Lily Bread wrote:

[Easy]
00:10:430 - i suggest this, because - 00:11:637 - there is a drum beat here. it's very hard to follow it in easy diff, but you can make slider to "overlap" it.
nope. I just want to follow by long sound
01:14:568 - it's not so good imo. there is a obvious drum beat here. so i suggest you to add a circle here. ok man...
01:58:706 - ^

01:49:051 (3) - it's not necessary to blanket here. this flow is quite hard for begineers. okay
ctrl+> and adjust, you can make a better flow here.

[Normal]
01:14:223 (6,1) - is this pattern OK in Normal diff? i have no idea. i saw it somewhere. Hope it's ok

[Hard]
01:28:189 (2) - just a suggestion: move it closer to - 01:28:361 (1) - , because - 01:25:603 (1) - this slider's sv is really slow, this jump is too sharp imo. sure


[Technique Of Shadow]
it's too hard for me to mod. sad, but okay

good luck!

Weegle wrote:

m4m from your queue
my map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/387617

sorry if im really picky about even the slightest offsetting in note placement ;-;

[General]
Nothin seems wrong

[Easy]
• 00:03:879 - Close to hp bar (might not be too close but i use a bulky hp drain bar and it was nearly touching) -
• 00:05:603 - Maybe move the angle of the slider over to make that look like a nice even angled blanket - fine for me
• 00:25:948 - Make the triangle of notes more evenly spaced and maybe move the slider out a bit so it's even on both sides of the angle - maybe later
• 00:55:258 - Even though its two different sounds, since its an Easy difficulty I suggest making those two spinners into one longer spinner - i thinks it's fine for beginners
• 01:25:603 - Maybe extend spinner to 1:28:017 to follow the sound effect thing -

[Normal]
• 00:12:499 - the end of the slider is a little closer, fix ze blanket - not sure, i think it's fine
• 01:25:603 - juicy xD

[Hard]
• 00:18:017 - slightly larger offset then rest of notes - because nc
• 00:46:982 - I LOVE THESE FUCKING SLIDERS ♥♥ -
• 01:15:603 - maybe move the slider over for a nice blanket? -
• 01:31:456 - i recommend a nc here rather than 01:31:120 to avoid confusion since those notes are so close together -

I'm sorry but that's as much as my skill level will allow me to properly mod x_x

Good luck on getting this map ranked, those sliders made me drool

• Is the offset off? When I listen to it at 25% it sounds super off at some parts - could just be me though (I didn't notice it in play).

1. AR 8 for DT players Consider lowering the AR a tiny bit for the skill level, 8.7 maybe?
2. 00:01:465 (1) - Move this over to blanket the previous 2?
3. 00:04:741 - I hear a beat here, any particular reason its left out? (Kind of jarring when I first played it.)
4. 00:09:051 (3) - Move this slider over to form a nice triangle at the bottom there
5. 00:15:258 (1) - Fix this blanket a bit, it could definitely form better.
6. 00:19:396 (1) - Make these dips a bit more even, it looks really odd atm.
7. 00:23:534 (1) - Blanket better?
8. 00:45:603 (1) - Why so fast? I broke here the first time. I like the concept a lot but it should be toned down a bit IMO
9. 01:08:189 (3,4,5) - As far as I remember this is the only time you do this jump in the entire map, it felt out of place IMO
10. 01:28:361 - 01:38:706 - this section felt kind of boring to me with all the stacked half notes. Just something to consider changing
11. 01:44:913 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - You did it here as well, and I can't quite figure out the reason.
12. 02:07:672 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The spacing of these jumps and there positions to one another confused me a little bit - but I could still read it. Just something to consider again.
    
    Overall, I enjoyed it - it was mostly easy to read and fit the music well - good job~!

1. Increase the OD? OD 7.5 seems a bit too low for a 5* map.
2. AR 9.2 felt a bit odd at times, but I'd get more playtests before changing anything here because that may just be me.
3. 00:27:672 (1) - Poor little guy may need some rounding out (just a wee bit).
4. 00:45:603 (1) - Like I mentioned on Slayed's diff, why so fast? I slider broke her on my first read through.
5. 00:49:741 (1) - 10/10 slider, please never change it.
6. Just as a random note - all the jumps seemed to feel a bit different to me, like they were done in two or three different styles. Just something to mention.
   
