forum

cillia - Ringo Uri no Utakata Shoujo [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
50
Topic Starter
mintong89
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 2016年3月2日 at 21:47:07

Artist: cillia
Title: Ringo Uri no Utakata Shoujo
Tags: 歌幡メイジ The Transient Apple Salesgirl yukkedoluce kyaami vocaloid vocaloid4 Gahata Meiji Gahata Mage
BPM: 225.2
Filesize: 8650kb
Play Time: 05:36
Difficulties Available:
  1. Ringo Oni (5.36 stars, 2204 notes)
Download: cillia - Ringo Uri no Utakata Shoujo
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
「cillia - Ringo Uri no Utakata Shoujo」
21th Ranked Beatmaps


yeaah countinue map cillia
blessssss her
blessssssssssss these two people too

standard: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/517120

Surono
Hai, (M4M if You accept My map) via pm site

>General
  1. SliderMultiplier:1.40000000596046 delete red colour in notepad of this map
  2. untick countdown
  3. Kiai unsnap, Check AiMod
  4. Offset Like early with notes
  5. I think this map can to be more to mapping till end with adjusting for reducing patterns to fitting music
>Apple
  1. 00:19:432 - kat for high vocal and to varies with previous vocal pitch?
  2. 00:27:425 - kat? its fit for adjusting contrast in this pattern
  3. 00:29:023 - its similar with 00:28:757 - this? so its would fit to hitsounding with patterns 00:27:158 (39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46) - (just need don 00:27:957 (42,44) - for this both low pitch)
  4. 00:31:954 (58,59) - ctrl g? emphasizing vocal its fit imo
  5. 00:32:620 - change don? its look good for variety vocal pattern
  6. 00:38:082 (84,86) - ctrl g? its like mirror of 00:33:819 (66,67,68,69,70,71,72) - this, but different 00:37:016 (80,81,82,83,84,85,86) - of this is 00:38:348 (85,86) - here.. "ka ka" should kat? and its fit too with 00:38:082 (84,85,86) - instrument
  7. 00:41:013 (96) - change don? just like heard 00:40:213 - similar with this, and for 00:41:279 (97,98,99) - contrasting this pattern
  8. 00:41:679 - kat? have pitch to be mapped, so kkd. its main instrument right?
  9. 00:46:741 (128,129) - ctrl g? variety looks fit with 00:47:140 (131,132,133,134) - this
  10. 01:07:256 (310,316) - ctrl g? and change 01:07:655 - kat for this? like fit with instrument imo
  11. 01:16:847 (393,395) - I think to better with drum you should ctrl g this
  12. 01:17:780 - change kat? high drum would fit and good as variety, 01:16:714 - with this
  13. 01:23:375 - kat? to follow with 01:23:241 - this vocal
  14. 01:24:241 - change kat? so can be as dkd? I think is nice emphasize with guitar
  15. 01:24:973 (464,465) - ctrl g? for consistent with 01:25:506 - this instrument, vocal is already fit with instrument
  16. 01:26:705 - why not to fill here with kat? its similar with 01:26:572 - this drum and should mapped imo
  17. 01:29:103 (496,497) - ctrl g? 01:28:970 (494,495,496) - ddd already enough imo for smooth flow, and 01:29:236 - drum would be fine if change to kat
  18. 01:30:035 (504,505,506,507) - ddkd 1/2? and 01:30:568 (508,509) - change kat? vocal and drum is fit if you heard it
  19. 01:32:766 - same above about emphasize with guitar, if you like it
  20. 01:34:032 (536,537) - imo ctrl g would better to up-down-up-down pitch?
  21. 01:34:565 (541,542,543,544,545,546,547) - kddkkdD 1/2? Guitar and Instrumend looks good to heard and fit with vocal pitch too
  22. 01:47:885 - change kat? to long imo for hit donkatdonkat pattern, I think after finisher is fit to starting donkatdonkat patterns
  23. 01:49:217 - instrument and vocal high imo, change kat finisher?
  24. 01:52:415 (666,667,668,669) - wow nice to be xx xx patterns, its fit with vocal flow. I like it ww
  25. 01:53:613 - why this not to be rest? its fit and no have pitch, just heard to flow. and maybe 01:53:480 - this high vocal can be finisher, if you like it to be emphasize with next rest 1/1 ( 01:57:743 - like you did in here)
  26. 01:56:411 - kat? kkddk good for emphasize with 01:56:145 - similar vocal
  27. 01:56:944 (712,713,714) - kkd? looks good with instrument and contrast
  28. 01:58:676 (728,729) - ctrl g? 01:58:809 - this nice to be don and variety looks good with 01:59:342 - this vocal
  29. 02:02:006 - same above about to be rest and finisher, 02:02:139 (762,763) - just need to delete this
  30. 02:03:605 (777,778) - heard like rather odd, ctrl g would better emphasize with vocal and previous
  31. 02:04:404 (785,786,787) - not fit imo, maybe you can change to kdd for mirror of 02:04:137 (782,783,784) - this or kkd for 02:03:871 (779,780,781) - this, its both fit with music imo
  32. 02:06:002 (800,801) - I think you just need this pitch, and delete note in blue tick. I feels is not fit with drum and looks overmap pattern
  33. 02:06:668 - kat? snare drum fit with this
  34. 02:09:599 - delete for rest? i think is still have similar part with previous patterns
  35. 02:11:731 (840,842,844,846) - I Like to delete it and focus to drum. but if you like follow with vocal, 02:11:731 (840,842) - just delete it, its would better and not look over
  36. 02:13:728 - until 02:39:306 - here looks fine with contrasting and emphasize
  37. 02:43:302 - kat for02:42:503 (1059,1067) - contrasting both of this?
  38. 02:46:499 (1081,1085) - kat? same above
  39. 02:52:360 - kat? still similar drum 02:52:094 - with this
  40. 03:02:351 - delete? for rest or 03:02:218 - change this kat for avoid monotone?
  41. from 2nd kiai and next parts looks good, 04:04:562 - change kat? or 04:04:295 - this?
  42. 04:11:755 (1703) - kat for 04:10:956 (1699,1707) - contrast?
  43. 04:27:474 - untill end, good emphasize and contrasting, so nothing to give more suggestion from me and I Like with some flow you mapped, eg: 04:53:584 (69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85) -
  44. one more, 05:21:025 - change kat for emphasize high pitch? and I think end of map its fine with main instrument (like started again)
I realised is full of spam ctrl g and first mod on this map, so sorry for a lot suggestion and my simple english, Hope this helpful with my lot emphasize and contrast suggestion for this map and hope you understand.
Topic Starter
mintong89

Surono wrote:

Hai, (M4M if You accept My map) via pm site

>General
  1. SliderMultiplier:1.40000000596046 delete red colour in notepad of this map lol I don't know why it will become this but ok
  2. untick countdown ok
  3. Kiai unsnap, Check AiMod ^
  4. Offset Like early with notes eeh I don't think so? it's fine when i play
  5. I think this map can to be more to mapping till end with adjusting for reducing patterns to fitting music ahh since the song is fading out I can't really map it sorry
>Apple
  1. 00:19:432 - kat for high vocal and to varies with previous vocal pitch? I'd prefer k to keep first beat for d
  2. 00:27:425 - kat? its fit for adjusting contrast in this pattern hmm I think current contrast is good(? because you have d k d at beginning and k d k and end of the part
  3. 00:29:023 - its similar with 00:28:757 - this? so its would fit to hitsounding with patterns 00:27:158 (39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46) - (just need don 00:27:957 (42,44) - for this both low pitch) yeah you're right but I'd prefer d k d then k d k pattern for the flow and gameplay
  4. 00:31:954 (58,59) - ctrl g? emphasizing vocal its fit imo yep ok
  5. 00:32:620 - change don? its look good for variety vocal pattern yeah because I've change the previous pattern
  6. 00:38:082 (84,86) - ctrl g? its like mirror of 00:33:819 (66,67,68,69,70,71,72) - this, but different 00:37:016 (80,81,82,83,84,85,86) - of this is 00:38:348 (85,86) - here.. "ka ka" should kat? and its fit too with 00:38:082 (84,85,86) - instrument ok
  7. 00:41:013 (96) - change don? just like heard 00:40:213 - similar with this, and for 00:41:279 (97,98,99) - contrasting this pattern yep and change previous note as k
  8. 00:41:679 - kat? have pitch to be mapped, so kkd. its main instrument right? yeah but I'd prefer current part's pattern just 1/2 only
  9. 00:46:741 (128,129) - ctrl g? variety looks fit with 00:47:140 (131,132,133,134) - this hmm ok seem legit
  10. 01:07:256 (310,316) - ctrl g? and change 01:07:655 - kat for this? like fit with instrument imo ^
  11. 01:16:847 (393,395) - I think to better with drum you should ctrl g this ^
  12. 01:17:780 - change kat? high drum would fit and good as variety, 01:16:714 - with this ^
  13. 01:23:375 - kat? to follow with 01:23:241 - this vocal
  14. 01:24:241 - change kat? so can be as dkd? I think is nice emphasize with guitar change with ddk instead
  15. 01:24:973 (464,465) - ctrl g? for consistent with 01:25:506 - this instrument, vocal is already fit with instrument
  16. 01:26:705 - why not to fill here with kat? its similar with 01:26:572 - this drum and should mapped imo ok but i'll put d
  17. 01:29:103 (496,497) - ctrl g? 01:28:970 (494,495,496) - ddd already enough imo for smooth flow, and 01:29:236 - drum would be fine if change to kat
  18. 01:30:035 (504,505,506,507) - ddkd 1/2? and 01:30:568 (508,509) - change kat? vocal and drum is fit if you heard it
  19. 01:32:766 - same above about emphasize with guitar, if you like it I'll keep this as the flow
  20. 01:34:032 (536,537) - imo ctrl g would better to up-down-up-down pitch?
  21. 01:34:565 (541,542,543,544,545,546,547) - kddkkdD 1/2? Guitar and Instrumend looks good to heard and fit with vocal pitch too hmm I'll consider this
  22. 01:47:885 - change kat? to long imo for hit donkatdonkat pattern, I think after finisher is fit to starting donkatdonkat patterns
  23. 01:49:217 - instrument and vocal high imo, change kat finisher? hmm nah I'll keep this because I feel the first beat should be d
  24. 01:52:415 (666,667,668,669) - wow nice to be xx xx patterns, its fit with vocal flow. I like it ww
  25. 01:53:613 - why this not to be rest? its fit and no have pitch, just heard to flow. and maybe 01:53:480 - this high vocal can be finisher, if you like it to be emphasize with next rest 1/1 ( 01:57:743 - like you did in here) you're right but I'll keep this as the flow and because there's high pitch at before so I want to emphasize that
  26. 01:56:411 - kat? kkddk good for emphasize with 01:56:145 - similar vocal
  27. 01:56:944 (712,713,714) - kkd? looks good with instrument and contrast I'd prefer to follow the ddk ddk ddkkk pattern for symmetry
  28. 01:58:676 (728,729) - ctrl g? 01:58:809 - this nice to be don and variety looks good with 01:59:342 - this vocal
  29. 02:02:006 - same above about to be rest and finisher, 02:02:139 (762,763) - just need to delete this
  30. 02:03:605 (777,778) - heard like rather odd, ctrl g would better emphasize with vocal and previous
  31. 02:04:404 (785,786,787) - not fit imo, maybe you can change to kdd for mirror of 02:04:137 (782,783,784) - this or kkd for 02:03:871 (779,780,781) - this, its both fit with music imo
  32. 02:06:002 (800,801) - I think you just need this pitch, and delete note in blue tick. I feels is not fit with drum and looks overmap pattern hmm nope I'd prefer to keep this for the flow
  33. 02:06:668 - kat? snare drum fit with this I'll consider this, but now I'll keep for the pattern flow
  34. 02:09:599 - delete for rest? i think is still have similar part with previous patterns
  35. 02:11:731 (840,842,844,846) - I Like to delete it and focus to drum. but if you like follow with vocal, 02:11:731 (840,842) - just delete it, its would better and not look over
  36. 02:13:728 - until 02:39:306 - here looks fine with contrasting and emphasize
  37. 02:43:302 - kat for02:42:503 (1059,1067) - contrasting both of this?
  38. 02:46:499 (1081,1085) - kat? same above
  39. 02:52:360 - kat? still similar drum 02:52:094 - with this
  40. 03:02:351 - delete? for rest or 03:02:218 - change this kat for avoid monotone?
  41. from 2nd kiai and next parts looks good, 04:04:562 - change kat? or 04:04:295 - this?
  42. 04:11:755 (1703) - kat for 04:10:956 (1699,1707) - contrast?
  43. 04:27:474 - untill end, good emphasize and contrasting, so nothing to give more suggestion from me and I Like with some flow you mapped, eg: 04:53:584 (69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85) -
  44. one more, 05:21:025 - change kat for emphasize high pitch? and I think end of map its fine with main instrument (like started again)
I realised is full of spam ctrl g and first mod on this map, so sorry for a lot suggestion and my simple english, Hope this helpful with my lot emphasize and contrast suggestion for this map and hope you understand.
Thanks for the useful mod! I've apply other that I'ven't reply. Well mostly when I map fast song I'll take flow as the primary and ignore the tone and vocal. So these is quite help me, thanks!
Midnaait
Hello, Mod request from chat

[General]

Disable Countdown
Maybe OD=6 but that's up to you

[Apple]

00:20:098 - You could delete this note, since there is no voice here, If you do so change 00:19:965 - to kat
00:36:217 - How about a kat there? Background music is high pitched as well as the voice
01:01:527 (258,259) - ctrl+g? Pitch is higher in the first note
01:16:181 - d? It's to emphasize the drum kick
01:27:771 - How about this?

01:33:899 - I think it's more convenient to have a break here, move that note to 01:33:632
01:41:092 - Delete?
02:05:070 (792,793) - Ctrl+g this?
02:47:032 (1087,1088) - Ctrl+g? Voice is lower here
02:47:698 (1090,1091) - ^
02:57:289 - Move that note 1/2 to the left and change to don, I think this part needs more the break lol
03:35:654 - How about a kat here? There's a guitar sound. If you did so change 03:35:787 to don
04:14:819 (1729,1730) - Delete these kats? If you did so change 04:14:686 - to kat

Well, that's all, I couldn't find too many flaws, is a good map =w=b
Good luck!
Surono
Sorry for saying about offset, my bad. I just tired and rather unusual for playing flow patterns
Yeah, fast song is fit if mapped with flow or vocal. follow music just bad for playing ( I've been tried with mostly follow like drum, and I get the result )
I Just Think in Kiai parts has harsh part to playing, but its fine cuz for Approve map. Just this from me, bye sir.
Topic Starter
mintong89

Surono wrote:

Sorry for saying about offset, my bad. I just tired and rather unusual for playing flow patterns
Yeah, fast song is fit if mapped with flow or vocal. follow music just bad for playing ( I've been tried with mostly follow like drum, and I get the result )
I Just Think in Kiai parts has harsh part to playing, but its fine cuz for Approve map. Just this from me, bye sir.
lol I guess you missed my point. What I've mean is I'm suck on mapping fast song, and you mod is really great to me and I've change a lot of things.

