It gives more emphasize to (6)
02:09:438 (1,1) - if u decided not to follow drum but the special sound here, i believe 02:10:449 (2) - should be a slider and should disable nc on 02:09:943 (1) -, just like u do the rest part. And btw ur spacing here is kinda too small for the 1/1 gap, should fix that as well, reading traps like 02:08:595 (3,4,5,6) - is tolerable but imo ppl won't feel comfortable playing sth like 02:10:955 (3,4) - while u apply similar spacing to the 1/2 gap 02:11:460 (4,5) - Yeah fixed some but small spacing was on purpose because it doesn't really to be hard imo

E n d wrote:

Hello! M4M here!

Pretty good song imo and great map!

[Another]

00:04:654 - I feel like this could be mapped, but I guess that would cause a lot of issues including storyboard so that's just an idea It's fine imo
00:10:786 (1,2) - Here we have a very large jump why isn' it the same for over here? 00:12:134 (1,2) - Made a similar pattern
00:50:730 (4,5,6) - why the sudden jump from 5 to 6 when 4 to 5 was so small? I emphasize the vocals for that jump since I can't put 1/4 sliders like I did before or it would be really confusing with the stream incoming
00:57:134 (2,3,4,5) - Make this DS a bit more consistent? I might just be nit picking Things like that happen when I use hexagrids, I can't do much to fix this but some back and forth jumps or whatever and it wouldn't fit imo and the DS doesn't change "a lot" imo so it's fine I guess I'll see
00:59:831 (2,3,4,5) - ^ ^
01:22:247 (1,2,3,4) - ^ Here maybe I could do something for 01:22:247 (1,2) - but the vocals go a bit random here so weird spacing fits well here imo but idk I'll see
02:01:685 (2) - make it a bit closer to 3? going from 1.9 to 2.5 is quite a change It emphasizes 3 but I'll see if more complains
02:08:932 (4,5,6) - big jump from 4 to 5, but not 5 to 6? why not make it consistent? 02:09:269 (6) - is a less strong sound imo and it fits well with the next pattern 02:09:269 (6,1,2,3,4,5) -

I wish you the best of luck!

Sorry, if it was a bit nit picky, but it was tough to find pretty much anything lol


:d

00:17:865 (2,4) - This doesn't look pleasing imo
00:34:213 (3,5) - ^
00:36:910 (3,5) - ^ They are readable
00:51:067 (5,1) - Improve blanket Too far, not really noticeable
00:52:247 (4) - flip this slider and move these 00:52:584 (1,1,1,1) - below it Actual jump gives some emphasize to (4)
01:02:022 (1,2) - Blanket possibly? Already blanketed
01:09:944 (5,1) - Move 5 a bit further and blanket with 1 You don't need to blanket everything you can d:
01:19:887 (4,5) - why so small DS It gives more impact to (6)
01:31:348 (1,2) - Move further so it emphasizes the music Sounds the same as other circles, btw having a higher spacing would be really hard due to the lack of momentum

Another

1. 00:10:786 (1,2,1,2) - Doesnt matter but I hate perfect stacks.
2. 00:21:573 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - With all these, the 3's always flow strange into the 1's. Play around with rotating them and stuff and you can keep a nice circular flow throughout.
3. 00:31:011 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - Come on, you can be more creative than this to match those drums.
4. 00:39:606 (3) - Is this the only time you havent used a slider here for this rhythm? This one particular combo felt off to me while playing. 00:39:775 (4,5) - This transition was a little strange. Probably because its suddenly not the same pattern you're used to.
5. 00:47:696 (3,4) - No stream for those vocals?
6. 01:07:415 (1,2) - This feels rather underwhelming for the slight pickup on the trumpets(or whatever they are)
7. 02:30:505 (7,8) - Same before about possible vocal stream.

The Fetish wrote:

NM From Queue.

Super late. All my time was going on a new map. Sorry about that.

Nothing really wrong with the map. So this is gonna be rather short and mostly personal opinions.

