Crimmi wrote:

General (Metadata, Timing, etc.)

_________________________________________________________

1. Clear~

Red Night

1. 00:03:345 (4) - This blanket could be improved a bit. changed
2. 00:16:095 (4) - Maybe blanket (1) with this slider? no need to
3. 00:23:070 (6) - I don't think there is anything in the music that supports this note, you should probably remove it. ok
4. 00:29:595 (x) - You could add a note here. ^
5. 00:33:945 (4) - I know this an approval map, but you should move this so it won't be obscured by the hitbursts. ^
6. 00:42:495 (x) - You could add a note here, plus it's clickable. i don't hear sound here
7. 00:56:670 (5) - Again, I don't think I hear anything in the music that supports this. mmm i'll think about it
8. 01:28:845 (5) - Maybe shorten this back 1/4, sounded a bit more better imo. oki
9. 01:33:645 (3) - ^ ^
10. 02:10:395 (2) - Think this should be moved to avoid obscurity by hitbursts from that stream. ^
11. 02:14:670 (2,3) - Check your spacing on this, I doubt anybody would think this is a slider/triplet combo. aww fifth person say this, ok fixed
12. 02:28:470 (5,6) - ^ ^
13. 02:34:695 (7) - I rather see this as a single note, as I doubt anybody would hit (1) that quickly after that kick slider. om okay

Hmm, that's all I have on this map, just clean up a few spots and it should be fine, good luck and sorry for the delay. Thanks for mod ~~~ :3

Battle wrote:

From my queue (m4m is kinda implied since you have a queue):

[Red Night]
00:05:145 (8) - You can make this slider look smoother by making the white point lower, if yo still want the distinct sharp curve, move the red point lightly up
00:05:445 (1,3) - Maybe overlap this more?
00:19:395 (3,4,5) - There's no note on 4, which is fine and all for triplets, but you have the options to emphasize the drums by removing 4 and making 5 a jump (tbh you can do this on all the triplets lol, maybe mix it up?)
00:27:945 (6,1) - Moving it down a little can makes this seem a little smoother, so that going out of the 6 goes directly in to the 1 and stuff
00:30:495 (4) - The vocals here are pretty strong, but the spacing is pretty low, maybe increase spacing?
00:43:095 (3,4,1) - Maybe make straight line?
00:54:645 (1,2,1) - Maybe make spacing even (distance from the 2/1 slider is .5 and the distance from 2 - 1 on chorus is .55) .3.
01:46:095 (1,2,3) - Maybe raise slightly up to be diagonal to the slider
01:56:445 (1,2) - Slider end blanket can be improved slightly
03:01:245 (1,2,1) - This is being somewhat picky, but all the other sliders had the note after it being somewhat flow-y, maybe just raise 2 so it's diagonal to the start of the first 1
03:18:045 (1,1) - I feel like I'm the only one disappointed that the first 1 isn't blanketed by the second 1's curve (either way for
nah 03:18:495 (1,3) - you should blanket the slider head to the 1/4 slider
03:36:645 (2) - Maybe change this to a 1/2 slider that starts at 03:36:495 - since there is a beat there
03:45:645 (1,2) - Maybe move 2 down a little to make it feel like 1 leads into it more?
03:56:445 (1,2) - This follows the music better if 2 is on the red tick after 1
03:58:845 (4,1,2) - Kinda the same situation, but after you put 1 on the red tick, make it a 1/1 slider

That's all from me, pretty clean map imo Most of them fixed . Thanks for mod ~~ :3

1. unused green lines, please delete them:
   02:22:545 -
   05:11:895 -
2. 02:22:845 - unnecessary red line, there's no change in bpm or offest. use a green line instead if you want to change anything
   --
3. 00:08:445 (3,4) - song doesn't slow down so lowering the spacing doesn't play well. move (4) elsewhere? http://puu.sh/l4jow.jpg
4. 00:09:045 (1,3) - I don't get the reverses. there's nothing on the blue ticks that can be emphasized with them so I prefer sliders without reverses.
5. 00:11:745 (2,1) - low spacing seems weird, cause it seems like you wanted this to have more impact. placing (1,2) differently could work better in this case- http://puu.sh/l4jzS.jpg
6. 00:21:045 (4) - consider stacking this below 00:19:545 (4) - ? creates nice flow and works better with the pace of the song, imo. the low spacing currently feels off
7. 00:22:395 (2) - move this a little further down/left maybe. it's so close to 00:21:945 (4) - but looks better if there's some more room between them, imo
8. 00:23:595 (2,3,4) - no beat on (3), remove the circle?
9. 00:24:345 (7,8) - feels weird, cause there's nothing on the first blue tick, only on the second. try this rhythm instead: http://puu.sh/l4jNg.jpg
10. 00:25:545 (5,6) - the downbeat is stronger that the other beats so it should be clickable, imo. you can ctrl+g these two on the timeline, that works better rhythmwise
11. 00:25:995 (7,8,9) - remove (8), there's no beat there?
12. 00:28:170 - extended slider doesn't follow anything, so I prefer if you end this on the red tick before. there's a beat you skip otherwise
13. 00:30:345 (3,4) - same with the downbeat again, ctrl+g them on timeline?
14. 00:30:795 (5,6,7) - remove (6), same reasons as before
15. 00:33:645 (1,2,3) - sliders feel weird. can't tell what it is exactly, but they were very uncomfortable to play. consider a simple stream instead?
16. 00:40:245 (7) - reverse doesn't work well here, because of the beat at 00:40:695 -. how about removing the reverse and adding another slider?
17. 00:40:995 (8) - sliderend should be clickable cause the white tick is much more dominant than the red one here
18. 00:46:395 (2,3,4) - no beat on (3), remove? (same reasons as before)
19. 00:46:995 (6,7,8) - ^ for (7)
    --really, there are so many triplets mapped to nothing.. why? :/ ofc it's playable, but it doesn't match with the melody or the vocals. it just feels completely overmapped to me as it is.. :c especially if you could map a really awsome diff -you'd just have to pay a little more attention to the song and the rhythm. maybe it's too much to ask for this map, but you should try to _map to a song_, don't place objects "randomly" everywhere and have a nice song playing in the background with little to no relation to the gameplay. Sorry if this sounds mean in some way, it's just my opinion :3 and I'm not trying to say that all of the map is bad, there are many many good things, too. I just noticed some 'basic' stuff that's missing here and there, like these triplets or for example unstressed strong beats (mostly downbeats)..

