This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Montag, 7. März 2016 at 08:27:57

Artist: sana
Title: Miraizu
Tags: 好きになるその瞬間を。 Suki ni Naru Shunkan wo. honeyworks
BPM: 178
Filesize: 8891kb
Play Time: 02:59
Difficulties Available:

1. Advanced (2,48 stars, 332 notes)
2. Forever (5,62 stars, 706 notes)
3. Hard (3,66 stars, 484 notes)
4. Insane (4,86 stars, 645 notes)
5. Normal (1,9 stars, 210 notes)

Download: sana - Miraizu
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------

Hi, from my modding queue~





Even I'm the first one to mod this yet I can't find anything much, sry. If you think this mod isn't useful then you don't have to give me kd.
Good luck!

Electoz wrote:

Hi, from my modding queue~

General

- "Widescreen Support" checked in Extra while other diffs didn't.
- Maybe you could map until the end? I played and felt like this song is unfinished.the song doesn't really offer any gameplay value beyond that point, is nice as the ending is, also I love the way it plays in the score screen

Easy

01:06:187 - Maybe map this note? I didn't map it in both kiais. The easy is already very 1/1 heavy in this part, so leaving out one here makes it slighlty easier and also feels like it adds more emphasis to the next one (very strong beat)
01:51:692 (2) - Blanket fix? wow, how could I miss that, fixed
02:04:164 (5,1) - ^ (Not sure that this one is already intentional though.) it's fine, only way to make a better looking blanket would be making 1 more rounded which I really don't like here

Normal

02:06:861 (3,1) - Fix this blanket? sure

Hard

02:10:569 (3,1) - Weird overlap imo. it's fine, the slider goes through the middle of 02:10:569 (3) - and it's no problem during gameplay:
02:31:805 (2,3) - Blanket? fixed
02:55:064 (1,1) - ^this one looks fine for me

Even I'm the first one to mod this yet I can't find anything much, sry. If you think this mod isn't useful then you don't have to give me kd.
Good luck!

thanks for the mod, it still helped and improved some looks of the map (also that stupid widescreen thing that seems to enable it self all the time)

[Extra]

1. 00:10:569 (1) - uncurve the end a little, could look better imo like this maybe, but rn looks a little odd.
2. 00:13:940 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Stacks are veeeery slightly awkward here and don't look the best, but maybe it's just me. Would look better as another pattern tho imo.
3. 00:28:603 (1) - Same as slider above.
4. 00:51:692 (1) - Think you went overboard with this one, looks a little funky (not in a good way), maybe tone it down just a little bit.
5. 01:17:310 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - This pattern looks a little familiar :^)

Got really lazy to do anything else, dw about kd haha, maybe i do more later when i go through my unranked maps.

cheezstik wrote:

[Extra]

1. 00:10:569 (1) - uncurve the end a little, could look better imo like this maybe, but rn looks a little odd. I changed the slider a litle bit, but the end curving back will stay
2. 00:13:940 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Stacks are veeeery slightly awkward here and don't look the best, but maybe it's just me. Would look better as another pattern tho imo. they go really well with the beats of the song here, as 00:14:108 (2,4) - are way weaker than 1 and 3 I don't hink this is a problem :/
3. 00:28:603 (1) - Same as slider above. changed this a bit
4. 00:51:692 (1) - Think you went overboard with this one, looks a little funky (not in a good way), maybe tone it down just a little bit. yes, right on that one it doesn't go well here, removed some of the red anchors and made it a bit simpler
5. 01:17:310 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - This pattern looks a little familiar :^) pls :vvvv) btw I ctrl+h'd that pattern, flows better from the star before

Got really lazy to do anything else, dw about kd haha, maybe i do more later when i go through my unranked maps.

thanks for the small mod and the tesplay

if you aren't doing more later I'll just kds this since it still helped me improving the diff (and made me think about some stuff/fix minor issues) even if it was really short :v)

[Overall]

- There are some kiai sections that are toggled on for less than 15 seconds
- 01:20:007 in Extra/Insane this section has an empty section that just drains HP, however Hard/Normal/Easy that section is set by a break point. Fix it
- 02:53:041 - ^
- I suggest to place a break somewhere in higher difficulties too

[Extra]

- 00:45:625 (3) - i suggest to set this slider like this:
- 00:46:636 (2) - 1 grid (lvl4) down
- 01:01:889 (6) - there is no addition hitsounds in the music track. Delete
- 01:17:310 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1) - Suggesting to reduce all those jumps. I think they work too hard for such moment
- 01:23:209 (2) - move to x336 y120

[Insane]

- AR -0.5~-1.0
- 00:07:872 (3) - reconsctruct like this?

268,264,7872,2,0,B|219:280|203:264|186:247|130:264,1,141.75

- 00:24:052 (5) - either you use 4 1/3 notes or just add one more repeat in slider and delete the next note. Looks awkward
- 00:27:086 (4,5,1,2,3) - ctrl+shift+d will help you to make perfect pentagons.
- 01:09:895 (3,4,5,6) - what is the meaning of such strange spacing?
- 02:04:501 (1,2,3,4) - adjust to perfect square pattern?

[Hard]
- 00:42:254 (1) - starting from this point and till 00:47:648 - has an awkward randomness as i see. Could you make them all specific, but not random?
- 02:12:591 (1) - ^
- 00:57:086 (1) - spacing

[Normal]
- 00:05:850 (1,3) - make theme symmetric?
- 02:07:198 (1) - fix the blanket

[Easy]

- nothing to say.

That's it. Good luck ~

Louis Cyphre wrote:

[Overall]

- There are some kiai sections that are toggled on for less than 15 seconds I know and aimod doesnt like that, but it is rankable and fits in those places, so it's fine
- 01:20:007 in Extra/Insane this section has an empty section that just drains HP, however Hard/Normal/Easy that section is set by a break point. Fix it
- 02:53:041 - ^
those are intended for those diffs, the repeat sliders on 01:19:333 (1) - together with the low drain gives enough hp to pass here, even if the playedr messes up the jumps, it adds some "suspense" imo. On the lower diffs there is a break here cause it's more fair for newer players like that

- I suggest to place a break somewhere in higher difficulties too
parts like 01:33:490 (1) - and 02:12:591 (1) - act pretty much the same as breaks since they are so slow and give the player some time to recover. also the bpm of the song is quite low, so it's not really exhausting to play anyways

[Extra]

- 00:45:625 (3) - i suggest to set this slider like this: slightly moved
- 00:46:636 (2) - 1 grid (lvl4) down k
- 01:01:889 (6) - there is no addition hitsounds in the music track. Delete I know that this might be slightly "overmapped". but it really puts more pressure on this part, which goes well with the really strong vocals, same as 02:34:839 (5,6,7) -
- 01:17:310 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1) - Suggesting to reduce all those jumps. I think they work too hard for such moment
I love those jumps, this is by far the most intense part of the song so they feel justified, epsecially since they don't start with an extremely juge jump but increase over time. a very fitting diffspike in my opinion
- 01:23:209 (2) - move to x336 y120 current one looks better for me

[Insane]

- AR -0.5~-1.0 9 is fine here
- 00:07:872 (3) - reconsctruct like this? remade the slider
- 00:24:052 (5) - either you use 4 1/3 notes or just add one more repeat in slider and delete the next note. Looks awkward seems fine for me
- 00:27:086 (4,5,1,2,3) - ctrl+shift+d will help you to make perfect pentagons. [/color]
- 01:09:895 (3,4,5,6) - what is the meaning of such strange spacing? 01:09:895 (3,4) - and 01:10:232 (5,6) - have the same spacing, with a .5 increase between, making the jump to 01:10:232 (5) - bigger seems justified because it's a stronger beat
- 02:04:501 (1,2,3,4) - adjust to perfect square pattern? yes, I though I fixed all of those thing, seems like I overlooked this one, perfect square now

[Hard]
- 00:42:254 (1) - starting from this point and till 00:47:648 - has an awkward randomness as i see. Could you make them all specific, but not random?
- 02:12:591 (1) - ^
I changed the a little bit, but they seem mostly fine
- 00:57:086 (1) - spacing fixed

[Normal]
- 00:05:850 (1,3) - make theme symmetric?
- 02:07:198 (1) - fix the blanket[/color]

SPOILER

yes, already fixed last mod

[Easy]

- nothing to say.