   Overall, theres not much wrong here I can find. Theres probably a few blanketing things you could do that I missed, but it seems really good!

CrypticMech wrote:

[Technique of Shadow]

Increase the OD? OD 7.5 seems a bit too low for a 5* map. no
AR 9.2 felt a bit odd at times, but I'd get more playtests before changing anything here because that may just be me. changed to 9.1
00:27:672 (1) - Poor little guy may need some rounding out (just a wee bit).
00:45:603 (1) - Like I mentioned on Slayed's diff, why so fast? I slider broke her on my first read through. why not? i wlill rework this if it's unranked
00:49:741 (1) - 10/10 slider, please never change it.
Just as a random note - all the jumps seemed to feel a bit different to me, like they were done in two or three different styles. Just something to mention.

Overall, theres not much wrong here I can find. Theres probably a few blanketing things you could do that I missed, but it seems really good!

1. 00:10:086 (2) - this felt unnecessary, since the beat is not as loud as the previously placed hit circles, I would suggest removing it
2. 00:19:568 (1) - the break between the spinner and the hitobject afterwards is a bit too short (well it is borderline I would say) and also doesn't make sense to end it at 00:21:120 - because of the music, there is a louder beat at 00:20:775 - it would make more sense to end the spinner there, however the spinner would be too short (in my opinion!) so I think you should just replace the spinner with sliders
3. 00:41:465 (1) - why don't you emphasize the spinner end with a hitsound? the music is loud (I think you used a hitsound on the other difficulties)
4. 01:25:603 (1) - try to have 4/1 space between the spinner end and object to give time for beginners to recover
5. 02:08:361 (3,1) - this doesn't look nice, why not try this maybe? not much change but it looks nicer and it looks similar to yours! - http://puu.sh/lUj04/540d86b898.jpg

1. 00:19:396 (1) - you should leave more space between the spinner and the next object for recovery time
2. 01:14:223 (6,1) - anti-jumps aren't really a good idea on a normal, it is confusing, use normal spacing please, example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4127828
3. 01:15:948 (3,1) - same as above ^, example - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4127837
4. 01:23:361 (3,4,5,6) - this looks very crowded and confusing, because even though the distance snap is fine, the reverse arrows make it confusing, I would suggest you to try a different pattern also especially because of this: 01:24:741 (5,6) - example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4127887 (and afterwards replace the long slider) and also remove 01:25:258 (6) - since you didn't hit any of the big beats anyway, there is no reason to keep this, it will just stay confusing
5. 01:25:603 (1) - this slider is very out of the screen as well, it might be better to change it a little since players with 4:3 screen might not see the edge of the slider
6. 01:36:982 (2,3) - I think this will also confuse players, they might try to hit the hit circle as if it was the reverse slider, and I know it is not bad to put a little challenge in it but the amount of 1/2 is already a challenge alone at 174 bpm
7. 01:43:189 (3) - remove this maybe? you should put a little break between the large amount of 1/2s X_X (plus players might want to hit (3) earlier than (2) because they are both near the end of the slider)
8. 02:01:810 (1,2) - you should place either (1) or (2) differently, it is too close to the reverse arrow and it could be confusing, example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4127969
9. 02:04:396 (1,2) - it might be better to make this a reverse slider because it could be easier to hit than hitting a hit circle on a red tick
10. 02:06:637 (6) - this appears quite early so the pattern looks messy, you could just try to flip (or rearrange) the whole pattern so that it wouldn't be confusing, example: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4127995

1. 01:12:499 (3,1) - very subjective but this half-cover kind of disturbs my eyes xD I wouldn't cover them like that, but this might be just me
2. 01:31:120 (6,1) - I personally disliked this anti-jump while playing, and it also breaks the flow in my opinion, so I would rather follow the fast rhythm that you used in most places
3. 01:35:775 (3,4) - ctrl+g fits a lot better to the rhythm! at 01:35:948 - you can hear that "long wub" sound which would ask for a slider from 01:35:948 - to 01:36:120 (4) - you did it like this at 01:41:292 (4,5) -
4. 02:09:741 (1,2,1) - ths distance change is somewhat disturbing here, try a little bit higher and equal spacing?