Squirrel wrote:

hey there!
my m4m part-- :3
just making some suggestions.

Red Night

1. unused green lines, please delete them:
   02:22:545 -
   05:11:895 -
2. 02:22:845 - unnecessary red line, there's no change in bpm or offest. use a green line instead if you want to change anything
   --
3. 00:08:445 (3,4) - song doesn't slow down so lowering the spacing doesn't play well. move (4) elsewhere? http://puu.sh/l4jow.jpg
4. 00:09:045 (1,3) - I don't get the reverses. there's nothing on the blue ticks that can be emphasized with them so I prefer sliders without reverses.
5. 00:11:745 (2,1) - low spacing seems weird, cause it seems like you wanted this to have more impact. placing (1,2) differently could work better in this case- http://puu.sh/l4jzS.jpg
6. 00:21:045 (4) - consider stacking this below 00:19:545 (4) - ? creates nice flow and works better with the pace of the song, imo. the low spacing currently feels off
7. 00:22:395 (2) - move this a little further down/left maybe. it's so close to 00:21:945 (4) - but looks better if there's some more room between them, imo
8. 00:23:595 (2,3,4) - no beat on (3), remove the circle?
9. 00:24:345 (7,8) - feels weird, cause there's nothing on the first blue tick, only on the second. try this rhythm instead: http://puu.sh/l4jNg.jpg
10. 00:25:545 (5,6) - the downbeat is stronger that the other beats so it should be clickable, imo. you can ctrl+g these two on the timeline, that works better rhythmwise
11. 00:25:995 (7,8,9) - remove (8), there's no beat there?
12. 00:28:170 - extended slider doesn't follow anything, so I prefer if you end this on the red tick before. there's a beat you skip otherwise
13. 00:30:345 (3,4) - same with the downbeat again, ctrl+g them on timeline?
14. 00:30:795 (5,6,7) - remove (6), same reasons as before
15. 00:33:645 (1,2,3) - sliders feel weird. can't tell what it is exactly, but they were very uncomfortable to play. consider a simple stream instead?
16. 00:40:245 (7) - reverse doesn't work well here, because of the beat at 00:40:695 -. how about removing the reverse and adding another slider?
17. 00:40:995 (8) - sliderend should be clickable cause the white tick is much more dominant than the red one here
18. 00:46:395 (2,3,4) - no beat on (3), remove? (same reasons as before)
19. 00:46:995 (6,7,8) - ^ for (7)
    --really, there are so many triplets mapped to nothing.. why? :/ ofc it's playable, but it doesn't match with the melody or the vocals. it just feels completely overmapped to me as it is.. :c especially if you could map a really awsome diff -you'd just have to pay a little more attention to the song and the rhythm. maybe it's too much to ask for this map, but you should try to _map to a song_, don't place objects "randomly" everywhere and have a nice song playing in the background with little to no relation to the gameplay. Sorry if this sounds mean in some way, it's just my opinion :3 and I'm not trying to say that all of the map is bad, there are many many good things, too. I just noticed some 'basic' stuff that's missing here and there, like these triplets or for example unstressed strong beats (mostly downbeats)..

with that said, I think you should check your diff by yourself and try to figure out on your own what needs some changes (talking about the basic things here).
If you still need more help feel free to send a message in game or via forum pm, I can take another looks at this, if you want me to. but only if this stuff is fixed--

Hope I could help you a little up til now! :3 Try to fix all and ye i'll do that. Thanks~~ and squee :3
//squee

Euny wrote:

m4m! came from my queue♥

• General

1. for metadata : change source: ' 11eyes-罪と罰と贖いの少女- ' / also you should add romanized source: ' 11eyes -Tsumi to Batsu to Aganai no Shoujo- ' for tag.
   
   from natsu

   04:39 Natsu: source should be: source: 11eyes-罪と罰と贖いの少女-
   04:39 Natsu: romanized source: 11eyes -Tsumi to Batsu to Aganai no Shoujo- for tags
   04:40 Natsu: did check with KSHR sometime ago whehn I submitted mine

ok, changed metadata

• Red Night

1. 00:10:845 (1) - dont need to nc for this even if you want to cause of overlap stuffs. tbh its not that close like 00:14:445 (1,2,1,2) - those so i think you should remove this nc (remove nc for like this stuffs. its really dont need to spam) yea, fixed
2. 00:12:045 (1) - ^ ^ ^
3. 00:13:245 (1) - ^ ^ ^
4. 00:28:545 (2) - move it to around 352l179 for better ds with 00:28:245 (1,3) - them and 00:28:695 (3) - to 387l60 will be better and last, 00:28:845 (4) - stack with 00:28:245 (1) - this tail. nice proposition, of course :p
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:34:545 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - if you want to keep this '2measure nc intentional' , you should fix 02:01:245 smth fixed
   (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - there too. ^
6. 00:37:845 (6) - you can change tail direction since bit boring cause next slider is same direction. ok
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:17:145 (3,4) - this flow really hard to read. cause straight flow but not regularly ds. moving (4) to bit down like this did something
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 03:20:445 (1) - there is no 1/4 beat make this to 8/12(but i dont recommend since 1/12 too confused for players) or if i you, i'll map this part with 1/1 slider after remove 03:20:745 (2) - this. i make 1/2 and circle

sorry for late Thanks ~~:3 and sorry for your ring ;w;

Euny wrote:

oh man, i miss shoot.

i wish luck for your map

Gamu wrote:

Hello! Sorry for being late.

