Call me back when you're done.

Monstrata wrote:

[Ripples]

You have two .osb's Whoops! Fixed this the first metadata change but forgot to do it the second, thanks
01:04:114 (5,1) - This blanket is off. Fixed
01:16:199 (2) - Hmm... I wonder if you can rotate this entire pattern like about -15 degrees? Like copy/paste 01:16:114 (1) - so you have a reference, then Rotate the entire pattern of 01:16:114 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - like -15 degrees? It would just make the stream a bit easier to sightread because right now its really hard to spot the first time around. Fixed
01:32:657 (4,5) - Just a tip for stuff like this, but try using a slightly higher SV, like 0.9 or something just so the blanket on 4 can be better seen. The SV will be too low to be noticed in gameplay, but it'll help make the pattern look cleaner. I'm not a fan of breaking structural consistency for an aesthetic change that, as you say, wouldn't be noticeable anyway but I did try to spruce the blanket up a bit
01:59:829 (2,3) - Sliiightly off for me. (But this is super nazi even for my standards) Nah that's completely valid, tried and fixed
02:37:714 (1,2,3,4) - Okay, This just felt really random for me. The SV is quite slow, but more than that, you suddenly drop object density here during a build up. I would do some like 1/2 slider spam here instead for a better bridge between the 1/1 circle spam earlier, and then 1/2 circle spam later. I wouldn't 1/2 spam because that doesn't fit what's going on in the music. The build-up also doesn't really start here, it starts 02:40:457 (1) - here - before then it is still comparatively static. The SV is slow because that's what the song merits, and consistency for that slow SV has been established anyway (02:34:286 (1,2) - these two were higher SV because of the sounds at that moment in time). 1/2 slider spam would be completely misrepresenting the song, and also ruin the actual buildup
02:49:714 (2) - How about stacking under 02:48:686 (1) - 's tail. That sound feels "closed" to me, which is why on all similar sounds in that section I map the 1/4 gap circle closely, also I've a suspicion stacking it under the tail would be a little messy
03:45:772 (4) - This slider doesn't look like the same shape as the other 3. Doesn't look as bent lol. Pattern lol, each successive slider is straighter there
04:12:000 (3) - Move the tail like 2 pixels more to the left for perfect perfect blanket. Fixed

Call me back when you're done.

Monstrata wrote:

Here, have another bubble

1. Big white faint bubbles, constant slow
2. Add surges
3. Fix 00:12:343 - sudden SB flip
4. 00:21:943 (1) - Maybe improve shape
5. 00:22:886 (2,3) - Fix shitty placement

Zexous wrote:

Monstrata wrote:

Here, have another bubble

Kaine wrote:

reol - minazoko yuuhodou [nipples]

1. 02:34:629 (2) - Seems over-spaced for me. I don't really think the music supporting this much, I only hear vocals going stronger and not strong enough to making this preferable with such jumps
2. 03:02:486 (1) - Personally I don't prefer this spinner here, would be nice to play with low sv slider like 02:56:572 (1) -
3. 03:16:972 (2) - I don't know why but after I testing this part, I literally don't hit this circle. Maybe because of my preferences about rhythm though

Ipas wrote:

Hello!
Writing mod in exam seems legit Holy crap don't get failed

[Ripples]

1. 02:34:629 (2) - Seems over-spaced for me. I don't really think the music supporting this much, I only hear vocals going stronger and not strong enough to making this preferable with such jumps For me the vocals change in strength enough to warrant this, to go into detail 02:34:286 (1,2) - these are spaced as such because of the buzzing sound (I didn't actually map these in the 1/8 because I didn't like how it fit in the map so I used the sliders), and then the 02:34:972 (1) - is spaced as such both to indicate a return from the buzzing, as well as to reflect how the vocals become "charged" (ex. the harmony), that is to say Reol isn't singing in a "muted" way anymore like she is from the previous section. This transition from "muted" to "charged" in the song is imo plenty of justification for the spacing. Finally, because of the oval flow, the spacing ingame feels less than it actually looks in editor.
2. 03:02:486 (1) - Personally I don't prefer this spinner here, would be nice to play with low sv slider like 02:56:572 (1) - This is an entirely different sound from 02:56:572 (1) - which is more like a downscaling sound which is fine for a slider, but this sound I have never felt could be represented by anything but a spinner and this is something I am very adamant about
3. 03:16:972 (2) - I don't know why but after I testing this part, I literally don't hit this circle. Maybe because of my preferences about rhythm though :/ there's nothing weird about it, it's pretty normal so idk what to tell you

-----

Okay, my conclusion is whole diff is really good and pretty solid. The only thing I was concerned is about emphasis at kiai section. First I saw 00:26:057 (1) - , I feel like what you suppose to emphasis if you're making this spaced closely. And then, I saw many of them. Please tell me why are you putting them like this. I personally don't prefer kind of this pattern, yes because the music needs further accentuation. Also, at the other kiai they were inconsistent, example : 01:20:914 (1) - and 01:19:200 (6) - . I feel like they have same enough to have both spaced widely, but there's (6) with small spacing. Again, tell me reasons why are you making them like that before I put further push for this map.
01:20:914 (1) - and 01:19:200 (6) - are not inconsistent from each other, because they shouldn't be compared to begin with, they are different sounds, hear the strong sounds on 01:20:914 (1) - that are not present on the other one and merit somewhat wider spacing on this one. As for things like 00:26:057 (1) - , I totally understand your point but those sections are not meant to be as intense and I believe the sounds are represented well by the slider itself anyway.

Zexous wrote:

Reminder to self for pop:

1. Big white faint bubbles, constant slow still working on it done!!!!!
2. Add surges added
3. Fix 00:12:343 - sudden SB flip decided to leave it
4. 00:21:943 (1) - Maybe improve shape ehhh
5. 00:22:886 (2,3) - Fix shitty placementfixed

1. 01:16:800 (1) - Touched up 01:16:800 (1) - shape

Ipas wrote:

#2

Nerova Riuz GX wrote:

Ok so now zexous is famous

Nerova Riuz GX wrote:

Cuz reol and camellia and a more acceptable map base
Enjoy ur nice trip!

Zexous wrote:

wait but when have i ever cared about the acceptance of my maps

Kuki wrote:

Zexous wrote:

wait but when have i ever cared about the acceptance of my maps

since u went for rank

Haruto wrote:

thanks to me for convicing ipas all of the time

jk, CONGRATS ZEX! for first approval and rank

Zexous wrote:

Leader wrote:

OH MAN IT JUST HAPPENED