wow i love people who reply mods and yes its much better now good luck with rankmaxandcheese wrote:
Thank you for this wonderful, wonderful mod. It was very good as a non-experienced modder. Best case-scenario, your map will get modded tomorrow. If not, it will definetly be posted on Friday. Thank you again! o/shadow_neko wrote:
Hi from your modding queue m4m ) (im not an experienced modder btw) Neither Am I. Only 6 mods so far.
00:38:611 (1) - this looks nicer no? -> http://prntscr.com/8iati0 Completely agree. Changed.
00:48:178 (1) - this slider shape is weird but maybe its just me Looked like an ass. Fixed.
00:49:800 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - this part is very compact and shaped very weirdly do change it (readability affected) Fixed.
01:00:826 (5,6) - doesnt flow along well? Fixed.
01:02:610 (1,2,3) - pls space this properly and why not straighten it It's spaced out correctly and looks fine to me.
01:03:097 (1,2,3) - straighten this too? things look neater as well ^
01:06:178 (9,10) - the space between here is quite misleading people might intuitively think its a half beat tap rather than stream
01:06:989 (1,2) - ^
01:07:638 (1,2) - ^(ok maybe its just me but of coz its up to you since youre the mapper and im just giving opinions ) Yeah, I don't see any problems here. No change.
01:08:773 (3) - slider shape Fixed.
01:14:935 (8,9) - i feel that changing their order like as in putting the 9 before the 8 and then ctrl+g both of them flows better Yep. Changed.
01:15:583 (1,2) - the spacing problem as well Fixed
01:16:556 (6,7) - ^ A little closer.
01:19:151 (5,1) - ^ Seems fine.
01:19:962 (1,2) - ^ ^
01:20:610 (5,6) - ^ A little closer.
01:21:016 (6,7,8,9,10,1) - im not sure whether u can map that low the screen :/ Moved a little higher in conjunction with your last point.
01:23:205 (6,7) - spacing Moved a little closer.
01:26:448 (9,10,1,2,3) - the flow here is bad Stream stacked and (2) moved.
01:29:854 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - messy jumps Fixed
01:40:475 (2,3) - why place it like that? why not flow with the slider
01:40:719 (4,5,6,7,8) - compact and hard to read but i guess thats barely acceptably compact but the flow?? maybe can make the slider point towards the next hit Slider pointing towards the stream.
01:43:070 (2,3) - why place it like that?
01:43:962 (9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - messy i feel Fixed
01:46:962 (2,3) - ok at this point i kind of get why u place it like that but its really messy to look at especially when its used a few times in the map? why not place it sth like this http://prntscr.com/8ib0jc (i guess ill stop talking about this problem now coz its really up to you) Yeah, I place it like this because I want it to lead towards the next note, but it song doesn't sound like it has the justification to space it.
01:49:800 (4) - overmapped coz theres only 1/4 beats in the song Fixed
01:56:043 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - really hard to read if youre gonna do this do space it out more so its easier to read and the last 3 taps doesnt even follow the flow?? Fixed
02:00:259 (2,1) - its like theres a stop in the streams pls space accordingly to the streams
02:01:313 (3,4) - this is really quite unacceptable (and ill stop talking about spacing too) I feel like this works here fine because of the intensity of the song. But I did make them all spaced by two.
02:08:448 (1) - why nc Good question.
02:10:313 (2,3,4,5) - bad flow from previous slider Feels Fine.
02:12:827 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - ?? inconsistent pattern Fixed
02:18:502 (6,7,8,9) - misleading and inconsistent spacing Square now.
02:37:475 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - weird flow and shape Fixed, hopefully.
02:38:610 (1) - slider shape Fixed a little.
02:54:665 (4) - while i feel its overmapped at the same time i seem to be picking sth up from the music but idk i tried very hard to listen but i still cant be sure(do confirm with other modders) I think I'm correct with this one. No change.
03:08:286 (1) - ???? slider shape Fixed.
