Then yeah, splitting is a good idea.
forum
hapi - THE MEDLEY OF POKEMON RGBY+GSC -3PBs-
posted
Total Posts
404
Topic Starter
I think splitting the map would break the flow, since people will not be able to play the map in once, and I think that's quite sad, since the problem is only on CTB...DaxMasterix wrote:
The only solution is cutting this by 2 parts.
I really don't know why CtB has this problem if the other modes don't have it, It's kinda weird, but, It's just an advice, if you don't want to cut it off It's ok, I really hope this "bug" will be fixed soon or in a near Future, the entire Community will be happy with that and you will make history
Apparently the devs don't want to fix it from what I've read. Also the reason it happens in CtB and not Standard is that you get more points on CtB, so it actually reaches that cap.
The only ways I can think of that would fix things are either cutting the map or reducing OD as that also reduces the possible score.
The only ways I can think of that would fix things are either cutting the map or reducing OD as that also reduces the possible score.
Topic Starter
One solution is to finish the map at 21:39:713 -
That'd be sad, but there's nothing else do to, and I don't really want to cut the map in 2 diffs :/
That'd be sad, but there's nothing else do to, and I don't really want to cut the map in 2 diffs :/
damnit! SO MUCH WORK ON THIS DOE
LETS PRAY FOR A SOLUTION GUYS
LETS PRAY FOR A SOLUTION GUYS
Topic Starter
Soooo do you want me to cut at 21:39:713 - ?
Or should I split it in 2, and then have 2 diffs ?
http://strawpoll.me/7105941
Or should I split it in 2, and then have 2 diffs ?
http://strawpoll.me/7105941
You should cut it on the break of 13:39:214 to 13:54:648 , IMO Exactly on 13:42:414 . So you will have a diff with 13:42 minutes and other with 12:36 MinutesKenterz wrote:
Soooo do you want me to cut at 21:39:713 - ?
Or should I split it in 2, and then have 2 diffs ?
http://strawpoll.me/7105941
But also, I would preffer 2 maps with 1 diff than 1 map with 2 diffs. Just my likely.
Good luck!
holy shit, this is bad. This also means that Because Maybe full version won't ever be ranked ...
well, good luck on it. IMO cutting at 21:39 seems more reasonable since it's the "ending" of the song (well, it's the credits song for RBY) and NTD03 "26ROAD" is actually the outro.
well, good luck on it. IMO cutting at 21:39 seems more reasonable since it's the "ending" of the song (well, it's the credits song for RBY) and NTD03 "26ROAD" is actually the outro.
Can't believe how stupid this is 
(and no it's not gonna be fixed)
Pretty sure Cutting at 21:39 still unrankable because HR+DT+HS+FL break the score barrier ROLF.
IMO Cutting in 2 Differents diff and keeping them in THE SAME MAPSET(so this one) is the best solution if you cut the first diff at 09:33:284 - begin the second at 10:09:417
This way you have:
A First diff with 9:30 minutes drain/5,08 Star
And a second diff with 15:30 Minutes drain at 5,33 star
Doing that you still keep the complete 26min playable, and the player as more possibility then just chosing between a part 1 or a part 2 of equal lenght/diff.
But If you don't like this idea then Cutting at 21:39 is fine tho, we just loose 5 min of playtime :/
Anyway whatever you do, please DON'T Cut the song In equal lenght part, is the worst thing ever, please don't do that :V
(and no it's not gonna be fixed)Pretty sure Cutting at 21:39 still unrankable because HR+DT+HS+FL break the score barrier ROLF.
IMO Cutting in 2 Differents diff and keeping them in THE SAME MAPSET(so this one) is the best solution if you cut the first diff at 09:33:284 - begin the second at 10:09:417
This way you have:
A First diff with 9:30 minutes drain/5,08 Star
And a second diff with 15:30 Minutes drain at 5,33 star
Doing that you still keep the complete 26min playable, and the player as more possibility then just chosing between a part 1 or a part 2 of equal lenght/diff.