Another

1. 00:10:786 (1,2,1,2) - Doesnt matter but I hate perfect stacks. Fixed
2. 00:21:573 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - With all these, the 3's always flow strange into the 1's. Play around with rotating them and stuff and you can keep a nice circular flow throughout. Not sure about this, seems fine to me but I'll see if I get more complains
3. 00:31:011 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - Come on, you can be more creative than this to match those drums. Hmm idk the stream is more simple to play imo but I'll see
4. 00:39:606 (3) - Is this the only time you havent used a slider here for this rhythm? This one particular combo felt off to me while playing. 00:39:775 (4,5) - This transition was a little strange. Probably because its suddenly not the same pattern you're used to. Hmm I understand what you're saying but I'm mapping the background noise thingy here 00:39:438 (2,3,4) - so idk aaaaa
5. 00:47:696 (3,4) - No stream for those vocals? Fixed
6. 01:07:415 (1,2) - This feels rather underwhelming for the slight pickup on the trumpets(or whatever they are) Fixed
7. 02:30:505 (7,8) - Same before about possible vocal stream. Fixed

Good effort m8. GL on the rest of the set.

1. For your spread to be rankable, you need to have a difficulty under 2 SR.. atm your Normal is 2.17 so just know about that. You could probably easily get it under 2 SR by just nerfing OD or something.
2. Maybe change the OD and HP of your Hard to 5? It makes for a more gradual progression as you increase in difficulty.
3. HP7 on 2 diffs both under 5 stars hoyl.
4. Your SB elements aren't in a SB folder which.. I haven't seen before. I dunno if it's a problem though.

1. 00:12:977 (4,5) - switch these two so that the clap is on a clickable object?
2. 00:16:179 (1,2) - space these out more?
3. 00:16:179 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - the angles in this part are kinda sharp and don't look very nice. I would move these objects ar
4. 00:18:202 (4,1) - overlap here is meh
5. 00:20:561 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - the equal spacing in this section makes it unmemorable, I suggest playing around with the spacing and adding emphasis to certain jumps where you see fit
6. 00:22:584 (1,3) - blanket this and 00:23:426 (5,8)
7. 00:24:101 (8) - ctrl g? and maybe space these out more
8. 00:24:269 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - are these the same? can't be sure but if they're not you can just use polygon creator to make them that way
9. 00:25:617 (3,5) - blanket?
10. 00:26:629 (8,9) - maybe do something like this here? Makes it more interesting imo
11. 00:29:325 (7,8) - imo all of these are like emphasized because they're kicksliders, so I would do something more interesting with them spacing wise
12. 00:40:112 (5,6) - space these more?
13. 00:42:134 (2,3) - ^
14. 00:45:505 (6,7) - ok imo these are the emphasized parts in these section but the spacing on all of these are very low so I would change them a bit. It'd make the map more fun to play to have some important jumps with these
15. 00:48:539 (1,3) - blanket?
16. 01:10:786 (3,4,5) - angle is meh because it's a straight line
17. 01:11:460 (1,2) - spacing kinda big?
18. 01:22:752 (4) - move this to x397 y302
19. 01:58:988 (2,5) - overlap meh

1. 00:14:831 (1,2,1) - blankets
2. 00:26:207 - don't think there should be a note here?
3. 00:26:629 (6) - I don't like how the start of the new section isn't clickable. This is okay in like.. lowdiffs but I wouldn't do it here.
4. 00:29:325 (3) - ^
5. 01:13:820 (6,2) - fix overlap?
6. 01:19:550 (1,2,3,4,5) - don't like this angle, feel like jumps with freer spacing would play better, or maybe continue with the back and forth pattern
7. 01:24:438 (1,2,3) - bring this to the right a bit?
8. 01:27:977 (3,6) - ew :<
9. 01:33:033 (1,2,3,4) - again, in my opinion continous wide angles like this don't play well, and I would change it as the rest of the map flows very well in comparison
10. 02:19:213 (6,7,8,9,10,11) - ^

Logic Agent wrote:

Hi friend, m4m stuff, sorry I'm late hehe np :^)

[General]

1. For your spread to be rankable, you need to have a difficulty under 2 SR.. atm your Normal is 2.17 so just know about that. You could probably easily get it under 2 SR by just nerfing OD or something. o I think you had the old version of the map since I added Ren's Easy recently haha
2. Maybe change the OD and HP of your Hard to 5? It makes for a more gradual progression as you increase in difficulty. Fixed
3. HP7 on 2 diffs both under 5 stars hoyl. idk there are a lot of ranked maps with the same SR that have the HP7 (I know it's not really a good way to defend myself for this but it's not that bad imo I'll probably change it if more complains tho)
4. Your SB elements aren't in a SB folder which.. I haven't seen before. I dunno if it's a problem though. I've seen it before and I don't think it's a problem but maybe I'll fix it if other modders complain

[Another]

