1. Easy (1.31 stars, 149 notes)
2. Hard (2.62 stars, 358 notes)
3. Normal (1.62 stars, 277 notes)

Aoi Minase wrote:

I'm going to mod the easy Difficulty
Just remember this is just a suggestion.

00:32:338 (3) - Move the end point to 00:33:088 cool, will actually give this a try
01:02:338 (1) - Move the end point to 01:03:088 then add a reverse arrow Would rather keep this 2/1 for atleast some variation in the rythm. Besides, I feel like it actually does a better job of following the vocals
01:04:338 - Add a note ^
02:30:338 (1) - Move the end point to 02:31:088 add a Dot on 02:30:838 ^

That's all of my suggestions you can Ignore this anytime if you don't find it helpful.
Good Luck!

1. Use 朋友出去走走 as a title, because the title must be in original language. Romanization is the same.
2. You should add some tags. I recommend: 2 more loves (because it's this song's album), 郭彥均 (1st member of 2moro), 郭彥甫 (2nd member of 2moro). Also don't forget to add their romanized names: Guo Antony Angus (they are brothers, so you use surname (Guo) only once).
3. I don't recommend to use low-quality (128kbps) mp3s when lossless quality is available. I recommend to use this (I'll provide when I have time) mp3, it's the best quality you can use.

1. I'd recommend you to use CS 2.5, because your Easy is not the 'easiest easy'. I mean, if you used all settings lower, it would fit pretty well, but that would make a difficulty gap, so the best at this point is to use CS 2.5 - Big circles with this are look quite confusing, smaller will make visually bigger gaps between objects so it is harder to get confused there.

1. 00:46:338 (1,2,3) - I would say there should not be note on 00:47:088 (2) - . It is in a song, but the rhythm is quite complicated and clicking a note in a middle of two, quite fast repeat sliders is not easy enough for players of normal diffs. He doesn't have enough time to react to all those repeats and middle-circle at once.

Wafu wrote:

Random mod

Red - Unrankable
Blue - Highly recommended
Black - Suggestion

General

1. Use 朋友出去走走 as a title, because the title must be in original language. Romanization is the same. I kinda saw this one coming, thanks for making sure c:
2. You should add some tags. I recommend: 2 more loves (because it's this song's album), 郭彥均 (1st member of 2moro), 郭彥甫 (2nd member of 2moro). Also don't forget to add their romanized names: Guo Antony Angus (they are brothers, so you use surname (Guo) only once). I'm horrible when it comes to tag D: I just map whatever song I like and do not think about where the song is from or how to add proper Tags ><
3. I don't recommend to use low-quality (128kbps) mp3s when lossless quality is available. I recommend to use this (I'll provide when I have time) mp3, it's the best quality you can use. Thank you! will switch mp3s as soon as it's available

Easy

1. I'd recommend you to use CS 2.5, because your Easy is not the 'easiest easy'. I mean, if you used all settings lower, it would fit pretty well, but that would make a difficulty gap, so the best at this point is to use CS 2.5 - Big circles with this are look quite confusing, smaller will make visually bigger gaps between objects so it is harder to get confused there. fair enough, sounds like a proper justification. Will do!

Normal

1. 00:46:338 (1,2,3) - I would say there should not be note on 00:47:088 (2) - . It is in a song, but the rhythm is quite complicated and clicking a note in a middle of two, quite fast repeat sliders is not easy enough for players of normal diffs. He doesn't have enough time to react to all those repeats and middle-circle at once. rythm in the Normal is quite 1/2 heavy at times so I'm willing to nerf stuff like this a bit for the sake of keeping it simple c:

Conclusion: Rankable

Simple, yet impressive map as your previous map. I am not sure whether this needs another diff, but that's your choice. Good luck, have my star~! :3 Thanks a bunch for your random mod and your Star, you've helped me out alot here!

Taeyang wrote:

• General

1. recommend colours
   [Colours]
   Combo1 : 210,218,78
   Combo2 : 128,128,255
   Combo3 : 29,172,188
   Combo4 : 255,128,128

Thanks!

