Pazzaz wrote:

I really like this song so I think it would be a good idea to give some of my opinions of your beatmap

[Milan-'s Light Insane]
00:54:551 (1,2,3,4,5) Having this stream end on top of the next slider on creates frustrating gameplay. If this was moved a little further up to the right it would still keep the same ds from the previous slider while still not punishing the people that overstream. I really like it tho, and i dont think people is that bad ):
02:00:069 (1) I think this one should be curved downwards a little more to mirror the circle pattern before. I get what you mean, but i tried to mirror the previous slider, as it looks cooler imo >w<

I think that overall there's too much whistle spam, but a custom sound might help with that. whistles are fine, they follow a specific instrument/sound and give feedback
Aimod also said something about timing points being different in this difficulty, so you might want to check that.

Well I'm not experienced enough to mod the rest of the difficulties so I won't even try.
I hope this mod helped.

Dionysaw wrote:

Nice map! hope this gets ranked sometime

ErunamoJAZZ wrote:

Dionysaw wrote:

Nice map! hope this gets ranked sometime

mod it pls

HappyRocket88 wrote:

Buenas, vengo desde la queue de #spanish. Veo a ErunamoJAZZ en todos los mapas que modeo. xD

Bueno aquí vamos

General

1. Si bien tienes tres bgs diferentes, ¿por qué no tener una bg distinta para cada dificultad? porque es un bg por persona (la diff de eru tiene un bg diferente porque la diff la hizo eru, al igual que con la de mis diff y la de Milan- :p)
2. Aquí hay una lista de cosas que hacen falta en la carpeta del mapa.
   

   AIBat v3.1 wrote:

   Missing SB Elements
   sb/blank-1366x768.png
   sb/circle.png
   sb/highlight.png
   sb/left.png
   sb/lyrics/1.png
   sb/lyrics/2 pt1.png
   sb/lyrics/2 pt2.png
   sb/lyrics/3.png
   sb/lyrics/4.png
   sb/lyrics/5 pt1.png
   sb/lyrics/5 pt2.png
   sb/lyrics/6 pt1.png
   sb/lyrics/6 pt2.png
   sb/lyrics/e.png
   sb/particle.png
   sb/right.png
   sb/ring.png

3. Y aquí hay una lista de los elementos que el mapa no usa (curiosamente son los mismos que faltan) lol
   

   AIBat v3.1 wrote:

   Unused Image Files
   sb\blank-1366x768.png
   sb\circle.png
   sb\highlight.png
   sb\left.png
   sb\lyrics\1.png
   sb\lyrics\2 pt1.png
   sb\lyrics\2 pt2.png
   sb\lyrics\3.png
   sb\lyrics\4.png
   sb\lyrics\5 pt1.png
   sb\lyrics\5 pt2.png
   sb\lyrics\6 pt1.png
   sb\lyrics\6 pt2.png
   sb\lyrics\e.png
   sb\particle.png
   sb\right.png
   sb\ring.png

   no deberias confiar en lo que el AIBat dice acerca de esto, te esta troleando, porque todos esos elementos son los que conforman el SB lol.. (y obvio todos los estoy usando :p )
4. Ey! Dígale a Eru que los colores que el maneja no son exactamente los mismos que el de los demás, please. Copie y pegue el código de los demás. Eru Witch!! D: (?
   

   Combo1 : 173,192,211
   Combo2 : 255,255,121
   Combo3 : 255,111,111
   Combo4 : 172,89,255
   Combo5 : 34,145,255
   Combo6 : 21,255,80
   Combo7 : 29,248,199

5. También hay una inconsistencia en el preview point. Estoy seguro que debe ser el mismo en todas las dificultades. ups, thx~
   

   AIBat v3.1 wrote:

   General and Metadata
   Inconsistency in PreviewTime:
   - [Dreams] : 54807
   - [EruJazz's Easy] : 54797
   - [Hard] : 54807
   - [Milan-'s Insane] : 54797
   - [Normal] : 54807

6. También con lo del kiai, la dificultad de Milan- y la de Eru... demasiado rebeldes. ¿O esto no tiene nada que ver? no en realidad :3
7. En el storyboard del break que comienza aquí 02:02:048 considero que muevas un poco más a la izquierda las letras porque, al parecer, las últimas tres o cuatro letras están comidas. Lose your h... xD de hecho cuando lo ves por completo en 1366x768 se ve el resto lol... porque seguramente lo estas viendo en 1024x768 :p

Normal

1. Para qué el Beat Snap divisor en 1/16? lol wat?
2. 00:22:048 (1,2) Nuu... esto se ve feito. Asegúrate que el tail del slider 00:23:428 (2) Termine en el tail de este slider 00:22:048 (1) cambiado todo el pattern
3. 00:16:359 (2) Sólo un detalle con este slider [url=blanket (?)]http://puu.sh/j7BR2/6870173117.jpg[/url] no, para mantener una longitud simetrica
4. 00:44:807 (2,3,4) La distancia no es la misma entre estos sliders, por ello te sugiero ubicar el slider 00:46:186 (4) aquí x=288| y=184
5. 00:46:876 (1,2,3) El ritmo está bien, pero no sé, considero que está un poco aburrido el flujo aquí. no para mi :3
6. 01:46:186 (4,1) Meja el blanket de estos dos objetos. un tanto nazi pero oki lol..
7. 02:15:152 (1) Bueno, este slider no es del todo simétrico, pero podrías dejarlo así. :>
8. 03:06:186 (2) NC aquí para un patrón épico (?) no porque lo quiero dejar en morado (soy muy flojo para cambiar el color por el .osb looool)