Midnaait wrote:

Hello, Mod request from chat

[General]

Disable Countdown oops ok
Maybe OD=6 but that's up to you hmm ok

[Apple]

00:20:098 - You could delete this note, since there is no voice here, If you do so change 00:19:965 - to kat ...but there's have voice..?
00:36:217 - How about a kat there? Background music is high pitched as well as the voice yeah sounds fine
01:01:527 (258,259) - ctrl+g? Pitch is higher in the first note ok
01:16:181 - d? It's to emphasize the drum kick yeah
01:27:771 - How about this? ^

01:33:899 - I think it's more convenient to have a break here, move that note to 01:33:632 I find it weird but I'll consider it
01:41:092 - Delete? I've follow the piano sound here
02:05:070 (792,793) - Ctrl+g this? yep
02:47:032 (1087,1088) - Ctrl+g? Voice is lower here You're right but I'd prefer d on the first beat
02:47:698 (1090,1091) - ^
02:57:289 - Move that note 1/2 to the left and change to don, I think this part needs more the break lol ok
03:35:654 - How about a kat here? There's a guitar sound. If you did so change 03:35:787 to don ^
04:14:819 (1729,1730) - Delete these kats? If you did so change 04:14:686 - to kat I've changed other pattern to make it more fit

Well, that's all, I couldn't find too many flaws, is a good map =w=b
Good luck!

thanks for mod :)
Jerry


Hello mint! Here's the Taiko mod that you requested for.

  • [Apple]
  1. 01:33:233 - There is a heavy "thump" here in the music. So, I recommend deleting the note at 01:33:366 - so that the "thump" can be emphasized more with a slight 1/2 gap after the don.
    :idea: Additionally, you can also change 01:33:499 - to a kat after applying the changes above so that it flows better with the vocal note.


  2. 01:58:942 - This ddd here is placed in an unnatural position that doesn't flow well with the music, try moving the don at 01:59:009 - over to 01:58:875 -?

  3. 02:53:959 - This gap here kinda ruins the flow for this part imo. I suggest moving 02:54:092 - over to this spot and then changing it to don. This way, the flow of the note structure will fit better with the music and also, there is a consistency of rhythm with 02:54:758 -
    :idea: Alternatively, you can also just add a don here to fill up a gap. Both method works.


  4. 04:06:693 - How about changing this ddk d pattern to a ddd k instead? The placement of the kat improves the flow of this part much better imo

  5. 04:50:253 (38) - Change this note to kat? It makes the note structure here feel more solid and stronger when played :3c

  6. 04:58:646 (126,127,128,129,130) - Change this pattern to kkkkd? It follows up nicely with 04:58:113 (120,121,122,123,124) - imo

  7. 01:52:415 - I highly discourage this double-note pattern because throughout this entire kiai, you've only used triplet and five-note patterns. Suddenly having a double-note pattern come out of nowhere really ruins the flow for this part.
    :?: How about changing it to a triplet pattern or five-note pattern instead?


  8. 04:59:045 - ^ Same for this, the flow is severely affected by this sudden double-note pattern. Change it to a triplet/5-note pattern instead?

This is a really really good map! Most of my suggestions only touched on the flow of the note structures and rhythms because those were pretty much the only issues with the map. Other than that, the map is very solid and I hope it gets ranked soon! :D
Topic Starter
mintong89

Jerry wrote:



Hello mint! Here's the Taiko mod that you requested for.

  • [Apple]
  1. 01:33:233 - There is a heavy "thump" here in the music. So, I recommend deleting the note at 01:33:366 - so that the "thump" can be emphasized more with a slight 1/2 gap after the don.
    :idea: Additionally, you can also change 01:33:499 - to a kat after applying the changes above so that it flows better with the vocal note. yep you're right, fixed


  2. 01:58:942 - This ddd here is placed in an unnatural position that doesn't flow well with the music, try moving the don at 01:59:009 - over to 01:58:875 -? Hmm I think current position is fine to me, but I'll take look in next mod

  3. 02:53:959 - This gap here kinda ruins the flow for this part imo. I suggest moving 02:54:092 - over to this spot and then changing it to don. This way, the flow of the note structure will fit better with the music and also, there is a consistency of rhythm with 02:54:758 -
    :idea: Alternatively, you can also just add a don here to fill up a gap. Both method works. lol you're right, I was doing this in second parts too


  4. 04:06:693 - How about changing this ddk d pattern to a ddd k instead? The placement of the kat improves the flow of this part much better imo ok, seem fit more with vocal too

  5. 04:50:253 (38) - Change this note to kat? It makes the note structure here feel more solid and stronger when played :3c

  6. 04:58:646 (126,127,128,129,130) - Change this pattern to kkkkd? It follows up nicely with 04:58:113 (120,121,122,123,124) - imo yup

  7. 01:52:415 - I highly discourage this double-note pattern because throughout this entire kiai, you've only used triplet and five-note patterns. Suddenly having a double-note pattern come out of nowhere really ruins the flow for this part.
    :?: How about changing it to a triplet pattern or five-note pattern instead?


  8. 04:59:045 - ^ Same for this, the flow is severely affected by this sudden double-note pattern. Change it to a triplet/5-note pattern instead? I've changed the second one but I feel first one are fine, I'll look forward to next one

This is a really really good map! Most of my suggestions only touched on the flow of the note structures and rhythms because those were pretty much the only issues with the map. Other than that, the map is very solid and I hope it gets ranked soon! :D
Thanks :)
Firce777
blah
SPOILER
17:17 *mintong89 is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/866288 cillia - Ringo Uri no Utakata Shoujo]
17:17 mintong89: 这张 ^______^!
17:18 Firce777: 00:39:014 (87,88,89,90) - kddk?
17:18 mintong89: omg ok
17:19 Firce777: 00:58:730 (235) - k
17:19 Firce777: 01:05:924 (299) - d
17:20 mintong89: okok!
17:22 Firce777: 02:33:312 (1000) - d
17:23 Firce777: 03:05:948 (1230,1231,1232,1233,1234) - kdddk
17:23 mintong89: wow ok
17:23 mintong89: good
17:27 Firce777: 04:43:460 (1) - move to 04:42:394 -
17:27 Firce777: 04:43:993 - add slider
17:27 mintong89: 噫反过来可以吗
17:28 Firce777: 可以
17:28 Firce777: 05:17:828 (25) - d
17:28 Firce777: 好了 懶了
17:29 mintong89: 好 omg 谢谢 >_<!
17:29 mintong89: 你发osu forum吧
Topic Starter
mintong89

