DeRandom Otaku wrote:

(Can you) take stars?

1. 00:05:947 (1) - maybe this can safely trim to 1/1 slider because intro's instruments was on 00:06:272 - and this can be more consistent how you mapped on 00:04:650 (1,2) -
2. 00:20:704 (2,2) - idk touching isn't good imo
3. 00:56:218 (6) - maybe just convert it to single circle, let's consider it's for a lowest diff, this is pretty looks spammed due to all 1/2 gaps on 00:55:245 (4,5,6,1,2,3) -
4. 01:01:407 (6) - ^
5. 01:02:704 (3,4) - idk this flow is pretty confusing for a new player, they prolly click the tail of 4. maybe this kind of shape can help for less-confusing
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:09:515 (1) - maybe can reduce the curve for sth flow thingy
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:18:596 (4,3) - this isn't really a problem but myocd tells me it shuld be stacked xd

1. 00:05:299 (2,2,3) - idk maybe they can be create some doritos http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5210911
2. 00:11:137 (5,1) - maybe swap NC regardless of some greenline there for be more consistent with prev. section 00:08:542 (1,2,3,4) -
3. 00:27:353 (2,1) - hi blanket.jpg
   
   SPOILER

   

1. cs5 reminds me angelhoney lel
2. 00:03:110 (5) - idk I don't really hear anything on the audio itself.
3. 00:59:623 (2) - ctrl g this will create a better something spinning flow with 00:59:137 (1) - but nah nvm
4. 01:03:677 (3) - hi blanket(2).jpg
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:12:596 (2,4) - this will be based on my shitty taste, maybe this slider can change to parallel with 01:12:110 (1) - for create something sexier flow for 01:12:920 (3) - since current 01:12:920 (3,4) - is kinda forced to move for player imo
   
   I didn't polished but how it looks liek

   

1. saem as prev diff, there's no beat on 00:03:110 - imo
2. 00:05:947 (1,2,3,4) - maybe this section should be more intense for pp jumps, not on 00:06:596 (5,6,7) - or maybe make them more balanced-looking liek move 00:06:110 (2,4) - to the right
   i can't rly mod and map insaen and extra 4give me

• [uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh???]

1. 00:03:028 (4,5) - why are you doing 2 kicksliders here lol, i mean this dont fit the music and is inconsistent with other part
2. 00:26:055 (4,1) - this could move to 253 133 to blanket with 00:25:407 (2) - , and maybe you need to move 00:25:893 (3) - either
3. 01:11:785 (5) - i would rather do this, so the blanket would look nicer
4. 01:14:704 (1,2,3) - lol another penis XDD
5. 01:19:569 (3) - NC here? just like what youve done at 00:17:299 (1) -
6. 01:22:812 (3) - NC here to consist this part
7. 01:24:110 (3,5,7) - maybe NC on these notes either to consist with the whole part XD

• [insane????????????????????????????????????????????????????]

1. awww CS5 is really necessary lol?
2. 00:23:461 (3,1) - stack these would be nice, or make the spacing bigger like 00:39:028 (3,1) -
3. 00:26:055 (4,1) - samu
4. 01:00:434 (1) - make the sliderend stack with 01:01:407 (4) -

Sotarks wrote:

poeple are meme'ing by shooting stars xdd

Okorin wrote:

üüüüü

[gnrl]
ur custom clap is fricking annoying, the default claps actually sound better ok i removed that clap, and using the default one
whistlespam in the very beginning makes it seem like "idk how to hitsound this so here have whistles", would search for something that is less focused on spamming 1/2 whistles tbh i'm following something on those whistle, but i didn't know how could I place them propelly, i tested and it fits okay, so I guess I left them like that.
youre incapable of doing the sb properly i see wait, why? i'm not a pro SBer, btu I like playing with backgrounds...