Hard

1. 00:11:014 (1) NC aquí cómo las otras dificultades.
2. 00:12:221 (3,4) Podrías hacer un overlap decente cómo lo hiciste al principio para seguir secuencia. no porque el stack significa un espacio de polaridad mas grande, en cambio el anti-jump significa uno mas pequeño :3
3. 00:15:842 (1,2) Definitivamente arregla este blanket. ugh Quizás esto podría funcionar Aquí
4. 00:16:359 (2,1) Podrías evitar overlap moviendo la cola del slider hacia la izquierda.
5. 00:19:117 (2) No se ve mal, pero es mejor que intentes hacer sliders dónde sea más sencillo seguir los sliderticks ya que las estrellas no encajaría para este tipo de sliders. (aunque los he visto en este tipo de canciones dubstep pero en las dificultades mayores)
6. 00:37:911 (2,2) Sólo una sugerencia nazi para evitar el overlap. esto el overlap es intencional :p
7. 01:21:186 (4,2) Stack them maybe? o fue intencional? ^
8. 01:36:531 (1,2,3,4,5) Deberías de manejar el mismo patrón de NCs aquí para consistencia con este 01:14:462 (1,2,1,2,1,2) no me parece necesario :3
9. 01:43:945 (5) No encaja bien, ya que no suenan streams y recomendaría que siguieras los piticos de la canción. Así, podrías agregar notas aquí 01:43:945 - 01:44:117 - 01:44:290 y 01:44:462 . encaja muy bien para mi, ademas de que si suena un stream (indiscretamente, pero suena :p )
10. 01:46:186 (5,6,7) Al menos deberías de conservar el spacing porque el cambio de polaridad se hace muy repentino y confunde. no lo veo confuso imo, pero si alguien mas me lo dice lo cambio :3
11. 02:25:842 (5) Ubícalo aquí x=396| y=216 para hacer un sliderbow con este 02:24:807 (3) . hice un sliderbow, pero cambie el pattern un poco

No sé modear dificultades mayores a cuatro estrellas. Bien sea porque no puedo pasar y no sé que decir sobre ellas. lol Mimod termina aquí.

Aquí una estrella. Mucha suerte con el mapa. o.o7

Milan- wrote:

HappyRocket88

HappyRocket88 wrote:

Milan-'s Insane

1. ¿Por qué será que esa imagen de fondo se me hace conocida? :> nuse, cldsdmmds la elijio xd
2. A decir verdad, diría que esta dificultad esta perfecta, sólo debo puntualizar unas cositas qué son sugerencias a mi criterio.
3. 00:13:083 (4,5,1) Por ejemplo eso lo siento arrítmico ya que no sigue las lyrics, quizás si el slider empezara aquí 00:13:600 Y no tuviera revese y fuera larguito encajaría perfectamente. A esto me refiero. :> sigo el piano aca, o en casi toda la cancion practicamente
   
4. 00:37:221 (6) NC para consistencia. uh yo no NC'd acorde un patron, lo hice acorde a la musica. Por eso no añadi nc cuando la musica es como mas suave por asi decirlo w
5. 00:42:738 (5) ^
6. 00:48:255 (6) ^
7. 01:35:152 (5) ^
8. 01:36:531 (1,2,1,2,1,2) Personalmente, este patrón me confundió demasiado, porque el stack entre estos 01:36:704 (2,1) no suplía la diferencia de spacing que quería para saber cuando clickear. Quizás podrías arreglarlo o sólo se deba a un error mío de jugabilidad. te entiendo, pero esta bien.. a algunos le costara y a otros no
9. 02:05:842 (6) NC no quedaría mal aquí. uh lo mismo que antes
10. 02:16:531 (3) ^
11. 02:27:566 (7) ^
12. 02:41:359 (6) ^
13. 02:55:152 (1) Remueve el NC, para consistencia.
14. 03:14:462 (5) NC aquí. :>