That's it. Good luck ~

thanks

Hi from our modding queue

[Easy]
-Not only i think that it should be CS 2.5 but also SV is a little high for an easy, oh well geuss its rankable
-00:15:119 (3,4) - really needs improvements in term of blanketing :p
-00:18:996 (5,1) - ^
-00:20:513 (2,4) - ^
-00:22:704 (1) - maybe reverse this slider here 00:23:209 - and put circle here 00:24:052 - would be great
-00:27:086 (3,1) - a bit off blanket
-00:31:468 (1,2) - ^
-00:46:973 (5,1) - ^
-02:04:164 (5,1) - guess u should move 1 to the left a bit
-02:28:771 - why not a slider like this one 02:30:119 (1) - here
-02:59:782 (3) - NC

[Normal]
-i also think SV is high here u could at least use DS *1.0 x)
-00:05:850 (1,2,3) - i also think blankets needs to be loved here
-01:02:142 (3) - actually no need for this note
-02:07:872 (2,3) - blanket
-02:10:569 (2,3,4,5) - i dont think beginners can handle this x) maybe replace with sliders
-02:27:507 (1) - u can add spinner here 02:28:771 -
-02:59:782 (3) - u really dont want NC here dont you xD

[Hard]
-00:10:569 (2,1) - blanket
-00:13:265 - no note here D:
-00:33:322 (3,4) - blanket
-01:06:187 (5,1) - ^
-01:11:580 (5) - tail could be stacked on 01:10:400 (1) -
-02:12:254 - u sure need a note here there s clearly a guitare note there
-02:39:221 (5,1) - guess blanket is a bit off
-02:44:614 (5) - stack on 02:43:434 (1) -
-02:52:535 - trust me u can add a note here
-02:59:782 (1) - OH U DID HERE U DID THE NC XD

[Insane]
-00:32:816 (1,2) - not stacked properly
-00:36:440 - missing note (make a triple)
-02:05:344 (5,1) - blanket
-02:28:434 - dont u want to mute this note here it goes for all diffs
other than that this diff is gud nice job

Still learning how to map Extras so modding is beyond me ;w; gud luck with the map

HB24 wrote:

Hi from our modding queue

[Easy]
-Not only i think that it should be CS 2.5 but also SV is a little high for an easy, oh well geuss its rankable
-00:15:119 (3,4) - really needs improvements in term of blanketing :p
-00:18:996 (5,1) - ^
-00:20:513 (2,4) - ^
-00:22:704 (1) - maybe reverse this slider here 00:23:209 - and put circle here 00:24:052 - would be great like the current one more
-00:27:086 (3,1) - a bit off blanket
-00:31:468 (1,2) - ^
-00:46:973 (5,1) - ^
-02:04:164 (5,1) - guess u should move 1 to the left a bit current placement is fine and 4-5-1 flows really well
-02:28:771 - why not a slider like this one 02:30:119 (1) - here yes, added it, but I had to remove the break
-02:59:782 (3) - NC no, look how 02:55:737 (1,2,3,4) - is nc'd, it's the same nc pattern for the whole part



[Normal]
-i also think SV is high here u could at least use DS *1.0 x) dont think that is a problem, it fits well within the spread. making this diff easier would not be good. Also, if I map with 1x ds all 1/2 notes slighlty overlap which looks really bad
-00:05:850 (1,2,3) - i also think blankets needs to be loved here
-01:02:142 (3) - actually no need for this note removed
-02:07:872 (2,3) - blanket
-02:10:569 (2,3,4,5) - i dont think beginners can handle this x) maybe replace with sliders replaced 4/5 with a 1/2 slider, should be better now
-02:27:507 (1) - u can add spinner here 02:28:771 - changed that part a bit anyways
-02:59:782 (3) - u really dont want NC here dont you xD still doesnt fit nc pattern

[Hard]
-00:10:569 (2,1) - blanket
-00:13:265 - no note here D: slide follows the guitar, imo more outstanding here
-00:33:322 (3,4) - blanket
-01:06:187 (5,1) - ^
-01:11:580 (5) - tail could be stacked on 01:10:400 (1) - sure
-02:12:254 - u sure need a note here there s clearly a guitare note there remapped that part a bit
-02:39:221 (5,1) - guess blanket is a bit off
-02:44:614 (5) - stack on 02:43:434 (1) - done
-02:52:535 - trust me u can add a note here I know, this is "undermapped" on purpose, since it goes so well with the music getting much calmer, an object here would ruin it
-02:59:782 (1) - OH U DID HERE U DID THE NC XD yes cause my nc pattern is different for this part on this diff

[Insane]
-00:32:816 (1,2) - not stacked properly not supposed to be, I really like that way that looks with that many beats distance since it makes 2 "pop out" more
-00:36:440 - missing note (make a triple) well I guess so, made it a kickslider, same on extra
-02:05:344 (5,1) - blanket
-02:28:434 - dont u want to mute this note here it goes for all diffs lowered volume of this
other than that this diff is gud nice job

Still learning how to map Extras so modding is beyond me ;w; gud luck with the map

all mentioned blankets fixed
thanks for the mod!

Hello Lasse. Focusing on Easy and Normal~~ btw. I tested your Insane and it's good tho :p

general:

i'm not sure about drum-hitclap bcs he have only 705kb/s transmision.

Mayb change BG : .png -> .jpg or .jpeg ?

00:00:457 - please remove green line or change volume on red line~~

[Easy]

Prefer to change difficult:

CS : 3,2 -> 3
AR: 4 -> 3
OD and HP: 3 -> 2,5

00:13:940 (1) - x: 67 y: 253 for me it's a better place (moar flow imo)
00:17:985 - should be clickabe dood
00:28:603 (1,3) - swap NC or remove on (3)
00:31:468 (1,2) - fix blanket.
01:05:176 (1) - don't spam NC on Easy, remove NC.
01:56:749 (2,3) - bad flow imo. Try this : http://puu.sh/lsMwo/21e3d80cd2.jpg
01:59:782 (1) - really unnessesary NC
02:20:007 (1) - same ^
02:38:210 (1) - remove NC
02:48:996 (3,4) - fixd blankettt

[Normal]

Also prefer to change difficult ( well it's Normal+ so here we go ) :

CS: 4 (Normal and CS 4, nah) 4 -> 3,5
AR: 5,7 (ahh why 5,7 dood?) -> 5 or 5,5 if you really want
OD and HP: 4,5/4 -> 4/4

00:25:232 (3) - move to up a little? : x: 188 y: 140
00:32:816 (1) - is this NC nessesary dood?
00:35:513 (1) - ^ imo it's not
00:42:254 (1,2) - this rhythm sounds weird for me. could you please short sliders to white tick, not red
00:51:692 (1) - suggest removing NC 00:57:086 (1) - also and 02:27:423 (1) - there
00:54:389 (3,4) - replace it with 1/2 slider. You do this in 00:53:041 (1) - and it sounds good.
01:04:839 (4,1,2,3) - spam 1/2 sliders isn't good in Normal tho:(
01:23:715 - add circle dood.
01:56:412 (1) - this slider is avaible in Normal ??

Ok, that's all. Good Luck~~

Kalibe wrote:

Hello Lasse. Focusing on Easy and Normal~~ btw. I tested your Insane and it's good tho :p

general:

i'm not sure about drum-hitclap bcs he have only 705kb/s transmision.