But If you don't like this idea then Cutting at 21:39 is fine tho, we just loose 5 min of playtime :/
Anyway whatever you do, please DON'T Cut the song In equal lenght part, is the worst thing ever, please don't do that :V
Topic Starter
No it doesn't :3Mindwaves wrote:
Can't believe how stupid this is
Pretty sure Cutting at 21:39 still unrankable because HR+DT+HS+FL break the score barrier ROLF.
Topic Starter
Updated. Now it is rankable
(so I don't know if it breaks the 2 bubbles or only one)
(so I don't know if it breaks the 2 bubbles or only one)
Updated. Now it is rankableNice.
But you probably need to cut/fade out the mp3 now?
Having 5 Useless minutes at the end of your songs is not very rankable if i remenber correctly^^
Ah and also delete this too 21:39:713 (1) please.
If you really want to keep the full transition you can just extend this spinner21:37:213 (1) - and make it end at 21:39:713 instead, it's wayyy more natural.
Topic Starter
DoneMindwaves wrote:
Updated. Now it is rankableNice.
But you probably need to cut/fade out the mp3 now?
Having 5 Useless minutes at the end of your songs is not very rankable if i remenber correctly^^
Ah and also delete this too 21:39:713 (1) please.
If you really want to keep the full transition you can just extend this spinner21:37:213 (1) - and make it end at 21:39:713 instead, it's wayyy more natural.
Now it should be ready
why nobody already bubble bubble ranked this
if you changed mp3 already and going for approval, please say that anyone that downloaded the map before you changed it should redownloadKenterz wrote:
Done
Now it should be ready
edit:
That dedication thoughTequilaWolf wrote:
suuuuch a big fan *-*
Let's see if my PC can handle it now
[diff]
00:03:832 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Even spacing please
00:08:569 (6,7,8,9,1) - ^^
00:31:463 (2,3) - You put high spacing on patterns like this, but not on this one, despite the sound being the same (00:33:990 (2,3) - for example)
01:09:990 (2,3) - The slidershape of (3) makes this look rather awkward. Why not Ctrl G (3)?
01:36:990 (6) - Shouldn't the SV change be at the big whit tick?
11:48:873 - THIS SCARED THE FUCK OUT OF ME HOLY SHIT UNOWN WHY?
12:49:373 (10) - There is a strong beat at the red tick, why is it skipped?
14:05:040 (6) - NC, you know why
14:49:373 (1) - Wouldn't 2 circles work better here? It feels weird to give such emphasis to a sliderend
14:52:040 (1) - ^^
16:30:636 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Too much overkill for a marathon?
17:43:936 (3,4,5,6,1) - Even spacing please
18:30:446 (1,1,1,1) - Silence the ends please. 3/4 extended sliders at 240 BPM feels really weird (The sound at the tail I mean)
18:42:446 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - ^^
18:52:446 (1,1,1,1) - ^^
19:10:446 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - ^^
19:18:446 (1,1,1) - 19:22:446 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - 19:29:446 (1,1,1) - 19:36:446 (1) - 19:38:446 (1) - 19:40:446 (1) - 19:43:446 (1,1,3,1,1,1,1,3,1,1) - 20:03:446 (1) - 20:05:446 (1,1,1) - 20:09:446 (1,4) - 20:11:446 (1,3) - Yeah, these too
Call me
[diff]
00:03:832 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Even spacing please
00:08:569 (6,7,8,9,1) - ^^
00:31:463 (2,3) - You put high spacing on patterns like this, but not on this one, despite the sound being the same (00:33:990 (2,3) - for example)
01:09:990 (2,3) - The slidershape of (3) makes this look rather awkward. Why not Ctrl G (3)?
01:36:990 (6) - Shouldn't the SV change be at the big whit tick?
11:48:873 - THIS SCARED THE FUCK OUT OF ME HOLY SHIT UNOWN WHY?
12:49:373 (10) - There is a strong beat at the red tick, why is it skipped?
14:05:040 (6) - NC, you know why
14:49:373 (1) - Wouldn't 2 circles work better here? It feels weird to give such emphasis to a sliderend
14:52:040 (1) - ^^
16:30:636 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Too much overkill for a marathon?
