Keada wrote:

Heey~ M4M from my queue :>
I looooooooove Demetori <3

• 
  

  General

1. Your map need some hitsounds D: cause the default ones is so boring .-. sooo I picked some for you http://puu.sh/hVUTC/8423a2f15d.rar
   hope you like them, and know how to use them
   Come poke me if you dont know how :3 aaand if you need help with the hitsounds, I can do it too ^-^ I love hitsounding Demetori <3 Alright nice i'm gonna need you then
2. OD8 should be fine in this map I think OD8.5 is fine too
3. Consider having capital letters on all new words in your diffname (nothing big but) so it should be Flower-Viewing Party :> Ok done :3

• 
  

  Flower-Viewing Party

1. 00:04:431 (1) - this loses flow a little bit Yep, changed but still trying to figure out how I could make this better
2. 00:29:116 (1) - sliderend isnt perfectly stacked but its like a millimeter or something so xD Alright fixed
3. 00:29:631 (2,4) - ctrl+g here? would be cool Yeah why not
4. 00:44:888 (3) - make this the other way for better flow + it plays better, can also blanket http://puu.sh/hVTzl/b0eaecaea0.jpg Changed
5. 01:20:031 (1,3) - not sure if intentional or not, but this isnt correctly stacked fixed
6. 01:22:431 (5) - could move this a little bit to the left so it doesnt overlap 01:21:745 (2) - or just take the slider a bit to the right cause its overlapped with 01:21:059 (6) - as well Moved the slider
7. 01:43:516 (1) - shouldnt and should be a note here, dont know but it isnt a beat here in the music. You could either do a slider over this big white tick or you can remove the note there and do it like you did here 02:39:574 (1,2) - would play pretty nice too I guess you're right, changed
8. 01:54:659 (5,6,7) - fix this pattern? to a triangle like this maybe? http://puu.sh/hVTXF/b1fdb69b34.jpg It's fine like that
9. 02:05:802 (7) - move a bit to the left to get a nicer triangle here 02:04:431 (2,3,7) - then you need to move the next slider too, but that shouldnt be a problem should it Alright changed
10. 02:26:202 (2) - stack? with 02:25:259 (4) - yep
11. 02:31:174 (8,1,2,3,4,5,6) - The patterns here doesnt really look so good D: try something like this: http://puu.sh/hVUdw/78afbe0fdb.jpg changed
12. 02:44:888 (8) - dont overlap with 02:43:945 (2) - I think it's okay, (2) is long gone and that would mess all my pattern for praticly nothing
13. 02:47:974 (2) - Move a bit down on this, its kinda close to the (7) Changed a bit
14. 03:04:088 (6,1,2,3) - Triangle alittle bit off Fixed
15. 03:29:888 - could fit with a note here, would fit the solo if you listen to the guitar I think it's fine, would fit but surely overmapped as well
16. 03:30:231 - same here ^ ^
17. 03:46:859 (1,2,4,6,7) - triangle a bit off again D:
18. 04:03:745 (5) - move a bit up to correct the triangle (I am upsessed with triangles DDDDD:) Fixed
19. 05:27:916 (7,8,1) - Triangle fixed
20. 05:33:059 (5,6) - Ctrl+G Changed

Pretty good map here, was hard to find much here D: oh well, Ill give you a star too <3 since Demetori is luv and this map seems so fun to play shame I cant play at night ;w;

1. 00:21:231 (1,2,3,4) - wth, really weird imo
2. 00:36:916 (4) - This note is not necessary
3. 00:57:402 (3,4,5) - change to one slider
4. 01:29:031 (4) - 01:29:716 (2) - 01:30:402 (6) - delete these notes :3
5. 01:35:888 (5) - This note is more necessary at 01:35:716 -
6. 04:14:288 (2) - delete
7. omg reduce some triplets please u.u

-Sh1n1- wrote:

[Flower-Viewing Party]