• Easy

1. 00:50:338 (1) - over edit luckily, this is not off-screen c:
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:44:338 (3) - sampleset change to auto oops thanks

• Normal

1. 00:06:088 (6) - uncheck clap? nor 00:29:838 (7) - tail add calp there's a build-up in the song supporting the clap
2. 01:08:338 (4,5) - suggest nice, thanks!
   
   SPOILER

   

• Hard

1. 01:02:338 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - suggest Did something similar here, though I changed up the 1/2 and the 1/1 a little
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:44:713 - fix volrume 70% it's supposed to be at 80%
3. 02:30:338 (1,2,3,4) - you can be better cool, thanks!
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 02:43:838 (3) - here is not whistle change calp oops
5. 02:44:338 (4,5) - blanket looks fine to me :c
6. 03:16:338 (4) - change whistle messed up because I copied this slider, thanks for pointing this out!
7. 03:16:338 (4) - ^

nice map i cant more find it here is star

1. 00:02:338 (1,2,3,1) - all choose and move (2) (x:256 y:192) more good symmetry.
2. 01:20:463 (1) - it's easy diff. so, move 01:20:588 - start better. maybe beginner suprise.
3. 02:48:463 (1) - ^
4. 03:20:463 (1) - ^

1. 00:18:338 (1) - add finish. i hear cymbals sound.
2. 03:18:338 (1,3) - same x axis　seems better?

1. try add some triplet more. That’s a waste.
2. 02:42:213 - add circle (x:300 y:64)
3. 01:13:713 - want add note. but, how to put.
4. 03:14:213 - add note (x:275 y:148)

P o M u T a wrote:

[Easy]

1. 00:02:338 (1,2,3,1) - all choose and move (2) (x:256 y:192) more good symmetry. I just moved 1 instead
2. 01:20:463 (1) - it's easy diff. so, move 01:20:588 - start better. maybe beginner suprise. alright, fair enough
3. 02:48:463 (1) - ^^
4. 03:20:463 (1) - ^^

[Normal]

1. 00:18:338 (1) - add finish. i hear cymbals sound. oops. thanks!
2. 03:18:338 (1,3) - same x axis　seems better? I guess. Will try this c:

[Hard]

1. try add some triplet more. That’s a waste. This sounds so harsh D: anyways, I added triplets to map the 1/4 the song supports, so there's no more 'add tripplets' complaints c:
2. 02:42:213 - add circle (x:300 y:64) oki
3. 01:13:713 - want add note. but, how to put. had to get rid of one curved slider ;w;
4. 03:14:213 - add note (x:275 y:148) done

nice map

Xinchii wrote:

hello ~ from my queue :3/

do you like Chinese song ?

just remember you ranked a Chinese song map before , cus Chinese song mapper is really less xD I really like them because they're relaxing and nice to listen to, just like this one~

[General]

1. clear

[Easy]

1. no issue for me :3

[Normal]

1. 00:11:588 - maybe add a note to symmetry with 00:13:588 (5) - cus they are similar you're right c:
2. 00:25:338 (4,5) - about rhythm , I really like what you did at Hard diff better. hmm I guess I just wanted some variation..I can see what you're saying do, it does sound more natural this way
   
   SPOILER

   
   00:25:088 - 's guiter is really more deserve to follow than 00:25:338 - 's cymbals sound
   also like you do at 00:37:088 - :3
3. 00:53:838 (6) - maybe increase some grid , then make (4,5,6) a stage? Did something different/more interesting :3
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:38:338 (1) - it can be better blanket with 01:37:088 (5) - done
   
   SPOILER

   

[Hard]

1. 01:59:338 (4) - maybe set this slider blanket with 01:57:838 (7) - done, though i made sure y-axis symmetry was on point
   then (4,5,6) - can be set at the center of screen
   
   SPOILER

   
   
2. 03:19:338 (3) - maybe set at x:216 | y:180 , the angle will be more relax will give it a try ><
   
   SPOILER

   

Yay awesome map ~!
Good luck for rank

Also I shoot you a star ~ woo~ thanks

-Nya- wrote:

Heya, Peach-chan~ >w</~
M4M from in-game.
Some things in Easy and Normal may be repeated, cuz I modded those two diffs yesterday.