para dreams, cosas que personalmente cambiaria:
00:47:911 (3) - cola deberia ser clickable y tambien seria bueno que añadas ritmos para 00:48:428 - y 00:49:117 - . Algo asi http://puu.sh/j7Oxr/8d7098af90.jpg
01:02:393 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - este tipo de jumps son super molestos porque los pones de manera super cerrada. que te parece algo asi? http://puu.sh/j7OSt/9e18278175.jpg no, se arruina el efecto de expansion
01:10:324 (1) - extiendes el slider pero la musica es siempre 1/2 aca. Suena super mal por eso ;w;.
01:11:100 - seria bueno iugla que mapearas el stream o almenos triple. Por que es raro ver que añadas triples despues para sonidos que apenas se escuchan como lo es 01:11:962 (2) -
01:23:342 (4,5) - este 1/4 salto se siente sobre hecho (y todos los que hiciste en este verso igual) por que la musica es super debil, de hecho, por ejemplo yo ni siquiera lo mapie ppor que se siente sobremapeado de lo debil que son los sonidos . lo mimso con la seccion esta 03:14:462 -
01:26:876 (8,9) - estos deberian terminar en 1/2. Recuerdo que te dije que una parte era en 1/3 pero solo me referia a 01:26:531 (6,7) - xd por que los intrumentso no son claros ahi, pero la mina que canta sip. En adicion, yo haria ese 1/3 repeater asi es mas facil de leer. Un 1/3 circulo entre puro 1/2 es raro.
01:34:117 (2,3,4) - plz no. se vera super bonito y todo pero no ahi nada en la musica que llame por ese tipo de pattern
01:35:669 (4) - lo moveria mas abajo y correria 01:35:842 (5) - mas cerca, esto aun sigue siendo la parte lenta de la cancion. como asi por ejemplo http://puu.sh/j7PW7/8a2dea13e2.jpg wat?
01:36:186 (7) - similar aca. los saltos terminan siendo aleatorios por que la musica es aun lenta esto junto con lo anterior da una sensacion de aumento de intensidad, el cual me parece apropiado
01:36:790 (3) - 01:37:307 (7) - 01:37:824 (2) - uhuh nose, como que suena decente pero aun asi no ahi nada.. sacaria almenos 01:37:824 (2) - ya que el stream es claro ahi no, arruina la intensidad
01:49:635 (1,1) - despues de tal rapidez en el sliders, yo esperaria que 01:50:324 (1) - estuviera mas lejos que lo que esta ahora, se siente como si pararas la music de golpe o algo asi. 02:55:842 (1,1) - lo mismo aca
01:55:497 (11) - cola deberia ser clickable. ocupa 2 circulos en ves de un slider. se siente mejor
02:14:462 (4) - 02:48:255 (1) - 03:11:186 (4) - nose si esto se sale en 4:3, ahi te fijas tu w
02:18:945 (3) - elimina esta nota ya que estas siguiendo las vocales. se siente super raro asi..
03:01:704 (13) - la cosa de la cola. podrias hacerlo 1/2 este y añadir un circulo. aca lo mismo 03:12:738 (7) - <= este si que no D:<
03:07:566 (1) - se ve mejor stackeado /w\
03:26:876 (1) - podrias añadir un repeat aca 03:27:307 - no, quiero que el slider complete el sonido sin reverse, da un mejor efecto imo
ahi otros pattern que sienten sobre hechos igual, como este 01:47:566 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - o 01:57:221 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - o triples donde no ahi mucho como 02:47:135 (7) - , pero supongo que esas cosas son pasables uhm

cambia mi AR a 8.4 >(

HappyRocket88 wrote:

EruJazz's Easy

1. AR +1. ¿Para que tengas los 4 tres en el CS, AR, OD y HP? /me runs nope xD
2. 00:15:842 (4) Este slider no sé, se ve raro. No sería mejor un slider curvo sencillo para seguri el flujo del slider que le sigue 00:16:531 (1). Como esto. hice otra cosa... la idea era seguír el sonido que va a la mitad del slider, pero en fin, así queda bien también.
3. 00:18:600 (2) ^ acá si no u.u
4. 00:22:048 (1,3) Este pequeño detalle no es importante pero es para que se vea más bonito. :o done
5. 00:24:117 (2,4) Almost se tocan. ¿No se vería mejor si haces un stack? O tal vez, sólo mueve 00:26:186 (4) un poquito más arriba. no se tocan, están a un pixel xD
6. 00:46:186 (4,5,6,7) Este patrón lo podrías hacer simétrico con el de arriba 00:44:117 (1,2,3) para que quede algo como así o puedes intentar la forma de un hexágono aquí también. La intención es no hacerlo simetrico xD
7. 02:01:359 (4) NC aquí para consistencia. emm... se hace dificil de leer si no le dejo la guía de las flechas.
8. 02:21:014 (1,2) WOW! La super blanket aquí. xD buen trabajo. jejeje ;)
9. 02:53:773 (6) NC aquí para consistencia de los patrones siguientes. :>
10. 03:06:186 (1,1) El NC es para enfatizar qué?
11. 03:11:704 (7) NC para consistencia. Cada dos palitos blancos "debería" ir NC.
12. 03:13:083 (1) Remueve el NC.
13. 03:15:842 (5) NC
14. 03:17:221 (1) Remueve NC

Kuki wrote:

[General]
Offset shouldn't be in the negatives, try to avoid that, set offset to 324. isn't completly neccesary put the point in a positive offset, in fact it's better, 'cause cover more sound :3
Most of the SB ripples and effects aren't actually on the notes, and the beginning of Milan-'s Insane is out of time and out of place also. The design tab places everything a bit higher and to the right I think, try to compensate for that. it should be higher, when i play it's in the note
SB font is not very good quality, try to get some better quality versions to use. mmm, not completly neccesary, it's fine how it is
02:16:530 - Ripple here in sb doesn't make any sense imo, I suggest removing it. fit the part of the song, no changes :3

[Dreams]
00:42:048 (1) - NC? no, it ruins the effect of NCs what i'm giving
02:45:842 (1,2,3) - Even out spacing perhaps.
03:29:635 (9) - Perhaps stack this on 03:29:548 (8) - why?

XinCrin wrote:

Deberías hacer caso a las sugerencias de Kuki con respecto al SB. Just sayin' . . .
No encaja

1. 00:19:290 - the change in the vocals could be highlighted, matter of choice though
2. 00:23:428 (3,4) - the part where the slider start of (4) overlaps with (3)'s body looks ugly, even in game, could be centered better, while keeping the blanket
3. 00:27:566 (1,2) - the storyboard thing in those sliders is not centered correctly, I'm a complete newb at sb's, but it's clearly noticeable
4. 00:35:842 (5) - NC
5. 00:41:359 (7) - ^
6. 00:49:635 (1) - ok nevermind the last point, I think the whole storyboard might be incorrectly cenetered
7. 01:19:462 (3) - ctrl+j?
8. 01:33:342 - I don't think this note is necessary, there's no main beat here
9. 01:33:428 (7) - if you changed the above reposition this note
10. 01:49:635 (1) - a bit too sudden, since the players comes pretty slow from the last stream, imo you should never have an increase in SV larger than 0.5 speed
11. 02:13:773 (3,4) - like at the beginning, the overlap looks ugly
12. 02:19:290 (4,5,6) - this change of rhythm is really confusing, either make all these 3 notes a NC, or use a slider to represent them
13. 02:55:842 (1) - same as before as well
14. In general flow could be a little bit better in some patterns, but besides that I loved the map ^^

1. This style of background is so overused ahah (it's not bad though)
2. 01:48:255 (2) - make this a triple so that it doesn't confuse players when getting into 01:48:945 (1) - which has more reverses
3. 01:54:980 (7) - slider fits a lot better in the end of the stream, starting at 01:55:324 -
4. 01:59:980 (1) - slight SV decrease?