[ General]

1. Source is wrong. This song is a anime song(opening theme), not game song. Source must be 11eyes.
   
   image

   
   ・official info: https://www.marv.jp/special/11eyes/

Mmm, okay changed

[ Red Night]

1. 00:04:245 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Why did you ignore 00:04:620 and 00:04:770 and 00:04:920 sounds? Obviously, it is possible to hear the drum sound there and this rhythm is a little weird to me. So, I would like to recommend that you change 00:04:545 (3,4) to 1/4 sliders and add a circle at 00:04:920. yea i had this rhythm but i changed on second mod if i remember, but ok sounds cool
   
   image

   
2. 00:12:345 (5) - clap is missing. oups
3. 00:15:045 (T) - I feel finish sound is too small. Please try to raise the volume (+30%?) 20 % :3
4. 00:29:745 (T) - Why did you change from S:C1 to N:1? I prefer S:C1 and it will fit the music. yea i was thinking about it, fixed ~
5. 00:33:945 (5,6) - You might want to change to 1/4 sliders because I think it is better than now, and cool! Pretty
   
   image

   
6. 00:54:645 (T) - Same as 00:15:045 (T). try to raise the volume because back sound is very strong. ok
7. 01:40:245 (3,1) - Swap these new combos. you're right
8. 01:56:745 (T) - Same as 00:29:745 (T). [
9. 02:21:645 (T) - Same as 00:54:645 (T). 20% is really too small. [
10. 03:09:645 (1) - It has not been perfectly stack. move to x:364 y:231. did i drink here? o.o fixed
11. 03:12:495 (1,2) - I want the sound of something. Maybe you might want to add a clap sound. on red tick
12. 03:19:245 (1,2) - These are a little cramped. try to expand the more spacing~ moved a bit
13. 03:55:245 (1) - Same as 00:54:645 (T). [
14. 04:44:295 (1) - Inaudible sound of the start point, so you must raise the volume. changed to 35 %

Good luck! Thanks Gamu :3 ~~

Fort wrote:

hello

yeah probably i really sucks at this beatmap analyzing, but maybe there is some problems i got from here

[Red]

1. 00:04:245 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this flow directions seems like random, use possible constant distance can make this thing smooth at beginning (example like this http://puu.sh/la9I8/9bf2cf679c.jpg, this pattern can possibly clearly visible because it has some good looking follow points and has natural zigzag flow which it can be good on movement)
2. 00:09:045 (1,3) - you can do something better than this, like put circles and add jump more than previous pattern (ummm i think it needs some change placement at 00:09:345 (2) - and 00:09:945 (4) - ) maybe you can try an circular pattern jump for this
3. 00:12:645 (1,2,3,4) - i'd better mapped this part following guitar to provide 00:13:845 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - stream emphasize (example like http://puu.sh/la9RT/02481f5367.jpg it can be cool jump pattern and can make 00:13:845 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - stream more fun
4. 00:33:945 (5,6) - i think this jump flow too rigid, because 00:33:645 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this flow feels like forced straight pattern without any direction changes and then with this 00:33:945 (5,6,1) - sudden jump can make some people got miss because this flow, you can move 00:34:095 (6) - to 290|300 and move 00:34:245 (1) - to 421|132 to shorten distance between 00:34:095 (6,1) -
5. 00:48:195 (4) - change to 1/4 slider to make some consistency on 00:45:795 (4) -
6. 00:53:145 (1) - well im just can say for what you put new combo here?
7. 00:53:745 (3) - im sure the stream thing start in that timeline, i hope you map that slider with circles and remove new combo on 00:53:895 (1) - no? i hear stream at 00:53:745 (3) - because of this instrumets here ;w;
8. 01:06:345 (5,6,1) - this can be questionable pattern i think, probably you can make some jump on there because vocal and jump for drum transition, well i can say you can move 01:06:495 (6) - to 161|254 to provide some emphasize for vocal and transition on vocal patterning combo and to make sure players to deal with 01:06:795 (2,3) - this one
9. 01:07:695 (7,1) - im sure this one is missleading pattern especially on 01:07:695 (7) - , put one circle is enough to fill that pattern (if you want you can add some jump too for that one)
10. 01:14:445 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - move this to 235|275 to make sure this stream pattern has same speed with 01:14:145 (5,6) - jump pattern
11. 01:31:995 (2,4) - that slider (4) almost touch circle (2), to make sure it can be clean move 01:32:445 (4) - to308|104 and rotate it -28 degrees (selection centre), but it's up to you but i suggest you can make 01:32:145 (3,4) - distance more bigger than your current one
12. 01:36:645 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - put 1,2,3,4 combo please. just like your previous patterning
13. 01:39:045 (1,2,1,2) - same suggestion with 00:12:645 (1,2,3,4) -
14. 01:51:195 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - try this one i think http://puu.sh/laaFo/5272c74459.jpg (01:51:495 (7,8,1) - direction change on here because kick transition and it can be works on stream patterning)
15. 01:52:995 (1,2,3,4) - a bit inconsistant distance, for this maybe you can polish distance to constant one, to make sure this pattern looks good at distance consistency
16. 02:20:745 (3) - same thing like 00:53:745 (3) - (well it can be a questionable thing because on that part is more stronger than 02:20:895 (1) - for new combo pattern, you can consider this thing i guess) same
17. 02:22:545 (2) - this overlap looks too small overlapped, you can move this one to 131|79 (0.50x seems perfect distance for slow part like this) so you need to to stack 02:22:845 (1) - lel
18. 02:30:945 (5) - yeah looks distance between 02:30:945 (5,1) - to small to emphasize 02:31:245 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1) - pattern (yeah you can move that slider to 277|290 for extra distance at 02:30:945 (5,1) - )
19. 02:54:045 (1) - nice slider sample
20. 03:03:645 (1) - i was wondering how to map this part with full violin patterning, like this i think http://puu.sh/lab6U/4ff52fb321.jpg (well you need to delete 03:05:445 (1) - for slider (3) sliderend nah, i want slider art here
21. 03:13:245 - cool stream pattern but i notice something who can be minor problem for some players
22. 03:15:195 (7,8,1) - well this jump seems can be done if you make 03:15:345 (8,1) - distance more bigger than 03:15:195 (7,8) - you can do this pattern i think http://puu.sh/labi7/4022371311.jpg (it makes some distance more stable with 1/4 pattern jumping especially on high AR it can be clearly visible and nice to play) but not too much big ; )
23. 03:17:295 (1) - well i can say this slider should be on 03:17:145 - because at previous pattern you follow guitar melody with a 1/4 sliders (and maybe you can just change 03:17:145 (6,7) - to slider, yeah both are strong guitar melody so why not?)
24. 03:24:045 (1) - well this one is 1/6 , 03:24:345 (2) - this one is 1/4 snap,
25. 03:37:695 (2) - this slider so sad, well change it to 1/2 better and confident
26. 03:54:345 (3) - well same like i said before lol (if you decline my opinions just put some reason why you do this thing please okay? :3)
27. 04:05:145 (1,2,3,4,5) - i dont know how to fix this thing (04:05:595 (4) - maybe move this circle to 125|135 to make sure that circle clearly visible and make follow point on 04:05:595 (4,5,6) - more visible to do some jump flow on there)
28. 04:14:445 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - nah this pattern i want lol lol yea
29. 04:24:645 (1,2,3,4) - how about this? http://puu.sh/labJm/d620d7dc64.jpg (yeah im focusing the flow like this if i change that to circle http://puu.sh/labLn/0fb89e5e9f.jpg maybe you can know what i mean) the " 4 " yea i like it but less spacing and ctrl g on 3 and 4
30. 05:07:395 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - im just can say this guitar melody really intense and interesting for me maybe you can try this patterning http://puu.sh/labRo/b811be78b1.jpg
31. 05:12:045 (1) - you put slider whistle intentionally? if no you can remove it i think