1. 00:21:231 (1,2,3,4) - wth, really weird imo Yeah but it doesn't play so bad so idk
2. 00:36:916 (4) - This note is not necessary Removed
3. 00:57:402 (3,4,5) - change to one slider I think it's fine, not changed
4. 01:29:031 (4) - 01:29:716 (2) - 01:30:402 (6) - delete these notes :3 Yep removed
5. 01:35:888 (5) - This note is more necessary at 01:35:716 - Changed
6. 04:14:288 (2) - delete got it lel
7. omg reduce some triplets please u.u yeah i'll see what i can do about that

Sorry for short mod but the most important thing that you should change on your map are your triplets D: Good Luck, hope to help you

• 
  00:17:802 (4) - ctrl G? i think it would fit very well with 00:17:288 (2) - for a sort of repeating jump pattern kind of flow. at the same time, the jump and angle to 00:18:145 (1) - isnt as strong so the (1) slider isnt emphasized as much as before, which i think would make it better since you didnt add a finish there like 00:16:774 (1) - 00:19:516 (1) - . so two birds with one stone ?
  SPOILER

  

1. 00:30:488 (5,1,2,3) - uhhh this is pretty hard to read mostly because its so clumpy there without a pattern that i can see and partially because the long reverse slider doesnt set up for such a drastic change into 1/4ths o-o buuuut thats not too important if its read well. soooo maybe you could move it out of that little spot like so?
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:37:859 (2) - hidden reverse arrow at the tail. almost certain this is unrankable o-o if you want to keep similar flow, maybe try something like this
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:43:688 (3,4,5,6,7) - mmm there really isnt a reason for these 1/8ths! theyre kinda way too crazy lol theres barely even 1/4ths here. not only that but starting at 00:43:859 - is a triplet so those beats are completely missed o-o consider using a rhythm like this?
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 02:55:345 (3,4) - imo this would play better if you ctrl G these two and then ctrl G them individually for smoother transitions according to the slider shapes. the (4) slider could also set up with the downward motion onto 02:56:031 (1) - . try it out!
   SPOILER

   
5. 03:04:259 (1,2) - this plays a bit awkwardly for me. try ctrl G for these two? the transition between 03:04:088 (6,1) - will have a sharper angle to break rotation and better emphasize 03:04:259 (1) - which is like the "start" of the new section of the dingdingding parts if you know what i mean LOL i think its a xylophone? anyways it would be similar to what you did so nicely at 03:02:202 (4,5) -. another thing is that i noticed youre trying to lead your sliders with the note before so you might want to move 03:04:431 (2) - too lol. ALL IN ALL!! try something like this and see if oyu like it heh
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 03:57:402 (3) - this part could be made to fit the music better. 03:56:888 (2,3) - these two notes play very similarly but its very different in the music. (3) is much more powerful, and the start of the new section in the new measure is at the reverse arrow or tail. consider this rhythm and placement instead?
   SPOILER

   
7. 04:01:859 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - i can play this map perfectly fine but i have a lot trouble reading this part if i dont remember the rhythm in the music. 100s everywhere orz. please consider adding NCs to 04:03:231 - 04:05:974 - so the different rhythms are at least sectioned in terms of NC o-o iiiiiim not sure if thatll completely fix it though because its stuck in my head now and i memorized it lol
8. 04:08:716 (3,4) - this only an opinion!: i think itd be better aesthetically if this was the mirrored pattern of 04:07:345 (1,2) - . of course this is just what i would prefer and if you dislike it, really, just forget this point lol. i just wanted to make sure this option was properly considered~ c:
   SPOILER

   
9. 04:58:945 (3,4,5,1) - this smooth flow of circles doesnt really sit well with me.. it feels a bit out of place o-o all the other circle patterns in this part of the music is mapped with this.. jumpy/edgy feel? if that makes any sense. and its great! it fits well in those parts! but this part plays very differently to me and is lacking. maybe consider a pattern like this instead
   SPOILER

