from my queue~
[Hard]
[Hard]
- 00:11:108 (1) - I would decrease the hitsound volume in this section by at least 10%, it's way too loud
- Actually, in general, I wouldn't use such drastic hitsound volume changes. Example:Use a 10% change at 00:19:389 (2,1) - since there's only 10% change at 00:20:951 (4,1) - . Same thing at 00:22:670 (6,7) - The finishes already make it sound louder than the previous section, no need to go over the top with a 20% volume increase
- 00:36:576 (3) - NC here, otherwise your 1/2 spacing at 00:36:108 (1,2) - looks exactly like your 1/1 spacing at 00:36:264 (2,3) -
- 00:58:451 (1) - I wish you would use a different slider here since it represents your vocal as well and the start of the chorus again. for example, something like this http://puu.sh/noLbG/a06b33ea9f.jpg
- 01:09:389 (3,4) - 01:16:733 (3,4) - be careful with spacing, these are basically touching
- 03:06:733 (4) - I think a 1/4 repeat slider would be nice to represent drum and make rhythm more interesting
- 03:27:201 (1,2,3) - pretty intense part of the song, so I wish you would represent this with bigger spacing
- Lol, there's nothing light about it. this should really just be called insane
- 00:13:373 - add a note here
- 00:25:951 (5,1) - bigger spacing pls, your hard diff even has a larger spacing here
- 00:49:076 (2,3) - fix stack
- 00:57:201 (1,2,3,4,5) - even if you're following the instrument, the vocal intensity changes so much here that it feels weird to play. Maybe you could try successively increasing DS between each note http://puu.sh/noMGc/b444ec804c.jpg
- 01:15:326 (2) - break this into a note+slider so you don't miss drum beat at 01:15:483 -
- 01:29:858 (1) - why not continue pattern and place this at [72, 320]?
- 03:06:733 (1,2,3) - hard to tell this is 1/3 rhythm, so it might be better to make this a 1/3 repeat slider
- and this should really be extra, but since you already have an extra...idk
- 00:25:326 (4,5,6,7,8,1) - the song intensity feels pretty constant here, so I don't think the jump spacing should keep increasing.
- since 01:03:608 (1) - and 01:04:233 (3,4) - sound identical, you should use the pattern to represent both
- 01:13:608 (1,2) - avoid overlap. same at 01:32:358 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) -
- 02:23:295 (4) - this should be closer to [~270, ~209] for your pattern