hope this mod can helped you for some reference
see ya later & good luck!

1. 00:06:495 (5,1) - A stack feels quite inappropriate, a spacing would feel much better here
2. 00:21:045 (5,1) - Switch Nc please, to follow the downbeat. Also, the low spacing here feels soo awkward, because of the clap/NC
3. 00:33:945 (5,6,1) - Distance between (6,1) should be much higher then (5,6) There is no strong sound at (6), while there is at (1), so the spacing to that object should be higher
4. 01:11:295 (1,2) - This overlap doesn't look good, please space them apart
5. 01:14:145 (5,6,1) - Distance between (6,1) should be much higher then (5,6) There is no strong sound at (6), while there is at (1), so the spacing to that object should be higher
6. 01:24:045 (7,8,1) - ^^
7. 01:45:045 (3,1) - Blanket better
8. 02:20:895 (1) - It's really awkward for a stream to start on a red tick. Mekt his a 1/4 slider as well, and start the real stream at 02:21:045
9. 02:35:595 (5,6,7) - Feels quite awkward, as the triplet is like the only custom-stacked one so far, and feels weird. A normal stack would be more appropriate
10. 02:55:995 (3,4) - Why is here a jump? Better Ctrl G (2,3)
11. 03:14:294 (1,1) - Really weird NC'ing here. Please stick to downbeat only
12. 04:05:295 (2,4) - They kinda cover eachother, making it hard to read. As the first 3 objects are sliders, it would feel natural if the 4th is one too, while it's not, making people less possible to react to it. Move it somewhere else

Baraatje123 wrote:

Hi

[General]
All clear!

[Rednight]

1. 00:06:495 (5,1) - A stack feels quite inappropriate, a spacing would feel much better here
2. 00:21:045 (5,1) - Switch Nc please, to follow the downbeat. Also, the low spacing here feels soo awkward, because of the clap/NC
3. 00:33:945 (5,6,1) - Distance between (6,1) should be much higher then (5,6) There is no strong sound at (6), while there is at (1), so the spacing to that object should be higher
4. 01:11:295 (1,2) - This overlap doesn't look good, please space them apart
5. 01:14:145 (5,6,1) - Distance between (6,1) should be much higher then (5,6) There is no strong sound at (6), while there is at (1), so the spacing to that object should be higher
6. 01:24:045 (7,8,1) - ^^
7. 01:45:045 (3,1) - Blanket better
8. 02:20:895 (1) - It's really awkward for a stream to start on a red tick. Mekt his a 1/4 slider as well, and start the real stream at 02:21:045
9. 02:35:595 (5,6,7) - Feels quite awkward, as the triplet is like the only custom-stacked one so far, and feels weird. A normal stack would be more appropriate
10. 02:55:995 (3,4) - Why is here a jump? Better Ctrl G (2,3)
11. 03:14:294 (1,1) - Really weird NC'ing here. Please stick to downbeat only i removed from second circle but on first it's nice place to put NC even if isn't on downbeat streampart imo, i'll leave this
12. 04:05:295 (2,4) - They kinda cover eachother, making it hard to read. As the first 3 objects are sliders, it would feel natural if the 4th is one too, while it's not, making people less possible to react to it. Move it somewhere else

Good luck!

1. 00:19:545 (4,5) - How about making something to emphasize the strong notes? this could work for example: http://puu.sh/lbo8R/19da958faa.jpg
2. 00:24:945 (3) - Why did you start using whistles here? Seems pretty random.
3. 00:27:345 (3,4) - Stacking those both together on 3 would be nice. It works out pretty nicely with the rhythm and the flow (You'd need to reduce the spacing between 4 and 5 as well)
4. 00:30:345 (3,4) - Why? Cmon, you clearly hear the nice vocals with the fact that 00:30:645 (4) - is overmapped. You should use this: http://puu.sh/lboib/917dee6a96.jpg
5. 00:46:545 (3) - The stack on 00:46:245 (1) - is kinda boring and removes most of the emphasiztion the note has, try moving it to x362 y280, it's really nice there.
6. 00:51:945 (4,1) - Kinda misleading and doesn't look that well tbh. You should emphasize the strong vocal in some different way.
7. 01:14:295 (6) - CTRL+G creates a nice movement here.

Avishay wrote:

zzz zzzzzzzzzz

[Ayane is gud]

1. 00:19:545 (4,5) - How about making something to emphasize the strong notes? this could work for example: http://puu.sh/lbo8R/19da958faa.jpg
2. 00:24:945 (3) - Why did you start using whistles here? Seems pretty random. did something
3. 00:27:345 (3,4) - Stacking those both together on 3 would be nice. It works out pretty nicely with the rhythm and the flow (You'd need to reduce the spacing between 4 and 5 as well)
4. 00:30:345 (3,4) - Why? Cmon, you clearly hear the nice vocals with the fact that 00:30:645 (4) - is overmapped. You should use this: http://puu.sh/lboib/917dee6a96.jpg
5. 00:46:545 (3) - The stack on 00:46:245 (1) - is kinda boring and removes most of the emphasiztion the note has, try moving it to x362 y280, it's really nice there.
6. 00:51:945 (4,1) - Kinda misleading and doesn't look that well tbh. You should emphasize the strong vocal in some different way.
7. 01:14:295 (6) - CTRL+G creates a nice movement here.