   
10. 05:51:059 (1,2) - this kills the soul and spirit of players ;-; a bit out of the blue and harder to hit since its after a slider like that, especially at the end of the map to kill the FCs. i am guilty of trying this once in my map. i wish i could remove it lol
11. 01:05:802 (7) - NC for better representation of change in music and pattern?
12. 01:38:545 (4) - NC for clearer patterns?
13. 01:48:488 (4) - should remove NC here imo. notes are still part of the previous musical section with no change in rhythm
14. 02:10:774 (6) - this NC is highly based off preference. it doesnt matter too much but i would NC here for the slight change in music as it gets a bit more intense
15. 02:33:574 (1) - ^ same here
16. 02:37:516 (3) - NC? cuz this is the same rhythm as 01:20:716 - and that has an NC. soo uh one or the other please make these two consistent o3o
17. 02:42:316 (1,1,2,1,2,1,2) - errr these are a bit strange since the NCs are on red ticks and this poor guy 02:42:316 (1) - is just all alone. :c i know youre NCing off pattern but i think this still works, just a bit more cleanly
    SPOILER

    
18. 03:17:288 (7) - NC for clearer patterns?
19. 03:21:916 (1) - NC? you did a double measure NC here when the only ones i could find so far are from slow sections and this is very much not a slow section heh
20. 03:28:602 (1) - NC for clearer patterns?
21. 03:43:688 (3) - NC? im not sure why you switched into double measure NCs.. 2 measures after the section in the music starts lol its also not a slow parttt
22. 03:46:602 (4) - ^
23. 03:52:088 (4) - ^
24. 03:54:831 (5) - ^ and if youre worried about it b/c there arent enough notes in the combo, i would say NC consistency is more important o-o
25. 03:57:574 - ^ just gave the time stamp in case you did the change mentioned up there somewhere o3o
26. 04:31:859 (6,1) - swap NC? this is where the pattern and measure sorta starts
27. 04:33:745 (1,2) - swap NC? 04:33:745 (1) - still feels like its part of the previous section in the music
28. 04:39:574 (3) - remove NC? this one doesnt seem too important as it isnt much of a jump pattern by 2s. you also havent done these kinds of NCs in previous choruses... i dont think o-o
29. 04:54:659 (1) - i would personally NC this for the increasing intensity but thats just me! this suggestion pretty much doesnt matter at all! l0l
30. 04:56:031 (1) - NC to mark kind of a sudden SV change?
31. 05:04:431 (1) - remove NC? again, this isnt much of a jump pattern thing and its a bit inconsistent with the previous parts of this section of music
32. 05:18:659 - mmmm from this point onwards i would follow a regular 1 NC per measure pattern only o-o since you havent done any special NCs for patterns like this on the similar section of music in the beginning if ya know what i meannn.. and there isnt anything special in the music either :/ your NCs here are kinda all over the place with NCs for 2 note patterns 05:04:431 - .. like once in the whole section orrrr double measure NCs 05:28:259 - ,,,,,,, aaaa
33. 00:21:059 - clap?
34. 03:53:288 - are you sure you want to map over the clap here? its the only missed clap you have.. maybe a 1/2 slider and a note added at 03:53:459 - would be better

HaloMaster96 wrote:

I only have one problem, my opinion.
00:43:688 (3,4,5,6,7) - I feel this is a area people may easily break combo, cus sum might misread it. Either add some slower type sliders, or somthing that aswell flows to the map. Just my opinion. and gl!

Kihhou wrote:

I tend to give object placement options for almost everything so you can ignore them, do a variation of them, or copy them exactly as is, but please consider my points regardless of placement suggestions o3o

[Flower-Viewing Party]

• 
  00:17:802 (4) - ctrl G? i think it would fit very well with 00:17:288 (2) - for a sort of repeating jump pattern kind of flow. at the same time, the jump and angle to 00:18:145 (1) - isnt as strong so the (1) slider isnt emphasized as much as before, which i think would make it better since you didnt add a finish there like 00:16:774 (1) - 00:19:516 (1) - . so two birds with one stone ? Good point, changed

