[General]
- For Shoegazer's GD, shouldn't the diff name be "Shoegazer's 6236"?
- For 7140, I'd recommend setting your OD a little higher since there are 0 LNs in it and it's all short notes.
- OD ~8.2 might be a little better for 5332 cause of no LNs.
- Last thing is I think you should set the HP a little higher on all the diffs cause it's all bursty but idk.
[5332]00:08:909 (8909|0) - Correct me if I'm wrong, but you're only mapping the synths, kicks, and snares in the intro section right? So then why is this note here? There's only a hihat here and no synth.
00:10:713 (10713|0) - ^^
00:26:728 (26728|0,26954|0,27179|0) - This stack doesn't look that visually appealing, nor does it play well imo. I think moving 00:26:954 (26954|0) to 2 would be better so you don't jack 3 1/1 notes.
00:30:788 (30788|0,30788|2) - Two suggestions here: this is the same sound as the one at 00:23:570 but the difference is that you used a double for the first set of notes I highlighted, whereas 00:23:570 (23570|0,23570|1,23570|3) is a triple. So, you can either add a note to 00:30:788 or remove one from 00:23:570
00:37:668 (37668|1,37781|2) - I'd consider removing these notes to accent the pause in the instruments and the synth at 00:37:894 (37894|1)
00:48:157 (48157|2) - Shouldn't this be a double note since 00:49:961 (49961|2,49961|1) is and they're the same sound.
00:57:405 (57405|2,57405|3) - Me being a PR nazi here, but the chord here is lower in pitch than the one at 00:55:600 (55600|2,55600|3) yet they're the same {34} chord. So I'd recommend making 00:57:405 (57405|2,57405|3) a {12} chord or something similar like that.
01:00:112 (60112|3,60112|1) - I think it'd be cool to make a stack with 00:59:660 (59660|0,59660|2,60563|0,60563|2) since they're all the same snare, interrupted by a kick, so maybe try something like this?
01:07:781 (67781|0,67781|3) - Why not use a different chord for this kick, because right now, it looks like this is the same sound as 01:08:006 (68006|3,68006|0,68119|0,68119|3) since they're the same {14} placement.
01:11:051 (71051|3,71164|2,71277|1) - The snares here are almost inaudible (or they're not they're at all), so I'd recommend removing them.
01:15:450 - I don't really understand the triples in this section because they feel really forced since they're only kicks similar to 01:16:352 (76352|2,76352|1) so there's no real reason to make them more emphasized.
01:18:608 (78608|2,78608|0,78608|1) - Piggy backing on the above idea, since this note is only a kick, I'd consider removing the note in 1 in order to avoid a tiring 4 note jack.
01:19:172 (79172|1,79285|0) - You started using a pattern of jacks in this section, and then you stopped. I would recommend keeping them for pitch relevancy, which would mean that these notes need to be jacked together.
01:19:510 (79510|0,79623|1) - These two should be in whatever column the previous two notes are in.
01:20:074 (80074|1,80187|2,80412|0,80525|1) - ^^ and you start to get the idea.
01:26:390 (86390|2,86503|0,86615|3) - If you follow pitch relevancy here, control H since 01:26:503 is higher than 01:26:615 . If not following PR, I'd suggest arranging your notes in a {2-3-4} roll for playability
01:43:589 (103589|0) - I think the 1/8 roll starts at 01:43:645 so this is a ghost note...?
01:42:518 to 01:42:743 - There should be a 1/8 roll here?
[4424]00:14:322 (14322|2,14435|1) - You don't map the other synths here, so remove these?
00:16:127 (16127|3,16239|2) - I'd also consider removing these in this diff because the start of the synths is very quiet for these first two notes, only reaching full volume at 00:16:352
00:24:698 - Why not add a 1/2 LN here for the drum roll? If accepted, I guess you could control H 00:24:585 (24585|1,24698|2) and add the LN at 2.
00:47:254 to 00:47:931 - At 00:50:863 (50863|1,50863|2,51089|2,51089|1,51315|2,51315|1) you make all the notes jacked with each other, so for consistency, why not do the same here with all these doubles?
00:53:570 (53570|2,53570|1,53683|3,53683|0,53796|1,53796|2) - And for these notes here, I'd try and do the same thing you did in 5332 and jack 00:53:570 (53570|2,53570|1,53683|0,53683|3) together.
01:00:788 (60788|0) - Again, maybe try a 1/2 LN here for the drum roll?
01:11:051 (71051|3,71164|2,71277|0) - As I mentioned in the last difficulty, these sounds are almost inaudible and very difficult to hear, which is why I'd consider removing them.
01:52:217 (112217|3,112217|2,112668|0,112668|1) - Why are these doubles when their sound is only a hihat? Most people are probably assuming you're just following the drum here, so it makes no sense to layer a synth over this hihat click to make a double note.
[3516]00:08:570 (8570|1,8570|0) - This is your easiest diff, which is why I'm kind of against using a pattern like this since it's not really beginner friendly. I think it would be fine if you just removed a note at 1 to make it a minitrill.
00:10:262 (10262|0,10262|1,10375|2,10375|3) - ^^ and basically what I said as above, but it's up to you anyways.
00:17:706 - For this entire section, you accent the downbeat, which is understandable as that's the heavy beat (normally), but the snares are on beats 2 and 4 or 00:18:157 - 00:19:059 - for example, so shouldn't the accent come on those beats instead?
00:33:157 and 00:34:961 - Why don't you just finish mapping the synth here and make a minitrill, so it'd be something like this
01:21:766 (81766|2) - Move this to 1 to restore some hand balance because 01:21:315 to 01:22:668 is very right hand heavy.
01:43:420 to 01:44:322 - Rather than use notes to represent the drum roll, why not just add an LN for it instead. I think it helps with building up to the ending section.