General:

1. Soooo many green lines. 0_0 ;w;
2. No tags? Maybe try to add some? Not a requirement but a suggestion for players to find this song a bit easier. added some during a previous mod
3. Your BG resolution is a bit weird. It’s only like 1 pixel or so off, but everything have to be perfect, lol. I managed to fix your current one cool, thanks!:
   http://puu.sh/hOemm/5c1a6f216f.jpg
4. Add this soundfile into your song’s folder to get rid of that annoying sliderslide I honestly don't really think the sliderslide sounds distubring or anything..will see what future modders have to say about this:
   http://puu.sh/hOeAH/4b9b8db73b.wav
   I think you’re going to have to add two of the above files and call them: “soft-sliderslide1” and “soft-sliderslide2”.

Easy:

1. 00:28:338 (3) –Imo, a straight slider here will support this pattern better made it straight and then changed the previous pattern to an arc instead, looks neat c:. Like this:
   
   Picture

   
2. 00:33:838 –I suggest adding a note here. It will fit nicely with the music and also prevent that awkward gap. eeeehhh alright, can't see why there shouldnt be a note
3. 00:52:338 (3,1,2,1) –and so on . . . I feel you used too many of these repeat sliders. The rhythm gets too repetitive imo and also rather boring. Try to whip up more of a variety rhythms/patterns here. Something like this perhaps:
   
   Picture

   
   There are other places in this diff where these constant repetitive sliders occur, but I’m not going to point out every single one. Just go through the diff and make sure that your repetivity doesn’t go out of hand. These only occure during the kiai I think (I mean they only repeat like this in the kiai). I changed 1-2 of those in each kiai for some more variation~
4. 01:43:338 (2,3) –Imo, a blanket here will look a bit better: works for me
   
   Picture

   
   But of course, this is just a knit-picky suggestion. Your current pattern is fine as well.
5. 02:01:838 –Maybe add a note here? There’s a clear vocal, so perhaps it would be a good idea to map the vocal. added one previously, so I guess I'll add one here too
6. 02:15:838 (2,1) –Unnecessary overlap. You’ve been avoiding nasty overlaps in the previous part of this diff, so I suggest you avoid this overlap as well. Just move 02:18:338 (1) – a bit lower. huh? what's overlapping here?

Normal:

1. 00:08:338 (3,4) –Ehhh, this kind of flow always look better to me: aight
   
   Picture

   
2. 00:18:338 (1) –Shouldn’t there be a finish on the head of this slider? If not, I suggest adding one since there’s a cymbal sound in the background music. There's a finish on this already :p
3. 00:24:338 (3,1) –I don’t like it that (1) is like going right through (3) like that. It looks a bit crammed and not well structured. Perhaps do something like this instead for a better spaced-out pattern: changed during a previous mod
   
   Picture

   
4. 00:51:338 (2,3) –Be careful not to curve sliders too much since they tend to look ugly then. real sliders have curves! jk decurved them slightly
5. 01:12:338 (5,6) –Better flow? I like the little drop, sorry :c
   
   Picture

   
6. 01:17:588 (6,3) –Hm, please try to avoid this overlap. It just looks untidy. ugh you're right, fixed
7. 02:40:338 (5,6) –Ehh, not good flow and it also looks a bit wrong. Rather this: I don't think this looks particularly ugly/flows particularly bad :c
   
   Picture

   
8. 03:03:338 (3) –Eh, rather, no. Looks very weird, lol. Rather try this: Just made it a straight one like the previous sliders
   
   Picture

   

Hard:

1. 00:04:338 (5,7) –I guess you can try and avoid this overlap by making a blanket or something. A bit unnecessary imo. overlap isn't noticeable in game
2. 00:26:088 – and 00:26:213 – I hear two clear beats on those ticks. How about placing a short slider or two circles on them to emphasize those two beats. added these two and slightly remaped the previousl sliders to make them fit
3. 00:45:838 (8,3) –Try to avoid this slight overlap. again, not noticeable in game
4. 00:50:338 (1) –Hm, rather do this. It looks neater: did something very similar
   
   Picture

   
5. 00:50:088 (7,2) –Try to stack these two notes on top of each other. The pattern will look neater. Right now the overlapping is a bit irritating. works for me
6. 03:04:338 (7) –Maybe add a new combo here. The current combo feels a bit too long. done!

Like I said in-game, this is a pretty good mapset. Could do with a few more polishes and austhetics fixes of course but overall it looks very promising.
You may call me back after like 5 more mods and when you feel it’s ready.

Will do! though I want to make sure this is as good as possible, so it might take some time ;w;

Good Luck~!

Tarrasky wrote:

Easy

00:06:338 (1) - a bit nazi, but in x:256 y:180 is better for me this messes up both the blanket and the symmetry :c

01:00:338 (4) - I prefer you remove NC here, like 01:16:338 (4) - oops, forgot deleting it while remapping this part

03:18:338 (1) - this in this position https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3137756 improves a bit the translation with 03:16:338 (4) - works for me

Normal

Sounds good 00:47:338 (2) - in 00:47:088 - and add a circle in 00:47:838 -, but the map is will be a bit more hard Just recently removed a cricle here during a recent mod, and I don't want to add/del a circle here with every second mod :c will see what BNs will have to say about this

02:43:838 (3,4) - this overlap is a bit aggressive, I'm not sure how to explain, it is correct but the position does not seem nice for a Normal. Your mapstyle followed some pretty parameters blanket, but this overlap broke a little, i think Did something nicer :c

Hard

circle in 01:06:088 - and in 01:06:213 -? I like the little gap here, goes along nicely with the vocals :c will consisder adding circles if more people point this out, though the map already has plenty of 1/4

01:42:338 (1) - I think have a diferent sound in deep and if you listen, it is cool to map, like 00:46:338 (1,2,3,4,5) - I'm mapping the long, drawn out harmonika (wtf do you call that instrument LMAO) sound, so using the same pattern as I did previously would feel too fast ><

In all difficulties

Have a intense sound before the end of this break, is in 02:56:338 - until 02:58:088 -, I think you can map this moment in all difficulties, what you think? Will consider doing this, though I'd like the break to go along with the Vocals since it feels the most fitting to me ><

1. 00:03:338 (3,5) - Blanket is off.
2. 00:05:838 (7) - Two circles here would be better imo. That way the player can actually click on 00:06:088 - to begin the triplet.
3. 00:13:338 (7,8,9,1) - I think you could improve the flow from 7 into the triplets. After 7 the player will have a right and slightly downward motion, but the triplets are pointed upward and curving left.
4. 00:15:088 (2,3,4,5) - You could set them up as perfect triangles just to improve aesthetics and stuff.
5. 00:16:088 (4) - -116||54
6. 00:16:338 (5) - 45||113
7. 00:23:338 (3,4,5) - Would be nice if you could make this centered on the screen. This shouldn't require a lot of fixing from the later circles too.
   
   Reference.

   
8. 00:30:838 (2,3) - Idk about this overlap. It's very small so it almost seems more like a mistake than an intentional overlap.
9. 01:10:338 (1,2) - ^This overlap is much better. I think you should try and aim for something more like this.
10. 02:33:338 (9) - This slider maps some nice guitar sounds in the back, maybe use a different shape rather than a straight slider? It's in a good location to create some sort of symmetrical slider design too.
11. 02:36:338 (5,6) - Could improve this overlap. Well actually here's an idea.... Some people like this design, others don't. i'll just show you anyways and you can be the judge of that.
    
    Yea its a large overlap but it flows nicely from 4 into 5 and it fits your usual flow-break into the straight slider.