Firce777 wrote:

blah
SPOILER
17:17 *mintong89 is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/866288 cillia - Ringo Uri no Utakata Shoujo]
17:17 mintong89: 这张 ^______^!
17:18 Firce777: 00:39:014 (87,88,89,90) - kddk?
17:18 mintong89: omg ok
17:19 Firce777: 00:58:730 (235) - k
17:19 Firce777: 01:05:924 (299) - d
17:20 mintong89: okok!
17:22 Firce777: 02:33:312 (1000) - d
17:23 Firce777: 03:05:948 (1230,1231,1232,1233,1234) - kdddk
17:23 mintong89: wow ok
17:23 mintong89: good
17:27 Firce777: 04:43:460 (1) - move to 04:42:394 -
17:27 Firce777: 04:43:993 - add slider
17:27 mintong89: 噫反过来可以吗
17:28 Firce777: 可以
17:28 Firce777: 05:17:828 (25) - d
17:28 Firce777: 好了 懶了
17:29 mintong89: 好 omg 谢谢 >_<!
17:29 mintong89: 你发osu forum吧
Thanks :)
Manimani_old_1
100post!
[apple]
OD稍微高一点?长图od5给的pp略少了 >.<
00:45:408 (114,115,116) -116听起来有点像k欸
00:47:940 (138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146) - kkkkddddk感觉更适合这个00:47:407 (133) -位置些
01:08:255 - 好像能加个k和前面的ddd d呼应一下
TAT歌里有k k k的节奏但是和鼓音混杂在一起于是晕掉了@ @
01:50:816 (652,653,654,655,656) - kkkkd?
01:52:415 (668,669,670,671) - 这里全图唯一的二连有点不大明白欸 求解释;w;
01:53:880 (682,683,684) - 虽然kkd和ddk都很贴不过感觉往后接下ddk比较好?
01:56:677 (712,713,714,715,716,717,718,719,720,721,722) - ddd k k kkddk d试试?(原因说不出来凭感觉的www
02:23:187 (932) - 感觉有点突兀 补上02:22:654 - 或者删掉单独 d k dkk?
02:24:253 (938) - 02:25:319 (944) - 同上
02:51:561 (1117,1118,1119,1120,1121) - 02:55:291 (1142,1143,1144,1145,1146) - >n<有没有除了同色带过以外更好的方法咩
03:05:415 (1221,1222,1223,1224,1225,1226,1227,1228,1229,1230,1231,1232,1233) - kdddkdddkkddk?(03:05:948 (1229) - 的音听起来要比前两个长一点的样子
03:14:473 (1306,1307,1308,1309,1310,1311,1312,1313,1314) -kkddkkkkd可以吗;w; (dkkkdkkkd苦手表示/runs)
04:00:565 (1622,1623,1624,1625,1626) - 感觉还是k更适合钢琴些;w;
04:36:266 (1826) - 实际打好像没什么不正常233 但是editor看随着乐句分跟着八音盒节奏还是有点不太习惯(语死早无视掉这个就好orz)
04:43:460 (1) - 这里要是能换成note体现出来那种逐渐逼近的紧迫感就好了
05:00:377 (147) - d?
后面可以加料到八音盒前吗 这样成绩结算界面就能听到八音盒了(runs)

又被安利了首曲子 看了歌词和PV简直泪目TAT
Topic Starter
mintong89

Manimani wrote:

100post!
[apple]
OD稍微高一点?长图od5给的pp略少了 >.< 好!!
00:45:408 (114,115,116) -116听起来有点像k欸 ok
00:47:940 (138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146) - kkkkddddk感觉更适合这个00:47:407 (133) -位置些 hmm 我考虑看看
01:08:255 - 好像能加个k和前面的ddd d呼应一下 好像有点太难了233 这里歌比较安静所以要保持容易点
TAT歌里有k k k的节奏但是和鼓音混杂在一起于是晕掉了@ @
01:50:816 (652,653,654,655,656) - kkkkd?
01:52:415 (668,669,670,671) - 这里全图唯一的二连有点不大明白欸 求解释;w; 好吧 太多人投诉我就该惹
01:53:880 (682,683,684) - 虽然kkd和ddk都很贴不过感觉往后接下ddk比较好? 不明白 (
01:56:677 (712,713,714,715,716,717,718,719,720,721,722) - ddd k k kkddk d试试?(原因说不出来凭感觉的www 先保留着 想保留ddk ddk ddkkk 的节奏
02:23:187 (932) - 感觉有点突兀 补上02:22:654 - 或者删掉单独 d k dkk? 这里跟着鼓节奏的所以先看看
02:24:253 (938) - 02:25:319 (944) - 同上
02:51:561 (1117,1118,1119,1120,1121) - 02:55:291 (1142,1143,1144,1145,1146) - >n<有没有除了同色带过以外更好的方法咩 同色打起来比较累 虐人(
03:05:415 (1221,1222,1223,1224,1225,1226,1227,1228,1229,1230,1231,1232,1233) - kdddkdddkkddk?(03:05:948 (1229) - 的音听起来要比前两个长一点的样子 ok
03:14:473 (1306,1307,1308,1309,1310,1311,1312,1313,1314) -kkddkkkkd可以吗;w; (dkkkdkkkd苦手表示/runs)
04:00:565 (1622,1623,1624,1625,1626) - 感觉还是k更适合钢琴些;w; 好 爽
04:36:266 (1826) - 实际打好像没什么不正常233 但是editor看随着乐句分跟着八音盒节奏还是有点不太习惯(语死早无视掉这个就好orz) 233
04:43:460 (1) - 这里要是能换成note体现出来那种逐渐逼近的紧迫感就好了 好 我考虑看看
05:00:377 (147) - d?
后面可以加料到八音盒前吗 这样成绩结算界面就能听到八音盒了(runs) 好吧

又被安利了首曲子 看了歌词和PV简直泪目TAT
谢啦 :) 要mod可以随时找我 (.
Alpe
Wow this map is amazing. I like it :)
snz
From My Queue

Apple
00:42:078 (100) - Change this to k
00:52:336 (183,184,185,186) - Ctrl+G
01:00:928 (255,256) - ^
01:14:050 (369) - Add Finish
01:49:351 - Add k here
02:15:994 (872,873,874,875,876) - kdddk
02:26:384 - Add k here
02:33:445 (1003) - Delete this
02:55:824 (1148) - Add finish
03:19:269 (1357) - ^
03:42:182 (1499,1500,1501,1502,1503,1504) - ^
04:50:386 (39) - Change This To K
05:22:824 (58,59,60,61) - Ctrl+G
05:36:212 (138) - Add Finish

Good Luck With Rank :D
Topic Starter
mintong89

Azulae wrote:

Wow this map is amazing. I like it :)
thanks :D

Ppuskalin wrote:

From My Queue

Apple
00:42:078 (100) - Change this to k but I wanna make a pattern difference from previous part
00:52:336 (183,184,185,186) - Ctrl+G I will consider it, it seem quite odd
01:00:928 (255,256) - ^ but there are guitar at final note?
01:14:050 (369) - Add Finish I don't want because there's no loud sound to let me emphasize it
01:49:351 - Add k here Well I'd prefer to keep empty here because I wanna emphasize the big note
02:15:994 (872,873,874,875,876) - kdddk I will consider it
02:26:384 - Add k here there isn't have any sound...?
02:33:445 (1003) - Delete this there's vocal here...?
02:55:824 (1148) - Add finish same as above reason, there's no loud sound
03:19:269 (1357) - ^
03:42:182 (1499,1500,1501,1502,1503,1504) - ^
04:50:386 (39) - Change This To K k K seem really hard to press
05:22:824 (58,59,60,61) - Ctrl+G I don't see the reason lol
05:36:212 (138) - Add Finish I don't want because the sound is kinda fading out so loud D will kinda noisy

Good Luck With Rank :D
Thanks for mod :)
wasonz
w00t

00:42:611 - NO REMOVE IT ;w; remove it please. you didn't follow background noise at first

02:34:243 - kdddk : reflect 02:31:046 -

02:51:561 - dkddk that piano <3

02:55:291 - kdkkd it's reflect ^

03:41:382 - K K 03:42:182 - K ? looks more varies

03:53:638 - you forgot the note or what ?