Mayb change BG : .png -> .jpg or .jpeg ?

this stuff seems fine to me :/

00:00:457 - please remove green line or change volume on red line~~ wow I really forgot that, fixed on all diff

[Easy]

Prefer to change difficult:

CS : 3,2 -> 3
AR: 4 -> 3
OD and HP: 3 -> 2,5
it's a very "hard" easy, should be fine with those settings

00:13:940 (1) - x: 67 y: 253 for me it's a better place (moar flow imo) makes a triangle, the flow is nice here
00:17:985 - should be clickabe dood sure, there is big white tick so people might think that, but it is not stronger than the others, sliderreverse here is okay
00:28:603 (1,3) - swap NC or remove on (3) oh, right
00:31:468 (1,2) - fix blanket.
01:05:176 (1) - don't spam NC on Easy, remove NC. sure
01:56:749 (2,3) - bad flow imo. Try this : rearranged
01:59:782 (1) - really unnessesary NC
02:20:007 (1) - same ^
02:38:210 (1) - remove NC
02:48:996 (3,4) - fixd blankettt

[Normal]

Also prefer to change difficult ( well it's Normal+ so here we go ) :

CS: 4 (Normal and CS 4, nah) 4 -> 3,5
AR: 5,7 (ahh why 5,7 dood?) -> 5 or 5,5 if you really want
OD and HP: 4,5/4 -> 4/4
same reasons to keep like easy
but I'll use ar 5.5 for now

00:25:232 (3) - move to up a little? : x: 188 y: 140 really like the current angle
00:32:816 (1) - is this NC nessesary dood? dood dood I nc every measure for this part starting 00:30:119 (1) - since the music changes
00:35:513 (1) - ^ imo it's not same
00:42:254 (1,2) - this rhythm sounds weird for me. could you please short sliders to white tick, not red there is a really strong sound on 00:42:760 so I don't want to ignore it, it plays fine
00:51:692 (1) - suggest removing NC 00:57:086 (1) - also and 02:27:423 (1) - there same reasoning as before
00:54:389 (3,4) - replace it with 1/2 slider. You do this in 00:53:041 (1) - and it sounds good. no, I want lower density (2/1) here so the increase at 00:55:737 (1) - adds intensity (1/1 now)
01:04:839 (4,1,2,3) - spam 1/2 sliders isn't good in Normal tho:( seems fine for me, they are basically low spacing 1/1 taps
01:23:715 - add circle dood. there's only week drums here, this way puts more emphasis on the guitar (sliderheads)
01:56:412 (1) - this slider is avaible in Normal ?? seems fine for me, I got this ranked on a normal too http://i.imgur.com/6h820ov.jpg the slider is not confusing and I only using it twices during a 3min map where it fits really well

no comment on blanket/nc stuff means I applied it, or I'm stupid and overlooked it :/
Ok, that's all. Good Luck~~

thanks kalibe

renamed extra (=> forever)
added some small hitsound stuff
==> redownload

Heyo Lasse o/
I hope this was helpful!
Good luck

moph wrote:

Heyo Lasse o/

[General]

1. Everything seems fine

[Easy]

1. 00:16:636 (1,2) - You should swap these two so it becomes slider -> circle, 00:17:310 - is pretty dominant and shouldn't be covered by a slider end. really like the way it is currently :/
2. 01:06:187 - any reason as to why this is missed? Should be a single here as it follows the drums and vocals nicely. lol I think I accidentally deleted that, fixed
3. 01:10:569 (4) - I think you should reduce the length of this slider by 1/2, you're missing out 01:10:906 - and 01:11:243 - which are imo much more important beats as they both map the drums and vocals. 01:07:872 (3) - compare it to this which is fine as it maps the piano on all 3 notes I think you're right, fixed
4. 01:25:400 (1,2,3) - Maybe keep this rhythmically consistent with 01:28:097 (3,4,5) - yes
5. 01:53:715 (1) - Reduce the length by 1/2 pls, ending it 01:54:389 - would sound a lot better as you're not ignoring the main beat + a 3/2 gap feels cool rhythm wise :3 kk
6. 01:57:760 (4) - Same as before, reducing the length by 1/2 sounds better to me, again compare it to its use here 02:00:456 (1) - the repeat is on the guitar which is fine as it is pretty dominant and a nice change in rhythm use. done
7. 02:20:681 (1) - Again same reasoning as before BUT I think you should increase the length this time to 2/1, fits the drums better imo and reduce the length of the following slider by 1/1 and move it forward by 1/1. did sth
8. 02:39:221 - Again why is this missed? At least there's consistency with the other kiai haha. idk either, fixed
9. 02:43:603 (4) - Same, not mapping anything properly blah blah.blah blah fixed :v)

[Normal]

1. 00:26:412 (6) - Try this rhythm. yes ,that is better
   
   example

   
2. 00:35:513 (1) - Maybe reduce by 1/2 and add a single 00:36:018 - here where the vocals are. like the current one better
3. 00:50:344 (1,2) - Maybe try this rhythm here? sounds a little odd as you're skipping this 00:51:018 -
   
   example

   
   00:50:850 (2) - is perfectly on the piano which it is supposed to be, don't really need the drum here clickable
   
4. 02:20:681 (1,2) - Same ^ same but with guitar
5. 02:38:209 (1,2,3) - I like what you did here better than 01:05:176 (1,2,3,4) - Feels a bit more "Normal" if that makes sense haha yes, applied

[Hard]

1. 00:34:839 (3) - Maybe add a repeat to this slider, I feel like something should be here 00:35:176 - yes there is sth on that tick but current one goes so well with the vocals and gives better emphasis imo
2. 00:40:906 (1,2,3) - The rhythm switches to 1/3 here, try this rhythm (hopefully its not too hard). changed this a bit, but I'll skip the 1/3 on 00:41:580 (3,4) - since that goes better on this diff
   
   example

   
3. 01:03:743 - Single here maybe? yes
4. 01:07:872 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Try this here, kinda sounds weird having a 1/1 gap when there are all those 1/4 notes lol
   
   example

   
   this seems to be the best way to get the strong piano beats clickable 01:08:378 (4, 7) - while keeping the difficulty appropriate, i only mapped the 2 1/4 before each piano tick cause they put a nice emphasis on it
5. 01:18:659 (1,2,3,4,5) - Again sounds a bit off as there are 1/3s in here, try this done
   
   example

   
6. 02:36:777 - Again single here? yes
7. 02:40:906 (1,2,3,4,5) - Same as in the last kiai same
8. 02:51:693 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - Same as before as well heh done

[Insane]

1. 00:40:906 (1,2) - This is 1/3 here, imo switch both into 2/3 sliders as currently you're ignoring 00:41:468 - k
2. 00:42:254 (1) - This entire section are just 1/2 sliders ._. maybe change things up a bit so its not too boring rhythmically for example
   00:42:928 (3,4) - Maybe 1/1 slider then single?
   see forever, sure it might be considered a bit "boring" but it goes well hereo/
3. 00:56:917 (4) - x340, y176? dont want a normal triangle here, it's the same jump as 00:55:737 (1,2) - which makes for a really nice pattern im
4. 01:01:889 (6) - Overmap, there is nothing audible here sure there are no 1/4 audible here, but it really puts more "pressure" on the really strong vocal that goes on until 01:01:973 (7) - so I'd like to keep it. same for Forever. It just puts so much emphasis on the vocal and one easily readable/playable/etc. "overmapped" 1/4 won't hurt anybody
5. 02:12:591 (1) - Again so many 1/2 sliders haha, imo you should vary it up a bit added some stuff here like on forever, not too much but at least some singletaps
6. diff is nice ty :v)

[Forever]

1. 00:40:906 (1,2,3) - Like insane, maybe try 2 2/3 sliders instead that's really nice, changed
2. 00:42:254 (1) - Again with the 1/2 sliders :V maybe try replacing the second slider in each stanza with two singles? I get your idea, but I really like the low density the sliders bring since there is really no intensity here
3. 00:47:310 (4) - Just a single instead? huh, there are clearly drums on the sliderend like before, ignoring them would feel weird imo. also fits perfectly on the breathing :v)
4. 00:52:956 - Should be a note here. fair enough
5. 01:17:310 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) -aaa see below
6. 02:12:591 (1) - What I said before. added some 1/2 where it fits with the guitar since there is more going on than the first time it happens
7. 02:23:294 - Note here again pls k
8. 02:50:344 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - pls