Well I'm lazy to mod anymore lol, if my mod so far was helpful and you want me to mod everything else as well, shoot me a message.

Lasse wrote:

short m4m reply

those overlapped slider pattern in this song are really nice, well done \:D/

00:14:370 (8,1,2,3,4) - this felt so "clumped" together when I played it did smth
http://i.imgur.com/c8gAIgx.jpg more liek this maybe?

00:16:545 (2) - move up make a nice blanket and will also flow abit better that way no need to and i change this slider to straight
00:29:220 (2,3,4,5) - ctrl h on this shape would flow so muc hbetter from the slider, but I understand why you made it liek this so do whatever you want with it

00:33:945 (5) - align properly with stream before, looks much more polished that way

00:39:045 (1,3) - those make for an agle that looks really bad imo

00:40:245 (1) - ctrl j on this shape would look and flow better did smth other

01:03:795 (2,3,4) - spacing this like 01:03:195 (2,3,4) - would look better

01:07:845 (1,2,3) - bit weird flow http://i.imgur.com/eoqYgh0.jpg maybe more like thiis?

01:12:570 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - stacked 1/4, stacked 1/4, stacked 1/2 ? I think low spacing for the 1/2 would make this better to play

01:29:445 (1,2) - blanket could be better smth

01:53:895 (5) - moving right or blanketing with 4 would be better here

02:14:745 (3,4) - roatate 4 for better flow

02:32:295 (2,1) - idk about that one hmm

02:51:645 (1,2,3) - space evenly, this play so weird right now

03:31:245 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - this stream plays so much worse than the others :/
you executed the idea much better, for example here: 03:54:495 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - plays way better

04:48:645 (1,2,3) - still dont like it
04:54:045 (1,2,3) - ^

04:58:845 (1,2) - proper stack? i like this pattern tho
05:00:795 (5,6) - ^ move closer to make identical spacing as ^
both ways seem fine, but not stacking looks so weird if played with sliderends imo

map looks pretty polished already, good luck with it Thanks Lasse ~ fixed everything except comments :p

1. 00:04:845 (5) - this isn't should be NC because I can see other parts you do NC when next object is notes, so this should NC, just make sure you style is EDIT:consistency
2. 00:09:645 (5) - no stack in 00:09:045 (1) ?
3. 00:12:045 (3,4,5,6) - look unsymentric for me because the 4 amd 6 is near, 5 and 3 to far, so the 00:12:345 (5) - move place to x:468 y:256, just fixe symentric
4. 00:23:895 (4) - no blanket with 00:23:145 (6) - in end ? would be nice IMo
5. 00:25:845 (6,7,8,1) - wrong you style, put NC in 6 and remove nc in 1
6. 00:33:045 (5) - no NC ? look missing
7. 00:48:945 (2,3) - no blanket or is intentional ?
8. 00:56:895 (1,2,3) - look ok but the triangule look unsymentric, because 2 and3 is too near and 1 and 2 is too far, I feel the 3 need move x:268 y:144, or use you own, this triangule look unsymentric
9. 00:57:345 (1,2,3) - same ^
10. 01:07:845 (1) - the end point need move twice left to blanket
11. 01:28:395 (3) - Missing NC, the song is change
12. 01:49:245 (1,2,3,4,5) - weird follow song, the slider (1) in end don't have beat or instrumental, (2) and (5) don't have beat, ho well but this part is weird
13. 02:00:645 (4) - you missing NC because this song part is similiar in 00:33:645 (1), so this need NC, just you style need consistency
14. 02:43:995 (5,6,7) - triangule unsymentric, same explain before, why don't use symentric like this http://puu.sh/lfYpv/241955c7a4.jpg
15. 02:58:545 (1) - this should remove NC
16. 03:05:445 (1) - ^ same
17. 03:17:295 (1) - this should be remove nc right ? because I don't see other parts stream you do NC like 03:13:695 (6) - this you didn't and many more objects, so in 03:17:295 (1) - should be remove nc

Pereira006 wrote:

[Red Night]

Gameplay:

1. 00:04:845 (5) - this isn't should be NC because I can see other parts you do NC when next object is notes, so this should NC, just make sure you style is inconsistency
2. 00:09:645 (5) - no stack in 00:09:045 (1) ?
3. 00:12:045 (3,4,5,6) - look unsymentric for me because the 4 amd 6 is near, 5 and 3 to far, so the 00:12:345 (5) - move place to x:468 y:256, just fixe symentric
4. 00:23:895 (4) - no blanket with 00:23:145 (6) - in end ? would be nice IMo
5. 00:25:845 (6,7,8,1) - wrong you style, put NC in 6 and remove nc in 1
6. 00:33:045 (5) - no NC ? look missing
7. 00:48:945 (2,3) - no blanket or is intentional ? intentional and i want to have the "4" jump look
8. 00:56:895 (1,2,3) - look ok but the triangule look unsymentric, because 2 and3 is too near and 1 and 2 is too far, I feel the 3 need move x:268 y:144, or use you own, this triangule look unsymentric
9. 00:57:345 (1,2,3) - same ^
10. 01:07:845 (1) - the end point need move twice left to blanket
11. 01:28:395 (3) - Missing NC, the song is change
12. 01:49:245 (1,2,3,4,5) - weird follow song, the slider (1) in end don't have beat or instrumental, (2) and (5) don't have beat, ho well but this part is weird
13. 02:00:645 (4) - you missing NC because this song part is similiar in 00:33:645 (1), so this need NC, just you style need consistency
14. 02:43:995 (5,6,7) - triangule unsymentric, same explain before, why don't use symentric like this http://puu.sh/lfYpv/241955c7a4.jpg
15. 02:58:545 (1) - this should remove NC
16. 03:05:445 (1) - ^ same
17. 03:17:295 (1) - this should be remove nc right ? because I don't see other parts stream you do NC like 03:13:695 (6) - this you didn't and many more objects, so in 03:17:295 (1) - should be remove nc