1. 00:12:977 (4,5) - switch these two so that the clap is on a clickable object? Fixed
2. 00:16:179 (1,2) - space these out more? Fixed
3. 00:16:179 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - the angles in this part are kinda sharp and don't look very nice. I would move these objects ar Hmm idk about this, I already moved something because of the last point but I'll see if more modders complain
4. 00:18:202 (4,1) - overlap here is meh Yes it's a bit awkward but with hexagrids I can't fix it without moving this slider or whatever and it's not really noticable in game since they are not that close in the timeline but I'll see too
5. 00:20:561 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - the equal spacing in this section makes it unmemorable, I suggest playing around with the spacing and adding emphasis to certain jumps where you see fit idk the vocals here sound a bit the same so I don't think some sounds in this part need more emphasize but I'll see once again lol
6. 00:22:584 (1,3) - blanket this and 00:23:426 (5,8) I know they might not be a "perfect" blanket but I can't curve them more or they would be not long enough for the hexagrids thingy aaa idk if I'm explaining this correctly and it's not really really noticable in game imo
7. 00:24:101 (8) - ctrl g? and maybe space these out more I tried but if I do that the spacing would be huge for that part and since the triangles just after are spaced a lot too I don't think it's really necessary especially in a "calm" part like this
8. 00:24:269 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - are these the same? can't be sure but if they're not you can just use polygon creator to make them that way uh they look the same to me o I don't really understand ;_;
9. 00:25:617 (3,5) - blanket? Fixed I think
10. 00:26:629 (8,9) - maybe do something like this here? Makes it more interesting imo Fixed
11. 00:29:325 (7,8) - imo all of these are like emphasized because they're kicksliders, so I would do something more interesting with them spacing wise Honestly they look fine to me, I don't want to make them too "hard" to play since sometimes they can be awkward to play and they all have pretty much the same spacing through the map which makes them a bit less awkward and more consistent but idk maybe if I get more complains haha
12. 00:40:112 (5,6) - space these more? ^
13. 00:42:134 (2,3) - ^ ^
14. 00:45:505 (6,7) - ok imo these are the emphasized parts in these section but the spacing on all of these are very low so I would change them a bit. It'd make the map more fun to play to have some important jumps with these ^ sry but I really like how they are now :^(
15. 00:48:539 (1,3) - blanket? Fixed
16. 01:10:786 (3,4,5) - angle is meh because it's a straight line Straight lines are fun :^) idk it doesn't feel really awkward to play imo and I like this pattern aaa
17. 01:11:460 (1,2) - spacing kinda big? I know but if I move it to 01:10:449 (2) - 's head for example the spacing between 01:11:629 (2,3) - would be big too and I feel like 1,2 needs more emphasize compared to 2,3
18. 01:22:752 (4) - move this to x397 y302 Why? It doesn't match with the whole structure of the map which is hexagrids
19. 01:58:988 (2,5) - overlap meh Same as the previous overlap :^)

fun song! with some aesthetic changes this set could be great~

Nherantelon wrote:

Salut
-> From ta modding queue :

Déjà et avant toute chose : je suis pas un excellent modder et ce mapset me semble excellent, donc ça va pas être la folie^^ T'en fais pas tous les mods sont bons à prendre

Another

00:40:028 : J'aurais placé un cercle là pour plus de smooth, mais ça c'est juste mon avis Y a aucun vrai "beat" ici, ce serait considéré comme de l'overmap ce qui est unrankable désolé
02:12:471 (1, 2, 1) : Le pattern suit assez mal la musique je trouve, essaye de Ctrl+G, il me semble que ça sonne bien mieux Oula c'est bizarre quand je clique sur ta sélection ça m'affiche un pattern qui est très éloigné dans la timeline mdr, t'es sûr de pas avoir NC ou delete quelque chose avant de copier/coller ça ? Là je comprends pas trop ce que tu veux dire du coup rip

Voilà pour ce que j'en pense, d'ailleurs j'adore la musique btw^^
Au fait, Shyotamaze, tu as dit que tu avais la flemme de modder plus d'une diff chez moi, mais rassure toi (enfin si ça te gênais :p), tu m'a appris beaucoup plus qu'en simplement pointant les erreurs Haha oui je pense que c'est mieux de bien expliquer chaque point dans un mod lorsqu'on mod la map d'un débutant vu que ça te fait mieux comprendre ce qu'il faut améliorer hésite pas à me demander en mp ou quoi si t'as d'autres questions !