I hope this was helpful!
Good luck

Hey there
first let me elaborate on the jumps
1. they are way easier than the star rating suggests since one part of the jump stays on nearly the same spot for the pattern making you only really aim the other part
2. this is by far the most intense part and deserves intense spacing on an extra
3. it's not like the jumps come out of nowhere, you can clearly see that I'm reamping up the spacing slowly starting from 01:14:614 (1) -
4. I know comparing with other maps is no justification, but the spike on this is actually lower than on the ranked aki miraizu
I totally get what you are saying but there is enough reasoning here. more a problem of the star rating system overrating them tbh
5. If I got forced to, I could reduce the spacing on them, but that would only be if I really had to to get this ranked
Also "PP JUMPS" if you take a look at my other 2 ranked maps (okay one is only qualified) you can see that I'm not one to put stuff on maps just to give pp, except maybe my usage of high OD, but I do that cause it's more fun to play imo since a lower timing window makes the map more challenging without making the patterns harder. I put them cause they go great with the building up intensity and not cause "must.. put... pp jump... so people play map urgh"


reply might look a bit weird cause I started with Forever and ended with Easy

green stuff = applied
orange stuff = denied + reason
thanks for the mod it really helped me

you made me stay up two more hours (almost 3am here)

I'm modding this map from your queue.
[Easy]

1. 01:22:704 (1,2,3) - for this part i prefer push a little (1) and (3) from middle vertical line and lower place of (2)
2. 02:00:456 (1,2) - switch NC's?
3. 02:55:737 (1,2,3) - this is the same as first issue

[Normal]
CLEAR!
[Hard]

1. 01:08:209 (2,3,4) - this triplet is too late. I will show you by image what should be applied

1. 02:40:906 (1,2) - try a similar as above, the same mistake

[Insane]

1. 00:18:490 (3) - i prefer change into two circles and stack with (4)
2. 01:07:872 (1,2,3,4,5) - as usually, problem with place objects here. Do similar like a hard, but this time apply the circles.
3. 01:21:018 - for this area set break time
4. 02:40:906 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - them same again, and that's all about insane.

[Forever]

1. 01:21:018 - break time

ReFaller wrote:

I'm modding this map from your queue.
[Easy]

1. 01:22:704 (1,2,3) - for this part i prefer push a little (1) and (3) from middle vertical line and lower place of (2) this play really nice right now
2. 02:00:456 (1,2) - switch NC's? no, I nc like this the whole time
3. 02:55:737 (1,2,3) - this is the same as first issue seems fine for me

[Normal]
CLEAR!
[Hard]

1. 01:08:209 (2,3,4) - this triplet is too late. I will show you by image what should be applied

Open the box and look at image

listen this part several times when you done this sliders, distance snap is measured
P.S. copy this data directly to avoid spies(if you won't play with set these sliders)

356,192,68041,2,0,L|397:204,2,36
288,268,68378,2,0,L|308:305,2,36

1. 02:40:906 (1,2) - try a similar as above, the same mistakefixed too

[Insane]

1. 00:18:490 (3) - i prefer change into two circles and stack with (4) supposed to be a buildup one click 00:18:490 (3) - => two 00:19:839 (3,4) -
2. 01:07:872 (1,2,3,4,5) - as usually, problem with place objects here. Do similar like a hard, but this time apply the circles. IIt works either way but I changed it to something better!
3. 01:21:018 - for this area set break time see forever
4. 02:40:906 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - them same again, and that's all about insane. fixed

[Forever]

1. 01:21:018 - break timeno, this barely drains hp and fits better than a break

thanks!

did a thing

yo

[General]

• The following hitsounds are shorter than 100ms:
drum-hitfinish.wav (52ms)
normal-hitwhistle.wav (52ms)
using the default slidertick as a hitsound o
didnt liked the hitsounding xd

[Easy]

1. 00:14:614 (2) - p/4577511 this goes for all 1/2s
2. 00:16:636 (1,2) - ctrl+g does it better cuz this beat 00:17:310 - is clearly stronger than the one on (2)'s head
3. 00:17:985 - same
4. 00:21:355 (4,1) - making this 00:22:030 - clickable will be much better
5. 00:24:726 (4) - shouldnt this have nc
6. 01:14:614 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - this is too repetitive, you can use circles or reverses for more variety
7. 01:22:030 - nice kiai
8. 02:22:367 (2,3) - O
9. 02:55:063 - nice kiai
10. 02:58:434 (1,2) - lol this plays really weird cuz theres nothing on (2) but its an easy, you can use this http://puu.sh/lvbuP/0163159718.jpg its more simple and thats what you want in a easy diff
    you have some nc inconsistecies so pls check over them again xd
    needs moar polishment

[Normal]

1. 00:32:310 (3,1) - http://puu.sh/lvbLL/151e088175.jpg much better
2. 00:33:322 (2,3) - http://puu.sh/lvbNN/5b06172364.jpg yeah
3. 00:39:558 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - please nerf
4. 01:05:681 (2,3) - u know
5. 02:03:322 - dont ignore it pls. u mapped the guitars in this entire section so yeah
6. 02:04:670 - same
7. 02:13:265 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - nice copypaste
8. 02:58:940 (2,3) - uhhhh, the drums are on 1/3 so http://puu.sh/lvchF/acc0678304.jpg
   same nice kiais as easy
   too spaced for my taste

[Hard]

1. 00:34:839 (3,4) - fix spacing pls
2. 01:08:883 (8) - making shapes with short sliders is extremely ugly
3. 01:10:569 - this is strong enough to map it so why not
4. 02:31:468 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - nice copypaste
   too spaced for my taste, needs mooooore polishment

ill post so i dont forget to finish it xd

pkhg wrote:

yo

[General]

• The following hitsounds are shorter than 100ms:
drum-hitfinish.wav (52ms)
normal-hitwhistle.wav (52ms)
using the default slidertick as a hitsound o
didnt liked the hitsounding xd
fixed both
nobody so far disliked it, so I don't think it's a problemBut I changed the soft-hitfinish + soft-hitnormal2 for now

[Easy]

1. 00:14:614 (2) - p/4577511 this goes for all 1/2s well fine then, removed all of those
2. 00:16:636 (1,2) - ctrl+g does it better cuz this beat 00:17:310 - is clearly stronger than the one on (2)'s head ight
3. 00:17:985 - same same
4. 00:21:355 (4,1) - making this 00:22:030 - clickable will be much better fine
5. 00:24:726 (4) - shouldnt this have nc yes
6. 01:14:614 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - this is too repetitive, you can use circles or reverses for more variety remapped
7. 01:22:030 - nice kiai have the kiai like this on all diff, but seem like i'll change it here then
8. 02:22:367 (2,3) - O Ö
9. 02:55:063 - nice kiai as before
10. 02:58:434 (1,2) - lol this plays really weird cuz theres nothing on (2) but its an easy, you can use this http://puu.sh/lvbuP/0163159718.jpg its more simple and thats what you want in a easy diff
    there is some guitar on there and it feels fine imo. if more people complain i'll look into it again
    you have some nc inconsistecies so pls check over them again xd re-nc'd the diff, mostly every 2 stanzas with some exceptions like 00:30:962 (2,1) - where the music really calls for nc, just like 02:11:917 (2,1) -
    needs moar polishment

[Normal]

1. 00:32:310 (3,1) - http://puu.sh/lvbLL/151e088175.jpg much better rearranged
2. 00:33:322 (2,3) - http://puu.sh/lvbNN/5b06172364.jpg yeah same^
3. 00:39:558 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - please nerf well k
4. 01:05:681 (2,3) - u know a
5. 02:03:322 - dont ignore it pls. u mapped the guitars in this entire section so yeah yeah
6. 02:04:670 - same same
7. 02:13:265 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - nice copypaste made this more different eh
8. 02:58:940 (2,3) - uhhhh, the drums are on 1/3 so http://puu.sh/lvchF/acc0678304.jpg
   same nice kiais as easy see easy
   too spaced for my taste
   seems fine for me, it's a slighlty harder than average normal, just like the easy is harder than most easies but maybe I should rename the diffs up until hard :/
   If I space it any less it makes for really ugly slight-overlaps on 1/2 so I'd have to drastically reduce spacing to get decent looking overlaps on 1/2 but that would ruin the spread

[Hard]

1. 00:34:839 (3,4) - fix spacing pls a
2. 01:08:883 (8) - making shapes with short sliders is extremely ugly b
3. 01:10:569 - this is strong enough to map it so why not c
4. 02:31:468 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - nice copypaste well you're right. I rearranged lots of the parts of this section, should be better now
   too spaced for my taste nice copypaste :_v) same as normal tbh, needs mooooore polishment

ill post so i dont forget to finish it xd

I'll apply this stuff already until you're done with other diffs, thanks so far

Heya, m4m from your queue

[General]
The offset feels slightly off, 10ms less sounds perfect to me, so 447.