[]
Look good, but when I see you style, there lot NC mssing and parts dfferents, the gameplay still need improve, I can see there lot unsymentric and weird spacing, but this mapset almost good, this just still need improve
Any question or you don't understand my english ask me I will explain better
good luck Thanks fixed all except comments :3

1. 00:05:445 (1,3) - This doesn't look all that good imo
2. 00:06:945 (2,3) - I'd recommend making these the same shape
3. 00:09:945 (8) - Looks kinda weird
4. 00:34:545 (2,3) - Make sure the distance betwen these and 00:32:295 (3,4) - is the same (blanket wise)
5. 00:37:845 (1) - Should be facing more towards 00:37:545 (5) - or the other way around imo
6. 00:48:345 (5,6,7,8) - I think this stream should be a bit more curved
7. 01:51:195 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - This stream could look way better
8. 01:56:745 (2,3) - This isn't blanketed perfectly
9. 02:15:345 (6,7,8,9) - Should be more curved again
10. 02:18:195 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Positioning changes of this looks very ugly
11. 02:41:895 (3,1) - These overlap a little bit, avoid it
12. 03:58:545 (3) - Looks kinda ugly
13. 04:40:395 (4,5) - Tripple is not stacked in a straight direction but in a slight curve which makes it look bad

Zectro wrote:

Hiya! m4m

[Red Night]

1. 00:05:445 (1,3) - This doesn't look all that good imo
2. 00:06:945 (2,3) - I'd recommend making these the same shape
3. 00:09:945 (8) - Looks kinda weird
4. 00:34:545 (2,3) - Make sure the distance betwen these and 00:32:295 (3,4) - is the same (blanket wise)
5. 00:37:845 (1) - Should be facing more towards 00:37:545 (5) - or the other way around imo nah, i prefer my version D:
6. 00:48:345 (5,6,7,8) - I think this stream should be a bit more curved
7. 01:51:195 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - This stream could look way better nope, it's pretty and i love it owo
8. 01:56:745 (2,3) - This isn't blanketed perfectly
9. 02:15:345 (6,7,8,9) - Should be more curved again
10. 02:18:195 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Positioning changes of this looks very ugly
11. 02:41:895 (3,1) - These overlap a little bit, avoid it
12. 03:58:545 (3) - Looks kinda ugly moved a bit to avoid overlap, but i like this slider tho
13. 04:40:395 (4,5) - Tripple is not stacked in a straight direction but in a slight curve which makes it look bad

Gameplay wise the map plays great, just need to work on the visual aspect and some little technichal things before it gets bubbled!
Good luck! o/

Kami-senpai wrote:

M4M pwease! I'm kinda new at modding so if anything I say is vague or whatever, I apologize in advance.

Here's my map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/366026

00:37:395 (4) - Note here seems a bit unnecessary when listening to the music. Probably better to be removed, then moving the slider a bit farther away. oh, nice catch, fixed

00:42:345 (8) - Very odd placement of circle. Was unpredictable when I played for the first time. fixed

00:52:395 (2,3) - These circles are a little superfluous. The song only has one note, both for vocals and instrumental, so maybe a slider would work better here. nope, i hear 2 circles

00:57:195 (3,3) - Pattern is also kind of weird. I might just be OCD as crap a neat freak, but I feel that these should be equally spaced as a triangle. i like this pattern tho D:

01:08:145 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The back and forth pattern seems kind of weird with a triple stream in the middle. stacked

01:17:295 (4) - Again, might be better with consistent distance snap 4<-5 snaping emphasised, no fixed

01:24:495 (2) - Might be better with a small slider that ends where the spinner begins right now. The vocal note starts right on the spinner, so the circle right before it seems out of place. em, no?

01:30:570 (5,1,2,3) - Mini streams don't go along with music here. i hear it pretty good dood

02:01:095 (4,5,1) - Might be better with replacing these with another short slider and then the new combo circle at the end. no need to imo

02:01:545 (2) - Should be an upbeat circle here to go along with the music. i think not

02:51:045 (1,2) - These sliders also are a bit out of place as they don't go along with music or instrumental. i hear it !

03:20:445 (1) - Feels as if this slider should be two separate circles instead of one slider. if i'll do, it'll be really awful to play

05:00:195 (2,3,4) - The music here is a long note, so either a long slider or just multiple jump circles would work better here. prefer current pattern

05:10:920 (1) - Maybe make spinner a little shorter so you can add one more circle in right before end slider to reflect ending cadence (the BA in the BA DUMMMM) no need to xD and spinner end on red sounds weird buddy

Very good map! The song was great and the style of your map matches it well. However, one suggestion that I would make would be to map a little more closely to the music. It seems that there a lot of extra circles and sliders that are there just to increase difficulty. Also, many jumps are very unpredictable and overlapped (which might not be a bad thing since it's an extra map). The shapes of sliders and stream patterns were fine with me and the kiai times seemed on point. Overall, this is a great map and although I'm still a little ways off from being able to fully play it, I would definitely love to see the finished product. Thanks for mod~~ I'll mod tomorrow. :3

neonat wrote:

Red Night

00:15:045 (1,2,3) - reduce this spacing to be more like the section it is in ok
00:24:645 (1,2,3) - this flow isn't so ideal because 00:24:945 (3) flows in the exact opposite direction as where you were heading, and it is in a curved semi-circle motion, shift the circle to be something like: mhh fixed

SPOILER

00:24:645 (1,4) - not stacked oups
00:29:445 (1,2,3) - ?.? odd spacing changed to 1.6x DS
00:44:745 (4) - have it more to the right of the slider or directly in line with its shape fixed
00:51:045 (1) - this section sounds like it slows down the pace slightly, could use a slowdown as well in sv no need to i think
01:03:045 (1,2,3,4,5) - the way 01:03:195 (2,3,4) is directed, or is positioned, these patterns don't really match, this part looks random i stacked 01:03:045 (2,3,4) -
01:06:495 (6,1,2) - why the decrease in spacing fixed
01:36:645 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - honestly, this part doesn't sound like a place to keep repeating the same pattern....you could use sliders of the same shape, but they shouldn't keep facing the exact same way... i changed this section
01:57:045 (3) - please blanket okay i hate blankets =w=
02:24:045 (1,2,3,1,2) - I don't really see this spacing and repeating pattern working out well here hmm, i'll think about it. ok fixed lel
04:05:145 - 04:11:895 - rhythm/pattern feels unnatural yea i change it
04:47:895 (1,2,3,4,1) - the basis of this spacing? it's okay imo

Spacing is weird, that affects the patterns too. Also do not really know why you use certain patterns like the repeating left right sections, or why triplets are spaced in a certain and facing some direction and how it relates to what comes before and after it. I think this map could still work on polishing things up.