1. 00:44:223 (1,2,1) - might be subjective but I don't think it's a good idea to cover 00:45:603 (1) - THAT much, well to me it is playable but I personally dislike it when people cover sliderbodies like that
2. http://puu.sh/lUmT9/30ecc1fe6b.png - this is unrankable because you didn't use slider velocity change --> "An inherited timing section may be placed on an uninherited timing section (but only to change the slider speed)."

1. 02:06:292 (4) - personally this would have felt better to play if it lead to the opposite direction (at least when I first played it)
   I didn't really have problems with this difficulty (I can't even pass it lol), but the jumps look fun to play!

Mystyk wrote:

Hi! M4M from your queue! I hope my mod will be useful!

[Easy]

1. 01:25:603 (1) - try to have 4/1 space between the spinner end and object to give time for beginners to recover nah, 3/1 enough for beginners
2. 02:08:361 (3,1) - this doesn't look nice, why not try this maybe? not much change but it looks nicer and it looks similar to yours! - http://puu.sh/lUj04/540d86b898.jpg not sure, i thinks it's fine now

[Normal]

1. 00:19:396 (1) - you should leave more space between the spinner and the next object for recovery time same, it's enogh imo

In general there is a lot of 1/2 in this difficulty, so it might be safer to make some of the patterns easier. not think that it's big problem

[Hard]

1. 01:12:499 (3,1) - very subjective but this half-cover kind of disturbs my eyes xD I wouldn't cover them like that, but this might be just me it's okay i guess

[Technique Of Shadow]

• 
  I didn't really have problems with this difficulty (I can't even pass it lol), but the jumps look fun to play!

Good Luck!

pieguyn wrote:

suggestion, only change if you feel like it
should fix
unrankable

[Normal]
00:13:189 (5) - usually i'm ok with overlaps, but this one look odd bc it overlaps too much. moving down and right a bit could fix it. idk, i think it's fine
02:09:396 (5,6,1) - same as 01:41:120 (4,5,6) . could easily fix by making (5,6) into a slider. okay, previous moment was fixed, but here this is fine because end of song
02:09:741 - i think you could make another beautiful slider here (end at 02:12:154 )... the song obviously continue, so it feel empty to put a break imo, and 02:09:741 (1) exists on Easy so more consistent too. also, imo, sliderend->circle->circle would play more smooth than circle x3 for the last part. I would not want to repeat the same tricks in each diff

[Hard]
00:18:017 (1) - straight line is kind of boring shape imo. any reason it's not sth like a wave slider (00:06:982 (1) )? i like straight sliders
00:36:637 (3,4,5,1) - mb it's me but such a long straight line seems kind of boring. could easily change to a different shape like this... i like straight flowhttp://puu.sh/lUChC/d805099392.jpg
01:16:637 (1) - spacing here was confusing for me bc it felt like 1/2. i'd recommend finding a different position for this not sure, will listen more options

[Technique of Shadow]
...i disagree with most jumps in this map. but, sliders are beautiful.


if i had to give any suggestion, i thought the jumps in the first part were intuitive because they were structured well, but starting from 01:06:292 i couldn't comprehend how they were placed. this is a style issue, so if i am missing something, feel free ignore this.

i love your sliders.
good luck, hope this can become qualified ~

1. 00:00:948 (4,5,6) - This overlap is a bit ugly
   
2. 00:10:430 (5) - The early part of this slider is pretty ugly too, you could shape it better!
   
3. 00:19:534 - fix blanket
   
4. 00:27:672 (1) - I think you should decrease this slider to the red tick so that you can hit the strong drum beat with a circle at 00:28:275 -
   
5. 00:33:189 (1,3) - These sliders aren't parallel!!
   
6. 00:38:361 (6,1) - though its hardly noticable, you can improve this blanket!
   
7. 00:38:706 (1) - You could give this slider a more rounded shape near the bottom so that it could blanket 00:39:568 (2,3,4) - I think it would overall look neater like this!
   
   
   Asuna

   
8. 00:49:741 (1) - HOLY MOLY THIS SLIDER
   
9. 01:09:051 (1) - I find this a bit odd to have stacked here?? idk everything else is really spaced but this one circle isnt
   
10. 01:11:465 (6) - This could definitely be an extended slider! since its only the WOAHAOH sound, It would play well!
    