    
12. 03:05:338 (4) - Well, i guess this is a slow song, but maybe you could make this a 5-note stream instead of 3 note and use a 1/4 repeat slider instead of 1/2. Up to you though, i just felt this part was a bit undermapped for the hardest diff (unless you have an Insane GD in the works).

1. 00:08:088 - You could add a note here imo. It would fit with your rhythm.
2. 00:34:338 (1,3) - I wish you could do some sort of blanketting with this. With the AR you're using, you can actually see circle 3 appearing towards the end of slider 1 so I think blanketting would benefit this pattern aesthetically.
3. 01:04:338 (5,6) - I think you could improve the rhythm here. The held guitar sound at 01:04:838 - Is omitted because right now it's mapped to a slider-end when it should be a slider-head since it's a held note. You could try a rhythm like this instead:
   
   Reference.

   
   
4. 01:43:838 (3) - 1/2 slider instead?
5. 02:16:338 (3,4) - Would be nice if you could rotate slider 3 so that it points more in the direction of 4. Like if you could make it a straight line that'd be cool ;o.
6. 02:43:088 (2,3,4) - I think you could improve this slider placement. You usually map a slightly sharper flow at 02:43:838 (3,4) - . So this pattern stood out for me since the sharp flow is from 2>3
7. 03:02:338 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Is there some way you can maybe reduce density here just slightly? Compare this combo to any other combo on this diff and you'll notice it's very dense with no 1/1 gaps.

monstrata wrote:

So after reading -Nya-'s mod it seems aesthetically this mapset could be improved. Hopefully this will help. Most, if not all of these changes should be very easy to fix.

[Hard]

1. 00:03:338 (3,5) - Blanket is off. aight
2. 00:05:838 (7) - Two circles here would be better imo. That way the player can actually click on 00:06:088 - to begin the triplet. slider feels like it more accurately follows the music
3. 00:13:338 (7,8,9,1) - I think you could improve the flow from 7 into the triplets. After 7 the player will have a right and slightly downward motion, but the triplets are pointed upward and curving left. not sure how the flow here is bad, I think it's quite k
4. 00:15:088 (2,3,4,5) - You could set them up as perfect triangles just to improve aesthetics and stuff. aight
5. 00:16:088 (4) - -116||54
6. 00:16:338 (5) - 45||113
7. 00:23:338 (3,4,5) - Would be nice if you could make this centered on the screen. This shouldn't require a lot of fixing from the later circles too. hmm ok
   
   Reference.

   
8. 00:30:838 (2,3) - Idk about this overlap. It's very small so it almost seems more like a mistake than an intentional overlap. made it curved instead, works well for me
9. 01:10:338 (1,2) - ^This overlap is much better. I think you should try and aim for something more like this.
10. 02:33:338 (9) - This slider maps some nice guitar sounds in the back, maybe use a different shape rather than a straight slider? It's in a good location to create some sort of symmetrical slider design too. I like keeping it simple :c
11. 02:36:338 (5,6) - Could improve this overlap. Well actually here's an idea.... Some people like this design, others don't. i'll just show you anyways and you can be the judge of that. me like it
    
    Yea its a large overlap but it flows nicely from 4 into 5 and it fits your usual flow-break into the straight slider.

    
12. 03:05:338 (4) - Well, i guess this is a slow song, but maybe you could make this a 5-note stream instead of 3 note and use a 1/4 repeat slider instead of 1/2. Up to you though, i just felt this part was a bit undermapped for the hardest diff (unless you have an Insane GD in the works). did something else with the hitsounding here so it actually (hopefully) feels a bit faster, i don't really want to add anymore 1/4 though

[Normal]

1. 00:08:088 - You could add a note here imo. It would fit with your rhythm. fine
2. 00:34:338 (1,3) - I wish you could do some sort of blanketting with this. With the AR you're using, you can actually see circle 3 appearing towards the end of slider 1 so I think blanketting would benefit this pattern aesthetically. alrighty
3. 01:04:338 (5,6) - I think you could improve the rhythm here. The held guitar sound at 01:04:838 - Is omitted because right now it's mapped to a slider-end when it should be a slider-head since it's a held note. You could try a rhythm like this instead: huh, current rythm honestly feels fine
   
   Reference.