[uhh.]
od 9 is totally possible for this song B) od8.2 trademark, and yeah od9 is way to high for that, it's totally not me putting high od.
00:04:650 (1,1) - combospam seems unnecessary, and so does it seem in most of this map the fact that i'm using lots of nc spam, it's for the readability of my jumps in my map, and to make the play smoother. I tried some patern here with those, and seems weird in my eyes, like the way I placed them, needs to be emphasised by a NC. But I can understand some poeple won't agree with me about that.
00:04:650 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - that these are bigger / more intense than 00:11:137 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - makes little sense, it should actually the other way around because the 2nd pattern is a burst in intensity with new instruments, but you got that backwards yes you are totally right here, I changed those, like you said.
00:20:218 - that this and 01:22:488 - are so drastically different in terms of difficulty is odd mapdesign tbh. the fact is I wanted to keep the full single taps jumps for the last ending jump, so i changed the rythmn for the previous one with an other style of paterning, that makes sense to my eyes.
that the kiai is focused on instruments instead of vocals makes me as someone who mapped this already a bit sad, mainly because stuff like 00:54:434 (2,3,4) - has vocals on all ticks and 01:00:920 (2,3,4,5,6) - would give room for 2 sliders for vocals but whatever (01:00:920 (2,3,4,5,6) - ) seems random btw I don't think that part feels random, because this section the vocal is higher than the previous one where I put sliders, so I wanted to emphasis this section by putting a jump here with full notes, makes sense.

the way you organise spacing is pretty neat to play but i would have welcomed more intensity for parts such as 00:33:191 - where new instruments and overall more intensity kick in, but you keep on doing consistent stuff with the previous section which is different in that regard but w/e the fact is we all have different ways to five intensity to their maps, I know seems you mapped the same song, so I guess you probably have a different way of thinking than me. And I totally accept that because, while I mapped Historia, I disagree with the other mapset of it. We all want to gives intensity where we feel like it has to be, and I feel like the emphasis of this map makes sense to my eyes, and every patern of mine has a meaning.

00:42:191 (5) - 00:39:596 (6) - given their context both seem kinda random, but the first one i linked seems more random than the 2nd one because it doesn't serve much of a purpose Yeah I agree, I removed those. And tbh, I didn't like those triples that much xdd

I think that loving blankets too much is a bad thing, would instead recommend to use them wherever they would look neat as a pattern thing instead of just everywhere I know you don't like blankets to much, but I like the way I can structure paterns by blanketing stuff. I like watching maps nice and structured in the editor.

1. 00:35:785 (1,2) - not sure if this intentional but it really inconsistent with 1/2 spacing that you do all over the map here , so it should be 1.0x ?
2. 00:37:893 - no circle here ? I think add a circle here will make the rhythm here consistent with 00:32:704 (5) -
3. 00:40:650 - you can add a note here , I think it can make rhythm sound better
4. 00:45:839 (3,1) - 01:09:515 (1,2) - tiny spacing error ee

1. 00:27:353 (2,3) - I don't think this is a really good jumps since (3) doesn't seems to like sound strong , it sound very weak so using jumps here just feel a bit awkward imo , consider lowering spacing there a bit
2. 00:25:407 (2) - nc should be here instead of 00:25:083 (1) - ?
   
   with the amount of jumps in insane I think you may need to add some more jumps in this diff for spread

• cs5 insane d

1. 00:10:488 (3,4) - that (4) is so hard to see and notice in-game o: looks like it got cover by (3) sliderend lol maybe you could try manual stack instead
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:31:569 (1,2) - aesthetic wise , doesn't looks really good when the tail is nearly close to each other like that , perhaps you can move (2) to around x192 y104 for better aesthetic imo
3. 00:37:407 (3,1,2,3) - somehow this can be a bit confusing since you mash up the bell sound with the snare jumps there but I guess the problem with this mashup is the spacing 00:37:893 (1,2,3) - ok now this one I think you can treat it as three bell sound cus I think player would expect something like that so maybe you can try make their spacing somehow like similiar or like try move 00:38:218 (3) - to around x480 y280
4. 00:47:785 (2,1) - doesn't this jumps (?) feel a bit too big or something ? I think it play a bit weird at the current spacing so maybe lower spacing a bit there ?