03:13:638 (1,1,1) - spacing really misleading (what i suggest is spacing the 1 beat taps while u jump the 1/2 beats
03:16:232 (1,1) - ^ because that way at least theres a consistent patter behind
03:16:719 (1,1) - ^
03:18:827 (1,1) - ^
03:19:313 (1,1) - ^
03:19:475 (1) - why not just http://prntscr.com/8ib61u
03:20:286 (1,1) - spacing(kk i wont talk about it anymore im sure u can sieve it out yourself if you decide to change coz it seems youre using it a lot) No change for any of those. I don't see a problem.
03:31:962 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - one thing is the jump streams but i guess its acceptable but more imptly the sliders are overlapping so why not space it out a little? btw nice flow No change. Thank You
03:34:070 (1) - see this is a nice slider Thank you!
03:47:043 (4) - dont stack it directly under space a little Spaced 0.2 Kappa.
03:47:692 (6) - ^ ^
03:56:448 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - oh hey the flow here is quite fun Thanks!
04:02:935 (1) - pls fix especially the bottom part where theres some awkward contours Will wait for other mods opinions.
04:05:448 (12,1,2) - ?? flow??? Fixed the entire stream hopefully.
04:14:205 (3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1) - wow im not sure whether this is rankable but hey i like it Thanks again! Let's hope this slips by BNs.
04:19:583 (6,7) - misleading since its spaced out so much while your previous non stream jumps are equally spaced ?? I see no problem with this.
04:48:664 (1,2) - spacing but wow this kiai section was done very well Stacked and spaced by two and thank you!
04:49:637 (1,2) - ^ ^
04:49:961 (3,4) - ^ oh yes i wont talk about it anymore but im sorry i had to point it out coz these are really the things that forced the difficulty out ^
05:02:934 (5,6) - im sorry but... ^ this is really misleading I think it's fine.
05:14:529 (2) - dont place directly under Spaced by 0.2 Kappa.
05:19:718 (5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - ok this has to be fixed very unreadable LOL I fixed this in the last mod. I got so lazy.
05:34:394 (2,1) - nice move but not blanketed well Hopefully fixed now.
05:39:745 (5,6) - nvm might as well point it out since im finishing :< spacing Moved closer.
05:45:259 (1,2) - ^ you know this wouldnt be a problem if it isnt this far apart so if you insist on doing this pls reduce the gap I think it fits the intensity of this segment.
05:50:448 (1,2) - ok the flow is good and all and its barely acceptable i guess its ok but if you wanna improve it make it closer ^
05:53:042 (1) - ooh cool slider :D
05:55:637 (1) - ok i guess its fun and all the make it this way but lik its misleading coz the previous one wasnt even this far and the sudden increment in spacing might lead players to think its a tap one beat apart? Moved a little closer.general comments and thoughts-overall its quite messy
-do check on slider shapes, spacing and flow Will do.
-there are some nice sliders so maybe u should try to keep up the good work?? (for eg 02:44:935 (1) ) looks really smooth and neat :D
-some of the spacing leads me to think the difficulty was quite forced? to prevent this you should just map however u deem fit and whatever difficulty the map is at the end of it so be it since yours is a 5 minute map requiring only 1 difficulty so you dont have to control the difficulty. Like some of the spaced streams are overused and forced Yeah. I kinda speed mapped half of this song on Friday.
-there are some nice flows too like the alternating direction short sliders so do follow Ok
-oh btw the difficulty name hmmmm sunken???? idk coz like the song title is sinking and like the past tense of sinking Why are names so difficult to create? D:
-and of coz pls feel free to disagree with me because most of it is just my opinion other than overmapping and unreadability which is unrankable
-ps it seems you know of other people mapping this same song pst you can refer to theirs :D::D:D and i noticed one of them actually does have streams places apart from sliders but you know whats the difference? theirs is consistent throughout the song and they make it such that its need so ya if you really wanna do the same ensure the consistency and neatness(pm me in game if you wanna know which map im referring to so you can reference ))
btw about the spacing at 01:02:610 (1,2,3) it indeed isnt spaced properly coz by spaced properly it means the 'x-value' shown at the top right hand corner should not exceed 0.05 difference. as you can see here http://prntscr.com/8id46s your 01:02:773 (2) has a difference of 0.09x between the previous note's distance and the next note's.just adjust it to be less than a 0.05x difference unless it was meant to be a jump where you can then disregard spacing which i dont think it was meant to be then ignore this ))