Good Luck Thanks for mod~~

1. 00:15:045 (1,2) - the flow is abit weird here it should more or less lead upwards, but it doesn't. And the second note is actually not there so this would work with a pause (1/1 pause) or with a 1/2 slider.
2. 00:43:245 (1,2,3,4) - the spacing is not really appropriate here as it doesn't really emphasize anything in the song right now.
3. 01:41:295 (3) - ring a round the rosie flow means ctrl+g here.
4. 01:24:045 (7,8) - I don't know how you explain that spacing. it's kiai and stuff but it makes it kinda lol when gving normal 1/2 notes same spacing like you do with 1/4
5. 01:42:645 (3,4,5,6) - better visual spacing pls
6. 02:00:645 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - same problem like before. really hard to tell what you do here.
7. 02:09:645 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,1,2) - the song doesn't justify this huge of spacing at all.
8. 02:11:670 (5) - purposely bad stacking? if yes move it onto stack since you do it never again.
9. 02:20:745 (4,5) - this is less emphasized than this before even tho this is much more potent than the other one.
10. 02:32:745 (2) - move it a bit away.
11. 02:34:245 (5,6) - that stack is superfuckin random and breaks the flow very hard like a kick in the balls.
12. 02:51:495 (4,1) - uh 25% and listen theres no sound at the head at all the most potent sound is actually the red tick.
13. 02:52:845 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - that freakin stack caughts off guard lmao
14. 03:21:345 (6,7) - is this a blanket?
15. that section in particular feels very much like you trying to use as much 1/4 sliders as possible.
16. 03:43:845 (1,2,1,2) - unreasonable spacing.
17. 04:27:645 (1,2,3) - visual spacing.
18. 04:29:295 (3,4,6) - just looks very cramped.
19. 04:55:845 (1,2,3,4,1) - that flow, that spacing man.
20. 05:10:695 (4) - would actually be better with 1/4 slider like u did in the whole section.

Feb wrote:

little recheck. map improved alot from last time i saw it. but the ncing is really random troughout the map it feels like you put an nc on every downbeat which makes it kinda random when you make patterns clear with short combos. take notes when i say sth about a certain thing it might apply to other spots in the map as well. I think NC is not random lol? it's okay if NC is on every downbeat right?

1. 00:15:045 (1,2) - the flow is abit weird here it should more or less lead upwards, but it doesn't. And the second note is actually not there so this would work with a pause (1/1 pause) or with a 1/2 slider. i think not.
2. 00:43:245 (1,2,3,4) - the spacing is not really appropriate here as it doesn't really emphasize anything in the song right now. lower spacing a little
3. 01:41:295 (3) - ring a round the rosie flow means ctrl+g here.
4. 01:24:045 (7,8) - I don't know how you explain that spacing. it's kiai and stuff but it makes it kinda lol when gving normal 1/2 notes same spacing like you do with 1/4
5. 01:42:645 (3,4,5,6) - better visual spacing pls
6. 02:00:645 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - same problem like before. really hard to tell what you do here. same
7. 02:09:645 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,1,2) - the song doesn't justify this huge of spacing at all. ^
8. 02:11:670 (5) - purposely bad stacking? if yes move it onto stack since you do it never again.
9. 02:20:745 (4,5) - this is less emphasized than this before even tho this is much more potent than the other one.
10. 02:32:745 (2) - move it a bit away.
11. 02:34:245 (5,6) - that stack is superfuckin random and breaks the flow very hard like a kick in the balls.
12. 02:51:495 (4,1) - uh 25% and listen theres no sound at the head at all the most potent sound is actually the red tick. oh nice catch
13. 02:52:845 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - that freakin stack caughts off guard lmao i liek that D: and i think this emphasised sounds here imo
14. 03:21:345 (6,7) - is this a blanket?
15. that section in particular feels very much like you trying to use as much 1/4 sliders as possible. why not? i like 1/4 more than streams dood
16. 03:43:845 (1,2,1,2) - unreasonable spacing.
17. 04:27:645 (1,2,3) - visual spacing.
18. 04:29:295 (3,4,6) - just looks very cramped.
19. 04:55:845 (1,2,3,4,1) - that flow, that spacing man.
20. 05:10:695 (4) - would actually be better with 1/4 slider like u did in the whole section.

problem is most of the time the song isn't even that fast like your streams are (tbh i think the slider velocity is way to high). Good example why its sometimes weird spacing between your objects.
03:53:446 (4,5,6,1,2,3,1) - everything until the stream is pretty much cramped up not even high spacing at all, but here comes the kicker 1.1 freaking ds between the stream notes. holymotherfucking jesus thats just super awkward from very low spacing to highest-spaced stream in this map. welp. A tons of more 1/4 repeat sliders would make the map much more enjoyable. The map is very fast paced, but the song is not. Also i think the AR is to high, but that just might be me. nah SV is good for me. Ye i'll think about it. AR is perfect dood.

GL on ranking mate thanks~~ for recheck :3

monstrata wrote:

[Red Night]

00:04:245 (1,2,3,4) - Kinda odd you continue to use 0.80 SV for kick sliders. You can increase the SV imo.
00:15:045 (1,2) - Better to stack them, and have the jump from 2>3 instead of 1>2.
00:28:545 (2,3,4,5) - I would ctrl+g this rhythm. right now slider 5 is really awkward imo cuz its starting on a red tick, and ending when a stream is beginning xP.
00:39:945 (5,6) - Ctrl+G'ing them plays really well.
00:45:870 (5) - Sounds overmapped imo...
00:50:745 (5) - I would make this 2 circles instead of a slider, so players can hit a triplet on 00:50:895 - instead of slider-end >1/4 xP
00:51:945 (4,1) - Kinda expecting a jump here.
01:16:845 (1,2,3) - xPP This really doesn't play well imo because first of all the spacing is reduced from 1>2 kinda randomly, and the flow is very linear so its hard to snap.
01:17:145 (3,4) - Also, i wouldn't stack circles during jump sequences because it breaks momentum forcing players to freeze and wait on 3 to hit 4.
01:24:120 (8,9) - I don't hear 1/4's here xPP. How about making 7 a 1/2 slider instead?.
01:39:045 (1,2,3,4) - This rhythm works, but it's really simple and doesn't really reflect the drum beats very well here D:.