1. 00:09:839 (1,2) - (2) sound pretty weak and the pitch also weak too so why do you use high spacing here ? it make this feel weird and not good to play , consider lower spacing
2. 00:10:488 (1,2) - same ^ but this is worse , 00:10:164 (1,2,1) - this is when spacing correlation done right
3. 00:15:515 (4,5) - this doesn't play good imo , the way you use high spacing here seems like not really work somehow since 00:15:677 (5) - sound much softer than (4) and I think the pitch there also doesn't sound really strong to make the big jumps like this play good so consider lowering the spacing here a bit , maybe try move (5) to around x256 y288 ?
4. 00:16:326 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - consider your hitsound here 00:16:650 (1,2,1,2) - it seems like you just map for the pattern itself not the corralation with the music imo ok so 00:16:326 (1,2) - (2) here doesn't sound so strong so high spacing won't works here 00:16:812 (2,1) - this one (1) sound more softer so higher spacing seems doesn't make sense somehow so guess u know what to do
5. 00:20:542 (1,2) - I see it pretty weird that you use the same spacing as 00:20:218 (1,2) - when the those (2) aren't sound same so I guess 00:20:542 (1,2) - this should have higher spacing or more acute angle
6. 00:21:515 (1,2) - (2) sound very weak not good for jumps like this :C
7. 00:22:326 (1,2,3,1) - this is an example of good correlation with the music
8. 00:42:272 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - mmm why the spacing just go decrease when the beat here still stay the same tone and intensity :s , consider using similiar spacing for this pattern
9. 00:43:569 (1) - lol d doesn't looks that good , try this ?
   SPOILER

   [img]puu.sh/p9aqW/cb9c49dc1e.jpg[/img]
10. 00:52:650 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I think starting with sudden big jumps like this is not really fit the music here , I think it better to just try to gradually increase spacing or make angle go gradually more acute to make this jumps fit the music
11. 00:53:623 (1,2,1) - I think arrange like this make cursor movement better
    SPOILER

    
12. 01:01:245 (4,5) - flow here not really good if it come after the acute one 01:00:920 (2,3,4) - since I guess (5) is the strong beat one here and then u just use large angle suddenly here it make this flow a bit awkward imo , perhaps you can make the angle there more acute for better correlation with the music
13. 01:23:137 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - ok 01:23:137 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I don't think the jumps really work with those (2) being a weak beat like that consider lower spacing there or just use 1/2 slider ( yea )
    
    alright I think the spacing correlation with the music not really good tbh lots of stuff feel like map just for the being difficult jumps or just for some desire specific pattern which not really my thing here , you should try to make each rhythm play accordingly to the beat in the music like express how strong this beat is ? how high is this beat pitch ? or something like that , always questiong every rhythm you put in , is this spacing can express the beat there good enough or is this angle can express the beat there good enough yea I hope you get the idea here

1. Storyboard image file dimensions are more than allowed maximum (640x1440 or 1920x480 for scrolling images) or (1366x768)
   * SB\white.jpg (1920x1080)
2. 00:02:056 - In H/I/X, the uninherited timing section and the inherited one's hitsound value is not consistent.
3. I personally do not have any problem with the brightness issue mentioned above, but it can be considered.

1. 00:09:191 (4) - Try to stay away from polarity errors as much as possible when mapping easier difficulties. Consider using this instead? http://puu.sh/phWda/ac84312242.jpg
2. 01:04:326 (1,2) - This rhythm works quite well, especially for simplifying stuff. The weird thing to me is, that this is introduced in the 2nd part of the KIAI, and repeated constantly. But not in the first part at all? Should be easily fixed, makes things more consistent + makes the diff more considerable as easiest diff of the set.

1. 01:18:596 (1,2,3,4,5) - Try to avoid heavy single-tapping in Hard difficulties when not needed. Stuff like this is more appropriate when used sliders, or done at part which actually require it such as 01:24:434 (3,4,1) - .

1. 00:42:596 (1,2,1,2,3) - Jumps became significantly larger - keep in mind stuff like this will play harder in CS5.
2. 01:15:677 (3,1,2) - Mixed feelings on this. Having these all stacked, while the gaps are in different snaps might hurt readability as the approach circle overlaps can become a bit deceiving / messy here.