General

Ren's Easy

Normal

Collab Hard

6th's Hyper

galv's Insane

Another

Venix wrote:

For queue!

Legend

Light Suggestion
Normal Suggestion
Strong Suggestion
Unrankable

General

1. Combo colors is inconsistent Yea I'll probably fix it later for my diffs but I don't think it's unrankable if GDers don't have the same combo colours

Normal

1. 00:20:224 (1) - move to x=285 y=160 for cleaner look! It's here because I wanted the spacing here http://prntscr.com/cfdor2 to be the same but maybe if I get more complains yes, it's not a bad idea

Collab Hard

1. 00:34:719 (5,6,1,2,3) - blank it better It doesn't look like a correct blanket because there is a stack but it's a correct blanket

Another

1. 00:31:685 (1,2,3,4) - at this moment spacing need be bigger Why? It doesn't seem necessary to me sry
2. 00:51:910 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^ ^
3. 01:13:482 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^ ^
4. 02:39:775 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^ ^

~GL!

Shyotamaze wrote:

Oula c'est bizarre quand je clique sur ta sélection ça m'affiche un pattern qui est très éloigné dans la timeline mdr, t'es sûr de pas avoir NC ou delete quelque chose avant de copier/coller ça ? Là je comprends pas trop ce que tu veux dire du coup rip

Nherantelon wrote:

Shyotamaze wrote:

Oula c'est bizarre quand je clique sur ta sélection ça m'affiche un pattern qui est très éloigné dans la timeline mdr, t'es sûr de pas avoir NC ou delete quelque chose avant de copier/coller ça ? Là je comprends pas trop ce que tu veux dire du coup rip

Je parle des 3 objets qui se suivent à 02:12:471 (2 sliders et un cercle) Ah d'accord je sais pas j'aime bien le pattern actuel, je l'ai mis pour "varier" un peu vu que cette partie est pas mal répétitive mais si j'ai + de plaintes je le changerai sûrement oui

pinataman wrote:

[Normal]

00:16:179 (1) – Changing the rhythm so that 00:16:516 – isn't emphasized but 00:16:685 – is a radical shift in the map's rhythm that makes no sense to me. What's the intention? Fixed

00:19:719 (2) – I read this as being on 00:19:550 – and it's weird for you to not have a note here. Fixed

00:32:359 (1,2,1,2,3,4) – Rhythm in a normal is both tricky and subjective, but I'll do my best with this. I was going to rant here, but let me give you my rhythm suggestion for you to test yourself and you can find me in game if you want my explanation: http://puu.sh/r45X0/c76c1da4cf.jpg. On the next measure at 00:35:056 (1) - , you can make the first one a reverse slider like: http://puu.sh/r460T/d799cbab5f.jpg
Use these types of rhythm as the basis for the rhythm in this section and the mirrored section at 02:20:224 - I only fixed that http://prntscr.com/cfq9ws because I think the other patterns are fine, I don't want to make the rhythm of the Normal diff too difficult/weird for beginners

00:57:977 (1,2) – This 3/2 rhythm might not be appropriate. Relaxing your perspective and just making it 1/1 seems more agreeable to me: http://puu.sh/r46kk/fcd4c3dd04.jpg Hmm not a bad idea but I'm mapping the sax here but I'll probably fix it if I get more complains :d

01:00:674 (1,1) – This overlap looks poor, try rotating 01:02:022 (1) - idk the long slider is supposed to be a blanket too so if I rotate it it's going to be weird and I don't think the overlap is really that noticable in game since the objetcs are quite far away from each other in the timeline but I'll see if I get more complains wait nvm I fixed it because of the next point lol

01:03:202 – The saxophone gets syncopated to this beat, and since you're about to strongly go with the sax, you might want to consider changing your rhythm to start here. Test out a rhythm like this starting at 01:02:022 (1) - , though I could see pros and cons to both rhythms: http://puu.sh/r46yj/a99c17ad7e.jpg Fixed

01:04:719 (1) – I liked this section's rhythm a lot, you nail what the sax is doing. o thanks

01:26:292 (1) – From until the end of the kiai, your flow is all clockwise. Consider changing the direction of the flow somewhere like 01:31:685 (1) - by doing something like http://puu.sh/r45qc/bafea2e08c.jpg Fixed

[Collab Hard]