1. 00:30:488 (5,1,2,3) - uhhh this is pretty hard to read mostly because its so clumpy there without a pattern that i can see and partially because the long reverse slider doesnt set up for such a drastic change into 1/4ths o-o buuuut thats not too important if its read well. soooo maybe you could move it out of that little spot like so? This is actually a part that I knew didn't played well but had no real idea why, your suggestion seems good so I'm changing this into something along those lines
2. 00:37:859 (2) - hidden reverse arrow at the tail. almost certain this is unrankable o-o if you want to keep similar flow, maybe try something like this
   rip, changed in another way tho
3. 00:43:688 (3,4,5,6,7) - mmm there really isnt a reason for these 1/8ths! theyre kinda way too crazy lol theres barely even 1/4ths here. not only that but starting at 00:43:859 - is a triplet so those beats are completely missed o-o consider using a rhythm like this?
   After very carefully re-listening you're right, dam i got tricked. welp rip this too then, i liked it tho, im changing it into something like you suggested
4. 02:55:345 (3,4) - imo this would play better if you ctrl G these two and then ctrl G them individually for smoother transitions according to the slider shapes. the (4) slider could also set up with the downward motion onto 02:56:031 (1) - . try it out! it does indeed play better, changed
5. 03:04:259 (1,2) - this plays a bit awkwardly for me. try ctrl G for these two? the transition between 03:04:088 (6,1) - will have a sharper angle to break rotation and better emphasize 03:04:259 (1) - which is like the "start" of the new section of the dingdingding parts if you know what i mean LOL i think its a xylophone? anyways it would be similar to what you did so nicely at 03:02:202 (4,5) -. another thing is that i noticed youre trying to lead your sliders with the note before so you might want to move 03:04:431 (2) - too lol. ALL IN ALL!! try something like this and see if oyu like it heh
   Lel I actually came up with the same thing when trying to work out a solution for this problem without breaking what I had in mind, changed
6. 03:57:402 (3) - this part could be made to fit the music better. 03:56:888 (2,3) - these two notes play very similarly but its very different in the music. (3) is much more powerful, and the start of the new section in the new measure is at the reverse arrow or tail. consider this rhythm and placement instead? true, i wasn't totally satisfied with this so changed
7. 04:01:859 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - i can play this map perfectly fine but i have a lot trouble reading this part if i dont remember the rhythm in the music. 100s everywhere orz. please consider adding NCs to 04:03:231 - 04:05:974 - so the different rhythms are at least sectioned in terms of NC o-o iiiiiim not sure if thatll completely fix it though because its stuck in my head now and i memorized it lol heh I see I just applied some NCs
8. 04:08:716 (3,4) - this only an opinion!: i think itd be better aesthetically if this was the mirrored pattern of 04:07:345 (1,2) - . of course this is just what i would prefer and if you dislike it, really, just forget this point lol. i just wanted to make sure this option was properly considered~ c: good suggestion, changed
9. 04:58:945 (3,4,5,1) - this smooth flow of circles doesnt really sit well with me.. it feels a bit out of place o-o all the other circle patterns in this part of the music is mapped with this.. jumpy/edgy feel? if that makes any sense. and its great! it fits well in those parts! but this part plays very differently to me and is lacking. maybe consider a pattern like this instead I actually just ctrl+g (4) and (5)