1. What I generally wasn't a big fan of was the 1/2 chunks in the intro of the map (example at 00:04:650 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ). All are highly spaced, which gives me 1) an overdone feel, 2) I'm just not sure what you're trying to emphasize. Most of the times, everything's just a jump - it leaves some stuff overemphasized over the stuff that should be that spacing.
2. 00:20:218 (1,2,3) - According to almost every jump pattern like this in the intro, shouldn't these be spaced a bit larger? (00:08:542 (1,2) - 00:09:839 (1,2) - etc.)
3. 00:52:650 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Could use a small nerf to be honest... the jumps at the end are the same, or even easier, compared to this - and the parts are quite different. This chunk of notes is harder than your whole KIAI I think lol
4. Apart from the numerous antiflow usage and 1/2 chunks, still enjoyable for playing.

appleeaterx wrote:

Hello! M4M from my queue.

[General]

1. Storyboard image file dimensions are more than allowed maximum (640x1440 or 1920x480 for scrolling images) or (1366x768)
   * SB\white.jpg (1920x1080) Alright, I made it 1366x768.
2. 00:02:056 - In H/I/X, the uninherited timing section and the inherited one's hitsound value is not consistent. Ok, I made them consistent !
3. I personally do not have any problem with the brightness issue mentioned above, but it can be considered. What do you mean?

[Normal]

1. 00:09:191 (4) - Try to stay away from polarity errors as much as possible when mapping easier difficulties. Consider using this instead? http://puu.sh/phWda/ac84312242.jpg ok I fixed that, and rearanged the patern so it looks cleaner!
2. 01:04:326 (1,2) - This rhythm works quite well, especially for simplifying stuff. The weird thing to me is, that this is introduced in the 2nd part of the KIAI, and repeated constantly. But not in the first part at all? Should be easily fixed, makes things more consistent + makes the diff more considerable as easiest diff of the set. Yeah sure thing, I made the whole kiai consistent ! Looks better now.

[Hard]

1. 01:18:596 (1,2,3,4,5) - Try to avoid heavy single-tapping in Hard difficulties when not needed. Stuff like this is more appropriate when used sliders, or done at part which actually require it such as 01:24:434 (3,4,1) - . Alright ! I made the 2 circles in between a 1/2 slider, so it makes the patern easier !

[Insane]

1. 00:42:596 (1,2,1,2,3) - Jumps became significantly larger - keep in mind stuff like this will play harder in CS5. I wanted to emphasis 00:43:245 (3) - this note to make since it's the end of this rythmn patern, so it makes the gameplay more intense at this section, but as you can see the only hard point on this diff is the CS5, otherwise the paterning itself is not that hard reading etc.
2. 01:15:677 (3,1,2) - Mixed feelings on this. Having these all stacked, while the gaps are in different snaps might hurt readability as the approach circle overlaps can become a bit deceiving / messy here. With the NC on 01:16:001 (1) - it makes the patern easier to read, and the plays will be used to have those clap + pause since I did this the whole map, so yeah I can understand it may be confusing, but I want to keep it like this too keep the harmony of those overlaping paterns of this diff.

[Expert]

1. What I generally wasn't a big fan of was the 1/2 chunks in the intro of the map (example at 00:04:650 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ). All are highly spaced, which gives me 1) an overdone feel, 2) I'm just not sure what you're trying to emphasize. Most of the times, everything's just a jump - it leaves some stuff overemphasized over the stuff that should be that When I use high jump sections like that is too emphasis a rythmn, and in this current section I'm trying to make that "piano??" sound more intense. Like you exemple in my whole diff, I'm emphasizing all the kicks, all of them are clicable in this diff.
2. 00:20:218 (1,2,3) - According to almost every jump pattern like this in the intro, shouldn't these be spaced a bit larger? (00:08:542 (1,2) - 00:09:839 (1,2) - etc.) Changed (1) to make a consistence spacing, but kept the emphasis on clap and kick.
3. 00:52:650 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Could use a small nerf to be honest... the jumps at the end are the same, or even easier, compared to this - and the parts are quite different. This chunk of notes is harder than your whole KIAI I think lol Okay I did a small nerf on this jump spacing ! Because you're ass is always right xd
4. Apart from the numerous antiflow usage and 1/2 chunks, still enjoyable for playing. :D

Good luck for now!

dqs01733 wrote:

could u pls do something else for the sb on 00:43:569 - ?? Really hurts eyes when it has to adjust to brightness so much, especially in the dark nah I won't, I think this is not THAT bright, if you're really sensitive to that then don't play with the SB enabled. And I even put a warning at the begining of the map so...