05:23:423 - lower volume after here

you r00d why mapped this so good
newyams99
Really like this song. Gonna mod it soon, then maybe a bubble ;) Just maybe tho
Topic Starter
mintong89

newyams99 wrote:

Really like this song. Gonna mod it soon, then maybe a bubble ;) Just maybe tho
lol thanks
[I]MMoRTal[S]: Sorry but those are really fine in my option orz
Surono
please... Immortals quote rip ;_; lol
newyams99
Hi from request~

Apple

Warning: Some of my suggestions are highly subjective. Sorry about that x.x I felt like you could change many rhythms because you've matched many vocal areas with ds which aren't effective in the middle of patterns to bring out the vocals imo, and you've missed places where you could add ks in some places where the clap-like drum sound is present. You also mentioned something about flow of the rhythm in the chat, but hopefully my suggestions don't affect it too much. Don't feel obliged to change anything if this isn't your style of mapping.

Please consult with Ono regarding the difficulty name. I don't want to bubble a set that possibly can't be ranked because of the name.

Change the artist name to シリア. In your Fairytale beatmap, you used it. Remember to change the romanized artist to cillia. Also add "Gahata Mage" or "Gahata Meiji" for the romanized words of 歌幡メイジ into the tags.

Many suggestions
00:19:432 (7) - You may want to change this to k since the vocal pitch is higher than the hits surrounding it.

00:24:494 (28) - ^ The pitch is the same as the next hit, and you did a similar thing at 00:34:085 (67).

00:27:957 (42,43) - Just a personal opinion, but this should have Ctrl + G done on it, then change 00:28:490 (44) to k. The way you've matched the ks here seems to be matched to the music box (let's call it that); if so, you could possibly Ctrl + G 00:27:158 (39,40) instead.

00:29:423 (47,48,49,50,51,52) - I'd personally delete this portion, since adding hits in a quiet section doesn't sound good imo. Also, it creates a transitional effect into the second half of the quiet section. You can do whatever you want tho.

00:36:616 (78) - I realize you matched the instrumentals here because it's on a different place within the measure compared to places such as 00:31:821 where you didn't match to the instrumentals. However, I still think you should add the hits at these places where you omitted, such as the one mentioned above, and other similar places such as 00:35:018 in the quiet section. Idk, it just felt kinda inconsistent when I played through it.

01:06:190 - Add a d here. You can clearly hear an instrumental sound here, and it kinda interrupts the flow. To compensate for the break loss, you could add a break by deleting 01:07:789 (314,315) which doesn't have a sound.

01:07:922 (316) - You can change this to k to match to the vocals and instrumentals. Even further, you could change 01:08:055 (317) to k as well, and Ctrl + G 01:08:188 (318,319,320) for a better match with the instrumentals, like so https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4431956

01:08:721 (322) - Change to d? The background instrumentals aren't present here (the snare drum-like sound I think), and vocals aren't present either.

01:09:121 (327,328,329,330,331) - This rhythm should be reworked as there are instrumentals that are missed. Something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4431966 may work

01:11:119 (343) - You could change this to k for the snare drum sound.

01:13:384 (363,364) - Ctrl + G for the same reason as above.

01:15:115 (378) - You could change to d as there's a clear bass drum sound here.

01:15:781 (384) - Change to k? Then Ctrl + G 01:16:048 (387,388) would make a better match the instrumentals, with the ks matching the snare drums once again.

01:16:448 - This rhythm is absolutely beautiful.

01:18:579 (406) - I'm guessing this is a d for contrast with the next hit which is vocals. However, I personally like this as a k better.

01:18:845 (408,409,410,411,412,413,414) - This could be reworked too imo. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4432058

01:21:510 (432) - Change to d to match the bass drum and because there's no snare drum, and because the vocals are lower.

01:22:842 (444) - You can change this to k if you want to match the snare drum.

01:26:172 (472,473) - You may want to delete this for a nice emphasis on the vocals.

01:26:705 (477) - Change to k for the snare drum.

01:27:504 (483,484,485,486) - You could switch the colours of these four hits for the same reasons as before. The colour change on 01:27:904 (486) is most optional.

01:28:304 (490,491) - Ctrl + G matches the snare drum and the vocal pitch better.

01:29:369 (500,501,502) - Switch the colours for the same reason as above?

01:30:435 (509) - You can change this to k. Alternatively, 01:30:568 (510) may be changed to match the vocals.

01:33:499 (534,535,536,537) - k d d k is possible to match the snare drums, and the first k d to match the vocals.

01:34:698 (544,545,546,547) - k d k k is possible to match the snare drums and the k k to match the vocals.

01:35:763 (550) - You may change this to d to match the pitch of the vocals, as you did at 01:38:960 (568).

01:47:086 (622,623) - Ctrl + G would have the k matched to the vocals and have a d to contrast with the instrumentals at 01:47:352 (624).

01:52:415 (668,669,670,671) - Switch the colours of this pattern? A k on 01:52:415 (668) works to match the vocals, and a k on 01:52:681 (671) works to match the instrumentals.

01:58:809 (732,733,734,735,736,737,738) - This can also be reworked like this perhaps: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4435774
The current rhythm is too monotonous at 01:58:809 (732,733,734,735,736) imo.

02:02:805 (772) - You can change this to k to match the instrumentals. Alternatively, you could change 02:03:072 (774) to k to match the instrumentals.

02:04:804 (792,793) - Ctrl + G would match the instrumentals and vocals better imo.

02:07:867 (814) - You could change this to D to contrast with the surrounding hits and to emphasize the highest point of the vocals at 02:08:666 (818). Same at 03:25:130 (1402) and 05:04:774 (174).

02:08:666 (818) - Best part of every kiai and the whole song right at this hit <3

02:12:663 - I think the kiai should end here. I'm pretty particular on stylistic elements such as the kiai time.

02:16:260 (875,876,877,878) - Switching the colours of these hits would work better to match the pitch of the instrumental melody.

02:18:525 (895,896,897) - ^

02:20:256 (910,911,912,913) - ^

02:22:921 (931) - You could change this to d to contrast the vocal pitch and the instrumental sound difference.

02:26:118 (949) - Change to k? The instrumental sound is more similar to the next hit than the previous.

02:26:384 - It wouldn't hurt to add a hit here.

02:27:050 (955,956,957,958) - Ctrl + G would work to match the ks to both the vocals and instrumentals.

02:28:782 (970,971,972) - ^

02:29:448 (976,977) - ^ If you want to match to the vocals.

02:30:381 (984,985,986) - If you switch the colours of these hits, it could work better for the k on 02:30:381 (984) to match a similar sound that was heard at 02:30:248 (983) and d k for a nice contrast on the vocal pitch.

02:34:377 (1006,1007) - You could change these to d to show a difference in instrumental sound with the next two hits, and you could also add a k at 02:34:910 if you want to.

02:44:767 (1076,1077,1078,1079,1080) - You could switch the colours of these hits to match the instrumentals better at 02:44:901 (1077,1078).

02:49:297 (1101) - You can change this to k to match to the vocals which I think you're doing here; it also matches the instrumentals.

02:49:896 - You can add a hit here.

02:54:891 (1141,1142) - Ctrl + G may be better to have the k be matched to the high pitched drum sound at 02:55:024 (1142).

02:55:424 (1144) - You can change this to d to put a bit more emphasis on the vocals.

03:04:216 (1211) - You can change this to k to match the similar sound at 03:04:083 (1210).

03:07:146 (1240) - You can change this to d for a slight more variety.

03:07:946 (1247,1248) - Ctrl + G works to bring out the vocals with the k at 03:08:079 (1248).

03:10:610 (1272,1273,1274,1275) - Ctrl + G for consistency with 01:53:347 (678,679,680), it also sounds better. You may also want to change 03:11:076 (1276) to k if you want, or just have the whole triplet as ddd as it was originally.