[Forever]

1. 00:00:457 (1) - I'd recommend muting the end of this (00:04:839 - ) since it doesn't really fit
2. 00:10:569 (1,1) - You could somehow blanket these
3. 00:11:243 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Here you follow the vocals and 00:13:097 (7) - suddenly follows the guitar and ignores the vocals, doesn't sound too good, also, I HATE these slider shapes haha, but that's subjective I guess
4. 00:14:277 (3,4) - Try x48y134 for a better triangle
5. 00:14:614 (5,6) - I recommend having the slider first and then the note http://puu.sh/lvFLx/67c7ed4aba.jpg
6. 00:17:816 (6,1) - Try to blanket these better, Slider head to x87y202 (ignore if it was already there) Middle anchor point to x50y159 and slider tail to x44y105 should work
7. 00:21:187 (4,5) - These can just be on /4 instead of /6
8. 00:24:052 (5) - That middle anchor point is too high for such a short slider imo, try x442y163 on the RED anchor point
9. 00:24:389 (6) - Try something like x312y223
10. 00:24:979 (2,3) - Make them go in a straight line from 00:24:726 (1) -
11. 00:26:243 (1,2,3,4) - This doesn't really look/flow well
12. 00:36:861 (1,3) - These are a little too close to eachother
13. 00:44:951 (1,2) - Look at the distance between these. Now apply it to 00:45:288 (2,3) - , 00:45:962 (4,1) - 00:46:299 (1,2) - etc. It's all so inconsistent
14. 00:51:692 (1) - This shape looks really ugly..
15. 00:52:704 (1) - Unnecessary nc
16. 00:57:128 (1) - Can't you just start the spinner at 00:57:170 - ?
17. 01:00:794 (5) - Try rotating it from Selection Centre by -21, and move the RED anchor point (middle one) to x260y85
18. 01:03:322 (4,5,6,7,8) - I don't think the hitsounds on these fit the song all that well
19. 01:05:176 (1,2) - 01:05:850 (4,5) - Make them go in the same direction, for example, 01:05:850 (4) - to x213y39
20. 01:05:344 (2,5) - Don't you want to stack these? If you don't then make the distance between them bigger by moving 01:06:018 (5) - down for example
21. 01:06:524 (1) - This shape doesn't really fit here imo, subjective I guess
22. 01:17:310 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - These jumps are overmapped compared to the rest of the map. This whole map is SO easy compared to these jumps, fycho's map was on the limit, this one exceeds it
23. 01:20:007 (1,1) - Maybe a break between these?
24. 01:22:030 (1,2,3,4) - Is quite boring, maybe make the spacing x1,20 between all of them, and NC all of them just like Fycho did so you know it's 1/3
25. 01:22:704 (1) - Nah, don't like it at all, won't mention more of these
26. 01:22:704 (1,2,3,1) - Make the distance between these roughly the same so it looks better
27. 02:01:805 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - Increase the spacing on each of those maybe?
28. 02:51:355 (1) - Try x165y348
29. 02:51:692 (1) - Try x107y348
30. 02:52:030 (1) - Try x56y348
31. 02:53:041 (1,1) - Consider a break again
32. 02:55:063 (1,2,3,4) - Same as before
    
33. Diff feels too easy compared to the giant jumps, just look at those spikes! http://puu.sh/lvGSC/e2872230b6.png
34. Also a lot of the stuff in this mod goes for the other diffs aswell so I won't mention them again
    
    
    [Insane]
35. 00:24:052 (5) - Try x54 y183 and 00:24:389 (6) - x76y190 or something similar
36. 00:42:254 - to 00:50:176 - In this section there are a lot of spacing inconsistencies between the sliders, try to fix them since they look ugly
37. 00:50:344 (1,2,1) - Are you sure about ignoring the drums between these?
38. 01:29:277 - Maybe place a note here?
39. 02:11:917 (3) - NC to indicate 1/3?
40. 02:12:591 - to 02:20:513 - In this section there are a lot of spacing inconsistencies between the sliders, try to fix them since they look ugly
    
    [Hard]
41. 00:13:097 (2) - Switch to guitar is confusing. Try 00:12:591 (1) - Remove nc 00:13:097 (2) - Add nc
42. 00:58:434 (1,2) - Can be blanketed way better
43. 00:59:614 (1,3) - More space between these please
44. 01:03:827 (1,3) - ^
45. 01:20:007 (1,1) - Oh hey here you DID add a break, now you should really add it to the other diffs
46. 02:00:962 (3,6) - Make them point in the same direction please
47. 02:23:378 (1,2,1,2) - So close to eachother and then 02:25:400 (1,2) - is so far away, consider making it more balanced
48. 02:39:221 (5,1) - Fix this blanket as it stands out
49. 02:58:771 - Add a note here?
    
    [Normal]
50. Consider using CS3.5 or 3.8
51. Useless green line over red (no SV changes): 00:00:457 -
52. 00:16:299 (3) - Try x158y108
    
    [Easy]
53. Useless green line over red (no SV changes): 00:00:457 -

Let's stop there, good luck! o/

Zectro wrote:

Heya, m4m from your queue

[General]
The offset feels slightly off, 10ms less sounds perfect to me, so 447. no complaints so far

[Forever]

1. 00:00:457 (1) - I'd recommend muting the end of this (00:04:839 - ) since it doesn't really fit seems fine
2. 00:10:569 (1,1) - You could somehow blanket these no need tbh
3. 00:11:243 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Here you follow the vocals and 00:13:097 (7) - suddenly follows the guitar and ignores the vocals, doesn't sound too good, also, I HATE these slider shapes haha, but that's subjective I guess love this thing
4. 00:14:277 (3,4) - Try x48y134 for a better triangle those coordinates dont even make it atriangle, current one is perfect triangle /create polygon) only autostack might slightly throw it off
5. 00:14:614 (5,6) - I recommend having the slider first and then the note http://puu.sh/lvFLx/67c7ed4aba.jpg
6. 00:17:816 (6,1) - Try to blanket these better, Slider head to x87y202 (ignore if it was already there) Middle anchor point to x50y159 and slider tail to x44y105 should work
7. 00:21:187 (4,5) - These can just be on /4 instead of /6 wrong snap, fixed
8. 00:24:052 (5) - That middle anchor point is too high for such a short slider imo, try x442y163 on the RED anchor point
9. 00:24:389 (6) - Try something like x312y223 not my style
10. 00:24:979 (2,3) - Make them go in a straight line from 00:24:726 (1) -
11. 00:26:243 (1,2,3,4) - This doesn't really look/flow well agreed, changed
12. 00:36:861 (1,3) - These are a little too close to eachother
13. 00:44:951 (1,2) - Look at the distance between these. Now apply it to 00:45:288 (2,3) - , 00:45:962 (4,1) - 00:46:299 (1,2) - etc. It's all so inconsistent
    wh, they are all 1.3x
14. 00:51:692 (1) - This shape looks really ugly..
15. 00:52:704 (1) - Unnecessary nc
16. 00:57:128 (1) - Can't you just start the spinner at 00:57:170 - ? no, leaves too big a gap
17. 01:00:794 (5) - Try rotating it from Selection Centre by -21, and move the RED anchor point (middle one) to x260y85
18. 01:03:322 (4,5,6,7,8) - I don't think the hitsounds on these fit the song all that well
19. 01:05:176 (1,2) - 01:05:850 (4,5) - Make them go in the same direction, for example, 01:05:850 (4) - to x213y39
20. 01:05:344 (2,5) - Don't you want to stack these? If you don't then make the distance between them bigger by moving 01:06:018 (5) - down for example
    no those look fine the way they are, it's stylistic choice and the way it appears at this spot slightly under the other one on this ar is great
21. 01:06:524 (1) - This shape doesn't really fit here imo, subjective I guess
22. 01:17:310 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - These jumps are overmapped compared to the rest of the map. This whole map is SO easy compared to these
    jumps, fycho's map was on the limit, this one exceeds it
    Ignoring the fact that the peak is way around the same/even a bit lower compared to the rest of the map being harder overall, I elaborated on that before. also those are massively overrated star/aim rating wise. not nearly as hard as star/diffcalc/whatever shows
    