   
   
4. 01:43:838 (3) - 1/2 slider instead? would rather keep it consistent with the other start
5. 02:16:338 (3,4) - Would be nice if you could rotate slider 3 so that it points more in the direction of 4. Like if you could make it a straight line that'd be cool ;o. did something to this part ><
6. 02:43:088 (2,3,4) - I think you could improve this slider placement. You usually map a slightly sharper flow at 02:43:838 (3,4) - . So this pattern stood out for me since the sharp flow is from 2>3 this feels fine imo :c
7. 03:02:338 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Is there some way you can maybe reduce density here just slightly? Compare this combo to any other combo on this diff and you'll notice it's very dense with no 1/1 gaps. I can see what you're saying. Might do this if it gets pointed out more often, though the song kinda supports a 1/2 heavy combo

Good luck .

1. offset +12
2. pointless .osb in folder it doesnt matter but yea
3. replace both of your hitsounds with http://puu.sh/hSxA3/b16a1df82b.wav (just doesn't have a delay)

1. 00:48:338 (5) - 01:19:338 (3) - 01:44:338 (4) - 02:16:338 (5) - 02:47:338 (3) - 03:19:338 (3) - hitsound volume on the clap slidertick should be lower. slidertick hitsounds already stand out since they're noises that defy the map's actual rhythm, so having them super loud makes them stand out more than they should.
2. 00:26:088 (9,10) - 01:11:838 (3) - 01:45:838 (6,7) - claps
3. 02:10:338 (1) - whistle
4. 03:01:838 (7) - 03:05:088 (2) - 03:06:088 (5) - claps instead of whistles
5. 02:36:338 (5,6) - overlap here is pretty gross since it covers almost the entire body of 6 + its tail. i assume you know what i mean, since every other overlap you've done looks great like 01:10:338 (1,2) - . something like 02:38:338 (1,2) - would probably be easiest to implement
6. 03:15:088 (2,4) - covering a reverse with an object that produces hitlighting (in this case a slidertail) is not a thing that should happen. should move the tail somewhere else

1. 00:48:338 (3) - 01:19:338 (3) - if you plan on having claps on the ticks, make them consistent and do the lower volume thing mentioned in hard.
2. smaller circles would prob be more appropriate. the map looks more crowded than it should becasue of the current giant circles (and other stuff that will be mentioned)
3. 00:20:338 (4,5) - would be nice if these didn't require as sharp of movement. less sharp.
4. 00:24:338 (3,4) - may also apply to ^, but not as severely. making it the same amount as 00:52:338 (4,5) - would be k. probably applies to some other places as well i won't point them out
5. 00:23:838 (2) - bending 1/2 sliders on normals so much that the inner sliderbody isn't visible is not a very good thing to do. it would probably be a pain to change all of them (since you do it a lot), but just bending these less makes things less confusing and looks a lot better. (changing circle size to something smaller also helps this :p)
6. 00:33:838 (6) - similar to ^, 5's stack on here makes the inner bend just not visible so using a straight slider better. (the broken flow thing between 6,1 also doesn't work very well there so could probably do something about it)
7. 02:20:088 (3) - stacking on 4 works way better. stacking underneath sliderends is just not a thing people do on normals and i think you know that already...
8. 03:02:338 (1) - section here is probably too dense. removing an object somewhere so there's a break would be fine, like 03:05:088 (6) -
9. 00:51:338 (2,3,4) - you do this type of thing a lot. as a concept it's fine, but when you've got them arranged like this, things just look too compact. giving them more length like 00:27:338 (2,3,4) - would be a lot less of a pain to look at. this would apply to all the other ones that are super close together.
10. 01:07:338 (2,3,4) - distance snap stuff uh i dunno why i even noticed this
11. 01:19:338 (3) - 02:47:338 (3) - 02:16:338 (3) - would look better if angled away from previous objects. just less squished patterning stuff
12. 00:53:838 (6,1) - 00:57:838 (6,1) - 01:09:838 (6,1) - 01:12:338 (5,6) - 01:57:838 (7,1) - 01:58:338 (1,2) - 02:03:838 (3,4) - 02:13:838 (6,1) - 02:01:838 (5,1) - 02:25:838 (6,1) - 03:10:338 (1,2) - 03:17:838 (7,1) - all of these are places where your antiflow stuff just doesn't work very well. usually i'd say "oh it's fine who cares" but apparently qats do as seen by dqs through the past few weeks, so changing things to flow better would be good. i'm sure you know how to do that