A rhythm i like to use.

01:40:545 (5,1) - These should be part of one NC, 01:40:845 (2,1) - Another NC set, 01:41:145 (2,3) - Another NC set. Right now you have the NC on a red tick which is weird.
02:16:545 (4,1) - Expecting a jump here too D:.
02:18:195 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - Weird rhythm choice here... feels really odd because you aren't really following anything... i mean the instruments are playing a particular triplet rhythm here which you arent following so idk :S
02:33:795 (2,3,4) - What i mentioned about linear flow... It plays really awkwardly here because yea, its weird to snap to these really obtuse angles. go for something sharper because those jumps are more enjoyable. 02:34:395 (6,7,8) - same here.
03:12:045 (1) - I would remove 1 repeat and add a circle on the white tick. at 03:12:345 -
04:30:945 (4,1) - No jump here? a jump here would fit better than 3>4 imo.
04:43:845 (5,6) - 1/2 slider fits better imo, since music is slowing down.
04:44:295 (1,1) - They aren't stacked perfectly.
04:50:745 (3,4) - This is unnecessarily confusing xP.
04:58:845 (1,2) - This is actually 1/3 snapping, not 1/4 stuff xP. (technically its 1/6 with that early triplet, but you might want to use repeat sliders)

Good luck!

1. 00:04:245 (1,2,3,4) - imo this rhythm will fit better
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:50:595 (4,5) - ctrl+g can more fit this part
3. 01:09:945 (5) - missing clap
4. 03:39:945 (4,5,1) - fix this stack
5. 04:29:745 (5) - why use soft clap here?

Rizia wrote:

maybe no kd

[Red Night]

1. 00:04:245 (1,2,3,4) - imo this rhythm will fit better
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:50:595 (4,5) - ctrl+g can more fit this part
3. 01:09:945 (5) - missing clap
4. 03:39:945 (4,5,1) - fix this stack
5. 04:29:745 (5) - why use soft clap here?

not too much thing to say
but i feel some placement need improve
mainly in the front
good luck

1. 00:00:645 (1,2,3,4) - 1 -> 2 should be jump like this part 00:01:695 (1,2,3,4,5) -
2. 00:04:845 (1,2,3,4,5) - the 1/4 sliders before this part is pretty high ds so maybe make this a moving stream?
3. 00:09:795 (6,7,8) - ctrl + j
4. 00:55:545 (2) - cant hear hitsound on this note aaaaa
5. 01:24:045 (6) - fix blanket with 01:24:495 (2) -

Deppyforce wrote:

xd

damn this song is good i know :3

[Red Night]

**I think the diff name ''Red Night'' doesnt fit with that background cuz its not night lol I think this is not a problem tho i like diff name tho:( and it's relative to this anime so i 'll leave it.

1. 00:00:645 (1,2,3,4) - 1 -> 2 should be jump like this part 00:01:695 (1,2,3,4,5) - nah i want to have like this.
2. 00:04:845 (1,2,3,4,5) - the 1/4 sliders before this part is pretty high ds so maybe make this a moving stream? i'm not sure about this. If someone say : change it - i will.
3. 00:09:795 (6,7,8) - ctrl + j ok
4. 00:55:545 (2) - cant hear hitsound on this note aaaaa aaaa fix
5. 01:24:045 (6) - fix blanket with 01:24:495 (2) - oh nice catch

short mod no kd is perfectly ok yas sir

gl :3 thanks ~

kalibe i wanna be ur friend plss ok owo

HB24 wrote:

Hi M4M ^^

[Red Night]
-00:04:245 (1,2,1,2,3,4) - pretty crazy spacing for 200 bpm...but i think its okay since i cleared it it's okay.
-00:06:045 (4) - more polish for better blanket: i try ;w;

Pic

-00:07:245 (3) - here too:

Pic

-00:08:295 (3,4,5) - failed at perfect triangle maybe..
-00:18:645 (1,2) - not exactly parallel
-00:27:045 (1,3) - blanket really off
-00:29:745 (3) - hmm this needs more polish:

Pic

-00:39:345 (3,6) - would prefer u blanket these
-00:47:895 (3,4) - blanket
-00:53:745 (1,2) - had a hard time reading this becuz of spacing nerfed a bit.
-01:32:745 (4,2) - really dont like this overlap ok fixed
-01:44:145 (5,1) - same here, its really unecessary i like this tho :<
-01:47:145 (2) - polish dem sliders:

Pic

-02:08:445 (1,2) - lots of blanket issues that i missed pls look for them and fix its really important (ill try to pint out as much as i can) aaa
-02:28:695 (1,2,3) - awh it looks bad here, try this: nope i like this slider looks dood :c

Pic

-02:35:445 (5,6,7) - hmm a little tricky here since here 02:34:845 (1,2,3) - they are stacked might lead to confusion why? It's nice to play imo. Maybe fixed idk ...
-02:36:045 (1) - ctrl+j? nope
-02:51:495 (1,3) - ugh, i think u can fix without me showing u an example i prefer my sliders buddy c:
-02:54:045 (1) - replace the first redpoint with a white one (yeah idk how they are called ;w;) anyway Pic: lol fixd

Pic

-02:55:245 - dont u wanna silence this note? mm ok
-03:06:045 (1,2) - very bad blanket look closely!! i try idk

-04:01:545 (2,1) - not a fan of these overlaps i love these.
-04:34:470 (6) - maybe add NC here since its an overlapped stream oh okay
-04:47:445 (4,1) - stack? oups

Well thats all, gud luck 0/ thanks for modd :3