1. 01:13:083 (1) - remove NC, I know the song kind of asks for it, but try to keep the pattern for NC's throughout the diff
2. 01:15:152 (1) - even if you don't use the above point, you should remove this one, only start NC's in ticks like 01:17:221 (1) -
3. 01:15:842 (1) - also remove from here
4. 01:21:186 (4,2) - ugly and confusing overlap, also be careful with the spacing in this pattern
5. 01:26:531 (4,5,6,7) - this change of rhythm in a hard is not advised, though not illegal you should use sliders instead
6. You should check if the spacing change in the last chorus is rankable or not, some spacings seem a little overkill, just to be sure

1. 00:16:359 (2,3,4) - should have the same spacing
2. 01:39:635 - a note or slider should be mapped here
3. Like in the hard diff, but more so on this one, I'm not sure if the spacing increase in the second chorus is rankable, I think you need to keep spacing consistent on a normal diff, and it did change a lot in that part

- Milhofo - wrote:

Hi M4M from my queue, sorry about the delay, my schedule changed a lot recently ^^

[Dreams]

1. 00:19:290 - the change in the vocals could be highlighted, matter of choice though naah, it's ok
2. 00:23:428 (3,4) - the part where the slider start of (4) overlaps with (3)'s body looks ugly, even in game, could be centered better, while keeping the blanket
3. 00:27:566 (1,2) - the storyboard thing in those sliders is not centered correctly, I'm a complete newb at sb's, but it's clearly noticeable in-game it's centered
4. 00:35:842 (5) - NC no
5. 00:41:359 (7) - ^ ^
6. 00:49:635 (1) - ok nevermind the last point, I think the whole storyboard might be incorrectly cenetered the same thing what i said before
7. 01:19:462 (3) - ctrl+j?
8. 01:33:342 - I don't think this note is necessary, there's no main beat here
9. 01:33:428 (7) - if you changed the above reposition this note
10. 01:49:635 (1) - a bit too sudden, since the players comes pretty slow from the last stream, imo you should never have an increase in SV larger than 0.5 speed for that it's the red color :p
11. 02:13:773 (3,4) - like at the beginning, the overlap looks ugly not for me :3
12. 02:19:290 (4,5,6) - this change of rhythm is really confusing, either make all these 3 notes a NC, or use a slider to represent them
13. 02:55:842 (1) - same as before as well
14. In general flow could be a little bit better in some patterns, but besides that I loved the map ^^

[Hard]

1. 01:13:083 (1) - remove NC, I know the song kind of asks for it, but try to keep the pattern for NC's throughout the diff no. 1) the patterns are different 2) make a transition of NCs, first 2 stanzas, then 1 stanza and after 1/2 stanza
2. 01:15:152 (1) - even if you don't use the above point, you should remove this one, only start NC's in ticks like 01:17:221 (1) - ^
3. 01:15:842 (1) - also remove from here ^
4. 01:21:186 (4,2) - ugly and confusing overlap, also be careful with the spacing in this pattern why is this confusing?
5. 01:26:531 (4,5,6,7) - this change of rhythm in a hard is not advised, though not illegal you should use sliders instead
6. You should check if the spacing change in the last chorus is rankable or not, some spacings seem a little overkill, just to be sure i hope, 'cause they're fit very well with that part of the song imo

[Normal]

1. 00:16:359 (2,3,4) - should have the same spacing
2. 01:39:635 - a note or slider should be mapped here that would be unrankeable
3. Like in the hard diff, but more so on this one, I'm not sure if the spacing increase in the second chorus is rankable, I think you need to keep spacing consistent on a normal diff, and it did change a lot in that part

Yes I suck at modding diffs lower than insane ;c hope it helps though, good luck!

1. You may want to add "dnb" "d&b" "remix" "vocal" "mix" to tags
2. Great SB!

1. I found this diff very incosistent from the beginning to the end, I'm sorry but, the jumps at kiai are too easy for this Extra, and at some other parts it's an overkill. The kiai feels more a Light Insane than an Extra and in fact it was supposed to be the hardest part of the song, besides that, the diff is quite decent
2. 00:13:599 (5) - This shape is very strong , flows really bad and the vocals doesn't ask such wiggy shape
3. 00:13:599 (5) - 00:15:841 (1) - 00:16:359 (2) - 00:13:083 (4) - I know you're following the vocals here but couldn't you make the sliders follow the drums too? Feels very awkward to have stuff like 00:13:255 -00:13:773 - 00:16:014 - 00:16:531 - 00:16:876 - 00:17:221 - 00:17:566 - 00:18:255 - unmapped
4. 00:21:359 (9) - Poor shape, the tail looks really weird imo
5. 00:22:738 (2) - Poor overlap, I recommend you fixing it or overlap a bit more because it's odd to have this small part of the tail overlapped
6. 00:22:048 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - This section is very boring in my opinion, what do you think of making it a bit more intense?
7. 00:30:669 (2) - Very boring, the rhythm is groing up and this slider plays like the song was dieing, stream here or make slider jumps?
8. 00:44:807 (2,3,4,1,2) - Finish on every head
9. 00:49:635 (1,3,1,3,1) - Finish
10. 01:02:393 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - This jump pattern looks a mess imo, and you're jumping on the wrong places, like 01:03:083 (6) - why constant spacing in this jump?
11. 01:35:497 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - I think you know what I mean here, wtf those jumps, all the song looks like a light insane and this is the only kind of Extra pattern I could really find in this diff
12. 01:49:635 (1,2) - Use this rhythm:
    
    
13. 01:58:600 (1,2,3,4) - Here too
14. 02:43:428 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^ doesn't really make sense because right b4 the jump was very small and the rhythm was the same, consider this too
15. I'll stop here, jumps are very awkward and most of them don't fit the song.

1. 00:33:773 (3,1) - Poor blanket, just minor thing
2. 00:36:876 (4,5) - Can you notice that it looks like a DS error? In fact everything is fine here, uuh. But this triangle with a note after doesn't looks so good imo, like try linear flow?
3. 01:07:566 (1) - Is there need of the white anchor near the tail?
4. 01:17:738 (2,4) - Could you blanket a bit better here?

Izect Ztenz wrote:

Hi there hi o/

Here's my mod

[EruJazz's Easy]01:00:669 (1) - This slider should be like this Why?, i just notice this rhythm is correct, so, nope.
01:02:048 (3) - This slider should be like this ^ I changed this in my way.
01:09:980 - Add a note Nope
01:23:083 - ^ Nope
01:23:773 - ^ Nope
01:33:773 (1,2) - Those slider should be like this lol, why? this looks ugly imo.
01:34:807 - Add a note Nope

Good Luck

1. You seem to use a negative offset for the timing, which we don't suggest you do that. Since all the difficulties have nothing in the intro, it's best you start on the first object of the map. Because Milan's difficulty started early compared to the others, the offset will then be on 00:09:635 (or 9635).
2. The BG filesize is quite big for the beatmap. I would compress the image and get at least 640 KB. Just go for this image file. I don't really see the difference with the current and the one I compressed.

1. You can compress PNG files into smaller files and get transparent results (still in its original state). When I compressed your sprites, you could save 172 KB. Might not be lots, but could save some KBs. Here's a ZIP file containing the new files: http://puu.sh/kjGoK/6329a30fdb.zip

1. For the background on each difficulty, there seem to have lots of numbers for the fade event, but they could be reduce I think. Fade-ins and fade-outs like 00:44:117 could be under a loop event. The fades have a similar opacity, but the values feel random to me, unless they're intended. In my opinion, it's best if you stick on a same value so it doesn't look random, but that's your choice. If you need help with looping, try this thread and go to the looping scetion, or I can help you (if I remember it well...).
2. 02:44:117 - The background disappears INSTANTELY and I don't like that. You might want replace the lines:
   
   SPOILER

    F,0,162738,163845,1,0.9943513
    F,0,163845,164096,0.9943513,0.9996132
    F,0,164096,164117,0.9996132,0
    F,0,164117,165475,0,0.02943587

   into something simple that would fade out quick, like:
   
   SPOILER

   F,0,162738,164117,1
    F,0,164117,164204,1,0

3. Lyrics that stops moving on a point like "Seize the fear..." on 00:17:911 and "Don't look back" on 02:07:911 are really to weird see; I fell all "tangling" in my body. Honestly, I don't like when they stop like that. I expected that they'll still move until the end of the. I would really want to see some motion going on for these lyrics.

1. 00:43:773 (4) - I don't know why but it looked like a 1/2 rhythm. The overlap is ugly to be honest. Also another thing is, it would be best if a hitcircle or a slider starts on 00:44:117 . That object will then emphasize the strong beat.
2. 00:49:635 (1,2,1,2) - Woooh! You do want to tone down with the spacing. It's pretty big for Normal. If I was you I'd stick with the same distance.
3. 01:03:428 (1,2) - Because 01:04:290 (2) is next to the head of 01:03:428 (1) -, the flow is not quite good. The first slider goes down, but the following slider goes also down, but gets out of the line. Perhaps the pattern in the image below will solve the problem:
   
   Pattern

   
4. 02:45:497 (2) - Since this object is on the beginning of a kiai time, a new combo would likely be added.

1. 00:39:290 (2,3) - The distance went suddenly low after the previous patterns, and it plays really weird. You might want to put some more.
2. 02:23:773 (1) - Maybe delete this note? You did this before 00:33:428 which could be for consistency, and having two beats of recovery is better for Hard in my opinion, as you have more time to get back to place. I also typed something in Dreams about the hitcircle, so you can check later or now (I don't want to copy and paste honestly. I want to have variety in the sentences).
3. 02:25:842 (5) - Sounds pretty weird to me. It skips the main beat on 02:26:186 and I wouldn't do that. Clickable objects are better on emphasizing the strong beats. So for this beat, you have the opportunity to start a slider or a hitcircle, but my option would be having a circle on 02:25:842 and start a 1/1 slider on 02:26:186 .
4. 02:28:255 (4,1) - Something similar like 00:39:290 (2,3) : the distance is low, but you have starting from 02:24:117 until 02:28:945 objects that have a bigger and (almost) constant spacing. The other reason is that it doesn't play well.
5. 02:45:497 until 02:55:842 - The spacing is larger than on the two previous kiai sections and 02:56:531 until the end of the kiai. This looks really weird, because normally the end or the section that contains "raver" beats (maybe not the right choice of word, but I mean something that has more sound) gets something tense. But what you did in this section is the opposite. I however recommend you go with a spacing of 1.0x ~ 1.1x. It would keep a similar way you did for the second kiai section.

1. 01:17:221 (1) -
2. 01:19:635 (4) -
3. 01:25:497 (1) - Quite out of the playfield
4. 01:26:359 (4) -
5. 01:31:014 (1) -

1. 02:46:186 (3) - The shape looks ugly to me. Looks like in the old times. Maybe a simple curve will go better.

1. 00:19:290 (4) - How about you add a new combo on this hitcircle? It feels useful after you have an alteration in the rhythm: the 3/2 gap starting from 00:18:773 .
2. 00:33:428 (1) - Remove this hitcircle perhaps? In my view, after completing the spinner, I get that little intensity when I go to that note, and I get a little off when I go to 00:33:773 (2) . This may be also due to the obejcts before the spinner. It's pretty much subjective.
3. 00:35:152 (4) - Sounds weird, but I don't know why honestly. I think it's because the downbeat doesn't have the same sound as 00:34:462 that makes it weird to hear.
   Okay, onto another point. If you did rhythms like 00:37:566 (7,8) - 00:39:980 (3,4,5) in the following, then why not for 00:35:152 (4) ? I think it sounds better that way (reason maybe on my previous point of this) and it could keep consistency through the rhythms. Something like a circle and a 1/2 slider is fine to me.
4. 00:37:221 (7,8) - Bring the distance to 1.0x, I felt uncomfortable to play this.
5. 00:48:255 (3,4) - In my opinion it would sound nice if you only stick with drums. Which means that those repeat sliders should only be a simple 1/1 slider. It would concentrate the drums better and emphasize the drums better if the section 00:44:117 to 00:52:393 is mostly following that instrument.
6. 00:55:669 (3,4) - Might want to lower the distance there. The beat on (4) is less strong than the one on 00:56:186 . Lowering the distance will also let 00:56:186 (5) be more emphasized. For placement, what you can do is flip 00:56:014 (4,5,6) horizontal (Ctrl + H) and move them wherever you feel like it.
7. 01:05:842 (7) - I think the flow will get better if you switch the head and tail (Ctrl + G). There's jumps in the kicksliders pattern, so if you put the head close to its previous object while there was jumps, it makes the jumps stops, and it makes an uncomfortable movement for that pattern.
8. 02:18:945 (3) - There's nothing in the music that makes the hitcircle could hit on something. It's pointless so you should delete it. On the other hand, you can add a repeat on 02:18:428 (2) if you want to hit the vocal on 02:18:773 .

sheela901 wrote:

Hello CSLM!

[General]

1. You seem to use a negative offset for the timing, which we don't suggest you do that. Since all the difficulties have nothing in the intro, it's best you start on the first object of the map. Because Milan's difficulty started early compared to the others, the offset will then be on 00:09:635 (or 9635).
2. The BG filesize is quite big for the beatmap. I would compress the image and get at least 640 KB. Just go for this image file. I don't really see the difference with the current and the one I compressed.

[SB]

Loved the SB! I've something that could optimize the filesize for the SB, and opinions on stuffs.

1. You can compress PNG files into smaller files and get transparent results (still in its original state). When I compressed your sprites, you could save 172 KB. Might not be lots, but could save some KBs. Here's a ZIP file containing the new files: http://puu.sh/kjGoK/6329a30fdb.zip

There's things that's been a little bothering me. This may or not be subjective.

1. For the background on each difficulty, there seem to have lots of numbers for the fade event, but they could be reduce I think. Fade-ins and fade-outs like 00:44:117 could be under a loop event. The fades have a similar opacity, but the values feel random to me, unless they're intended. In my opinion, it's best if you stick on a same value so it doesn't look random, but that's your choice. If you need help with looping, try this thread and go to the looping scetion, or I can help you (if I remember it well...). i know how work with the code and the looping :3
2. 02:44:117 - The background disappears INSTANTELY and I don't like that. You might want replace the lines no, i like it because bring up the player instantly in where the calm down it's:
   
   SPOILER

    F,0,162738,163845,1,0.9943513
    F,0,163845,164096,0.9943513,0.9996132
    F,0,164096,164117,0.9996132,0
    F,0,164117,165475,0,0.02943587

   into something simple that would fade out quick, like:
   
   SPOILER

   F,0,162738,164117,1
    F,0,164117,164204,1,0

3. Lyrics that stops moving on a point like "Seize the fear..." on 00:17:911 and "Don't look back" on 02:07:911 are really to weird see; I fell all "tangling" in my body. Honestly, I don't like when they stop like that. I expected that they'll still move until the end of the. I would really want to see some motion going on for these lyrics. no because the point it's stop the lyrics when the vocals stop.

[Normal]

1. 00:43:773 (4) - I don't know why but it looked like a 1/2 rhythm. The overlap is ugly to be honest. Also another thing is, it would be best if a hitcircle or a slider starts on 00:44:117 . That object will then emphasize the strong beat.
2. 00:49:635 (1,2,1,2) - Woooh! You do want to tone down with the spacing. It's pretty big for Normal. If I was you I'd stick with the same distance.
3. 01:03:428 (1,2) - Because 01:04:290 (2) is next to the head of 01:03:428 (1) -, the flow is not quite good. The first slider goes down, but the following slider goes also down, but gets out of the line. Perhaps the pattern in the image below will solve the problem the idea it's what both slider go down. Rised up the pattern for avoid getting out of the line but not used that pattern:
   
   Pattern

   
4. 02:45:497 (2) - Since this object is on the beginning of a kiai time, a new combo would likely be added.