17:43:936 (3,4,5,6,1) - Even spacing please
18:30:446 (1,1,1,1) - Silence the ends please. 3/4 extended sliders at 240 BPM feels really weird (The sound at the tail I mean)
18:42:446 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - ^^
18:52:446 (1,1,1,1) - ^^
19:10:446 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - ^^
19:18:446 (1,1,1) - 19:22:446 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - 19:29:446 (1,1,1) - 19:36:446 (1) - 19:38:446 (1) - 19:40:446 (1) - 19:43:446 (1,1,3,1,1,1,1,3,1,1) - 20:03:446 (1) - 20:05:446 (1,1,1) - 20:09:446 (1,4) - 20:11:446 (1,3) - Yeah, these too
Call me
Topic Starter
Thank you :3Bara- wrote:
Let's see if my PC can handle it now
[diff]
00:03:832 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Even spacing please
00:08:569 (6,7,8,9,1) - ^^
00:31:463 (2,3) - You put high spacing on patterns like this, but not on this one, despite the sound being the same (00:33:990 (2,3) - for example)
01:09:990 (2,3) - The slidershape of (3) makes this look rather awkward. Why not Ctrl G (3)?
01:36:990 (6) - Shouldn't the SV change be at the big whit tick? The sound of the new section of the map isn't on the big white tick, it's better that way imo
11:48:873 - THIS SCARED THE FUCK OUT OF ME HOLY SHIT UNOWN WHY?
12:49:373 (10) - There is a strong beat at the red tick, why is it skipped?
14:05:040 (6) - NC, you know why
14:49:373 (1) - Wouldn't 2 circles work better here? It feels weird to give such emphasis to a sliderend
14:52:040 (1) - ^^
16:30:636 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Too much overkill for a marathon? I don't think so
17:43:936 (3,4,5,6,1) - Even spacing please
18:30:446 (1,1,1,1) - Silence the ends please. 3/4 extended sliders at 240 BPM feels really weird (The sound at the tail I mean)
18:42:446 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - ^^
18:52:446 (1,1,1,1) - ^^
19:10:446 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - ^^
19:18:446 (1,1,1) - 19:22:446 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - 19:29:446 (1,1,1) - 19:36:446 (1) - 19:38:446 (1) - 19:40:446 (1) - 19:43:446 (1,1,3,1,1,1,1,3,1,1) - 20:03:446 (1) - 20:05:446 (1,1,1) - 20:09:446 (1,4) - 20:11:446 (1,3) - Yeah, these too
Call me
Let's do this again!
Speedrank is still possible guy you just have to believe.
Speedrank is still possible guy you just have to believe.
maybe change the 9,2 or 9,3? the end is p awkward with ar9 imo
Kenterz! Don't give up!
Topic Starter
I've got some exams, but I'll try to rank it again a bit laterCSLM wrote:
Kenterz! Don't give up!
Jigglypuff partMazziv wrote:
also why is vocaloid in the tags?
LOLKenterz wrote:
Jigglypuff partMazziv wrote:
also why is vocaloid in the tags?
Do you actually still need BNs? bc iirc I liked this map so ye
(I have exams myself tho)aww yis,if kenterz doesnt have a pocket BN for this map,i hope you two can work together on getting this ranked C:Bonsai wrote:
LOLKenterz wrote:
also why is vocaloid in the tags?
Jigglypuff part
Do you actually still need BNs? bc iirc I liked this map so ye
Topic Starter
Yes I need BNs :cccBonsai wrote:
Do you actually still need BNs? bc iirc I liked this map so ye
oh yeah I remember this map
#2
#2
PogChamp
Topic Starter
why not girls tooMazziv wrote:
LETS GO BOYS
(so hyped btw)
Kenterz wrote:
why not girls tooMazziv wrote:
LETS GO BOYS
(so hyped btw)
i cant wait to see this ranked! i highly appreciate your work on this marathon map! i hope to see a part 2 of it ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)