03:16:072 (1324,1325) - ^ for a better match with the vocals.

03:19:136 (1355,1356) - ^

03:19:669 (1359,1360) - You could also change this to dd if you want to bring out the vocals at the end of the triplet.

03:35:254 (1459) - Change to d. The k matching is inconsistent with 03:34:722 (1457). If you accept this suggestion, you should also Ctrl + G 03:35:521 (1460,1461,1462) for contrast and consistency of matching.

03:43:780 - It's also possible to create a kiai here. It's a pretty high-paced part. ok maybe not cuz the kiai would be insanely long lel

03:47:777 (1536,1537) - Ctrl + G for a nice match with the vocals 03:47:777 (1536,1537).

03:49:908 (1554,1555,1556) - Switch the colours of these hits? It'll help match the vocals and match the instrumental sound at 03:49:908 (1554).

03:53:105 (1579) - The drums are slightly higher pitched here and it'll also create a good contrast with the next finisher, so change to k?

03:54:970 (1587) - Change to k to keep the consistency of matching the instrumentals at 03:54:171 (1583). Same at 03:55:769 (1591). You may also want to change some surrounding hits.

03:58:833 (1607,1608) - Ctrl + G will have a k better match with the high vocals and the instrumental sounds.

04:08:291 (1681,1682) - ^

04:11:489 (1707,1708) - ^ To match the instrumental sound at 04:11:755 (1708).

04:14:686 (1730,1731) - ^

04:22:146 (1785) - You should change to D since the vocal pitch is lower. Similarly, 04:25:343 (1799) should be changed for the lower instrumental sound.

04:22:546 (1786,1787) - Maybe change to d d to contrast the instrumental sound at 04:22:945 (1788)?

04:27:740 (1801) - You can change this to k to match a similar sounding xylophone sound at 04:28:274 (1803).

04:36:266 (1827,1828) - Ctrl + G for the same reason as above.

04:34:401 (1822,1823,1824) - Switching the colours would match the pitch of the xylophone and the vocals.

04:41:595 (1844,1845) - Ctrl + G for the same reason as above.

04:47:722 (16,17) - ^ to have the k matched to the vocals, probably one of the more optional changes tho.

04:51:452 (48) - You could change this to k to match the high vocals.

04:58:646 (126,127,128,129,130) - Having this pattern start and end with a k would sound better imo.

05:02:109 (165) - Idk, but this slider seemed unnecessary to me, and could be made just like 03:22:466.

05:08:504 (202) - You could change this to K for a greater contrast with the surrounding hits.

05:09:036 (204) - This could be changed to k for the instrumental difference and vocals.

05:10:635 (1) - This spinner should end at 05:12:500 for the vocals imo.

05:14:498 (5,6) - Ctrl + G may work to have the k match the instrumental sound at 05:14:631. Same at 05:30:617 (104).

05:17:828 (25) - Could be changed to k for the same reason as above. Adding a hit could also be possible at 05:17:695.

05:19:693 (35,36) - d d works better to contrast the instrumentals at 05:19:960 (37).

05:20:892 (42) - This can also be changed to d for the same reason as above.

05:22:491 (55,56) - Ctrl + G works better to match the instrumentals imo.

05:23:956 (67,68) - ^

05:34:613 (126) - You may change to k here for the same reasons as before.

05:35:412 - May I ask why this inherited point is at 47% lel xD Change to 45% if you want to be precise:P

Ok, that's it. Hopefully this helped. I mentioned more of the major stuff that I found, but try to find places where possible changes could happen. Sorry if this doesn't help too much cuz of the style x.x

Good luck on rank~
Topic Starter
mintong89

newyams99 wrote:

Reduced some word so I can reply lol

diffname fine :(
metadata ok

Many suggestions
00:19:432 (7) - You may want to change this to k since the vocal pitch is higher than the hits surrounding it. I'd prefer to let the first stanza (or first beat) to be d, just like original Taiko no Tatsujin style do it.

00:24:494 (28) - ^ The pitch is the same as the next hit, and you did a similar thing at 00:34:085 (67). ok

00:27:957 (42,43) - Just a personal opinion, but this should have Ctrl + G done on it, then change 00:28:490 (44) to k. The way you've matched the ks here seems to be matched to the music box (let's call it that); if so, you could possibly Ctrl + G 00:27:158 (39,40) instead. But the vocal does fit these pattern if you hear properly

00:29:423 (47,48,49,50,51,52) - I'd personally delete this portion, since adding hits in a quiet section doesn't sound good imo. Also, it creates a transitional effect into the second half of the quiet section. You can do whatever you want tho. But I wanna keep the similarity of the part, you can see that all part a these soft section are contain 4-note.

00:36:616 (78) - I realize you matched the instrumentals here because it's on a different place within the measure compared to places such as 00:31:821 where you didn't match to the instrumentals. However, I still think you should add the hits at these places where you omitted, such as the one mentioned above, and other similar places such as 00:35:018 in the quiet section. Idk, it just felt kinda inconsistent when I played through it. Because generally the vocal is louder than instrumental and it barely hearable when I put note on it, but when the vocal is gone then I'll put the instrumental instead.

01:06:190 - Add a d here. You can clearly hear an instrumental sound here, and it kinda interrupts the flow. To compensate for the break loss, you could add a break by deleting 01:07:789 (314,315) which doesn't have a sound. But I does the same thing on other part?? It would be more interrupts the flow when I used your suggestion because the break part isn't similarity anymore.

01:07:922 (316) - You can change this to k to match to the vocals and instrumentals. Even further, you could change 01:08:055 (317) to k as well, and Ctrl + G 01:08:188 (318,319,320) for a better match with the instrumentals, like so https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4431956 I've changed the first suggestion but not second one because that is quite hard to press for kkdd player

01:08:721 (322) - Change to d? The background instrumentals aren't present here (the snare drum-like sound I think), and vocals aren't present either. same as above reason, it's kinda hard to press when comes to kkdd player's flow

01:09:121 (327,328,329,330,331) - This rhythm should be reworked as there are instrumentals that are missed. Something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4431966 may work I've used your suggestion but I think the rhythm is weird. Generally I want to emphasize the guitar bass at here.

01:11:119 (343) - You could change this to k for the snare drum sound. You're right but I wanna keep this to d because the it was too much k on it imo

01:13:384 (363,364) - Ctrl + G for the same reason as above. sure

01:15:115 (378) - You could change to d as there's a clear bass drum sound here. Same as above reason, I don't want to make it same pattern in like ~2 sec. It's kinda boring imo

01:15:781 (384) - Change to k? Then Ctrl + G 01:16:048 (387,388) would make a better match the instrumentals, with the ks matching the snare drums once again. ddkdk is really hard for kkdd player imo when comes to really fast bpm lol sorry for this

01:16:448 - This rhythm is absolutely beautiful. wow I didn't notice these, thanks :)

01:18:579 (406) - I'm guessing this is a d for contrast with the next hit which is vocals. However, I personally like this as a k better. yeah

01:18:845 (408,409,410,411,412,413,414) - This could be reworked too imo. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4432058 yeah I like this, also applied above suggestion cuz I've change pattern lol

01:21:510 (432) - Change to d to match the bass drum and because there's no snare drum, and because the vocals are lower. I want to make it same as 01:21:776 (434) - this note as their vocal tone are same

01:22:842 (444) - You can change this to k if you want to match the snare drum. hmm I'd prefer to keep this so I can make a variety of

01:26:172 (472,473) - You may want to delete this for a nice emphasis on the vocals. If you hear properly this is already emphasis to it because at 01:24:707 - here you get d k d k d k-ish pattern and 01:25:773 - at here you will get k d k d k d-ish pattern.