pishifat wrote:

can you show me where you got your metadata i dont know how to google ty confirmed by Wafu during her/his mod? does that count? will have to learn how to google if it doesnt

[general]

1. offset +12 ayy
2. pointless .osb in folder it doesnt matter but yea rip
3. replace both of your hitsounds with http://puu.sh/hSxA3/b16a1df82b.wav (just doesn't have a delay) done

[hard]

1. 00:48:338 (5) - 01:19:338 (3) - 01:44:338 (4) - 02:16:338 (5) - 02:47:338 (3) - 03:19:338 (3) - hitsound volume on the clap slidertick should be lower. slidertick hitsounds already stand out since they're noises that defy the map's actual rhythm, so having them super loud makes them stand out more than they should. reduced volume by 20% to make it more subtle
2. 00:26:088 (9,10) - 01:11:838 (3) - 01:45:838 (6,7) - claps ok
3. 02:10:338 (1) - whistle great
4. 03:01:838 (7) - 03:05:088 (2) - 03:06:088 (5) - claps instead of whistles yes
5. 02:36:338 (5,6) - overlap here is pretty gross since it covers almost the entire body of 6 + its tail. i assume you know what i mean, since every other overlap you've done looks great like 01:10:338 (1,2) - . something like 02:38:338 (1,2) - would probably be easiest to implement hmm would like to keep this if possible since I feel like having the repeat angled this way creates the best flow, and I honestly don't think it looks shabby :c
6. 03:15:088 (2,4) - covering a reverse with an object that produces hitlighting (in this case a slidertail) is not a thing that should happen. should move the tail somewhere else remapped the ending, flows and looks nicer

[normal]

1. 00:48:338 (3) - 01:19:338 (3) - if you plan on having claps on the ticks, make them consistent and do the lower volume thing mentioned in hard.
2. smaller circles would prob be more appropriate. the map looks more crowded than it should becasue of the current giant circles (and other stuff that will be mentioned)
3. 00:20:338 (4,5) - would be nice if these didn't require as sharp of movement. less sharp.
4. 00:24:338 (3,4) - may also apply to ^, but not as severely. making it the same amount as 00:52:338 (4,5) - would be k. probably applies to some other places as well i won't point them out
5. 00:23:838 (2) - bending 1/2 sliders on normals so much that the inner sliderbody isn't visible is not a very good thing to do. it would probably be a pain to change all of them (since you do it a lot), but just bending these less makes things less confusing and looks a lot better. (changing circle size to something smaller also helps this :p)
6. 00:33:838 (6) - similar to ^, 5's stack on here makes the inner bend just not visible so using a straight slider better. (the broken flow thing between 6,1 also doesn't work very well there so could probably do something about it)
7. 02:20:088 (3) - stacking on 4 works way better. stacking underneath sliderends is just not a thing people do on normals and i think you know that already...
8. 03:02:338 (1) - section here is probably too dense. removing an object somewhere so there's a break would be fine, like 03:05:088 (6) -
9. 00:51:338 (2,3,4) - you do this type of thing a lot. as a concept it's fine, but when you've got them arranged like this, things just look too compact. giving them more length like 00:27:338 (2,3,4) - would be a lot less of a pain to look at. this would apply to all the other ones that are super close together.
10. 01:07:338 (2,3,4) - distance snap stuff uh i dunno why i even noticed this
11. 01:19:338 (3) - 02:47:338 (3) - 02:16:338 (3) - would look better if angled away from previous objects. just less squished patterning stuff
12. 00:53:838 (6,1) - 00:57:838 (6,1) - 01:09:838 (6,1) - 01:12:338 (5,6) - 01:57:838 (7,1) - 01:58:338 (1,2) - 02:03:838 (3,4) - 02:13:838 (6,1) - 02:01:838 (5,1) - 02:25:838 (6,1) - 03:10:338 (1,2) - 03:17:838 (7,1) - all of these are places where your antiflow stuff just doesn't work very well. usually i'd say "oh it's fine who cares" but apparently qats do as seen by dqs through the past few weeks, so changing things to flow better would be good. i'm sure you know how to do that
    