23. 01:20:007 (1,1) - Maybe a break between these?
24. 01:22:030 (1,2,3,4) - Is quite boring, maybe make the spacing x1,20 between all of them, and NC all of them just like Fycho did so you know it's 1/3 spacing etc indicates 1/3, never used a spacing like that for 1/4 except intro stream and never for 1/2
25. 01:22:704 (1) - Nah, don't like it at all, won't mention more of these
26. 01:22:704 (1,2,3,1) - Make the distance between these roughly the same so it looks better
27. 02:01:805 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - Increase the spacing on each of those maybe?
28. 02:51:355 (1) - Try x165y348
29. 02:51:692 (1) - Try x107y348
30. 02:52:030 (1) - Try x56y348
31. 02:53:041 (1,1) - Consider a break again
32. 02:55:063 (1,2,3,4) - Same as before
    
33. Diff feels too easy compared to the giant jumps, just look at those spikes! http://puu.sh/lvGSC/e2872230b6.png oh no, it's almost as if this graph reflect the intensity of the song, why would someone do that. they are more overrated than overmapped
34. Also a lot of the stuff in this mod goes for the other diffs aswell so I won't mention them again
    
    
    [Insane]
35. 00:24:052 (5) - Try x54 y183 and 00:24:389 (6) - x76y190 or something similar
36. 00:42:254 - to 00:50:176 - In this section there are a lot of spacing inconsistencies between the sliders, try to fix them since they look ugly scaling from 1.2 to 1.4 with consitency througout combos??
37. 00:50:344 (1,2,1) - Are you sure about ignoring the drums between these? 100%
38. 01:29:277 - Maybe place a note here?
39. 02:11:917 (3) - NC to indicate 1/3? repeating sliders starting on white ticks, no need would just look random
40. 02:12:591 - to 02:20:513 - In this section there are a lot of spacing inconsistencies between the sliders, try to fix them since they look ugly scaling from 1.2 to 1.4 with consitency througout combos??
    
    [Hard]
41. 00:13:097 (2) - Switch to guitar is confusing. Try 00:12:591 (1) - Remove nc 00:13:097 (2) - Add nc
42. 00:58:434 (1,2) - Can be blanketed way better
43. 00:59:614 (1,3) - More space between these please
44. 01:03:827 (1,3) - ^
45. 01:20:007 (1,1) - Oh hey here you DID add a break, now you should really add it to the other diffs this diff is supposed to be easier, etc. its fine on the higher diffs but would feel unfair here
46. 02:00:962 (3,6) - Make them point in the same direction please would look shit tbh
47. 02:23:378 (1,2,1,2) - So close to eachother and then 02:25:400 (1,2) - is so far away, consider making it more balanced all around a similar ds
48. 02:39:221 (5,1) - Fix this blanket as it stands out fine
49. 02:58:771 - Add a note here?
    
    [Normal]
50. Consider using CS3.5 or 3.8 no
51. Useless green line over red (no SV changes): 00:00:457 - a
52. 00:16:299 (3) - Try x158y108
    
    [Easy]
53. Useless green line over red (no SV changes): 00:00:457 -b

Let's stop there, good luck! o/

applied the green stuff, denied orange and most of the unmentioned ones
most of thouse orange and ignored ones are just complaint along "i subjectively don't llike it" instead of "objectively makes the map worse" since I like them like this they will stay

thanks

and another small hitsound update

after some thinking I decided to nerf the big jumps on forever slightly and buff some of the other jumps to make it spike less
=> 5.85* to 5.81
also restructured the big jumps a bit

comparison:
yes average is very low, mainly caused by the many slow parts the song has (=> low spacing used)

[Easy]
• 00:08:546 (2,3) - Wenn sich (3) auf dieses Glückenähnliche Geräusch bezieht, solltest du vielleicht nen NC machen, da die vorherigen Circles sich auf die Voice beziehen.
• Ist die Aesthetic mit Absicht so "schlecht"? 00:15:119 (3,4) - ist kein Blanket und der Slider sieht an sich komisch aus, genauso wie 00:16:636 (1) 00:17:985 (4) 00:42:254 (1,2) etc.
• 00:17:985 (4,5,6,1) - Mir würds tbh mehr gefallen, wenn du einen vernünftigen Flow reinbringen würdest anstatt den so oft zu breaken. Die Easy ist zwar schwerer als normale Easy's, aber trotzdem stört mich das irgendwie. D:
• 00:36:861 (1,2,3,4,1) - Warum switchst du von 1/1 Slider ganz plötzlich auf einen 2/1 Slider, obwohl der für Consistency auch 1/1 sein müsste?
• 00:50:344 (1,2) - Sehr unpassender Rhythm. Könntest sicher irgendeinen 1/3 Rhythm verwenden hier? 02:20:681 (1,2,3) - hört sich imo besser an. Eins von den beiden solltest du ändern, da es sonst an consistency fehlt.
• 00:58:434 (1,2) - Weird aesthetic. (1) sollte mehr curved sein imo.
• 00:59:782 (3,4) - ^
• 01:00:794 (4,1) - ^
• 01:06:524 (1,2) - Y u no blanket?
• 01:29:445 (3) - NC?
• 01:51:018 (1,2) - Blanket?
• 01:54:895 (2,3,1) - Unsaubere Transitions.
• 01:59:108 (1,2) - ^
• 02:00:456 (4) - Weiter nach oben platzieren?
• 02:07:198 (3,4) - Blanket?
• 02:07:535 (4,1) - ^
• 02:32:816 (3) - Vllt etwas mehr curved? Sieht auf diese Weise einfach ugly aus.
• 02:32:816 (3,4,1) - Vllt sowas? Das ist wenigstens nicht ganz so langweilig.
• 02:42:255 (1) - Unsauberer Blanket.
• 02:42:255 (1,2,3,4) - Ziemlich Boring. Vllt sowas?


[Normal]
• 00:11:243 (1,5) - Sehen nicht wirklich schön aus.
• 00:24:052 (1,2) - ^
• 00:47:648 (1,1) - Generell Slider die kaum gebogen sind, sehen ziemlich unschön aus.
• 00:54:389 (3) - MUSS wie 00:53:041 (1) ein 1/1 Slider sein, da gleicher Sound.
• 00:55:737 (1,2,3,4,1) - 1/2 Pattern wären definitiv besser angebracht.
• 00:58:434 (1,1) - Wäre wohl besser, wenn ich die nicht jedes mal rauskopiere... <.<
• 01:02:310 (1) - Sollte mehr curved und weiter oben platziert sein damit es ganz gut mit (2) aussieht.
• 01:12:254 (2,3,4) - Wie wärs mit dem Rhythm?
• 01:22:704 (1) - Weiter oben platzieren damit es besser aussieht?
• 01:28:097 (1,2,3) - Das gleiche wie oben.
• 01:54:895 (1,2) - Ziemlich boring. Platzier (2) mal weiter unten.
• 02:26:074 (1,2,3,4,1) - Wie auch oben schon gesagt, 1/2 Rhythms wären besser.
• 02:35:850 (2) - Etwas weiter unten?
• 02:45:288 (2,3,4) - Kannst du dir sicher schon denken.
• 02:56:242 (2) - Weiter nach oben.

Dadurch, dass viele Slider nur eine ganz leichte Kurve haben und viele Slider direkt miteinander connected sind, sieht die Diff sehr unpolished aus.