11. 01:14:568 (1) - I see why you did that no space circle stack thing on the end of the slider now, because in the song there is no wubs at that part!! really smart
    
12. 01:45:603 (4,5) - Shouldn't these two notes be the ones that are stacked? because of the 'boop boop' sound right

1. 00:14:913 (4,1) - The spacing hear is really gigantic! consider reducing it
   
2. 00:22:672 (2,1) - you could try blanketing these
   
3. 00:27:672 (1,2,3) - Try this rhythm instead, it applies the head of a clickable object on a white tick! and i think that is important at this particular part here
   
   
   Is

   
4. 00:31:120 (3,4) - Really random spacing increase here with no change in the song!
   
5. 00:49:741 (1) - click and drag the very last white square and move it to the right a little, so it covers the slider path, preventing a bit of uglyness!!
   
6. 01:23:017 - You skipped a really noticable kick drum here
   
7. 01:37:672 (6,1) - fix blanket

1. 00:10:430 (3) - This slider is a bit ugly imo
   
2. 00:11:120 (1,3) - These sliders are not parallel!!
   
3. 00:12:499 (1) - Why is this an extended slider?? doesn't fit and I think it would be better to make it a 1/2 slider
   
4. 00:13:534 (5,1) - Fix blanket!
   
5. 00:25:948 (4,1) - fix blanket
   
6. 00:24:913 (1,4,3) - These are a lot of overlaps in one area... it might be too hard for a newer player to read, consider some pattern changes
   
7. 00:36:465 (2,3) - This is not good looking, I would think that you should have 2 be directly in the center of 3! like this
   
   
   Best

   
8. 00:49:741 (3) - This circle part of this slider could look better
   
   
   Girl

   
9. 01:10:086 (6,1) - Blanket fix!
   
10. 01:10:086 (6) - This isn't distance snapped correctly also, I think it's important for a hard difficulty to keep all distance snap the same
    
11. 01:11:465 (6,1) - Another blanket fix hi
    
12. 01:51:810 (1,3) - I'm sure you can guess it...
    
13. 02:04:913 (4,1) - Stack these!!

1. 01:30:258 (5,6) - oh boy... stacks in a normal... this is a horrible idea, please dont do this as it is very hard to read for a beginner player
   
   also... the rhythms you choose to follow would be hard for a beginner player to follow, it doesn't look bad, but it doesn't make sense if that makes sense... wait what

• [Easy]

1. 01:12:499 (2,3) - Blanket fix!!
   
   I really like this diff!!

Mystyk wrote:

[Slayed's Insane]

1. 00:44:223 (1,2,1) - might be subjective but I don't think it's a good idea to cover 00:45:603 (1) - THAT much, well to me it is playable but I personally dislike it when people cover sliderbodies like that like my way, it really doesnt do nothing (only sladerbarakesad)
2. http://puu.sh/lUmT9/30ecc1fe6b.png - this is unrankable because you didn't use slider velocity change --> "An inherited timing section may be placed on an uninherited timing section (but only to change the slider speed)." yep yep, fixed

SkinnyJommy wrote:

[Slayed's Insane]

1. 00:14:913 (4,1) - The spacing hear is really gigantic! consider reducing it not really...
   
2. 00:22:672 (2,1) - you could try blanketing these didnt do this but i made it similar to the 00:22:844 (3)
   
3. 00:27:672 (1,2,3) - Try this rhythm instead, it applies the head of a clickable object on a white tick! and i think that is important at this particular part here added 3 1/2 sliders and a circle instead
   
   
   Is

   
4. 00:31:120 (3,4) - Really random spacing increase here with no change in the song! seems fine
   
5. 00:49:741 (1) - click and drag the very last white square and move it to the right a little, so it covers the slider path, preventing a bit of uglyness!! this slider is very sexy .-.
   
