1. 00:01:691 (2) - Move the node on the tail to (404,153) so the slider's curve will follow 00:00:428 (1)'s tail much better?
2. 00:09:743 - Why not add a finish too? There's a cymbal sound to follow here.
3. 00:44:480 - ^ (And 00:45:743 and 00:47:006. And maybe a few others. Care to explain why do you cover these with whistles most of the time? Also applies to the entire mapset.)
4. 01:12:428 (1,2) - Try this rhythm? Goes way better with the music, and is more easily followed.
5. 01:14:954 (4,5) - ^
6. 01:17:480 (1,2) - End (1) at 01:18:270 and start (2) at 01:18:585? Same reason as 01:12:428 (1,2).

1. 00:24:428 (5,6,1) - Spacing error.
2. 00:32:164 (3,4) - ^
3. 00:47:006 (2,1) - ^
4. 01:16:533 (5,6) - ^
5. 01:17:954 (2,3) - ^
6. 01:23:796 (2,3) - ^ (You may want to check the entire diff for spacing inconsistencies.)

1. 00:49:533 (1,2) - Try to make them not touch each other for the sake of neatness?

1. 01:02:006 (8,9,1) - Might as well make the spacing consistent so they'll look tidier.
2. 01:12:270 (2,1) - Uh again, you may want to make these sliders not touch each other. Either that, or make 01:12:112 (1,2,1) touch equally.

Hinsvar wrote:

Although there is already a ranked version of the song's map, I'll give the proof of the title anyway, taken directly from LiSA's official website.

Let's check this map!

*Bolded = Unrankable or very, very strongly suggested; red = Highly suggested or questionable (still weaker than the bolded ones); black = Minor suggestions/rants; blue = Notes/advices to avoid/fix repeated problems. Also note that hitsound suggestions on a diff may apply on similar parts of the song and the other diffs of the mapset.

>Easy

1. 00:01:691 (2) - Move the node on the tail to (404,153) so the slider's curve will follow 00:00:428 (1)'s tail much better?
   So you mean a blanket :p Fixed
2. 00:09:743 - Why not add a finish too? There's a cymbal sound to follow here.
3. 00:44:480 - ^ (And 00:45:743 and 00:47:006. And maybe a few others. Care to explain why do you cover these with whistles most of the time? Also applies to the entire mapset.)
   I mean I've checked through the entire mapset for hitsounding and I only use the finish when i really want to emphasise the music so sometimes parts that may need more emphasis, I don't do it and I simply use a whistle instead.
4. 01:12:428 (1,2) - Try this rhythm? Goes way better with the music, and is more easily followed.
   Unfortunately I think the rhythm here at the moment is very consistent and is fine to me. They're all on white ticks so I don't think rhythm is an issue here
5. 01:14:954 (4,5) - ^
6. 01:17:480 (1,2) - End (1) at 01:18:270 and start (2) at 01:18:585? Same reason as 01:12:428 (1,2).
   Did something else to keep consistency with the previous section

>Normal

1. 00:24:428 (5,6,1) - Spacing error.
2. 00:32:164 (3,4) - ^
3. 00:47:006 (2,1) - ^
4. 01:16:533 (5,6) - ^
5. 01:17:954 (2,3) - ^
6. 01:23:796 (2,3) - ^ (You may want to check the entire diff for spacing inconsistencies.)
   You just made me realise that the numbers at the top right tell me about the spacing lol. Adjusted and checked all distance snaps

>Hard

1. 00:49:533 (1,2) - Try to make them not touch each other for the sake of neatness?
   Adjusted. Didn't know they were touching

>Insane

1. 01:02:006 (8,9,1) - Might as well make the spacing consistent so they'll look tidier.
2. 01:12:270 (2,1) - Uh again, you may want to make these sliders not touch each other. Either that, or make 01:12:112 (1,2,1) touch equally.

Pretty much just that.

Poke me once you're done with this mod.

Yauxo wrote:

Metadata confirmed via BNSG

Unrankable
Rather important change
Not so important change/small note or opinion

(copy paste end | HistoryTag: ~ Sploosh ~)

[General]
■ Remove unused greenlines: 00:00:428 - 00:10:059 - 01:28:059 - (I assume you use the same greenlines for every diff (I took them from Easy)) Apparently this does not count for Insane.

I always see this as not a problem since I'm lazy and nobody will notice the greenlines during gameplay anyways :p. If there is some effect that actually affects the gameplay, I will delete the greenlines.

