Lally wrote:

nice speedrank ♥

1. 00:45:905 (3) - This object looks like it's touching the HP Drain, it's better to move it down a bit.
2. 00:46:405 (3,4,5) - Same as above.
3. 00:55:239 (3) - This slider is quite hard to see because it's covered by the previous objects, and it's even more tricky because the previous slider has the same formation.
4. 00:57:905 (3) - Same as above.
5. 00:58:322 (4,5,6,1,2,3) - This part doesn't really flow that well and the jumps feels kinda forced, they should be toned down a bit.
6. 01:05:405 (1,2,3) - Hidden slider once again, I'm not gonna mention the rest because it seems you've used this pattern quite a few times.
7. 01:08:989 (4,5,6,1,2,3) - Once again, another forced jumpy pattern that should be avoid or at least toned down, also the flow could be improved way more.
8. 01:31:405 (5,6,7) - This part is pretty calm and not intense, why there's a big jump all of a sudden here? It shouldn't be this big, I highly suggest to reduce it.
9. 01:39:072 (5) - If you wanna be consistent with the next combos, you should add one here as well.
10. 01:48:572 (3,4) - Why are these sliders so close each other? The spacing should be bigger here, this anti-jump looks quite confusing after having so many spaced patterns.
11. 01:56:572 (4) - You could stack this slider together with the circles, but that's not mandatory.
12. 03:18:905 (1,2) - These two sliders looks confusing, mostly because of how (1)'s shape is, it's highly suggested to simply make it linear or a bit curved if you really want.
13. 03:22:905 (1) - This slider isn't following anything in the music, it should be deleted and this part should be kept empty.
14. 03:49:572 (2,3,4,5) - This overlap is pretty strange to see, I'd suggest you to move (2,3,4) a bit to the left.
15. 04:07:405 (3,4,5) - Why does this sudden triplet have such a large spacing all of a sudden? It's a bit confusing to sightread on first try.
16. 04:19:739 (1,1) - The first slider on this pattern should be slow as well like the others, because this part is quite calm and having a fast slider here doesn't fit.
17. 05:17:405 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - This stream feels really randomly placed and it doesn't flow really good, you should completely remake this one in a better formation.

Avishay wrote:

Cool map, tho wasn't this ranked a bit too quickly?

Skimming through a bit of points I could snap those for examples -

05:20:072 (2,3,4) - Those are snapped incorrectly, or perhaps overmapped, it's supposed to be snapped to 1/3.

05:30:850 (2) - ^

It seems like the offset is a bit early as well, perhaps it changes at various points or idk.

Didn't really check everything throughly, but those are just some objective stuff, I would honestly try to get a few more mods, just because.

Baraatje123 wrote:

Since when can posts in Ranked-subforum receive kudosu? O.o

Shiirn wrote:

Gero, the italian GMT.

Shiirn wrote:

the italian GMT.

Shiirn wrote:

italian

1. 00:53:405 (3,1) - Not sure if this close patterning represents the instrument of 00:53:739 effectively.
2. 00:54:739 (1,3) - Regarding this slider pattern and anything similar to this afterwards, I think you can consider some manual stacks for a better readability, but not a major issue afterall since there is sufficient time to make the path fully visible. http://puu.sh/mr8Mg/017a1ee582.jpg
3. 02:02:405 (1,2) - 02:02:655 (3,1) - 02:18:405 (6,7,8,1) - Consider giving a similar spacing each to give a similar feeling in pattern. Like something you've done at 02:07:739 (4,5,6,1) - 02:23:572 (4,5,6,1).
4. 02:28:072 (1,2,3,4) - Not sure myself if this pattern has the best readability.
5. 03:53:905 (3,4,5) - Is this spacing intended for playability?
6. 04:19:739 (1,1) - Strongly reconsider this overlap. Slider tick is one of the intuitive signals of a sv change, but due to the overlap, players get 0 information regarding the sv change. Random suggestion http://puu.sh/mracN/0a3509577a.jpg
7. 04:44:572 (4,5) - Reversing the position of these two objects felt more natural for me in flow, but this is highly personal.
8. 05:09:405 (1,2) - I think the visual could be better as 04:58:739 (1,2).
9. 05:19:572 (5,6,1) - Check if this uneven spacing of triple was intended. Anyways having a different setting for 3 objects felt less effective for me.

Sonnyc wrote:

Dropping some points passing by:

1. 00:53:405 (3,1) - Not sure if this close patterning represents the instrument of 00:53:739 effectively. Normally I wouldn't bother, as this snare isn't what this pattern is following, but for the sake of consistency I modified the pattern a bit.
2. 00:54:739 (1,3) - Regarding this slider pattern and anything similar to this afterwards, I think you can consider some manual stacks for a better readability, but not a major issue afterall since there is sufficient time to make the path fully visible. http://puu.sh/mr8Mg/017a1ee582.jpg These are fine. I tried manually stacking before and the initial comments were always "how ugly" or "you know its not stacked right?"
3. 02:02:405 (1,2) - 02:02:655 (3,1) - 02:18:405 (6,7,8,1) - Consider giving a similar spacing each to give a similar feeling in pattern. Like something you've done at 02:07:739 (4,5,6,1) - 02:23:572 (4,5,6,1).
4. 02:28:072 (1,2,3,4) - Not sure myself if this pattern has the best readability.
5. 03:53:905 (3,4,5) - Is this spacing intended for playability?
6. 04:19:739 (1,1) - Strongly reconsider this overlap. Slider tick is one of the intuitive signals of a sv change, but due to the overlap, players get 0 information regarding the sv change. Random suggestion http://puu.sh/mracN/0a3509577a.jpg I have already pointed out my formal logic for this particular slider. To reiterate, the slider itself is so short and the player's natural instinct to follow the slider track means you'd literally need to have a muscle spasm mid-slider to get a 100 on either of these sliders without specifically trying. This is an alternative way to let them know that the slider velocity is cut in half and also allows me to follow the instrument that initially bursts twice at the start and end of the first slider, and on the second, bursts three times with the second being much less audible. It's the same instrument with different beat placement and volume and allows me to very accurately represent that while still being completely playable. I'm just going to copy+paste this to anyone who comments on this slider, because it is perfectly functional and does exactly what I intend it to do to represent the music at this point in time.
7. 04:44:572 (4,5) - Reversing the position of these two objects felt more natural for me in flow, but this is highly personal. The way these patterns are structured, at some point in time you'd need to swap from the easy flow curve and start moving in another direction to get back into the triangle spam. So I chose these notes.
8. 05:09:405 (1,2) - I think the visual could be better as 04:58:739 (1,2).
9. 05:19:572 (5,6,1) - Check if this uneven spacing of triple was intended. Anyways having a different setting for 3 objects felt less effective for me.

gl

Shiirn wrote:

I have no .osb file in my folder. I've submitted time and time and time and time and time again with no osb file. If it isn't sticking I don't know what to tell you. Isn't a blank .osb file like <1kb?

Gero wrote:

Lally wrote:

nice speedank ♥