6. 01:23:017 - You skipped a really noticable kick drum here this fits much the song caz i did this patterns all over the song, but if someone will notice, ill change it
   
7. 01:37:672 (6,1) - fix blanket fixed

pieguyn wrote:

[Slayed's Insane]
00:08:361 (1,2,3) - how about space this out like 00:05:603 (1,2,3) ? that way it could make a jump->nojump->jump->nojump pattern, seems make more sense consistency-wise. this way goes like jump->nojump->nojump->jump so it will be ok (i hope)
00:24:223 - shape feels kind of random for me. how about sth like this... http://puu.sh/lUAgY/56d84792f3.jpg instead? meh, its fine
01:20:775 (3,4,5,6) - what do you think about using 1.0x spacing for these like 01:12:327 (3,4,5,6) ? could be more interesting. in this kiai accent goes on stacked notes, so its fine i think
01:24:913 (4,5,6) - what do you think about placing it like this... http://puu.sh/lUzgB/3954c5a331.jpg instead? i think it'd flow really well, and make more sense pattern instead of just jumps. it could also fit with repeat patterns like 01:47:672 it will break readability and increase *rate, so no, sorry
01:29:051 (4,5,6) - just a suggestion, you have so many good flowing pattern in the map, but then this one is just "stack", and it's at the start of a new musical phrase, so it doesn't feel emphasized enough. variance is good, and i don't mind 2-stacks, but 3-stack and above feel a bit boring. imo, it would be so much more fun if you could place this normally. i started stack it when music told me, i dont think its smth bad or... so ill keep it as it is
01:29:741 (1,2,3) - if you change the above, ^ for consistency
01:30:775 (5) - x272 y268 seem to make more sense for pattern. ok
01:36:637 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same as 01:29:051 (4,5,6) . imo, this could be a really good place for a repeat pattern like 01:47:672 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) , keep consistency too.
01:41:810 (5) - x152 y108? nop, but i changed this way, thanks
01:44:913 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same as 01:29:051 (4,5,6) . i won't point out all of these
01:46:982 (4) - same angle as 01:46:982 (4,5) makes more sense imo. ok, changed

Yauxo wrote:

[shadow]
I feel like many pattern related objects are really, reaaaaally too close to previous objects. That might be a personal thing, but having objects spaced, as much as youve spaced some of yours, makes them look really ugly :v. Examples: 00:01:465 (1) - , 00:08:879 (3) - 00:33:879 (3) - . Having it spaced like http://puu.sh/lZ6ye/97e28de2e9.jpg just looks so much better, you might want to reconsider these D: lol, i don't see big problem with this. otherwise it may be the element of my style. But I trust you and will correct it


■ 00:07:844 (2,3,4) - Is this stack off on purpose? (with 00:06:465 (2,3,4) - )
■ 00:29:051 (1) - You could improve this blanket by ... alot actually.
■ 01:09:051 (1) - I dont think that the song supports a stack like this. There's no real stop between 6 and 1 (as it sits on 1 -> 2 instead), so having no movement doesnt feel too good. You could map it like ~this~ though. The lowered spacing from 1 to 2 would suit the lowered volume of the song. i think it's fine, but i will fix it if somebody said it again
■ 01:11:810 (1,2) - This also doesnt really fit imo. 2 has a very swooshy sound (strong) that shoulve been supported by some increased spacing before, not by some reduced spacing like it is right now. People arent gonna move like ~this~, but like ~this~ instead
■ 01:14:568 (1) - 01:20:086 (1) - 01:53:189 (1) - 01:58:706 (1) - similar as above
■ 01:57:327 (1,2) - I also really dislike this combo. Having to follow a Slider up like this, going the exact reverse because the next Circle is below the start again, doesnt add up in good design imo. I guess it'd be fine if the next object wouldve been towards the top again, as that'd result in zigzag movement, but it isnt. Make the player follow the Slider and place the Circle somewhere else, dont make the Slider "useless", let it flow /o/
01:48:706 (5,6) - 02:03:534 (4,5) - similar issue here. There's lots of movement, but then there's this stack-thing resulting in little to no movement. These are weird, dont do these :<

[Hard]
■ 00:18:017 (1) - Does this random spacing increase have to be there? :< aaa it's not random because nc but ok
■ 00:36:982 (4,5) - Maybe add some wiggle into these, straight lines arent as fun as wiggles ~~~ I think nah
■ 02:12:327 (2) - similar as in the shadow diff, you might want to space these further away for aesthetical reasons

Easy and Normal look fine. Good Luck!