01:26:705 (477) - Change to k for the snare drum. As above reason

01:27:504 (483,484,485,486) - You could switch the colours of these four hits for the same reasons as before. The colour change on 01:27:904 (486) is most optional. I thought this is fit the vocal perfectly?

01:28:304 (490,491) - Ctrl + G matches the snare drum and the vocal pitch better. ok

01:29:369 (500,501,502) - Switch the colours for the same reason as above? same

01:30:435 (509) - You can change this to k. Alternatively, 01:30:568 (510) may be changed to match the vocals. yeah

01:33:499 (534,535,536,537) - k d d k is possible to match the snare drums, and the first k d to match the vocals. ok

01:34:698 (544,545,546,547) - k d k k is possible to match the snare drums and the k k to match the vocals. yeah

01:35:763 (550) - You may change this to d to match the pitch of the vocals, as you did at 01:38:960 (568). ^

01:47:086 (622,623) - Ctrl + G would have the k matched to the vocals and have a d to contrast with the instrumentals at 01:47:352 (624). ^

01:52:415 (668,669,670,671) - Switch the colours of this pattern? A k on 01:52:415 (668) works to match the vocals, and a k on 01:52:681 (671) works to match the instrumentals. Changed to other pattern to make the flow better.

01:58:809 (732,733,734,735,736,737,738) - This can also be reworked like this perhaps: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4435774
The current rhythm is too monotonous at 01:58:809 (732,733,734,735,736) imo. Changed to other pattern too to make a variety or difference to previous part

02:02:805 (772) - You can change this to k to match the instrumentals. Alternatively, you could change 02:03:072 (774) to k to match the instrumentals. I'd prefer to keep this to make the flow better and more fun

02:04:804 (792,793) - Ctrl + G would match the instrumentals and vocals better imo. Changed to other pattern to avoid too much kdkdkd

02:07:867 (814) - You could change this to D to contrast with the surrounding hits and to emphasize the highest point of the vocals at 02:08:666 (818). Same at 03:25:130 (1402) and 05:04:774 (174). nah, if you see properly that I am playing with the big note pattern with D and then D and K and K. I did this for the vocal tone is slightly fading up too.

02:08:666 (818) - Best part of every kiai and the whole song right at this hit <3 Ikr haha!

02:12:663 - I think the kiai should end here. I'm pretty particular on stylistic elements such as the kiai time. But the score will be less

02:16:260 (875,876,877,878) - Switching the colours of these hits would work better to match the pitch of the instrumental melody. yep, these sounds great!

02:18:525 (895,896,897) - ^ yea

02:20:256 (910,911,912,913) - ^ but not here, kdd is a anti-flow lol

02:22:921 (931) - You could change this to d to contrast the vocal pitch and the instrumental sound difference. But I wanna emphasize the instrumental. If I change to d the pattern will too low-pitch-ish (that's mean the k generally for soft part or high pitch, so if I put too much d it will too noisy).

02:26:118 (949) - Change to k? The instrumental sound is more similar to the next hit than the previous. yep

02:26:384 - It wouldn't hurt to add a hit here. Generally I don't want to put something between big note so I can emphasis it.

02:27:050 (955,956,957,958) - Ctrl + G would work to match the ks to both the vocals and instrumentals. yep

02:28:782 (970,971,972) - ^ ^

02:29:448 (976,977) - ^ If you want to match to the vocals. ^

02:30:381 (984,985,986) - If you switch the colours of these hits, it could work better for the k on 02:30:381 (984) to match a similar sound that was heard at 02:30:248 (983) and d k for a nice contrast on the vocal pitch. Same as first reason, I'd want to keep this because of first stanza


02:34:377 (1006,1007) - You could change these to d to show a difference in instrumental sound with the next two hits, and you could also add a k at 02:34:910 if you want to. ok

02:44:767 (1076,1077,1078,1079,1080) - You could switch the colours of these hits to match the instrumentals better at 02:44:901 (1077,1078). well ok

02:49:297 (1101) - You can change this to k to match to the vocals which I think you're doing here; it also matches the instrumentals. ok

02:49:896 - You can add a hit here. I'd prefer to keep here just 1/2 beat snap divisor because here is very soft

02:54:891 (1141,1142) - Ctrl + G may be better to have the k be matched to the high pitched drum sound at 02:55:024 (1142). same reason

02:55:424 (1144) - You can change this to d to put a bit more emphasis on the vocals. ok

03:04:216 (1211) - You can change this to k to match the similar sound at 03:04:083 (1210).

03:07:146 (1240) - You can change this to d for a slight more variety. I wanna keep this not just because I wanna make it harder than first part but I wanna emphaize the drum tick at white line

03:07:946 (1247,1248) - Ctrl + G works to bring out the vocals with the k at 03:08:079 (1248). ok

03:10:610 (1272,1273,1274,1275) - Ctrl + G for consistency with 01:53:347 (678,679,680), it also sounds better. You may also want to change 03:11:076 (1276) to k if you want, or just have the whole triplet as ddd as it was originally. yea

03:16:072 (1324,1325) - ^ for a better match with the vocals.

03:19:136 (1355,1356) - ^

03:19:669 (1359,1360) - You could also change this to dd if you want to bring out the vocals at the end of the triplet.

03:35:254 (1459) - Change to d. The k matching is inconsistent with 03:34:722 (1457). If you accept this suggestion, you should also Ctrl + G 03:35:521 (1460,1461,1462) for contrast and consistency of matching. I want to keep the d d k d k k pattern

03:43:780 - It's also possible to create a kiai here. It's a pretty high-paced part. ok maybe not cuz the kiai would be insanely long lel lol

03:47:777 (1536,1537) - Ctrl + G for a nice match with the vocals 03:47:777 (1536,1537). ok

03:49:908 (1554,1555,1556) - Switch the colours of these hits? It'll help match the vocals and match the instrumental sound at 03:49:908 (1554). I'll change to k k D because of first reason

03:53:105 (1579) - The drums are slightly higher pitched here and it'll also create a good contrast with the next finisher, so change to k? I'll keep here to emphasis the vocal a~a~a (vocal tone is fading down)

03:54:970 (1587) - Change to k to keep the consistency of matching the instrumentals at 03:54:171 (1583). Same at 03:55:769 (1591). You may also want to change some surrounding hits. same as first reason

03:58:833 (1607,1608) - Ctrl + G will have a k better match with the high vocals and the instrumental sounds. ok

04:08:291 (1681,1682) - ^

04:11:489 (1707,1708) - ^ To match the instrumental sound at 04:11:755 (1708).

04:14:686 (1730,1731) - ^

04:22:146 (1785) - You should change to D since the vocal pitch is lower. Similarly, 04:25:343 (1799) should be changed for the lower instrumental sound. Same, I was playing the flow of the pattern (D and K and D and K)

04:22:546 (1786,1787) - Maybe change to d d to contrast the instrumental sound at 04:22:945 (1788)? Since the second big note is K, so I'll make it all k for similarity.

04:27:740 (1801) - You can change this to k to match a similar sounding xylophone sound at 04:28:274 (1803). I'll reconsider this, well I don't make it same as second part for variety

04:36:266 (1827,1828) - Ctrl + G for the same reason as above. same, for variety.

04:34:401 (1822,1823,1824) - Switching the colours would match the pitch of the xylophone and the vocals.