    Since I kinda re-worked the Diff it would be pointless to comment on each individual pattern I changed, so I'll make a list of things I took into consideration while re-working:
    
    - upped CS by .5 to make things less crowded
    
    -no anti-flow
    
    -alot less of the sharp movement, some things are still a bit sharp I guess, but these should be a big bother imo
    
    - minor rythmical changes that are probably not worth mentioning
    
    -made everything less crowded

nothing to complain about on easy. hard is also great. normal is the only diff i have problems with. apply whatever and we'll see where to go from there

Ringating wrote:

I'm a bit slow but here's a 16:9, 1366x768 version of the bg:

bg

no kds

[Kamiya] wrote:

M4M>w</~

I'm back.o(*≧▽≦)ツ

[Easy]

00:30:338 (1,2,3) - I think in easy this flow is best not to appear.（just suggest:)) flow is fine here imo

00:33:838 (4) - This way already started to sing.why not NC? 030 I want the combos to be consistent, so it has to be on the downbeat

03:08:338 (3,1,2) - I think this way maybe some boring. you can make some crooked slider. feels fine :c will change if pointed out any further

[Normal]

02:03:838 (3) - why in this way have Whistle voice.(maybe wrong. 030 second white measure needs a clap I think

[Hard]

01:11:088 (2) - why not at this way to NC(I think this way is sing's begin) needs to be on the downbeat I think :c

02:33:088 (8,9,1) - I think this way is too monotonous. In BGM have some voice you not to make note or slider.Maybe was regular. can not to move./w\ angled a liiiitle bit different :c

03:04:338 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - I think your map already very perfact~ but not challenge. allways appear trite and insignificant.And you need some change. I like your ideas, but I feel like impelemnting a stream here would simply pose as an unnecceessary spike in Difficulty :c

I made 3 different style ①.②.③
This is for your reference only. Maybe not good. but I hope to help you.


already rank. don't worry.
GOOD LUCK~!

-Nya- wrote:

Wow! Bubbled so quickly 0_0
Placeholder for my recheck.

Recheck

Easy:

1. 02:15:850 (2,1) –Can’t you maybe just try to do something to avoid this noticeable overlap. You can lower (1). done. hope you'll like it ><
2. 02:22:350 (1) –Eeehhh, so risky. This slider is very low and like just just missing the edge of the screen. I don’t suggest taking that risk. Just lift the slider a bit. done while I was working around the overlap

Normal:

1. 00:30:350 (1) –This slider is also very low (the bump of the slider). Please avoid that kind of risk and just lift the bump a bit. Better to be safe than sorry. oki
2. 01:41:850 (6) –Make this slider straight as well. It just makes more sense to support 01:41:350 (5) – done. feels nicer to play ><

Hard:

1. 00:14:350 (1) –The finish on the head of this slider sounds a bit weird. I noticed you just added a whistle on the head of that slider in the Easy and Normal. I suggest you do the same in Hard. honestly just a mistake
2. 03:15:850 (3) –Perhaps also lift this slider just a bit. To be safe. done c:

Can you maybe just make sure there is really no “source” for this song or something. I’ve seen a mapset get unranked because of this, but if you’re absolutely sure there’s definitely no specific source then it’s fine. talked about this (briefly) in game c:

Call me back~