1. Beginning (6.35 stars, 1145 notes)

Ringating wrote:

from pm:

I made two possible versions of the bg. one crops off some of the food on the right, and the other removes the left text entirely in order to crop from that side cleanly.

right cropped off

left cropped off

no kds

ohad1881 wrote:

hello
00:31:570 - note here?
00:37:570 - ^^ Current pattern is fine
00:51:120 (2,3) - fix blanket
00:58:470 (1) - remove nc?
01:04:620 (1,2,4) - - stack plox
01:11:370 (1,6) - ^^
01:33:870 (2) - unstack and jump mb? its kiai time. I know they are strong notes but it build up emphasis into the last one.
01:36:420 (4,2) - stack plox
01:57:720 (1) - unstack and jump mb?
02:19:620 (4,1) - fix blanket
02:31:320 (1) - ctrl h this?
02:36:420 (1,2) - make them the same?
02:52:620 (1,2) - fix blanket
03:09:270 (4,5) - ctrl g? I prefer the current pattern.
03:18:370 - note here? A 1/12 note? I'll pass.
03:31:170 (5) - if u tried to stack so...
03:43:020 (1,2) - blanket fix
03:44:220 (4,2) - stack plox
03:48:870 (3) - mb distance snap it too?
03:49:620 (5) - ctrl h? Prefer current one.
04:10:620 (2,3) - blanket plox
04:17:820 (1,1) - u can stack more with the mouse I don't understand.. But I improved a bit the shape.
gl!

1. 00:02:670 (2,3,4) - a 1/4 repeat slider works better i think, less pressure on the two first circles and for some reason I believe the pressure on last is the same.
2. 00:04:020 (1) - this snare feels out of place, I believe a finish works better
3. 00:03:120 (6,7) - try move (6) to x292 y340 and (7) to x144 y272, I think it flows nice
4. 00:04:020 (1,2,1) - try placing 00:04:470 (2) - at x88 y172 and 00:04:770 (1) - x84 y188. It's a nice way to stack 1/1 spaced similar to how you did at
5. 00:10:920 (4,1) - oh yeah there are actually more that are perfectly stacked, I think you should manually stack all of them like that. Makes the map a bit more consistent and theyre easy to read and plays nicely.
6. 00:05:670 (6) - move to x252 y252 for better flow
7. 00:06:120 (1,2) - its better if these are stacked, because that small jump takes away some of the pressure on 00:06:420 (3) - thats a pretty strong beat. and then you can unstack and make a small jump between 00:06:420 (3,4) - , or keep it stacked works too but i prefer jump on these
8. 00:10:020 (2) - this is pretty loud, I think the snare alone is enough to make a volume spike, adjusting volume for this is a bit too excessive,
9. 00:21:120 (1,2,3,4,5) - since the snare hits gets louder after each, I think a pattern with gradually increased spacing fits best, youre kinda doing that already but 00:21:270 (2,3) - this stack breaks that
10. 00:24:870 (3) - curve more so it blankets better
11. 00:47:820 (1) - this blanket is a bit too close i think , might wanna move it away a bit
12. 00:50:820 (1,2) - this very small overlap looks really ugly, move away 00:50:820 (1) - so the spacing is similar like 00:51:120 (2,3) -
13. 01:14:220 (3,4,5,6) - http://puu.sh/iRCsG.jpg i suggest this rhythm instead, pressure the vocals best while keeping it 1/2 rhythm so you dont miss any drum beats. Im dont wanna take a screenshot but you can also make that(5) in my screenie a 3/4 slider since the vocal is a held sound
14. 01:16:470 (5) - this can be confused as a 1/2 spacing, you could either rearrange the jumps to make it easier to spot, or make 01:16:170 (4) - 3/4 slider, or just nc 01:16:470 (5) - lol
15. 01:32:520 (5) - move to x192 y208 makes more pleasent jump
16. 01:43:995 (2,3) - okay this triplets is suuuuuper strange since its right before a strong beat where a triplet would fit better, it breaks the momentum completely. Highly suggest you move down 01:44:070 (2,3) - a 1/4 beat and stack them on 01:44:220 (1) -
17. 01:44:670 (4,5,6,7) - this has a really bad flow, http://puu.sh/iRDIK.jpg i suggest this pattern for the star instead, and replace 01:44:970 (6,7) - with a 1/1 slider
18. 02:19:020 (3) - more than 1 repeat on a 1/2 slider is never used on any modern maps, players naturally leave the slider after the first repeat so you shouldnt use this because it would combo break, better to just 1 repeat slider -> circle
19. 02:43:470 - circle here makes the rhythm more natural to play since its commonly used in other maps
20. 03:07:395 (2) - I think its better if you place this at 03:07:545 - . Since the triplets arent following anything, its more natural to make the additive triplet start on a red tick(blue in this map since its double bpm), triplets that start on white(or red in this map) should only be used to follow something.
21. 03:11:070 (3,4,5,6,7) - try this http://puu.sh/iRExn.jpg, nice circular flow. make sure to move up everything else that was stacked on 03:11:220 (2,3) -
22. 03:58:020 (1) - this sv change is too big imo, 1x difference is pretty huge, I think a 0.5 or 0.75x works well, and then you can curve the slider too to get extra slow effect
23. 04:07:470 (4) - this stack feels strange, you can move it up to x161 y44 and ctrl+ghj 04:07:620 (1) - so it flows nicely into that slider
24. 04:12:420 (1,2,3) - pls no triplet that starts on white tick ;;
25. 04:14:670 (4,1) - can make a triplet here instead for consistency
26. 04:15:870 (2,3) - and here too, though its not as needed as the previous one
27. 04:28:320 (2,3,4) - place triplet 04:28:470 (4,5) - here instead ;;

You requested a mod on our modding queue, so here it goes~ :3
Remember, I'm just expressing my opinion, so don't be offended when I criticize something, thanks~

General

Beginning

Kotonoha wrote:

im slow modder haha
when i say 1/2 spacing, it means 1/4 in this map since its mapped like double bpm.
[Beginning]

1. 00:02:670 (2,3,4) - a 1/4 repeat slider works better i think, less pressure on the two first circles and for some reason I believe the pressure on last is the same.
2. 00:04:020 (1) - this snare feels out of place, I believe a finish works better
3. 00:03:120 (6,7) - try move (6) to x292 y340 and (7) to x144 y272, I think it flows nice Did something a bit different instead.
4. 00:04:020 (1,2,1) - try placing 00:04:470 (2) - at x88 y172 and 00:04:770 (1) - x84 y188. It's a nice way to stack 1/1 spaced similar to how you did at
5. 00:10:920 (4,1) - oh yeah there are actually more that are perfectly stacked, I think you should manually stack all of them like that. Makes the map a bit more consistent and theyre easy to read and plays nicely.
6. 00:05:670 (6) - move to x252 y252 for better flow
7. 00:06:120 (1,2) - its better if these are stacked, because that small jump takes away some of the pressure on 00:06:420 (3) - thats a pretty strong beat. and then you can unstack and make a small jump between 00:06:420 (3,4) - , or keep it stacked works too but i prefer jump on these
8. 00:10:020 (2) - this is pretty loud, I think the snare alone is enough to make a volume spike, adjusting volume for this is a bit too excessive,
9. 00:21:120 (1,2,3,4,5) - since the snare hits gets louder after each, I think a pattern with gradually increased spacing fits best, youre kinda doing that already but 00:21:270 (2,3) - this stack breaks that
10. 00:24:870 (3) - curve more so it blankets better
11. 00:47:820 (1) - this blanket is a bit too close i think , might wanna move it away a bit I actually like the way it is now.
12. 00:50:820 (1,2) - this very small overlap looks really ugly, move away 00:50:820 (1) - so the spacing is similar like 00:51:120 (2,3) -
13. 01:14:220 (3,4,5,6) - http://puu.sh/iRCsG.jpg i suggest this rhythm instead, pressure the vocals best while keeping it 1/2 rhythm so you dont miss any drum beats. Im dont wanna take a screenshot but you can also make that(5) in my screenie a 3/4 slider since the vocal is a held sound
14. 01:16:470 (5) - this can be confused as a 1/2 spacing, you could either rearrange the jumps to make it easier to spot, or make 01:16:170 (4) - 3/4 slider, or just nc 01:16:470 (5) - lol
15. 01:32:520 (5) - move to x192 y208 makes more pleasent jump
16. 01:43:995 (2,3) - okay this triplets is suuuuuper strange since its right before a strong beat where a triplet would fit better, it breaks the momentum completely. Highly suggest you move down 01:44:070 (2,3) - a 1/4 beat and stack them on 01:44:220 (1) -
17. 01:44:670 (4,5,6,7) - this has a really bad flow, http://puu.sh/iRDIK.jpg i suggest this pattern for the star instead, and replace 01:44:970 (6,7) - with a 1/1 slider
18. 02:19:020 (3) - more than 1 repeat on a 1/2 slider is never used on any modern maps, players naturally leave the slider after the first repeat so you shouldnt use this because it would combo break, better to just 1 repeat slider -> circle I prefer the way it is now, it represents the music nicely.
19. 02:43:470 - circle here makes the rhythm more natural to play since its commonly used in other maps I prefer the current pattern.
20. 03:07:395 (2) - I think its better if you place this at 03:07:545 - . Since the triplets arent following anything, its more natural to make the additive triplet start on a red tick(blue in this map since its double bpm), triplets that start on white(or red in this map) should only be used to follow something.
21. 03:11:070 (3,4,5,6,7) - try this http://puu.sh/iRExn.jpg, nice circular flow. make sure to move up everything else that was stacked on 03:11:220 (2,3) -
22. 03:58:020 (1) - this sv change is too big imo, 1x difference is pretty huge, I think a 0.5 or 0.75x works well, and then you can curve the slider too to get extra slow effect
23. 04:07:470 (4) - this stack feels strange, you can move it up to x161 y44 and ctrl+ghj 04:07:620 (1) - so it flows nicely into that slider
24. 04:12:420 (1,2,3) - pls no triplet that starts on white tick ;; But they actually follow the song's beats, change to a slider tho.
25. 04:14:670 (4,1) - can make a triplet here instead for consistency Prefer not to.
26. 04:15:870 (2,3) - and here too, though its not as needed as the previous one Same.
27. 04:28:320 (2,3,4) - place triplet 04:28:470 (4,5) - here instead ;;

Good map, very nice momentum
Good luck

G3m4sSt4ffLP wrote:

You requested a mod on our modding queue, so here it goes~ :3
Remember, I'm just expressing my opinion, so don't be offended when I criticize something, thanks~

General

● How about custom colours that fit the background? Would be nicer~ Oh I totally forgot about those, I'll find something cool and change ASAP.

Beginning

● 00:06:870 (6,7) - That overlap looks weird. :c I think it looks fine but change slider shape a bit.
● 00:23:820 (3) - I guess the rule shouldn't be broken~ Seems and plays strange. The criteria is outdated, some rules are irrelevant nowadays and I saw this pattern in newly ranked maps too, and I think it is just fine.
● 04:43:020 (3) - Same for this one



● 00:24:870 (3,4) - Improve that blanket please.
● 00:26:520 (4,1) - ^
● 00:26:520 (4,2) - Also, overlap. Overlap is fine.
● 00:29:670 (2,1) - Why is there a small distance between them and not here - 00:30:120 (1,1) - ? 1/8 compared to 1/4, they don't have to have similar distances.
● 00:33:270 (2) - Y136 for perfect stack.
● 00:48:870 (3,4,5) - How about this for better flow? Current pattern has excellent flow too.



● 01:21:270 (2,5) - How about making the distance symmetrical like these - 01:21:570 (4,6) - ? Played around and changed a bit.
● 01:36:420 (4,1) - Improve blanket please.
● 02:17:520 (3) - X242 Y239 for perfect stack.
● 02:33:420 (3,4) - How about stacking these with - 02:32:520 (4) - ?



● 02:51:270 (2) - X436 for perfect stack~
● 02:53:220 (1) - X338 ^
● 02:59:220 (1,2,1) - It flows good, but it looks strange. :c Should look better now.
● 03:15:120 (2) - X259 Y200 for perfect stack.
● 03:23:970 (2,6) - How about a blanket?
● 04:22:920 (2) - X91 Y266 for perfect stack.

Nice map, I hope it'll get ranked~ :3

Euny wrote:

lets do m4m♥

• General

1. set combo colors for your map. Done!
2. your mp3 has bitrate 277kbps. you should change that under 192kbps the bitrate. Asked someone to do it, waiting for a reply.
3. disable to letterbox during breaks. cause there is no break time in your map. V
   

• Beginning

1. i know your map really have many timing change point buti think, you should straighten out new combo for your map. takes 1measure Uhm I'll go over the NC and hitsounds properly soon..
2. 00:06:870 (6,7) - isnt bit far? i think its harsh to tapping to (7) combo. It flows quite good, just requires proper movement.
3. 00:41:670 (3) - remove finish at this back. that sound bit awkward. cause there is no sound from music. Removed and replaced with whistles, there is actually ringing sounds there.
4. 00:45:720 (3,4,5) - objects are feels too far. how about this placing? Made something similar, your pattern is nice but it is too easy and doesn't fit the diff, but I used your idea to make something else!
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:51:420 (3) - i think, you can avoid overlap with 00:51:120 (2) - this. and makes more better shape try it
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:00:870 (2) - why you used normal sampleset? i think just auto is better for music. I dunno, I thought it was fine, changed to auto until I'll go all over the hitsounds (TOO LAZY)
7. 01:04:620 (1,3) - swap nc
8. 01:07:620 (3) - finish should be better for this head. and add nc
9. 01:08:220 (6) - add finish for this head too.
10. 01:09:420 (1,3) - swap these nc.
11. 01:10:920 (1) - this slider bit close to side screen. Well, as long as it doesn't touch it in any resolution it is fine then.
12. 02:14:520 (2) - i heard piano sound from here. hope you add note for here for music. thats better for tempo. The note is not a significant one so I just used the slider reverse.
    
13. 03:05:220 (8,1) - swap these nc.
14. 03:24:420 (6) - add nc cause there is sv changing.
15. 03:57:720 (3) - feels too far. i think its not good for music. lets less that jump how about move it on near by 38l154? Changed spacings a bit.
16. 04:40:020 (4) - add nc for sv changing.
17. 04:40:920 (6) - ^
18. 04:46:020 (5) - ^
19. 04:47:220 (4) - ^

that's it
hope this is helpful...

-Kanzaki wrote:

Hello!

I found your BPM is HALF and you used high SV because of it. 03:26:665 - 03:29:820 around this seconds the bpm feels like changing but i might be wrong about it please ask someone good with timing. This part simply has an other instrument that plays on a different offset (which is 1/16 tick earlier)

There are no tags, consider adding some. (Album name is FLOWER, you can use this.) You are right, totally forgot about those.

Audio bitrate cannot be more than 192 kbps so here you go 192 kbps version i converted for you : http://www21.online-convert.com/downloa ... 7a178c.mp3 Thank you, but I am not sure online convertors are the best, I asked a friend to convert it in the best quality possible.

03:28:957 (5) - Unsnapped circle. Look at my note earlier.

04:59:720 (6) - Unsnapped slider (repeat).

Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at: 02:49:045 - snap to 02:49:020 - These are not important because they are not kiai times. Oops, this one is unnecessary, deleted.

^ Ignore those if you made them on purpose. ^

00:08:520 (4) - It should be at 00:08:445 i think. Actually it should be snapped on a 1/12 tick, it doesn't play well so I ignored it.

00:04:470 (2) - this normal hitsound doesn't sound good. Yeah.. Changed.

00:09:420 (1) - Make it like this so i can see the difference between the previous one. but that's the pattern, the NC indicates a certain difference, which is the SV.

00:15:270 (2) - I don't understand why you used this circle instead of a slider -- http://puu.sh/iSPk9/397a2f0965.jpg Because there are 2 ringing sounds there.

00:38:520 (1,1,1) - what is this NC's about? SV changes.

00:40:320 (1) - Don't stack this one it seems like 2 stream I don't think it is readable as a stream, the AR helps it and it's just finebut acctualy try this : 00:40:620 (3,4) - Ctrl+G and this It is better now with good flow. The previous flow was good as well but you made me tweak the pattern a bit by using CTRL+G on 5

00:46:245 (5) - There is acctualy nothing to follow. It kinda supports the vocals, and it plays well.

00:51:795 (5) - Use longer slider with a little bit low SV adn follow the vocal pls. I don't think slow SV fits here that well.

00:55:320 (2,4) - Try to not overlap that 4 is ultra hidden. I think it is clearly visible while playing, might be a bit hard to see in the editor.

01:07:470 (2) - Not an good overlap. I suggest you to delete it and 01:07:470 (1,2,3) - make an triplet like others. Hm.. I thought a bit and changed it to a triplet.

01:09:120 (8) - NC V

02:43:245 (1,2) - I dont really understand. Vocal and beat, it seems fine.

02:53:220 (1,1,2,3) - No stack if possible since 02:53:220 (1,1) - are has 2 ticks between them. I added a note instead, it felt awkward beforethen.

Generally i found this map so overmapped, think about your triplets and doublets(i dont know what it called i gave one example on the mod 2 circle stream) one more time and you need an far-reaching hitsound mod.

1. 00:08:820 (1) - and 00:09:420 (1) - why did you change the sample set? imo the soft still fits better here
2. 00:08:820 (1,1,2,1,2,3,4) - this should be the same combo
3. 00:16:620 (1,2) - no need for NC here, and for the rest of the diff I think you should take a look at a lot of NC's, because a lot of them don't need to be so small
4. 00:17:220 (1) - you could start this slider with a triple
5. 00:20:975 - note missing (this point might be unsnaped because I'm using a mousepad lol)
6. 00:22:020 (1,2,3,4,5) - you're following the vocals ok, but you could also map the drums a bit, there's a triple not mapped, which makes this part feel undermapped (maybe I'm just paranoid and like to see everything mapped)
7. 00:23:820 (3) - important, I really don't think this is allowed, you should at least make the curves visible, else I think it falls under the Slider Velocity manipulation thing
8. 00:28:478 - note missing
9. 00:29:670 (2,1,1) - try to differenciate the timing difference a bit more (spacing wise)
10. 00:35:220 (1,1) - this overlap can be avoided, try to change the second sliders shape / rotation a bit
11. 00:38:520 (1,1,1) - all these NC's aren't really needed
12. 00:43:770 (2,3) - make them parallel
13. 00:45:420 (2) - I think reversing the curvature of this slider would improve flow
14. 00:55:620 (3,4,5) - the sudden decrease in spacing ruins flow, the stack would be okay with higher spacing, but I think it should be avoided here
15. 01:10:920 (1) - ctrl+g?
16. 01:16:170 (4,1,2) - overkill jump, I would at least move the double a bit up, to about y:276
17. 01:19:320 (2,1) - this blanket can be slightly improved
18. 01:35:970 (1) - no need for NC
19. 01:36:420 (4,1) - spacing should be increased / reduced, to highlight the timing change
20. 02:04:320 (4) - add whistle on slider start?
21. 02:20:220 (1) - NC hell begins x.x
22. 02:24:420 (2) - why is the finish not audible here?
23. 02:28:620 (3) - important, same reason as the above slider
24. 02:29:820 (1,2) - you could blanket this by rotating 1 and moving 2 a bit (circular sliders ask for blankets ; ; )
25. 02:46:920 (4,1) - maybe you could curve 1 a bit more while keeping the blanket
26. 02:47:070 (5,6,1,2) - move the whole thing a bit to the left
27. 02:53:670 (1) - this new combo is soooo confusing, this one must really be removed
28. 03:09:720 (6,7) - a bit overkill, try to move it a bit down and to the left maybe
29. 03:26:070 (3,4,1,2) - imo these notes should have the same spacing, because the spacing between 03:25:620 (2,3) - is actually shorter than between 03:26:220 (4,1) - which makes the pattern really confusing
30. 03:29:220 (1) - no need for NC
31. 03:46:770 (3,4,5) - jump is too small for the break, try to move 3 and 4 around
32. 03:58:020 (1) - overkill slowdown, would be better to have the same speed as 03:55:620 (1) - since the song is the same in both parts
33. 04:28:920 (7,8,9,10,1) - this stream feels a bit bland, maybe you could give it a shape?
34. 04:31:620 (1,1) - imo a slowdown would be welcome here, the sliders get really hard to follow in between al these huge jumps (with that speed)
35. 04:33:720 (5,6) - NC on each note for the sudden timing change (wow I'm asking for NC's xd)
36. 04:34:020 (6) - if you slowed the above sliders, do the same on this one
37. I currently only have my laptop to play and mod so I might have missed some things >.< sorry I couldn't help much with hitsounds but so far they seem perfect really, if you do the same for the rest of the map it should be ok

- Milhofo - wrote:

Hi, from your queue ^^

[Beginning]

1. 00:08:820 (1) - and 00:09:420 (1) - why did you change the sample set? imo the soft still fits better here Experimenting with hitsounds, changed to auto.
2. 00:08:820 (1,1,2,1,2,3,4) - this should be the same combo SV changes should be indicated by NC, but the pattern doesn't really sak for it, changed.
3. 00:16:620 (1,2) - no need for NC here, and for the rest of the diff I think you should take a look at a lot of NC's, because a lot of them don't need to be so small That's a pretty significant SV change, I'll leave the NC as it is.
4. 00:17:220 (1) - you could start this slider with a triple Although it is overmapped, I like it a lot, it fits nicely with the strong note on the slider.
5. 00:20:975 - note missing (this point might be unsnaped because I'm using a mousepad lol) It is on purpose, I wanted a small break, but on second thought a reversed 1/8 slider would fit here nicely, changed pattern a bit.
6. 00:22:020 (1,2,3,4,5) - you're following the vocals ok, but you could also map the drums a bit, there's a triple not mapped, which makes this part feel undermapped (maybe I'm just paranoid and like to see everything mapped) Yeah you are a paranoid lol, I ignored them on purpose.
7. 00:23:820 (3) - important, I really don't think this is allowed, you should at least make the curves visible, else I think it falls under the Slider Velocity manipulation thing I'll change it in-case it is confirmed unrankable, I am pretty sure the ranking criteria is outdated.
8. 00:28:478 - note missing On purpose.
9. 00:29:670 (2,1,1) - try to differenciate the timing difference a bit more (spacing wise) It kinda is, although a bit anti-intuitive, small DS means 1/8 when a stack means 1/4, but the NCs should help a bit, this is a reading pattern.
10. 00:35:220 (1,1) - this overlap can be avoided, try to change the second sliders shape / rotation a bit It's on purpose.
11. 00:38:520 (1,1,1) - all these NC's aren't really needed They are fine imo, SV change indicators.
12. 00:43:770 (2,3) - make them parallel Fixed.
13. 00:45:420 (2) - I think reversing the curvature of this slider would improve flow It is pretty insignificant imo, I like the current one.
14. 00:55:620 (3,4,5) - the sudden decrease in spacing ruins flow, the stack would be okay with higher spacing, but I think it should be avoided here Changed pattern to something much nicer.
15. 01:10:920 (1) - ctrl+g? Insignificant change, but changed either way.
16. 01:16:170 (4,1,2) - overkill jump, I would at least move the double a bit up, to about y:276 Changed pattern to fit the music better, with spacings too.
17. 01:19:320 (2,1) - this blanket can be slightly improved I know, however if I blanket it perfectly it will ruin the slider shape in my opinion.
18. 01:35:970 (1) - no need for NC Woops, removed both.
19. 01:36:420 (4,1) - spacing should be increased / reduced, to highlight the timing change Changed.
20. 02:04:320 (4) - add whistle on slider start? V
21. 02:20:220 (1) - NC hell begins x.x
22. 02:24:420 (2) - why is the finish not audible here? It is? for me at least.
23. 02:28:620 (3) - important, same reason as the above slider Same for me
24. 02:29:820 (1,2) - you could blanket this by rotating 1 and moving 2 a bit (circular sliders ask for blankets ; ; )
25. 02:46:920 (4,1) - maybe you could curve 1 a bit more while keeping the blanket But why? 1 is looking pretty nice.
26. 02:47:070 (5,6,1,2) - move the whole thing a bit to the left Repositioned, good stuff.
27. 02:53:670 (1) - this new combo is soooo confusing, this one must really be removed V
28. 03:09:720 (6,7) - a bit overkill, try to move it a bit down and to the left maybe Redone.
29. 03:26:070 (3,4,1,2) - imo these notes should have the same spacing, because the spacing between 03:25:620 (2,3) - is actually shorter than between 03:26:220 (4,1) - which makes the pattern really confusing 1 is a kinda stronger note and there's NC indication, I think it's cool.
30. 03:29:220 (1) - no need for NC V
31. 03:46:770 (3,4,5) - jump is too small for the break, try to move 3 and 4 around Changed.
32. 03:58:020 (1) - overkill slowdown, would be better to have the same speed as 03:55:620 (1) - since the song is the same in both parts But the build up is not the same
33. 04:28:920 (7,8,9,10,1) - this stream feels a bit bland, maybe you could give it a shape? Sure.
34. 04:31:620 (1,1) - imo a slowdown would be welcome here, the sliders get really hard to follow in between al these huge jumps (with that speed) Slowed down the first one, similar to previous pattern.
35. 04:33:720 (5,6) - NC on each note for the sudden timing change (wow I'm asking for NC's xd) Added NC on 4 instead of 5, feels better pattern-wise.
36. 04:34:020 (6) - if you slowed the above sliders, do the same on this one Won't fit
37. I currently only have my laptop to play and mod so I might have missed some things >.< sorry I couldn't help much with hitsounds but so far they seem perfect really, if you do the same for the rest of the map it should be ok Really? Great, now motivate myself to finish it faster than a snail.

I think the new combos should be looked at, rest if fine and it's a really fun map, good luck

HappyRocket88 wrote:

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————



Hi! Returning your favor of the M4M. Sorry for the late. >< I had some liabilities. I'm pretty sorry but I can't provide you a big mod because I don't know how to mod extras. Since the jumps are too high for me and I would suggest to reduce the DS a bit in these jumps 03:37:683 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) , 01:32:883 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3) and Well the map is intended for more experienced players, no worries

General

1. I don't know if this is even a problem but the filesize exceeds the 10mb in the mapset. Good quality mp3 and hitsound files.
2. 04:59:783 (6) This slider's repeat is unsnapped. Snapped on 1/12

Beginning

1. 00:04:083 (1) I don't know but this slider shape is weird and makes an ugly overlap with these objects 00:04:533 (2,1) I'd suggest you to change the shape for something that makes the pattern cleaner. I think that's fine
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:53:883 (1,3) Separate them a bit to avoid overlap. Neat.
3. 02:45:783 (6) Not sure, but you can stack them to make a neater flow. The pattern is supposed to brake the player after the huge jump but still not completely.
4. 03:27:183 (6) NC here for consistency. V
5. 04:02:883 (5) NC ^ V
6. 03:22:533 (6) Set this circle here x=64 | y=112 to make it parallel with 03:21:933 (2). V
7. 01:52:983 (3) ^ x=97 | y=196 The star is not completely symmetrical in both sides of the screen, it is a bit rotated, currnet pattern is fine.
8. 01:57:783 (1,2) Maybe they can be in the centre a bit more to clean the flow. Changed a bit!

Overall the map is pretty neat, blanket and is worth to be an extra. Pitifully, I can't pass this map. ;__;

Have a star then for my incompetence ◕‿◕

Thank you very much!

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————

VINXIS wrote:

ithinkitneedsworktbh

Map

1. buxw tags xd
   
2. hihi ur sv spams at the beginning are really random n rlly messy and it can fuk som players up at parts such as at 00:08:883 (1,2) - where theres litearlly no indication for the player wotsoever that the sv is goign to chnage tHAT DRAMTICALLY. can u clean up some of the sv changes adns tuff pls kthx OK
3. 00:04:833 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ugly because that overlap is so bad cuz usually almosto all things that r barely touching or r touching only a little bit r usually ugly as fuk lmfao. I think we can agree that if u actualyl used a star shape for it it'd look better ya FIXED
4. 00:06:183 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - gud spacing emphasis but ur design looks ugly mostly because of 00:06:483 (3,4,5) - how it's almost completely horizontal-like after u make a diagonal jump from 2 it just looks ugly and inconsistent. CHANGED
5. 00:07:383 (7) - why REMOVED
6. 00:07:683 (1,2,3) - random jumps with no justification from the song's emphasis or smth lik that CHANGED
7. 00:11:283 (1,2,3) - cud u possible have this away from ur combo before this it just makes it look cluttered this way NAH IT IS JUST FINE IN GAME, EDITOR MAKES IT MESSY
8. 00:13:683 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - yo can u do mor of this plz kthx I didn't realise this is good.
9. 00:18:933 (2,1) - y is the spacing not greater than 00:19:083 (1,2) - when the strong beat is o n 1 'Cuz I lowered the SV, might change patterns.
10. 00:19:533 (2,1) - ^
11. 00:21:183 (1,2,3,4,5) - the random spacing stuff THIS AINT RANDOM, I increased it whenever there was a strong beat.
12. 00:23:883 (3) - confirmed unrankable slider and its dum anyway cuz sliderend on strong beat when the sliderhead was weaker so like instead of that can u like make a slider going away from the next 1 and make a circle on the big white tick or smth cuz p sure that's 100% better trustmeplz 100% TRUST
13. 00:28:083 (1,2,3) - this right after 00:27:333 (1,2,3) - ???????????????????????????????? I DONT UNDERSTAND??
14. realy throughout the map the problem is that your design is really messy and there's little to no s t r u c t u r e.. U see it at parts like 00:13:683 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - cuz it actually looks like everything comes together in nicely and its not too cluttered or not too randomly placed and the spacing is emphasized very nicely where it should be. U dont do that kinda stuff ever again in ur map and it's just ajhsdjhasfjka and it's ltierally the main problem that wont make this map rankable. Really I could go on on every single problem and detail and tell u wot to do but like even in the first 30 mins i said all taht and sdfjkdaskl idk it's ur choice whether to listen to me or not but this is like zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz i can do more if u want in the weekend or smth but rn eh I map whatever feels right, I didn't use the same pattern because I didn't see the right call for it, but I will go over stuff again and remap what's needed.
15. i skipped stuff cuz same problems over and over e.t.c.
16. 00:50:883 (1,2,3,4,5) - wot evn y do u do this rhythm at all its like wh and sounds wh VOCALS ARE GOOD?
17. 00:52:383 (2,3) - u never map it like this ever y did u cuz vocals good
18. refrain from using diagonal sliders as much or competely vertical/horizontal sliders cuz tbh sliders with slight angles to them make the map look s o m u c h b e t t e r ok
19. tbh it looks like u have many different ideas that just dont flo together. Stick with 1 idea and then think of smth that f i t s with the part after it so its not like aeghsdjkfasjkjkdg all the time where ur just playing another airman u kno (except nowhere near as bad dw) ill try ty

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

loopuleasa wrote:

I love the latest updates to this map, and I hope you go for ranked since it's a really nice guilty pleasure marathon to play.

ohad1881 wrote:

00:31:383 (3,1) - stack better V
00:42:183 (4,1) - stack the end of 1 with it? Nah..
01:00:033 (1) - delete? Actually I removed the note in mid triplet instead and changed the pattern.
01:03:783 (6) - nc? V
01:09:933 (4,1) - better stack V
01:23:883 (1,1) - ^^ V
02:13:983 (1) - reverse this slider? Nah, it's good now.
02:28:683 (3) - imo if you attach the two red anchors the slider will look better Done and made some slight movements.
02:33:483 (3,4) - better stack V
02:55:383 (3) - either blanket with 02:54:783 (5) or stack the end with 02:55:233 (2) Why not both?
03:43:983 - mb like this? http://prntscr.com/8lwhjq 6 should be emphasized more imo. I like it.
03:44:583 (7,4) - better stack V
04:34:683 (2) - ctrl g? Nah.
gl!

FCL wrote:

M4M

• [diff]

1. 00:31:683 (1,2) - imo, this looks is very ugly I agree, changed.
2. 00:38:133 (4,1) - stack end? No, why?
3. 00:42:183 (4,1) - ^ ^
4. 00:45:483 (2,3) - make these sliders one form, so this look better Changed whole pattern shapes a bit to resemble each other.
5. 01:27:783 (2,3,4,5,1) - idk why is there a large spacings, this does not predispose Momentum that builds up.
6. 01:53:283 (1) - it is very unexpected, I do not think it's good I'll keep it anyway.
7. 02:08:883 (1) - it's looks weird Fine by me.
8. 02:19:083 (3,4) - imo, overlap there it's not a good idea. I suggest increase the distance between them You can't even see it while in game, the editor just increases the AR, it's fine.
9. 02:40:083 (1,2,3) - Why not, it's more logical? http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3784290 Because the vocal rhythm changes and it goes nicely into the next slider this way.
10. 02:53:733 (2,3,1) - make more spacing, it seems like it 1/8 Alright, changed.
11. 03:56:883 (1,2,3,4) - it's looks weird, Make a more pointed jump V
12. I also would like to draw attention to neatness. I think that in this map a lot of unnecessary overlaps and unstacks that need to be corrected I see where you come from, but I don't feel like it actually matters, I care about the gameplay rather than the astethics in the editor, if I'll fine something when I go by everything, sure I'll fix it

GL!

Smoothie World wrote:

[General]

Unused hitsounds. Delete the following:
drum-hitfinish4.wav
soft-hitnormal3.wav
soft-sliderslide3.wav
soft-hitwhistle2.wav
soft-sliderslide2.wav
drum-hitclap1.wav
drum-hitfinish1.wav
soft-hitclap4.wav
soft-slidertick2.wav
soft-hitclap1.wav
soft-hitwhistle1.wav

Fixed those, thanks.

[Beginning]

00:10:083 (2) - New combo here to better represent the change in slider velocity.

00:24:333 (4,1) - Spacing can be increased here to better emphasize the kick on the downbeat as well as the bass sound.

00:29:733 (2,1,1) - In this patter, I feel 00:30:183 (1,1) should not be stacked, as the time gap in between is misleading due to the fact that it isn't consistent with 00:29:733 (2,1) . I'd recommend not stacking them.

00:55:083 (1,3) - These two overlap in a way that makes it kinda weird to read. Consider simply stacking the head of 3 with the end segment of 1 for more clarity and a better overall appearance.

01:53:283 (1) - The change in slider velocity is too drastic considering it's the only one of its kind in the first Kiai section. I recommend increasing it a bit; I like the concept, but it feels a bit too extreme as it is right now.

01:54:483 (4) - This angle feels very rounded compared to the other shapes of sliders in this section. I recommend "opening it up" a bit to fit better with the style of the other sliders.

02:12:183 (2,3) - I feel you can just move 3 to x:260, y:152 and continue the pattern you have going now from there. A bit of a jump would feel very nice here albeit not very big.

02:16:983 (2) - Not a fan of the slider ending on the downbeat. Consider reversing 1 and just putting a circle on the white tick where this once ended.

02:23:283 (1) - Kind of a random whistle sound here, not sure if this was intended.

02:26:733 (5,1) - Spacing should be much larger here to better emphasize the crash hit in the song.

02:38:883 (1) - Flow can be broken here instead of keeping it in the same direction as 2, 3, and 4 to better represent the downbeat. But why would it represent the downbeat better? I don't see anything wrong with the current pattern.

02:59:283 (1,2,3) - A better aesthetic look would be to have 3 the same distance from 2 visually as 1.

03:28:533 (3,4) - In this jump section, you have sharp jumps to build up some momentum but here it's totally ruined by having this low spacing and very obtuse angle. I'd recommend keeping the large spacing, sharper angle jumps you have going already to keep the player's momentum going.

04:17:883 (1) - This slider is unrankable due to the beginning overlapping way too hard on itself. This needs to not be so clumped here. Nearly unreadable.

riktoi wrote:

moddddd from my queeue

[General]
Add the album name to tags. It is added, the name is FLOWER.

The mp3 suggests that this song/artist also has a name written in moon runes, you should fix that too. Idk what moon runes are and Google doesn't help me much either lol. I do see that there's some gibberish on the details of the mp3, however I have the original mp3 from the album and the title and artist are represented correctly in the beatmap.

01:44:283 (1,2,3,4,1) - you should look into maybe lowering the spacing a bit for parts like this, they feel a bit overemphasized (think about this carefully) I feel that it represents the songs nicely, I don't think they are overemphasized, but I'll reconsider it if more people will mention this certain pattern.

[Beginning]

02:12:183 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - you could increase the spacing here (OVERLAPS WITH THE MOD ABOVE) V
02:14:883 (2,3,4,5) - ^ V


04:26:883 - this sv does not feel right (It's fine when playing tho) Last intense chorus

04:41:883 (1,2,3) - make these into a triangle shape or something But why? I like the way they are now.

I think that's all I have to note about this map.
Good luck with your map

Troponoop wrote:

Howdy there, i'm posting this for a m4m from your queue.

[Beginning]

00:03:783 (2,1) - the 3.58 DS jump feels awkward and overmapped. Uhm, slightly reduced.

00:08:283 (1,2,3) - This seems like an abrupt halt. Maybe space these out more to continue with the earlier flow you had It is an abrupt halt, but the direction change is going great with it.

00:10:083 (2) - NC for SV change V

00:13:683 (1,2) - not really sure if you need a NC here since its a tiny SV change. (i also don't see the need for a tiny SV change NC fits here and I don't like big combos. The SV changes are because I liked to play around with the beginning, and as long as it plays well, why not?

00:17:283 (1,2) - you blanketed 2 on the second half of 1, so why not use 00:16:683 (1,2) - to blanket the first half? It'd be cute as fuck Kawaii measures activated.

00:19:083 (1,1) - to me it sounds like they are following the same sound (i could easily be wrong) so why do they have such drastically different SV changes? Well, you're wrong. The first one is held and kinda softer, while the second one is not held and is stronger.

00:23:883 (3,4) - Just my preference here, but i would scrap the overlap, and just extend 00:23:883 (3) - to follow the vocals This pattern feels really awkward, eitherway the pattern was changed.

00:29:283 (1,2,1) - The vocals seem more dominant for this section, so why not focus on them? I prefer following the instruments since the vocals are mixed with it.

00:30:183 (1) - it's a bit uneven, just saying I never was good with symmentry, hopefully fixed.

00:31:683 (1,2) - you could make this a swagtastic blanket. It would look a lot cleaner I tried.

00:45:183 (1,2,3) - NC for these 3 SV changes Meh, I hate the pattern now, remapped.

00:53:883 (1,2,3,4) - as cute as this is, these jumps feel out of place because the music hasn't really changed that dramatically to foster them jumps Jumps are there because they're beat away from each other and I honestly think it goes perfectly with the vocals.

01:52:083 (4,5) - extend 4 and remove 5 to match the vocals better The current pattern follows the vocals and instruments just right, she goes "da-ha" and then "te" and not "daa" to "te" as you think.

01:53:283 (1) - this SV just clogs up the flow of the map. It feels way too funky SV increased, the previous one was prob too extreme.

02:42:033 (6,1) - you really like overlapping the sliders like this in this song, but maybe you could spruce it up a bit by stacking their slider-ends I never found consecutive sliders that their ends are stack as appealing, it really depends on the song but I don't feel like it fits here.

03:09:783 (6) - NC Changed around.

03:29:283 (7) - Maybe you could change this into a funky slow slider to fill up the dead space There's no need to, it fits just right.

03:57:483 (1,2,3,4) - an alternative to these jumps could be to making a slider and matching the vocals It is an alternative after all, I might do that in the future, but for now I'll leave it as it is.

