o3o
thanks byby owo <3
thanks byby owo <3
Bug wLanturn wrote:
I'm confused. Was the preview point actually changed? It is on the website, but ingame I still have the old preview point, and I've deleted and redownloaded this many times. >_<;
_Gezo_ wrote:
Leaving this here before a QAT shits on HP9 inner_Gezo_ wrote:
map link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/0tayjf048s75z ... D.osu?dl=0
REASON WHY HP9 : the map would easily be passable (look at the screenshot below)
sorry sheela, I was very anxious to qualify itsheela901 wrote:
Oh, okay.
You forgot this beautiful good quality mapBlue Dragon wrote:
Nhawak, you should just let this beatmap go to graveyard. Apparently this song isn't allowed to be ranked because it's a "joke song" and we want the ranking criteria to have good quality maps only.
É realmente lamentável. Acho que por isso que não tento fazer muita coisa por aqui, pois é preciso" perfeccionismo demais". Não só aqui como em outros tipos de feitos posteriores...Blue Dragon wrote:
pode tirar ela, já que esses bats maravilhosos e essa comunidade perfeita do osu! acha que minha diff n é boa o suficiente pra eles :')
excuse you?The_Manu_ wrote:
You forgot this beautiful good quality mapBlue Dragon wrote:
Nhawak, you should just let this beatmap go to graveyard. Apparently this song isn't allowed to be ranked because it's a "joke song" and we want the ranking criteria to have good quality maps only.
Anyways, congrats, I hope this map gets ranked this time.
lol maeg mapped the original wh r u okThe_Manu_ wrote:
You forgot this beautiful good quality mapBlue Dragon wrote:
Nhawak, you should just let this beatmap go to graveyard. Apparently this song isn't allowed to be ranked because it's a "joke song" and we want the ranking criteria to have good quality maps only.
Anyways, congrats, I hope this map gets ranked this time.
NAZISTAS DESCARADOSBlue Dragon wrote:
pode tirar ela, já que esses bats maravilhosos e essa comunidade perfeita do osu! acha que minha diff n é boa o suficiente pra eles :')
Um...because it's their job? You kind of answered your own question there imo.Ealstrom wrote:
Just when you think its safe to play the map, it gets disqualified ;w;
This has actually happened me twice in the last few days, seriously QATs ik its your job here but why take it so seriously (?
its kinda hard to know when a map is finally ranked you know, unless you actually check the beatmap thread, just like i did when it got DQ. Because in the web of any beatmap when it gets Qualified or Ranked the only way to try to know if its ranked or qualified is to guess bassed on its ranked date, for example this mapthe_robot wrote:
Honestly, if you are getting upset about losing pp from dq's then just wait for maps to actually be approved before playing them for ranks. It's just a week, it's not that long. Being a BN or QAT is really tough and they have every right to be hard on a mapset if they don't think it is good enough.
Once a map is qualified, if it goes seven days without disqualification, it automatically converts to ranked/approved, no strings attached, and can never be disqualified or unranked. That's why the QATs who check maps have to be exercise extreme scrutiny to make sure it's as good as can be within the one week time frame that they are given, and there are a lot of maps to go through, all the time.Ealstrom wrote:
You can obviously know its ranked just because its ranked date, but what would happen it the actual process of DQ (1 week) had passed and the scoreboard was still there after 14 days of Qualification ? you would just naturally think that the map is actually ranked, am i wrong ?
The intention behind the slowdown is imo fine but too strong currently. @bbj0920 : What about having 00:19:481 - on 0.85x at the end?Atrue wrote:
[Muzukashii and Oni]
00:17:635 - These slowdowns are not needed. Beside less soundings in this part, there is no significant reason for this move. Also, it doesn't look nice and is pretty cluttered in Oni.
Atrue wrote:
Additionally
And 00:06:558 (1,2,3,4) - in Gerawak's Insane, even this was listed in the last DQ post, it was not fixed.
Gero wrote:
Thanks.Lust wrote:
[Gerawak's Insane]
- 00:06:558 (1,2,3,4) - Really awkward movement here, also inconsistent with previous and future 1/4 patterns. This requires a lot of momentum to be done successfully, which isn't supplied unfortunately. Fixed.
omg so many 69Stefan wrote:
Guys, please let us bring this forward so it can be reranked asap.The intention behind the slowdown is imo fine but too strong currently. @bbj0920 : What about having 00:19:481 - on 0.85x at the end?Atrue wrote:
[Muzukashii and Oni]
00:17:635 - These slowdowns are not needed. Beside less soundings in this part, there is no significant reason for this move. Also, it doesn't look nice and is pretty cluttered in Oni.