You are wrong, OP. This doesn't not not bother me.
Because farming in general is toxic. Encouraging players to play maps that contain 6 minutes of 5* difficulty sections and 2 minutes of 8* difficulty sections over and over again is worse than encouraging players to play maps that are 1 minute long with 45 seconds of 7.5* difficulty sections and 15 seconds of 6* difficulty sections.Khelly wrote:
Why is rewarding high consistency even worse? How is people who can do certain fcs retrying for hours on an 8 minute long map not worthy but it's okay for shorter maps?chainpullz wrote:
No, I don't think players should be rewarded more for farming 8 minute long maps outside of the already given long map bonus. Farming maps like that is even worse than farming 2 minute DT maps.
Well that's how it works. The problem is that such a system ends up underrating small circle sizes, so on top of that Tom added an extra aim pp bonus for maps with a circle size above 6 (I think.) Imo that was the right choice. All it needs is the right tweaking.Redon wrote:
Shouldn't pp for small circles automatically result from the ratio between (jump) distance and hitcircle radius? I think realistically if you were to take a map, scale it down to 50% and reduce the hitcircle size by half, the pp gain should be exactly the same.uberpancake wrote:
Well that nerf wasn't directed at xilver's ice angel score. It was simply some rebalancing around small circles that was supposed to be done months ago but accidentally didn't go through.
AR10,whatever 7,9* FC not better than AR10 6,7*Sylveon wrote:
I'm not saying the PP is broken, I'm saying that if you are going to nerf 600pp scores then treat all mods with the same value. I don't believe Hvicks play to be better than Xilvers in the slightest. Yet Xilver gets nerfed severely? Do you think Hvicks play is better than Xilvers and deserves 665pp vs 592?
I dont, 1-2* easy/normals full mod gives still similar pp to ar8-9 3.5-4* insane maps and require zero or even negative skill to play.Endaris wrote:
I believe in Tom.
ewwwwwww its the shittier version of doomsday.... get off my postTasty Beverage wrote:
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDSylveon wrote:
I'm not saying the PP is broken, I'm saying that if you are going to nerf 600pp scores then treat all mods with the same value. I don't believe Hvicks play to be better than Xilvers in the slightest. Yet Xilver gets nerfed severely? Do you think Hvicks play is better than Xilvers and deserves 665pp vs 592?
Hey, this post was never about me :3Momiji wrote:
nice acc lol
.
Half my playcount, 340 times my rankSylveon wrote:
ewwwwwww its the shittier version of doomsday.... get off my post
It's banter.Momiji wrote:
i think he was only semi-serious at most :^OTasty Beverage wrote:
ahh.... hit a light nerve with you did I? I'm sorry that the truth hurts D:Tasty Beverage wrote:
Half my playcount, 340 times my rankSylveon wrote:
ewwwwwww its the shittier version of doomsday.... get off my post
Keep trying buddy maybe you'll break 10k one day.
It's ironic that you think my skill level means I'm less entitled to post because your rank tells me you haven't got a fucking clue about this game, so you should leave judgements on the pp system to people who know what they're talking about.
I'm assuming you meant if his current play were converted from od 9.67 to 10.3Mahogany wrote:
idk but I know he'd be capable of setting a score worth 700+pp
I mean he has 98.47% on DT remote control which is OD10.3 and ridiculously hard to acc (IMO) so he could do very gud
Rrytui doesn't even play anymore.Mahogany wrote:
what about rrytui
ZenithPhantasm wrote:
Nice necropost