00:10:786 (1,2,3,4) – Just because it's the beginning of the map and I'm trying to understand what the map is expecting from me, be a little smoother with your flow from (1,2) and put any kind of emphasis with your flow on (4) instead. This will transition the player into your map a little calmer instead of jerking them around with the aggressive flow at (1,2). Try something like this: http://puu.sh/r46Io/7d7315f18e.jpg Haha yea fixed, I don't know wtf I did there tbh :^)

00:32:359 (1,2) – If this wasn't strong enough to get a jump, I don't think you should jump at 00:33:707 (1,2) -
00:34:887 (6,1) – If the downbeat at 00:33:539 (4,1) – is strong enough to get a jump, I think you should put a jump on this downbeat as well.
If you agree with either of the above two, apply consistently to the other jumps in this section With jumps like 00:33:707 (1,2) - this I try to emphasize the vocals here that feels stronger than 00:32:359 (1,2) - imo and I don't really want to put jumps everywhere since it's only a hard diff lol but maybe if I get more complains o

00:35:898 (4,1) – This is a little closer than 00:35:898 (4,5) - . Might be good to construct the pattern with symmetry first and then rotate like: http://puu.sh/r47cf/ac2bb9cb3b.jpg Fixed I think

01:00:168 (4,1) – Due to auto-stacking, these are a bit close and don't form that nice triangle. Try moving 01:00:674 (1,2) – to account for auto-stacking Fixed

01:05:224 (2,3) – Try deleting (3) and making (2) a ½ slider, then consider using the same rhythm at 01:06:573 (2) - Fixed

01:15:505 (1,2,3) – Two things about this jump. One is that there isn't a strong angle into (3). Linear flow has it's place, but I really think having a sharper angle will help accentuate the (3) note in a nicer way like http://puu.sh/r47Bz/9a808f6a26.jpg . Second, Try making the DS between (2,3) be 1.60x and leave the strong spacing of 1.80x for the stronger downbeats. I think 3 is already accentuated or idk how to say it correctly and as you can see here 01:15:505 (1,2,3,4,5) - the same kind of pattern repeats to emphasize the vocals ( 01:15:505 (1,2,3) - linear flow until 3 with a flow break or idk how to call it maybe anti-jump lol to emphasize vocals 01:16:011 (3,4,5) - same until 5) and I don't agree with the spacing change since the thing that I emphasize the most here are the vocals :d

[Another]

00:11:123 (2,3) – This reads like 1/1 rhythm because 00:10:786 (1,2) – is stacked. Change your spacing. Fixed
I just realized I'm lazy. pls if you're lazy and you can mod every diff with cool advices then I'm the most lazy guy on the planet earth

1. 00:10:955 - , 00:12:303 - there isn't any special reason that letting this spaces empty imo. what about filling it by adding a note on each space?
2. 00:30:168 (4,7) - what about adding a NC for indicating that triangle pattern? just like you did it on 00:22:078 (1) - this
3. 00:39:606 (3,4) - most of your rhythms are following the vocal well while this one doesn't. try reversing the rhythm and check how it works
   
   try this one

   
4. 02:12:471 (2,3) - you can make the rhythm fit well with the music by using this one. consider changing it on other same parts too(02:17:865 (2,3) - and so on)
5. 02:30:926 - it would be better if you add a note here to follow the music well

HelloSCV wrote:

from my queue

[Another]

1. 00:10:955 - , 00:12:303 - there isn't any special reason that letting this spaces empty imo. what about filling it by adding a note on each space? There is no "real" sound here 00:10:955 to add a note, 00:12:303 here there is one I can agree but I didn't map it for consistency and because the sound 00:10:786 (1,1) - is "fading out" or idk how to explain but imo it's better to not add a note here :d "but wait you added a note here 00:13:483 (1,2) - why can't you do the same?" well it's because I mapped vocals there (I know you didn't say this but it's for a better explanation lol)
2. 00:30:168 (4,7) - what about adding a NC for indicating that triangle pattern? just like you did it on 00:22:078 (1) - this Fixed
3. 00:39:606 (3,4) - most of your rhythms are following the vocal well while this one doesn't. try reversing the rhythm and check how it works Fixed
   
   try this one

   
4. 02:12:471 (2,3) - you can make the rhythm fit well with the music by using this one. consider changing it on other same parts too(02:17:865 (2,3) - and so on) idk I prefer my rhythm but maybe if I get more complains sure :d
5. 02:30:926 - it would be better if you add a note here to follow the music well Fixed

i'll finish rest of them later