[Hard]
• OD Gap zwischen Normal und Hard ist ziemlich groß. Verwend lieber OD6 (was eigtl. auch besser zur Diff passt)
• 00:09:895 (1,2) - Warum custom Stack? oO
• 00:11:243 (1,2) - ^
• 00:13:097 (2) - Weiter nach oben platzieren.
• 00:15:625 (2,3,4,5,6) - Entweder verwendest du bei allen 3 "Parts" (ka wie ich das nennen soll) die 1/2 Reverseslider oder du benutzt das Triplet mittendrin. Consistency und so. D:
• 00:22:030 (1,2) - Spinne ich oder ist der custom Stack sogar noch "weniger stacked" als die davor? o_o
• 00:23:378 (1,2,3) - Gibt sicher eine bessere Lösung dafür. Auf diese Weise ist es ziemlich langweilig.
• 00:26:412 (2,3,4,5) - Sowas evtl? So wie du sie platziert hast, ist es ziemlich langweilig.
• 00:32:310 (1,2) - Unsauberes Blanket (normalerweise erwähne ich unsaubere Blankets die nur minimal falsch sind nicht, aber hier sieht man es einfach)
• 00:33:322 (3,4) - ^
• 00:34:164 (1,2,3) - Hast du (3) gleich rotiert wie (2)? Sieht irgendwie falsch aus.
• 00:42:254 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Consistencyfehler. Entweder benutzt du die Circles und 1/2 Slider abwechselnd nach jedem NC, oder gar keine 1/2 Slider.
• 00:48:996 (1,2) - Weißt schon bescheid.
• 00:50:344 (1,2,3) - Könntest eigtl 1/3 Slider verwenden oder nicht? o_o
• 00:58:434 (1,2) - Weird transition. (1) mehr curven um es zu fixen.
• 01:09:895 (4,5,6,1) - Vllt sowas?
• 01:13:940 (4) - NC vllt hier anstatt bei 01:14:614 (1) ?
• 01:54:389 (4) - 1/1 Slider würde besser passen.
• 02:10:232 (2,3) - Wieso zeigt der Tail im Gegensatz von den anderen Slider direkt auf den Head von (3)?
• 02:12:591 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Weißt schon.
• 02:21:018 (2,3,4,1,2) - 1/3 Rhythm wie oben schon erwähnt?
• 02:31:468 (1,2) - (1) mehr curven für eine bessere Transition wie oben auch schon?
• 02:31:805 (2,3) - Unsauberes Blanket.
• 02:39:221 (5,1) - ^
• 02:42:929 (4) - Weiter nach oben platzieren und mehr curven, ggf. ein Blanket.
• 02:43:266 (5,6,1) - Vielleicht (6) weiter nach oben platzieren damit der Flow nicht so langweilig ist?


[Insane]
• 00:09:558 (1) - Kein NC nötig.
• 00:12:928 (2,1) - Lass sie nicht overlappen. Fällt ingame zwar nur kaum auf, aber ist trotzdem meh.
• 00:14:782 (5,1) - Besseres Transition please.
• 00:18:490 (3,4) - ?????
• 00:24:052 (5,6) - Sieht sehr weird aus.
• 00:26:749 (3,1) - Stacken?
• 00:48:322 (3,4) - Würde ich STRG + G'n. (also beide einzeln auswählen damit du nicht die Position switchst)
• 01:00:794 (5,1) - Weird transition.
• 01:16:299 (2,1) - Stacken?
• 01:17:310 (1,1) - Berühren sich, sieht nicht so toll aus.
• 01:17:648 (2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - NC Spam macht das readen unnötig schwer (und musste auch mehrmals im Editor zurückspulen, damit ich überhaupt verstanden habe wo der nächste Circle ist...)
• 01:23:883 (1,2,3,4,5) - Wie wärs wenn der Slidertail von (1) genau in der Mitte wäre? c:
• 01:31:805 (3,1,2) - Weird.
• 02:08:378 (6) - Platzier den mal in die Mitte von den (3) und (4).
• 02:46:973 (7) - NC?
• 02:50:344 (1,1) - Wie oben auch schon.
• 02:50:682 (2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Kein NC Spam please.

Stjpa wrote:

[Easy]
• 00:08:546 (2,3) - Wenn sich (3) auf dieses Glückenähnliche Geräusch bezieht, solltest du vielleicht nen NC machen, da die vorherigen Circles sich auf die Voice beziehen. nc, war sowieso einen takt zu spät
• Ist die Aesthetic mit Absicht so "schlecht"? 00:15:119 (3,4) - ist kein Blanket und der Slider sieht an sich komisch aus, genauso wie 00:16:636 (1) 00:17:985 (4) 00:42:254 (1,2) etc. ? http://i.imgur.com/R1d4TRx.jpg ziemliche geschmackssache, meine easies seh eig immer so ähnlich aus

• 00:17:985 (4,5,6,1) - Mir würds tbh mehr gefallen, wenn du einen vernünftigen Flow reinbringen würdest anstatt den so oft zu breaken. Die Easy ist zwar schwerer als normale Easy's, aber trotzdem stört mich das irgendwie. D: kann ich voll verstehen, mag diese kleinen "flow breaks" aber ganz gern, machen die ganze map interessanter zu spielen imo
• 00:36:861 (1,2,3,4,1) - Warum switchst du von 1/1 Slider ganz plötzlich auf einen 2/1 Slider, obwohl der für Consistency auch 1/1 sein müsste? kann nicht die ganze zeit den gleichen cllickrhythmus verwenden, wird ziemlich eintönig. änderung passt hier gut weil 00:39:558 (1) - gut mit dem gitarrenteil passt
• 00:50:344 (1,2) - Sehr unpassender Rhythm. Könntest sicher irgendeinen 1/3 Rhythm verwenden hier? 02:20:681 (1,2,3) - hört sich imo besser an. Eins von den beiden solltest du ändern, da es sonst an consistency fehlt. slider + repeat geht hier gut mit piano . klar rhythm ist bei beiden ziemlich gleich after andere instrumente/betonung
• 00:58:434 (1,2) - Weird aesthetic. (1) sollte mehr curved sein imo.
• 00:59:782 (3,4) - ^
• 01:00:794 (4,1) - ^
pls ich mag diese art von slidern :'(
• 01:06:524 (1,2) - Y u no blanket?
hab 1en mit 2 jetzt blanketed, doppelblanket mag ich hier von der position net, teile die drehung die dann in 1-2 entssthen würde lieber auf 1-2-3 auf
• 01:29:445 (3) - NC? hab doch alle 2 takte nc, hier auch. klar würde das mit der musik passen, aber mag nc "spam" auf easy net so
• 01:51:018 (1,2) - Blanket? fixed

• 01:54:895 (2,3,1) - Unsaubere Transitions.
• 01:59:108 (1,2) - ^
beide fixd

• 02:00:456 (4) - Weiter nach oben platzieren?
• 02:07:198 (3,4) - Blanket?
• 02:07:535 (4,1) - ^
beide fixd

• 02:32:816 (3) - Vllt etwas mehr curved? Sieht auf diese Weise einfach ugly aus. wie erwähnt, gefallen mir so viel besser
• 02:32:816 (3,4,1) - Vllt sowas? Das ist wenigstens nicht ganz so langweilig. meine leicht gekurvten slider bitte D:

• 02:42:255 (1) - Unsauberer Blanket. a
• 02:42:255 (1,2,3,4) - Ziemlich Boring. Vllt sowas? bisschen gerader flow hat noch niemandem geschadet


[Normal]
• 00:11:243 (1,5) - Sehen nicht wirklich schön aus.
• 00:24:052 (1,2) - ^
• 00:47:648 (1,1) - Generell Slider die kaum gebogen sind, sehen ziemlich unschön aus.
wh ich mag die immer noch D:

• 00:54:389 (3) - MUSS wie 00:53:041 (1) ein 1/1 Slider sein, da gleicher Sound. meinst 1/2 aber ja, fix
• 00:55:737 (1,2,3,4,1) - 1/2 Pattern wären definitiv besser angebracht. der undermap is okay für normal, spielt sich gut und ist nicht zu schwer
• 00:58:434 (1,1) - Wäre wohl besser, wenn ich die nicht jedes mal rauskopiere... <.<
• 01:02:310 (1) - Sollte mehr curved und weiter oben platziert sein damit es ganz gut mit (2) aussieht. mag diese art von flow
• 01:12:254 (2,3,4) - Wie wärs mit dem Rhythm? 1/2 slider auf red is net so toll hier
• 01:22:704 (1) - Weiter oben platzieren damit es besser aussieht? bisschen geändert
• 01:28:097 (1,2,3) - Das gleiche wie oben. density verringern passt toll mit der musik hier
• 01:54:895 (1,2) - Ziemlich boring. Platzier (2) mal weiter unten. b
• 02:26:074 (1,2,3,4,1) - Wie auch oben schon gesagt, 1/2 Rhythms wären besser. wie oben
• 02:35:850 (2) - Etwas weiter unten? flow von 1 hierhin ist so besser imo http://i.imgur.com/pJnsM06.png
• 02:45:288 (2,3,4) - Kannst du dir sicher schon denken. wie oben
• 02:56:242 (2) - Weiter nach oben. c

Dadurch, dass viele Slider nur eine ganz leichte Kurve haben und viele Slider direkt miteinander connected sind, sieht die Diff sehr unpolished aus.


[Hard]
• OD Gap zwischen Normal und Hard ist ziemlich groß. Verwend lieber OD6 (was eigtl. auch besser zur Diff passt) 6.5 okay
• 00:09:895 (1,2) - Warum custom Stack? oO
• 00:11:243 (1,2) - ^
gefallen mir gut hier, außerdem stacken die sl0.7 hier sonst komplett aufeinander was mir hier nicht gefällt und mehr als 0.7 leniency will ich nicht nutzen
• 00:13:097 (2) - Weiter nach oben platzieren. ctrlh + hoch p leichte ändeerung
• 00:15:625 (2,3,4,5,6) - Entweder verwendest du bei allen 3 "Parts" (ka wie ich das nennen soll) die 1/2 Reverseslider oder du benutzt das Triplet mittendrin. Consistency und so. D: spielt sich so besser, triple verleiht dem letzten teil mehr betonung
• 00:22:030 (1,2) - Spinne ich oder ist der custom Stack sogar noch "weniger stacked" als die davor? o_o fix
• 00:23:378 (1,2,3) - Gibt sicher eine bessere Lösung dafür. Auf diese Weise ist es ziemlich langweilig. find das gut so
• 00:26:412 (2,3,4,5) - Sowas evtl? So wie du sie platziert hast, ist es ziemlich langweilig. flow vom part davor ist ähnlich wie dein bild. bisschen abwechslung ist besser hier
• 00:32:310 (1,2) - Unsauberes Blanket (normalerweise erwähne ich unsaubere Blankets die nur minimal falsch sind nicht, aber hier sieht man es einfach)
• 00:33:322 (3,4) - ^
fix
• 00:34:164 (1,2,3) - Hast du (3) gleich rotiert wie (2)? Sieht irgendwie falsch aus. fix
• 00:42:254 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Consistencyfehler. Entweder benutzt du die Circles und 1/2 Slider abwechselnd nach jedem NC, oder gar keine 1/2 Slider. 1/2 slider kommen später für bisschen mehr density[ vor 00:48:996 (1) - /color]
• 00:48:996 (1,2) - Weißt schon bescheid.
• 00:50:344 (1,2,3) - Könntest eigtl 1/3 Slider verwenden oder nicht? o_o
• 00:58:434 (1,2) - Weird transition. (1) mehr curven um es zu fixen. d
• 01:09:895 (4,5,6,1) - Vllt sowas? finds so besser
• 01:13:940 (4) - NC vllt hier anstatt bei 01:14:614 (1) ? würde besser zu den vocals passen, aber inconsistent ü musik ändert sich bei 01:14:614 (1) -
• 01:54:389 (4) - 1/1 Slider würde besser passen. ja, 1/2 repeat aber noch besser, geändert
• 02:10:232 (2,3) - Wieso zeigt der Tail im Gegensatz von den anderen Slider direkt auf den Head von (3)? find das ganz nett so
• 02:12:591 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Weißt schon. wie oben
• 02:21:018 (2,3,4,1,2) - 1/3 Rhythm wie oben schon erwähnt? ^
• 02:31:468 (1,2) - (1) mehr curven für eine bessere Transition wie oben auch schon? e
• 02:31:805 (2,3) - Unsauberes Blanket.
• 02:39:221 (5,1) - ^
fix beide
• 02:42:929 (4) - Weiter nach oben platzieren und mehr curven, ggf. ein Blanket.
• 02:43:266 (5,6,1) - Vielleicht (6) weiter nach oben platzieren damit der Flow nicht so langweilig ist? find die ganze zeit so nen zickzack flow zu machen langweiliger lol

insane gleich
ty

Stjpa wrote:

[Insane]
• 00:09:558 (1) - Kein NC nötig. g
• 00:12:928 (2,1) - Lass sie nicht overlappen. Fällt ingame zwar nur kaum auf, aber ist trotzdem meh. nich nur kaum, sonder gar nicht, ist bis dahin schon lange weg (außer mit ez)
• 00:14:782 (5,1) - Besseres Transition please. pls, bisschen symmetry und gerader flow muss wenns irgendwie mal rein passt
• 00:18:490 (3,4) - ????? einfaches halb gestacktes kickslider pattern, leich readable (hatte noch keiner bei testplays probleme damit) mach den buildup besser, bei nächsten 1/4 => 00:19:839 (3,4) - kommt dann triple
• 00:24:052 (5,6) - Sieht sehr weird aus. geht so, mach 1/3 gap zu sliderende aber leicht verständlich
• 00:26:749 (3,1) - Stacken? zeitlicher abstand wie oben erwähnt, passt so besser von distance/angle/pattern
• 00:48:322 (3,4) - Würde ich STRG + G'n. (also beide einzeln auswählen damit du nicht die Position switchst) find den flow so "interessanter" ist auch nötig weil der teil musikalisch nicht viel bietet
• 01:00:794 (5,1) - Weird transition. 01:00:794 (5,1,2) - => gerade (5=sliderend), passrt so mit musik ganz gut und spielt sich durch flow änderung bei 3 interessant
• 01:16:299 (2,1) - Stacken? wie oben nicht sichtbar und viel zu limitierend
• 01:17:310 (1,1) - Berühren sich, sieht nicht so toll aus.
• 01:17:648 (2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - NC Spam macht das readen unnötig schwer (und musste auch mehrmals im Editor zurückspulen, damit ich überhaupt verstanden habe wo der nächste Circle ist...) im editor eventuell, ist aber ziemlich weit verbreitetes pattern, passt toll mit der hohen intensität und macht es im gameplay eher einfacher zu readen. liebe dieses pattern
• 01:23:883 (1,2,3,4,5) - Wie wärs wenn der Slidertail von (1) genau in der Mitte wäre? c: macht entweder 1-2 zu nem schlechten ds und/oder winkel oder overlappt seltsam, ist so ok
• 01:31:805 (3,1,2) - Weird. einfach readable 3/4 slider? + alle mit gleichem overlap? find das recht nett. sliderhead aud instrument und slider halten auf vocals
• 02:08:378 (6) - Platzier den mal in die Mitte von den (3) und (4). h
• 02:46:973 (7) - NC? joa, macht übergang zu kicksliderns besser, k
• 02:50:344 (1,1) - Wie oben auch schon. same
• 02:50:682 (2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Kein NC Spam please. ^

thx für mod
sind halt viele stilistische sachen, kann verstehen wenn dir nich gefällt wie ich mappe :v bzw meiner slider curve und nicht immer blankets spamme, aber mir gefällt es so und playability ist auch in ordnung.
sind halt keine sachen die nicht rankable sind und mir (und anscheinen genügend anderen) gefällt der stil. kann es ja nicht jedem mit maps recht machen, muss man ja auch nicht

updated hitsounds, mostly doing stuff like elvis suggested (using a different/third soft-hitnormal for some "weaker" parts)
redownload pls