[Easy]
■ I'd suggest that you double the amount of NCs in this diff, as that would support the 4/4 logic. This means, stuff like 00:02:954 (4) -, 00:08:006 (4) - and 00:15:585 (4) - (etc) should ne NC'd.
Since there has been many request to double the NC on easy, I guess I should do it :p

■ 00:17:954 (1) - There are two problems with this: a) It is placed on a redtick, which makes it usually harder to play, as the player might only be comfortable with basic 1/1 rhythms - and b) The spacing is too much. You can imagine the spacing being related to the timeline - the more space inbetween two objects, the longer the break is.

The easiest way to fix that would probably to move (1) closer to (6).
If you want to kee a basic rhythm (which also kinda fixed problem a)), then you could consider using something like this http://puu.sh/hZO9F/464822e14e.jpg
(Note: If you worry about skipping that beat where the current object is on, take a look at 00:02:322 (3) - You also skipped that one beat here in order to hold a basic rhythm - Same thing :3)
■ You could add notes on 00:27:901 - and 00:29:164 - . It might look like it'll be hectic to play, but it'll actually help the player hold the rhythm (since (4) is kinda alone over there)
■ Same goes for 00:31:691 - and 00:36:743 -
■ 00:56:006 (7) - I'd suggest that you do something like this to this section. The player knows the Slider-to-Slider 1/2 transition by now, so that one should fit more into this as opposed to a weirdish break

■ 01:08:638 (3) - Curve the last bit more to properly blanket 01:09:585 (4) - . You already have a tick there, use it :3

[Normal]
■ 00:05:954 (2) - I'd suggest that you keep these "triplets" (idk, 3 object transition thingies) straight without any fancy curve like this one. It'd be easier to play, which wouldnt harm that diff at all
■ 00:31:691 (2) - For some reason this one feels really out of place. Maybe try one of these? This section is rather weird to map in a Normal, so I dont blame you

The hitobjects do feel empty here so I agree with this but I will leave the 4 hitcircle

■ 00:49:059 (2) - Change to a repeat maybe?
Difficulty should be fine here. Straightened it
■ 01:16:849 (6,7) - For some reason I dont like this one. Uh. Maybe have this one be like 01:11:796 (4,5) - ?

Kinda lacks in visuals, but that's okay

[Hard]
■ 00:09:585 (2) - Blanket this one maybe? Would improve the flow imo (loop flow > zigzag)
Wanted some antiflow to compliment the music
■ 00:42:743 (4) - Like this? (Slider instead of Circle, Circle instead of Slider)

Red tick slider should be fine

■ 00:59:085 (4) - Remove. Dont think a triplet is neccessary here
■ 01:16:059 (1) - Move this one a bit so that its trail doesnt touch the previous object
■ 01:20:322 (2) - 504/200?
I like ty

Something buggs me in this diff, but I cant quite point it out
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Insane]
■ Amazing
<3

1. 00:02:164 (2) - This looks awful lol, why not make an actual snakeslider.
   
   SPOILER

   
   Fix dem all: 01:05:954 (1) -
2. 00:02:006 (1,2) - NC switch.
3. 00:09:743 (1) - Why extended slider here, put it in comparison to 00:09:112 (1) -. Either make both extended or regularly snapped for consistency.
4. 00:10:375 (1) - Slider here, fits better to the e-guitar nad makes for a good transition to the next section.
5. 00:12:901 (1) - Yo, where's the finish. Also, best slidershape (see above)
6. 00:20:164 (1) - Two circles because two strong beats, and do some nice stuff with it:
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:49:928 (2,4) - Man, this sounds clearly overmapped, delete and do something, jumps or such.
8. 00:51:980 (4,5,6) - Thanks for caring for the players (mentioned beats are overmapped, and you sure you want to keep that spacing lol)
9. 00:52:533 (2) - If you want to keep that extended slider already, at least keep it consistent and do same at 00:53:796 (2,3) -
10. 00:55:849 (4) - That finish on the tail hurts, delete.
11. 01:01:928 (4,1) - Streamjumps should only happen when there is a significant change/beat in the music to reason it. It's okay for 01:02:243 (4,1) - , but the one I mention has no reason for it to be there. Just because the vocals jump back in is no valid reason. Equalize the spacing here.
12. 01:12:428 (1) - 415|82 for alignment with the previous stream please.
13. 01:15:428 (2) - This combined with 01:14:638 (5) - chops the flow pretty hard imo, why isn't this a slider.
14. 01:18:585 (1) - ^
15. 01:19:375 (1,2) - Bad slider leniency man, how about:
    
    SPOILER

    
16. 01:23:480 (1) - Delete NC, don't need more emphasis.