10. 05:51:059 (1,2) - this kills the soul and spirit of players ;-; a bit out of the blue and harder to hit since its after a slider like that, especially at the end of the map to kill the FCs. i am guilty of trying this once in my map. i wish i could remove it lol it actually was a repeat slider before so people could at least not completely drop the combo but people suggested me doing a whole triplet, I think this is a good compromise and I like it. I'm keeping it for now but if people keep wanting me dead for this i'll consider removing it or at least keep a repeating slider
11. 01:05:802 (7) - NC for better representation of change in music and pattern? Actually I changed the last three notes into kick + circle with jumps to better emphasize the guitar begining to play, I'm not adding NC tho
12. 01:38:545 (4) - NC for clearer patterns? Added here
13. 01:48:488 (4) - should remove NC here imo. notes are still part of the previous musical section with no change in rhythm Oh ye indeed, removed
14. 02:10:774 (6) - this NC is highly based off preference. it doesnt matter too much but i would NC here for the slight change in music as it gets a bit more intense I guess it'd help players pay more attention to them and the fact that they're not 1/4 too, so added
15. 02:33:574 (1) - ^ same here Not added here tho
16. 02:37:516 (3) - NC? cuz this is the same rhythm as 01:20:716 - and that has an NC. soo uh one or the other please make these two consistent o3o oh yea added
17. 02:42:316 (1,1,2,1,2,1,2) - errr these are a bit strange since the NCs are on red ticks and this poor guy 02:42:316 (1) - is just all alone. :c i know youre NCing off pattern but i think this still works, just a bit more cleanly this is the only pattern that has a circle here because of the finish, I wanted to point this out so that's why there's a NC alone here, not changed
18. 03:17:288 (7) - NC for clearer patterns? added
19. 03:21:916 (1) - NC? you did a double measure NC here when the only ones i could find so far are from slow sections and this is very much not a slow section heh added
20. 03:28:602 (1) - NC for clearer patterns? I think it's fine, not added
21. 03:43:688 (3) - NC? im not sure why you switched into double measure NCs.. 2 measures after the section in the music starts lol its also not a slow parttt changed like earlier
22. 03:46:602 (4) - ^ ^
23. 03:52:088 (4) - ^ ^
24. 03:54:831 (5) - ^ and if youre worried about it b/c there arent enough notes in the combo, i would say NC consistency is more important o-o ^
25. 03:57:574 - ^ just gave the time stamp in case you did the change mentioned up there somewhere o3o ^
26. 04:31:859 (6,1) - swap NC? this is where the pattern and measure sorta starts yep indeed changed
27. 04:33:745 (1,2) - swap NC? 04:33:745 (1) - still feels like its part of the previous section in the music changed
28. 04:39:574 (3) - remove NC? this one doesnt seem too important as it isnt much of a jump pattern by 2s. you also havent done these kinds of NCs in previous choruses... i dont think o-o
29. 04:54:659 (1) - i would personally NC this for the increasing intensity but thats just me! this suggestion pretty much doesnt matter at all! l0l
30. 04:56:031 (1) - NC to mark kind of a sudden SV change?
31. 05:04:431 (1) - remove NC? again, this isnt much of a jump pattern thing and its a bit inconsistent with the previous parts of this section of music I wanted to emphasize the "one-two one two" feel of this part, if that makes any sense
32. 05:18:659 - mmmm from this point onwards i would follow a regular 1 NC per measure pattern only o-o since you havent done any special NCs for patterns like this on the similar section of music in the beginning if ya know what i meannn.. and there isnt anything special in the music either :/ your NCs here are kinda all over the place with NCs for 2 note patterns 05:04:431 - .. like once in the whole section orrrr double measure NCs 05:28:259 - ,,,,,,, aaaa aaaa indeed, idk what to do, part of me agree but I want to keep it like that
33. 00:21:059 - clap? I'll see this with Keada later
34. 03:53:288 - are you sure you want to map over the clap here? its the only missed clap you have.. maybe a 1/2 slider and a note added at 03:53:459 - would be better EDIT: i cant read >< alright changed this