04:41:595 (1844,1845) - Ctrl + G for the same reason as above. I'd prefer the k for final note because d is too noisy

04:47:722 (16,17) - ^ to have the k matched to the vocals, probably one of the more optional changes tho. ok

04:51:452 (48) - You could change this to k to match the high vocals. yep, and thus flow is better too

04:58:646 (126,127,128,129,130) - Having this pattern start and end with a k would sound better imo. yea

05:02:109 (165) - Idk, but this slider seemed unnecessary to me, and could be made just like 03:22:466. For emphasize the very strong word from the song

05:08:504 (202) - You could change this to K for a greater contrast with the surrounding hits. hmm I did prefer D d d d for similarity.

05:09:036 (204) - This could be changed to k for the instrumental difference and vocals.

05:10:635 (1) - This spinner should end at 05:12:500 for the vocals imo. But for the gameplay it's too short imo

05:14:498 (5,6) - Ctrl + G may work to have the k match the instrumental sound at 05:14:631. Same at 05:30:617 (104). ok

05:17:828 (25) - Could be changed to k for the same reason as above. Adding a hit could also be possible at 05:17:695.

05:19:693 (35,36) - d d works better to contrast the instrumentals at 05:19:960 (37).

05:20:892 (42) - This can also be changed to d for the same reason as above.

05:22:491 (55,56) - Ctrl + G works better to match the instrumentals imo.

05:23:956 (67,68) - ^ all are applied

05:34:613 (126) - You may change to k here for the same reasons as before. I wanna make a difference or variety for second part

05:35:412 - May I ask why this inherited point is at 47% lel xD Change to 45% if you want to be precise:P ahh you're right lol, miscalculated
So that's about it lol, I hope I didn't miss any mod.
Beside, I've listened one more time and I think currently is fine now imo lol
Thank you!
newyams99
Just some things I'd like to correct from my previous mod that could have some reconsideration. No kudosu please.

01:06:190 - Add a d here. You can clearly hear an instrumental sound here, and it kinda interrupts the flow. To compensate for the break loss, you could add a break by deleting 01:07:789 (314,315) which doesn't have a sound.

You've argued that you've put a gap here that's similar to the ones to the ones before, but I don't think that's the case. You have your 1/1 rests at the end of each measure (large white tick) while here, your rest is at the middle of the measure which is inconsistent. However, I'm also mistaken for my reasoning too. As an alternative, you can add a d here, and delete 01:05:657 (296,297) for the rest moment position consistency.

01:11:119 (343) - You could change this to k for the snare drum sound.

You said that there'll be too much k, so how about applying this suggestion, but also changing 01:10:719 (340) to d to solve that problem?

01:27:504 (483,484,485,486) - You could switch the colours of these four hits for the same reasons as before. The colour change on 01:27:904 (486) is most optional.

Perhaps I could explain this a bit better suggestion better. You think that this matches the vocals fine (and it does). You could make this so that 01:27:638 (483) would become a k for the vocal rhythm, while the 01:27:771 (484) should be changed to the k for the snare drum sound. Changing 01:27:504 (482) to d would help provide emphasis on the two vocal beats surrounding it, and change 01:27:904 (485) to d since the vocal pitch is lower than 01:27:638 (483). I suggested this to possibly get a better match with the vocals while also matching to the instrumentals.

02:22:921 (931) - You could change this to d to contrast the vocal pitch and the instrumental sound difference.

I really strongly recommend doing this one, since the instrumentals sound much different. I see your point with the ks being too loud, but they should be loud imo. The instrumentals are quite loud and contrasted at 02:23:054 (931,932) compared to 02:22:921 (930).

03:35:254 (1459) - Change to d. The k matching is inconsistent with 03:34:722 (1457). If you accept this suggestion, you should also Ctrl + G 03:35:521 (1460,1461,1462) for contrast and consistency of matching.

You said you want to keep the d d k d k k, so you could simply change 03:35:521 (1459) to k. If you want to, you could also change 03:35:654 (1460) to d for variety. Also, you should still change it somehow since it isn't following that d d k d k k rhythm perfectly at the moment.

05:10:635 (1) - This spinner should end at 05:12:500 for the vocals imo.

I'd like you to elaborate on this rejection because I don't see how this affects the gameplay very much; I feel the spinner is still a fair length. The spinner is also kinda weird, since the spinner is usually matched to extended vocals/instrumentals, which this doesn't match.

Ok, that was the stuff that I wanted restate, because I really really realllllllllllllllly think that this'll make your map sound better. The rest of the rejections were fair enough. Call me back after you look through this :D
Topic Starter
mintong89
Ok! Since you're given the suggestion and I think your suggestion is fair, I'd like to fix them all. Thank you again! :)
newyams99
Ok, the things look good. I didn't want to force you so please make sure the suggestions you applied actually make sense to you, and you like them. You have no reason to change them if you don't like my suggestions. Also, just one more thing, you should add hits after the spinner so there isn't a weird gap (perhaps that's what you were arguing against). Something like this would easily fill the gap: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4449897

Call me back after you filled that gap, then we can bubble this :D
Topic Starter
mintong89

newyams99 wrote:

Ok, the things look good. I didn't want to force you so please make sure the suggestions you applied actually make sense to you, and you like them. You have no reason to change them if you don't like my suggestions. Also, just one more thing, you should add hits after the spinner so there isn't a weird gap (perhaps that's what you were arguing against). Something like this would easily fill the gap: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4449897

Call me back after you filled that gap, then we can bubble this :D
Nah don't worry, because you've change something on your suggestion and I think that is reasonable enough, so I'll fix it :3.
And I fix this too, thanks :)
newyams99
Hi, hopefully this should be my last post before the bubble. Sorry x.x

02:12:663 - As said before, I personally think the kiai should end here. I couldn't tell if you completely denied it or not so just gonna restate that.

02:38:240 (1037) - You can change this to k to match the higher vocals. Perhaps there's a bit too much d here as well.

03:03:949 (1207,1208,1209) - You may Ctrl + G this for a better match to the instrumental clap sound.

03:17:404 (1335,1336,1337,1338) - kkd k would work better with the pitch of the vocals and matching the instrumentals imo.

04:49:987 (36,37,38) - Change to d k k for a match to the instrumental clap sound and contrast with the finisher at the end of the pattern. If not, you should at least change 04:50:253 (38) to k for contrast imo.

I have many other points to point out, but the way you mapped it sounds fine too imo. Other BNs may touch on things like that. Call me back one last time for the bubble :D
Topic Starter
mintong89

newyams99 wrote:

Hi, hopefully this should be my last post before the bubble. Sorry x.x

02:12:663 - As said before, I personally think the kiai should end here. I couldn't tell if you completely denied it or not so just gonna restate that. I'm sorry but I just gonna keep this. Mainly because the kiai time is almost same with chorus, but the vocal isn't sing finish yet when you put here

02:38:240 (1037) - You can change this to k to match the higher vocals. Perhaps there's a bit too much d here as well. yes

03:03:949 (1207,1208,1209) - You may Ctrl + G this for a better match to the instrumental clap sound. I will keep the ddk to ddd because in my option the ddk is too much at here.

03:17:404 (1335,1336,1337,1338) - kkd k would work better with the pitch of the vocals and matching the instrumentals imo. yes, this sound great

04:49:987 (36,37,38) - Change to d k k for a match to the instrumental clap sound and contrast with the finisher at the end of the pattern. If not, you should at least change 04:50:253 (38) to k for contrast imo. But at here I'm following the tone of the piano. If you hear properly that the piano tone is getting down.

I have many other points to point out, but the way you mapped it sounds fine too imo. Other BNs may touch on things like that. Call me back one last time for the bubble :D
Thank you and Thank you lol
newyams99
Ok, your denies are reasonable enough :lol:

Bubbled~

Bubble #1 8-)

Good luck on ranking this :D
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply