好
No, we like quality.VINXIS wrote:
we all love post-rank modding
also, no need for the bg to be so low res when versions like this exist.Blue Dragon wrote:
What's up with that unnecessary panty shot in the BG? Can't you find a more suitable BG for this map?
2 different thing s that are now being inductively connectedAyu wrote:
No, we like quality.VINXIS wrote:
we all love post-rank modding
你说的对,有人问过了确定漏内裤不等于NSFW,所以如果这图被dq了,就换回原来的bg吧=。=DarknessAngel wrote:
我在放這張圖前有先思考過,首先是這個
再來是說,我覺得那邊看起來其實很有可能是內搭的短褲,有點微小到看不出來,這位畫師把重點焦距在兩位女孩子和景色上所以感覺很不明顯,並不會讓人感覺到色氣~
希望你們覺得這些解釋合理:>
其實之前給Karen發過PM了,既然還有人有問題那我就發出來吧
我覺得思想還是純潔一點好呃...難道一定緊盯著那地方瞧那到底是不是內褲麼
EDIT: 為了避免爭議,我用遮蔽物擋掉了。不過我覺得很奇怪,是否是全年齡的標準不應該是以「有沒有性暗示」為判定標準呢?露內褲也是有區別的,而且也有就算沒有裸露太多也依然色氣滿滿的圖片啊(看過好多samples)。單純以「有沒有露內褲」來判定我覺得很膚淺,想想看小孩子在看一位女孩子身著泳裝搔首弄姿的圖片,跟現在BG這樣的圖片,哪一個才真正對他不好?在遵照制度走的時候也不能放棄作為人的思考,不然會變得像「機器」一樣無聊
There's not so much difference between modding and improving quality, unless you of course "only do it for the kd"VINXIS wrote:
2 different thing s that are now being inductively connectedAyu wrote:
No, we like quality.
let us hope that our quality is assured.Ayu wrote:
No, we like quality.VINXIS wrote:
we all love post-rank modding
i just wondering what kind of map "panty shot" could fitBlue Dragon wrote:
[General]
- What's up with that unnecessary panty shot in the BG? Can't you find a more suitable BG for this map?
possibly some good ol' rise against or bad religion.EvilElvis wrote:
i just wondering what kind of map "panty shot" could fitBlue Dragon wrote:
[General]
- What's up with that unnecessary panty shot in the BG? Can't you find a more suitable BG for this map?
@passing by
canadian tire xdddddddddCherry Blossom wrote:
Mapping is a VINXIS thing.