[Hard]

1. 00:39:290 (2,3) - The distance went suddenly low after the previous patterns, and it plays really weird. You might want to put some more.
2. 02:23:773 (1) - Maybe delete this note? You did this before 00:33:428 which could be for consistency, and having two beats of recovery is better for Hard in my opinion, as you have more time to get back to place. I also typed something in Dreams about the hitcircle, so you can check later or now (I don't want to copy and paste honestly. I want to have variety in the sentences).
3. 02:25:842 (5) - Sounds pretty weird to me. It skips the main beat on 02:26:186 and I wouldn't do that. Clickable objects are better on emphasizing the strong beats. So for this beat, you have the opportunity to start a slider or a hitcircle, but my option would be having a circle on 02:25:842 and start a 1/1 slider on 02:26:186 . added to 02:24:807 (2) - a reverse, added a circle in 02:25:841 - and leaved that 2/1 slider. I want leave it for emphatize the sound of 02:26:186 -
4. 02:28:255 (4,1) - Something similar like 00:39:290 (2,3) : the distance is low, but you have starting from 02:24:117 until 02:28:945 objects that have a bigger and (almost) constant spacing. The other reason is that it doesn't play well.
5. 02:45:497 until 02:55:842 - The spacing is larger than on the two previous kiai sections and 02:56:531 until the end of the kiai. This looks really weird, because normally the end or the section that contains "raver" beats (maybe not the right choice of word, but I mean something that has more sound) gets something tense. But what you did in this section is the opposite. I however recommend you go with a spacing of 1.0x ~ 1.1x. It would keep a similar way you did for the second kiai section. no, this part for being a bigger climax than the kiai of before it's better imo rise up the SV (i did the same in the Normal diff :p )

[Dreams]

1. 00:19:290 (4) - How about you add a new combo on this hitcircle? It feels useful after you have an alteration in the rhythm: the 3/2 gap starting from 00:18:773 .
2. 00:33:428 (1) - Remove this hitcircle perhaps? In my view, after completing the spinner, I get that little intensity when I go to that note, and I get a little off when I go to 00:33:773 (2) . This may be also due to the obejcts before the spinner. It's pretty much subjective.
3. 00:35:152 (4) - Sounds weird, but I don't know why honestly. I think it's because the downbeat doesn't have the same sound as 00:34:462 that makes it weird to hear. true, but it's better than take it off the HS or change it, if i do something like that will be unconsistent with the next ones, so i'll leave it how it is now
   Okay, onto another point. If you did rhythms like 00:37:566 (7,8) - 00:39:980 (3,4,5) in the following, then why not for 00:35:152 (4) ? I think it sounds better that way (reason maybe on my previous point of this) and it could keep consistency through the rhythms. Something like a circle and a 1/2 slider is fine to me.
4. 00:37:221 (7,8) - Bring the distance to 1.0x, I felt uncomfortable to play this.
5. 00:48:255 (3,4) - In my opinion it would sound nice if you only stick with drums. Which means that those repeat sliders should only be a simple 1/1 slider. It would concentrate the drums better and emphasize the drums better if the section 00:44:117 to 00:52:393 is mostly following that instrument. not imo, the pitch it's too strong for ignore it
6. 00:55:669 (3,4) - Might want to lower the distance there. The beat on (4) is less strong than the one on 00:56:186 . Lowering the distance will also let 00:56:186 (5) be more emphasized. For placement, what you can do is flip 00:56:014 (4,5,6) horizontal (Ctrl + H) and move them wherever you feel like it. i had a battle with this pattern, but i win xD fix~
7. 01:05:842 (7) - I think the flow will get better if you switch the head and tail (Ctrl + G). There's jumps in the kicksliders pattern, so if you put the head close to its previous object while there was jumps, it makes the jumps stops, and it makes an uncomfortable movement for that pattern.
8. 02:18:945 (3) - There's nothing in the music that makes the hitcircle could hit on something. It's pointless so you should delete it. On the other hand, you can add a repeat on 02:18:428 (2) if you want to hit the vocal on 02:18:773 .

I think this is it. If you have any questions you want to ask, don't hesitate!

Good luck on your map!

pkhg wrote:

rossonero1899

pishifat wrote:

i didnt forget
im just really really really gay you? that's so strange ¬.¬

normal
00:13:600 (4) - that 1/4 snapping for the tail tho. like why
00:16:359 (2) - when a reverse slider's tail doesn't line up with anything that means you just dont use a reverse slider. forcing it in where it isn't supported by the song is what
01:26:186 (6) - didn't every difficulty use 1/3 for the reverse of this inconsistent snappings within a set pourquoi
01:35:152 (3,4,1) - do i really have to say why this is bad don't do that overlap stuff within such a short period of timety which is the problem of this? there's not such confusion at all
01:40:669 (2,1) - similar amount of ew as the previous thing. cleaner placements are possibly with legit anything else
02:36:014 (4,5,6) - 02:38:773 (4,5,6) - hello misleading placement. spacing doesnt indicate 5 or 6 being the next object cuz they're both underneath 4 the same amount the the the
ok then it switches to spaced 1/2. you're really better off using one type of spacing throughout the whole diff (overlapped or spaced 1/2). tbh the whole "objects barely touching" thing youve got going now is super gross, but at least they're all touching (except this one kiai part) not for me :3
03:26:876 (1) - seriously isn't a clear sound on the tail here. following vocals for some random voice sample that's not meant to be snapped to beats is pretty lol but at least it follow something, for finish this a beat before of the last slider