00:46:164 - 00:51:353 - is rly rly bad experience oh well, I feel sad for your experience, but u didn't explain why it's a bad experience, so I don't know what to fix tbh. xD

1. 00:09:839 (1) - 00:07:245 (1,2) - Imo they have similar rhythm, so why 00:09:839 (1) - doesn't get the 1/2?
2. 01:03:028 (3,4,5) - Inconsistent here with other same pattern like 01:17:299 (1,2,3) - bothered me. The one that stacked is in the kiai (imo which means you need to more inetense) then the one that unstacked is outside of the kiai (which feels less-accentuate imo)

1. 00:54:434 (2,3) - According to my movement while playing, the transition broke the flow. It's rather sharp movement because the slider direction is contrasted with 3
2. 01:17:299 (1) - Are you sure you want to skip beat at 01:17:785 ? I think that this long vocal have similar with vocal that started here 01:18:596 but you're mapping it differently. It's not because the inconsistency. It just because you're skipping beat

1. 01:05:623 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Maybe I need explanation why these are placed. I mean, this is the only part in kiai that placed with jumps while the other similar parts placed with simple spacing way
2. 01:19:569 (4) - Compared with 01:18:272 (5) - , 4 could be has jump. It would be awesome and catch the same momentum (which I feel it's awesome)

1. 00:53:785 (2,1) - Movement is too rough here for me. I'm a fan of circular one so why don't try to stack 2 under 00:52:650 (1) - ? It would create higher spacing too so you won't lost the accentuate

Ipas wrote:

Hello I'm late aw

[normal?]

1. 00:09:839 (1) - 00:07:245 (1,2) - Imo they have similar rhythm, so why 00:09:839 (1) - doesn't get the 1/2? Because that first rythmn is not the same and I don't want to spam 1/2 everywhere.. And for the build up of the first rythmn, I think that sldier makes sense.
2. 01:03:028 (3,4,5) - Inconsistent here with other same pattern like 01:17:299 (1,2,3) - bothered me. The one that stacked is in the kiai (imo which means you need to more inetense) then the one that unstacked is outside of the kiai (which feels less-accentuate imo) it's not the same ruthmn at all, like the kicks are not it the same order, just like the claps, I wanted to give a bit more intensity to those kicks by stacking it on the slider, even tho the clap is not clicable i think it's fine for the ending of this section.

[hard?]

1. 00:54:434 (2,3) - According to my movement while playing, the transition broke the flow. It's rather sharp movement because the slider direction is contrasted with 3 ok got it, I ctrl + h that slider so it makes a better flow.
2. 01:17:299 (1) - Are you sure you want to skip beat at 01:17:785 ? I think that this long vocal have similar with vocal that started here 01:18:596 but you're mapping it differently. It's not because the inconsistency. It just because you're skipping beat Alright I made those beat clicable, just like this clap.. Looks better now :V

[insane?]

1. 01:05:623 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Maybe I need explanation why these are placed. I mean, this is the only part in kiai that placed with jumps while the other similar parts placed with simple spacing way Okay so the fact that I decided to jump here is that the section before is really slow, and i wanted to give thoses kicks/clap and voice a little bit more emphasis, since the voice aswell is getting louder on that section, so yeah I guess this makes sense.
2. 01:19:569 (4) - Compared with 01:18:272 (5) - , 4 could be has jump. It would be awesome and catch the same momentum (which I feel it's awesome) I didn't really understand what you said here lol "4 could be has jump" but I guess I got it, so I emphasised (4) by increasing the spacing here, I guess you'll prefer that.

[uhh?]

1. 00:53:785 (2,1) - Movement is too rough here for me. I'm a fan of circular one so why don't try to stack 2 under 00:52:650 (1) - ? It would create higher spacing too so you won't lost the accentuate Yeah I can agree with you I did an alternative patern without stacking on that (1) note, but it create a circular flow and I made those kicksliders blanket with the first one of the kiai start.

[]
Good Luck owo/