-Nya- wrote:

Heya~! M4M from my queue.

General:

1. The preview point isn’t snapped. Snap it to 01:06:308 – in all diffs please.
2. The audio lead-in is a bit too low imo. Maybe raise it to 2000ms?

Technique Of Shadow:

1. 00:15:619 (3) - Maybe do this?
   
   Picture

   
   It’s just to prevent the two sliders from being too close to each other.
2. 00:32:515 (5) –Place this slider like this to be consistent with 00:32:343 (4) – hm, i thinks it's fine
   
   Picture

   
3. 00:33:895 (3) –Ctrl+G? Would be better flow with 00:33:722 (2) –
4. 00:36:998 (4) –Not good flow atm. Ctrl+G that slider.
5. 01:09:067 (1) –Stacking here prevents a smooth flow. Rather not stack. You have convinced me
6. 01:09:412 (3) –Rather do something like this for better flow:
   
   Picture

   
7. 01:12:170 (2) –Rather place this slider somewhere here for better flow: break the flow sometime is okay
   
   Picture

   
8. 01:13:550 (2,5) –I would stack. nah, i like this
9. 01:14:584 (1) –Again, stacking like this prevents constant flow.
10. 01:15:964 (1) –Rather something like this for better flow:
    
    Picture

    
11. 01:20:102 (1) –Stacking prevents flow
12. 01:20:446 (3) –Ctrl+G for better flow? change place to 01:20:791 (4) - for better flow
13. 01:33:895 (1) –Placing this circle right behind the slider isn’t good for flow purposes imo. again i like break the flow
14. 01:53:205 (1) –Stack prevents flow. There may be more.
15. 01:46:308 (2) –This circle is a bit too high up. It’s touching the numbers in the top right corner.

Slayed's Insane:

1. 00:06:998 (1) –This works better imo:
   
   Picture

   

Hard:

1. 00:01:481 (1,1) –It seems as if you placed small jumps here but then just stopped. Place small jumps here as well: 00:04:239 (1) - 00:05:619 (1) – There are other similar places where you didn’t place small jumps, so I suggest you do to be consistent. okay, i have fixed spacing at same moments
2. 00:36:481 (2,3) –This doesn’t look good since they’re lightly touching each other. Prevent them touching please.
3. 01:28:895 (2) –The tail of this slider is too high up. Please lower it a bit.
4. 01:30:446 (4,1) –I would try to avoid this overlap.
5. 01:31:653 (2) –This placement would be better for flow:
   
   Picture

   

Normal:

1. 00:19:412 (1,1) –The reaction time between the spinner and the next note is too short imo. You have to make the spinner shorter or replace the spinner with a slider. You can maybe shorten the spinner to 00:20:791 –
2. 01:28:377 (1) –Not a fan of this flow. I would rather Ctrl+G the slider.
3. 01:29:067 (2) -^, place it here:
   
   Picture

   
4. 02:09:412 (5,6) –I would rather change these into a slider. Three circles after another is not a good idea imo.
5. 02:12:170 (1,2) - ^

Easy:
Looks fine

Nice set. You can call me back when you’re ready~

-Nya- wrote:

I never knew sliders like that were a problem in hard diffs. Easy and Normal definitely, but not hard diffs. You learn something new every day I guess, lol. Anyway, you can call me if Baraatje doesn't want to rebubble or if he rebubbles you can call me for rank.

Slayed wrote:

Поздравляю!

1. 00:55:274 (1,1) - insufficient recovery time. The spinners blend with each other, considerably lowering readability.

1. 00:55:274 (1,1) - insufficient recovery time. The spinners blend with each other, considerably lowering readability.
2. 01:36:998 (2,3,4) - please, emphasize the downbeat with a clickable objects properly. Starting a slider on a weak beat and finishing on a stronger one makes no sense with the song.
   Note: same applies for more patterns like 01:41:136 (4,5) -

1. 00:32:515 (5) - the slider has no musical reason to be extended. Make it end 1/4 earlier or on the previous white tick for musical reasons.
   

1. 01:16:653 (3) - the velocity change here is not readable yet exptremely intense. Please, warn players by placing a New Combo here.