hard
00:33:773 (1) - awesome this whole section has every slider tail without exception on the downbeats what is rhythm
01:48:600 (4,1) - uh nothing really to click on the blue tick where 1 is starting. would be better to start it on the downbeat and make 4 a 3/4 slider 3/4? do you mean 1/2 :p fixed~
02:17:221 (1) - do people really make spammy reverse sliders to express increasing volume on a single pitch
02:38:773 (4,5,6) - is this a mistake of some kind i really am not understanding the logic behind it at all but i do, and i like it :3
02:51:704 (3,4,5,6) - or is it supposed to be something mapped for the sake of visuals cuz it plays like balls i like that overlap, it's for variety
03:26:876 (1) - sucks just as much on hard as normal

~dREaMZ~
00:37:566 (8,9,10,1) - 00:39:980 (3,4,5,6) - what is consistent distance if you're gonna do overlaps do overlaps or if you're gonna do spaced stuff do spaced stuff switching between them barely is ew but the overlaps are for know which are 1/2, i can't see the problem
00:55:669 (3,4,5) - i dunno how capable you are of playing stuff like this, but as far as i know aiming patterns with large spacing differences yet low change of angle are way harder to hit than large spacing changes with sharper angles. something about momentum being harder to control = reason
00:56:186 (5,6) - like wahts with the huge spacing even tho 6 has nothing worth huge spacinging
01:49:635 (1,2) - pseudorhythm tho there's nothing even on the white tick. 1/2slider+3/4 slider is what the music's doing
01:57:393 (2,3,4) - 01:58:083 (6,7,8) - ya these are the same as the other ew momentum htings
02:17:221 (4) - hard diff tho
03:28:083 (2,1,2) - 1/4 sliders like these are played in nearly the same way as circles so the wtf impossible momentum thing applies here too

only 5 months late nbd 5 months deserves a icon don't you think? ;w;

ErunamoJAZZ wrote:

What happen with this?? :/

1. 01:05:324 (4,5,6) - eso fue dificil de preveer lol, sí le has hecho testplays?
2. 01:39:980 (3) - esto queda un poco confuso al jugarlo, te recomiendo que lo inclines un poco hacia la derecha: http://puu.sh/mgZNq/46f6cbaf83.jpg
3. 02:25:324 (4) - 02:30:842 (4) - por qué los overlaps?, no sería mejor evitarlos?
4. 02:34:462 (1,2,3,4,5) - 02:37:221 (1,2,3,4,5) - ponles en el head, el sample normal (y no el drum como está ahora). Así como está es super raro al jugarlo xD
5. 02:55:842 (1,2) - lol, no lo había visto, te quedó genial.
6. 03:06:186 (1,2,3) - esto es muuuy dificil de leer.. no sé si sea por el espaciado
7. 03:22:221 (4) - En 03:22:393 - hay un tambor, es super raro que quede a mitad del slider.
8. 03:28:255 (1,2,3,4) - no es un poco largo el spacing? con mouse saqué puros 100 xD

1. 01:46:704 (6,7) - es la unica parte donde usas eso xD
2. 02:34:462 (1,2,3,4,5) - 02:37:221 (1,2,3,4,5) - lo mismo que en otro mapa. Ponle sample normal a la cabeza de los sliders.
3. 03:22:221 (3) - Lo mismo que en el otro mapa.

ErunamoJAZZ wrote:

check, not kudo.

[ultima diff]

1. 01:05:324 (4,5,6) - eso fue dificil de preveer lol, sí le has hecho testplays? no pero hay mapas con patterns mas dificiles de preveer, esto mas bien es una pequeña dificultad lol
2. 01:39:980 (3) - esto queda un poco confuso al jugarlo, te recomiendo que lo inclines un poco hacia la derecha: http://puu.sh/mgZNq/46f6cbaf83.jpg
3. 02:25:324 (4) - 02:30:842 (4) - por qué los overlaps?, no sería mejor evitarlos? overlap = 1/2, y hasta donde yo se no es confuso
4. 02:34:462 (1,2,3,4,5) - 02:37:221 (1,2,3,4,5) - ponles en el head, el sample normal (y no el drum como está ahora). Así como está es super raro al jugarlo xD
5. 02:55:842 (1,2) - lol, no lo había visto, te quedó genial. gracias o3o
6. 03:06:186 (1,2,3) - esto es muuuy dificil de leer.. no sé si sea por el espaciado mmm, yo no veo tan dificil de leer
7. 03:22:221 (4) - En 03:22:393 - hay un tambor, es super raro que quede a mitad del slider. mmm, usualmente estaba siguiendo mas el sonido melodico, pero tienes razon, no puedo dejar sin mappear un beat asi de fuerte, fix~
8. 03:28:255 (1,2,3,4) - no es un poco largo el spacing? con mouse saqué puros 100 xD nop :3

[hard]

1. 01:46:704 (6,7) - es la unica parte donde usas eso xD
2. 02:34:462 (1,2,3,4,5) - 02:37:221 (1,2,3,4,5) - lo mismo que en otro mapa. Ponle sample normal a la cabeza de los sliders.
3. 03:22:221 (3) - Lo mismo que en el otro mapa.

[normal]
02:34:462 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - same like before.


-----------
No olvides decirme el nombre del font que usaste para las lyrics,