and thats all! c: umm.. overall, it was a really fun map to play! really cool! thanks :3

imo, it just needs some cleaning up, not only NCs but also some notes that are half touching sliders. like baaaaarely touching em but still touching like 01:13:516 (2,3) - . it seems kinda messy like that but its not too important right now and i didnt want to fill up the mod post with "EY MOVE THIS 2 CM!" lel okay imma tracking em now

this map is popular in the strawberry mousse lol ok bye! oo nice : D thanks o/

Alheak wrote:

HaloMaster96 wrote:

I only have one problem, my opinion.
00:43:688 (3,4,5,6,7) - I feel this is a area people may easily break combo, cus sum might misread it. Either add some slower type sliders, or somthing that aswell flows to the map. Just my opinion. and gl!

Thanks for the feedback, this sure is a little tricky to read but it plays nicely if done right. Just play it like a regular 5-notes stream.

In my opinion, flow-wise it's good so unless you have a counter-argument for that I'm not changing this part.

HaloMaster96 wrote:

Yet you said you werent gonna chaange it but you change to to a revers slider -_-, I don't really have a counter arg to what you said, like I said opinion, but I feel if it wasnt like the 5 slider pattern it would be just as easy to flow if there was a stream, and plus with those tricky sliders, come very easy slider break's.

jonathanlfj wrote:

[General]
I recommend you use the mp3 and timing in my map, since the original song is know to have some weird timing issues at rather random places. It seemed fine, but I'll trust you

[Flower-Viewing Party]
00:20:888 (5,1) - bring these a bit closer, the distance threw me off since this is the first occurrence alright
00:29:631 (2,3) - no partial stack here? indeed, changed
00:55:174 - perhaps a circle or a triplet starting here to complement the guitars I agree it feels like something is lacking here, but I just made the slider repeat instead
01:05:973 (8,9) - ctrl+g flows better imo yep
01:08:545 (1) - the correctly way to NC here in conjunction with the music would be this:

SPOILER

changed
01:14:716 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - NC group these in 3s (123 123) I prefer it this way
01:19:516 (1) - NC pattern:

SPOILER

changed
01:27:488 (3,4) - should be 1/6 snap indeed
01:27:745 (1,1) - use the same combo for this I guess that only one NC is enoguh to mark the change in rhythm, but I think this would be more fun in tag coop this way
01:49:516 (1,1,1) - same here ^
02:06:316 - add a slider here to connect the two sections better, the pause feels really awkward to play changed in another way
02:22:431 (1,1,1) - one combo ^
02:33:745 (9) - try a 1/4 slider here (do bring it closer so the next pattern is not difficult to aim) ok i like the idea and i think i did something interesting here
02:36:316 (1) - NC restructure:

SPOILER

changed
02:42:316 (1) - ^

SPOILER

^
02:48:488 (4) - NC to keep consistency with the previous sections alright
02:53:459 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - group these in 3s wanna keep this
03:18:316 (1,2,3) - there is not enough momentum in the patterns themselves which is making the flow really jagged, try increased the spacing within each triplet:

SPOILER

changed
03:37:688 (1) - finish added
04:07:345 (1) - change the default sample to soft and use drum additions in this section, this way you don't get the unfitting drum ticks on the sliders changed in another way since that would add soft hitsounds
04:10:088 (3) - NC added
04:12:316 (2) - NC here and remove NC on 04:12:574 (1) Added but instead of removing the other I'll leave it for the same reasons as earlier
04:32:716 (8,9,1) - this part plays really confusing, the 1/2 gap has a shorter spacing than the 1/4 gap...you might want to reposition this somewhere else good point, changed
04:39:231 (1) - remove NC here and the one just after as well
05:03:059 (4,5,1) - quite a random anti jump if you ask me, use normal spaced jump here would fit the music better changed
05:04:774 (1) - remove NC and place it on 05:04:945 (2) changed
05:07:516 (8) - remove the clap, doesnt fit the music here woops
05:15:916 (1) - not sure why you used a stream here, the 1/4 don't appear until 05:16:430 (7) which is ideally where you should start it isn't the guitar 1/4 here? Im ready to change this if it isn't, but right now i think it's fine
05:51:059 (1,2) - give this a little more spacing, i overshot the last circle due to the speed of my spin xD alright just a bit

the map is pretty nicely done, but the NC is a little random at times, so get a few more mods and call me back after

neonat wrote:

Flower-Viewing Party

00:21:422 (2,3,1,2) - flip? For more emphasis there I don't think it needs more emphasis, plus it'll be a bit awkward to play

SPOILER

00:30:508 (5,1) - don't know why you stack these when the rest either jump or at least still spaced away with this same tune Yeah this was a bit awkward to play, changed
00:39:936 (5,1) - ^ and whistle on start of 00:40:108 (1) This is fine here tho, but added the whistle
02:39:594 (1,2) - have them stacked instead? changed
05:15:936 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - use 1/2 beats till 05:16:279 instead? That's how the guitar feels imo For me the guitar feels more like 1/4, I guess I could do kick sliders instead but this just plays fine