Pho wrote:

toybot asked for some quick check on his diff:

[toytoy]

1. 00:02:164 (2) - This looks awful lol, why not make an actual snakeslider. - this is how i want to make snake sliders, idk why i like this way more
   
   SPOILER

   
   Fix dem all: 01:05:954 (1) -
2. 00:10:375 (1) - Slider here, fits better to the e-guitar nad makes for a good transition to the next section. - leaving as circle, its more fun to hit tbh with those kick sliders before it
3. 00:12:901 (1) - Yo, where's the finish. Also, best slidershape (see above) - added finish, left shape alone
4. 00:51:980 (4,5,6) - Thanks for caring for the players (mentioned beats are overmapped, and you sure you want to keep that spacing lol) - i think stream makes a great contrast to the sliders
5. 00:52:533 (2) - If you want to keep that extended slider already, at least keep it consistent and do same at 00:53:796 (2,3) - - shortened slider
6. 01:19:375 (1,2) - Bad slider leniency man, how about: - they're fine like this, i got 300s first try :p because you'll hover over (1), getting its tail, then you'll move through (2), which will get ITS tail.
   
   SPOILER

   

Overall it's fine, just take care of how to use streamjumps properly.

Irreversible wrote:

congratz mikii and toybot~

Yauxo wrote:

Gratz :3

Haruto Aizawa wrote:

Congratulations mikii and toybot!

gokugohan12468 wrote:

Gratzz~ \w/

toybot wrote:

hype~
grats on 1st ranked set mikii :3

Aerous wrote:

rip

• 
  Please keep the rhythms clear and simple here, because this difficulty is aimed for the beginners. That being said, the 1/2 rhythms are a no-go because they make the difficulty needlessly complicated and need to be removed. Here are the examples:

1. 00:08:006 (1,2) -
2. 00:34:849 (3,1) -
3. 00:40:217 (3,1) -

1. 00:32:006 (2) -
2. 00:37:059 (2) -
3. 00:54:743 (1) -
4. 00:57:270 (1) -

1. 00:06:191 (4) -
2. 00:07:454 (4) -
3. 00:40:296 (2,4,6) -
4. 00:51:980 (4,5,6) -
5. 01:26:875 (2,8) -

Asphyxia wrote:

Hey Mikii,

After some internal QAT discussion, we decided to pull your map out from Qualified for the following reasons:

[Easy]

• 
  Please keep the rhythms clear and simple here, because this difficulty is aimed for the beginners. That being said, the 1/2 rhythms are a no-go because they make the difficulty needlessly complicated and need to be removed. Here are the examples:

1. 00:08:006 (1,2) -
2. 00:34:849 (3,1) -
3. 00:40:217 (3,1) -

Haha this comes to bite me in the ass. Fixed

There are many objects that start on nothing, and because of this, you skip many powerful beats that should be emphasized throughout the difficulty. Here are few examples of said issue:

1. 00:32:006 (2) -
   I tried to simplify the rhythm here but mapping to the red tick might cause difficulty issues. I have changed this.
2. 00:37:059 (2) -
   ^
3. 00:54:743 (1) -
4. 00:57:270 (1) -
   This one is much harder to decide since I want to keep the slider but I would like to prevent using 1/2 as stated before so this should be left as it is in my opinion
   

----

Please keep in mind that the above listed examples are just examples for the mentioned issues so that this generally applies to more than just these mentioned ones.

For further assistance, please contact BNG members. Best of luck with the re-qualification!

###EM

Xilver wrote:

Heh, for once I agree with the DQ reasons of a map (The Extra at least)

Asphyxia wrote:

Hey Mikii,

After some internal QAT discussion, we decided to pull your map out from Qualified for the following reasons:

[toybot's Extra]

Overmapping. The patterns like the ones below have no connection with the song, resulting into questionable playability and loweing overall quality of the difficulty.

1. 00:06:191 (4) - ok
2. 00:07:454 (4) - ok
3. 00:40:296 (2,4,6) - ????? these aren't really that bad, but fine
4. 00:51:980 (4,5,6) - ok
5. 01:26:875 (2,8) - ok

+ a few other places that Mikii and I went over

----

Please keep in mind that the above listed examples are just examples for the mentioned issues so that this generally applies to more than just these mentioned ones.

For further assistance, please contact BNG members. Best of luck with the re-qualification!

###EM

Aerous wrote:

rip

xxdeathx wrote:

Hey nice job taking my set's video without notifying or asking me, I'd appreciate credit being given in map description.

Aerous wrote:

There might be a part in the audio where its wrongly snapped 00:50:638 -

I changed my audio to xxdeathx's because he fixed his audio for the drum to be snapped correctly.

Idk if you changed your audio or not , but yolo

Charles445 wrote:

Aerous wrote:

There might be a part in the audio where its wrongly snapped 00:50:638 -

I changed my audio to xxdeathx's because he fixed his audio for the drum to be snapped correctly.

Idk if you changed your audio or not , but yolo

you're kidding right


edit: also did nobody notice the download is bugged to need easy update?