03:58:083 (1) - and 01:53:283 (1) - should really have the same SV, since they are practically identical parts in the song It's not mandatory, so I'll leave it as it is.

03:56:583 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - and 01:51:783 (3,4,5) - should also be somewhat similar since these are also similar parts ^

04:32:883 (1,2) - make these into a single slider to match 04:31:683 (1,1) - since you are aiming for the vocals at this part This could work too, but the current pattern is just fine as well.

04:40:983 (1) - should really start where its slider-end currently is cuz red ticks are bad (and so it matches with 04:40:083 (1) - ) But it follows vocals well and again, it is no mandatory.

04:40:083 (1,1) - I don't see the big deal in these two having different SV changes Slider that starts at ringing = low SV, otherwise, higher SV.


Besides some of the wild SV changes, i really liked the map, not to mention that the song is gucci. Dropping a star for good luck!

- N a n a k a - wrote:

Yoho
i'm here by your Q

Beginning


00:29:733 (2,1) - this point can be unrankable, Its hidden head slide when i see this first time
00:35:283 (1,1) - make curve and blanket them. it will be pretty better I think the current one is fine too, there's a blanket and it's not a copy paste pattern.
00:44:883 (2) - suggest to place note like this for more flow

SPOILER

00:46:383 (2) - NC change sv
00:50:883 (1,2,3) - change slide tail to soft it will make more Compatible with the song and move whistle on this note 00:51:783 (4,5) - to on this slide 00:51:858 (5) - (slide-whistle) then make sure to remove whistle on head and tail slide

if you want code

200,176,50883,6,0,B|305:154|305:154|363:171,1,134.999996423721,8|0,1:0|2:0,0:0:0:0:
384,103,51183,2,0,P|457:84|480:24,1,134.999996423721,0|0,1:0|2:0,0:0:0:0:
405,29,51483,2,0,B|368:20|341:34|321:55|321:55|277:33,1,134.999996423721,0|0,1:0|2:0,0:0:0:0:
176,16,51783,1,0,0:0:0:0:
164,32,51858,2,2,P|167:76|150:117,1,89.9999976158143,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

01:16:533 (1) - move to 252,260 same as previous note
02:28:533 (2) - move to 160,264 more flow
02:30:783 (4) - move to 416,156 same as previous spacing I don't really understand this one? Although it doesn't matter, so I spaced it out a bit. Just noting.
03:51:783 (5) - I suggest to move this note to stack on 6 maybe better smooth jump
04:23:733 (5) - same as 00:46:383 (2) -
04:25:233 (4) - ^
04:36:633 (2,3,4) - kinda overmapped. if you want to triple, place on 04:36:483 (1) - I think it fits and goes nicely into the change of pace in the song.

also this part is hs suggestion

04:41:733 (3) - drum sampleset
04:42:783 (1) - drum on head
04:44:133 (2) - ^
04:45:183 (1) - drum sampleset
04:48:933 (6) - ^
04:46:083 (1,1) - drum on tail and on single note
04:46:983 (3) - drum on tail
04:47:883 (1,2) - ^
04:50:583 (3) - drum on head
04:51:783 (2) - drum on head and tail
04:52:083 (1,1) - same as 04:46:083 (1,1) -
04:52:983 (3) - drum on tail
04:53:283 (1,1) - same as 04:46:083 (1,1) -
04:54:183 (3) - drum on head and tail
04:54:483 (1,2,2) - drum on tail

Very cool and relax song
hope it ranked soon

Avishay wrote:

I don't really understand this one? Although it doesn't matter, so I spaced it out a bit. Just noting.

1. 00:26:583 (4,1) - fix this blanket
2. 00:27:483 (2,1) - ^
3. 00:42:783 (2) - the tail is not proper stacked
4. 00:45:183 (1) - not proper stack
5. 00:45:783 (3) - seems that you're following the vocal here. well that's good, but you need to mute the tail for that
6. 00:46:983 (3) - ^
7. 00:55:083 (1,3) - not a proper stack
8. 00:57:183 (2,1) - there. fix that blanket
9. 01:24:333 (2,1) - (1) is not proper stack, (2) and (1) needs to fix the blanket
10. 01:36:033 (7) - sounds like not even a proper stack
11. 02:52:083 (5) - not stacked properly
12. 02:59:283 (1,2) - fix this blanket
13. 03:00:183 (4) - not stacked properly
14. 04:01:983 (1) - ^
15. 04:02:733 (4,1) - fix this blanket
16. 04:17:883 (1) - not stacked properly
17. 04:52:533 (1) - how about stack with 04:50:883 (1) - head?

-Hakurei- wrote:

[Beginning]

1. 00:26:583 (4,1) - fix this blanket
2. 00:27:483 (2,1) - ^
3. 00:42:783 (2) - the tail is not proper stacked
4. 00:45:183 (1) - not proper stack
5. 00:45:783 (3) - seems that you're following the vocal here. well that's good, but you need to mute the tail for that
6. 00:46:983 (3) - ^
7. 00:55:083 (1,3) - not a proper stack
8. 00:57:183 (2,1) - there. fix that blanket
9. 01:24:333 (2,1) - (1) is not proper stack, (2) and (1) needs to fix the blanket
10. 01:36:033 (7) - sounds like not even a proper stack
11. 02:52:083 (5) - not stacked properly
12. 02:59:283 (1,2) - fix this blanket
13. 03:00:183 (4) - not stacked properly
14. 04:01:983 (1) - ^
15. 04:02:733 (4,1) - fix this blanket
16. 04:17:883 (1) - not stacked properly
17. 04:52:533 (1) - how about stack with 04:50:883 (1) - head?

well played man. this song is really good

1. 00:15:783 (3,1) - Stack them please, It fits much better
2. 00:50:583 (4,1,2,3) - Silence slider ends. PLEASE
3. 01:43:233 (5,6,7) - Consider spacing them out a bit