• 
  
  delete osbbb

1. 00:14:222 (1,2) - ctrl+g them for placement, flows better imo
2. 00:31:536 (5,6) - theres nothing on the taillsss, im against that
3. 00:32:908 (3,4) - 4 is strong enough to emphasize it with moar spacing, the stack kills it
4. 01:13:536 (2,3) - i dont like how this flows but meh
5. 01:32:736 (2,3) - i dont like this kind of stacks
6. 01:49:365 - y u ignored this, it even has a cymbal sound so pls
7. 02:39:936 (2,3) - u know, also the overlap makes it worst
8. 03:01:536 (1) - 03:16:279 (6) - dude thats c00L
9. 03:16:879 - add notee
10. 03:17:222 (6) - pls delete
11. 03:20:651 (4,1) - slider > circle 1/4 jumps are fine but circle > slider are awkward to play, isnt even too spaced idk why i pointed out this
12. 03:27:165 - add circlesss
13. 03:28:194 - u were following the guitar in the prev section so its better if u do it here too aka add circle
14. 03:37:365 - ^ same, theres a guitar sound here, also it helps to not leave that 3/4 gap which can cause a miss cuz spacing doesnt help too much to distinguish it
15. 03:50:136 (3,6) - those are overmapped
16. 05:05:308 (2,3,4,5) - the tailsss, y u do this
17. 05:36:508 (5) - wheres the nc
18. 05:40:708 (1,1) - make this one so players can get happy30'd

pkhg wrote:

i clicked that ^

[General]

• 
  
  delete osbbb fukken osb

1. 00:14:222 (1,2) - ctrl+g them for placement, flows better imo yep
2. 00:31:536 (5,6) - theres nothing on the taillsss, im against that it's debatable, i think the guitar kinda suggests those kick sliders, so i'll keep them for now
3. 00:32:908 (3,4) - 4 is strong enough to emphasize it with moar spacing, the stack kills it changed
4. 01:13:536 (2,3) - i dont like how this flows but meh changed this part a bit
5. 01:32:736 (2,3) - i dont like this kind of stacks i feel you but when read correctly it plays pretty well
6. 01:49:365 - y u ignored this, it even has a cymbal sound so pls wow tru
7. 02:39:936 (2,3) - u know, also the overlap makes it worst yes
8. 03:01:536 (1) - 03:16:279 (6) - dude thats c00L thx
9. 03:16:879 - add notee yes
10. 03:17:222 (6) - pls delete dam you have good ears
11. 03:20:651 (4,1) - slider > circle 1/4 jumps are fine but circle > slider are awkward to play, isnt even too spaced idk why i pointed out this redone this part since nobody liked it (not even me)
12. 03:27:165 - add circlesss yes
13. 03:28:194 - u were following the guitar in the prev section so its better if u do it here too aka add circle tru
14. 03:37:365 - ^ same, theres a guitar sound here, also it helps to not leave that 3/4 gap which can cause a miss cuz spacing doesnt help too much to distinguish it changed this part
15. 03:50:136 (3,6) - those are overmapped ill admit those drum beats are kinda thuds but they're here
16. 05:05:308 (2,3,4,5) - the tailsss, y u do this same as earlier, they're strongly suggested imo
17. 05:36:508 (5) - wheres the nc it escaped but i caught it
18. 05:40:708 (1,1) - make this one so players can get happy30'd no please not again

gl

jonathanlfj wrote:

just a small recheck no kd

[100%]
00:55:022 (6) - try two 1/4 sliders here wouldn't that be a bit overmapped? I do hear the guitar slide here but that doesn't seem enough to justify it, though the idea is great. i checked your map to see what has been done there and there was a stream, so I guess if yours got ranked with it that should be fine
01:27:508 (3,1) - way too much spacing here, people will get 100 on the slider changed
02:42:336 (1,1,2,3) - combo group these into 2s, the random single NC feels really awkward changed
03:37:194 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - these are really hard to grasp rhythm wise, so you should shrink the distance a bit to make it easier aim wise changed
04:39:765 (5) - silence the end done
05:15:936 (1) - the stream felt a little random, there are no constant 1/4s in the background I do agree that it feels a bit random, but the 1/4's are there (guitar shreds), changed for something more appropriate
05:51:079 (1,2) - could use a little more spacing to emphasize the halt in music I was reluctant at first since it's already tricky that those objects are placed just after the last spinner at the end of the song, but with slider leniency i think it should be okay

let me know afterwards