oh sorry i didn't read your post carefully =.=tasuke912 wrote:
Don't have to make forcibly various pattern in such quiet parts. Did you understand why I said "you should keep the simple pattern" ?
Read my post again. I can't bubble it without solving a 1/6s issue.
changed to d-d-kddk-d-kkkd-d-kddk-d-kkkd... instead
Nwolf wrote:
good luck~ hi
Since you did not apply anything tasuke posted in the recheck I doubt you would care about some stuff but
00:11:392 - 00:11:741 - 00:12:090 - 00:12:439 - are all the same sound at a different pitch. Disturbing is that the 2nd and 3rd ones are 1/6 while the first one is 1/4 and the 4th is 1/2. Why is that? Seeing the rest of the map I doubt you really care about mapping 00:12:613 (1) - as a big don, so why is there no 1/6 for example? I don't think you should have 1/6 here at all anyway, seeing as later in the map you don't map 1/6 to this sound but rather to the drums. since i think 00:11:392 is not as strong as 00:11:741 sound so i doubt to put 1/6 here
also the reason for 00:12:613 (1) why i put 1/2 on there. it's too early to make it harder. so i suddenly focusing drum on 00:12:613
00:44:881 (3,4,5,6) - 00:45:230 (8,9,10,11) - as noted by tasuke these are questionable, though I wouldn't simplify their pattern - I would rather suggest 1/4 on these. Simply because the sound here is 1/8 starting on 00:44:968 - so it's wrongly snapped anyway (and yes mapping this as 1/8 is not an option). Louder streams such as 00:21:857 (11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19) - are FAR more simple as well so you might wanna consider that. i accepted tasuke's mod :/ but not entirely
01:24:561 (23) - 01:30:142 (48) - Remove these notes. They are both the only one 1/4 mapped in this spot even though there are way more similar sounds - 01:22:468 - 01:24:387 - to name a few examples. This will also make it possible to have a bigger difference to the next part i just want to tuck a bit of 1/4 pattern to remove boredom when play on this part (i guess) since only 1/2 is kinda bored
02:03:369 (37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49) - Here I would also suggest to restructure this. 02:03:369 (37,38,39) - There is no 1/6 OR 1/8 on this, neither is on 02:03:718 (42,43,44) - . The 1/6 sounds here are on 02:03:544 - 02:03:892 - and really, it should not be too hard to map the 1/6 to the correct sounds and still having it play... "well" (we know that's subjective). but i think they (02:03:369 - 02:03:718 - and 02:04:067 - are same like 00:44:881 - and other sound like this
Above image shows following: 02:27:264 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - changing this to follow snare rhythm (d d k k d d k k d d k kdk) and starting the kddkddkdk rhythm 02:29:357 - here. Why is that? This song is build up in blocks of 8 bars, so it is possible to have changes every two bars! What you have is that 02:30:753 - only 1 bar before going to k ddd k ddd which feels weird. Having two bars of kddkddkdk prepares you better and sounds nicer! If you want more convincing: The kddkddkdk sound starts 02:29:357 - here anyway ah changed, i really confused with this part
02:36:509 (1,2,3,4) - 02:36:857 (6,7,8,9) - same as 00:44:881 (3,4,5,6) - 00:45:230 (8,9,10,11) - same
02:58:834 (32,33,34,35) - 02:59:183 (37,38,39,40) - ^
03:33:544 - 03:44:619 - maybe remove the 1/4 in this part like in the last calm part. It's not a must, it's fine. same as i mentioned. but in this part, it's slightly harder
04:12:613 - I know you are starting to follow the kick sound here, but you really should not, the kick sound does NOT change enough, it only adds 04:13:834 - a note here and some /later/. The melody you have followed stays more prominent so going from fast and rhythmically complex 1/4 to simple 1/1 is very anti-climatic and should be avoided. changed to 1/4
04:37:730 - is it necessary for the SV to go up this much here 0.0 I generally think the kiai could be generally 0.1 slower.i don't know, but these are looks really fit for the sound go up
05:01:625 (19,20,21,22) - 05:01:974 (24,25,26,27) - same as several spots before
05:03:195 - 05:14:009 - Another anti-climatic section. It starts dense and then goes into the 1/1 kat which - I admit - are quite loud. But then again the kicks are loud too! So maybe you could trade their densities - start off with 1/1 dons and add 1/2 in the kat section. i think it's the best choice, also its influence with the next part
05:24:474 (22) - my poor ears xDDD
hi thank you so much
wait don't you say hi at the beginning and good luck at the end
updated